SF 30_22-R-0029_A0004_B9201 Renovations.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

W912BV

The purpose of this amendment is update Section 00 22 16, Section 26 20 00, and drawings under Appendix A.

See "Summary of Changes" under the Block 14 Continuation Page and attached A0004 files for full details for revisions to this solicitation.

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

See Item 6

W912BV22R0029

1 26

07/27/2022

06/23/2022

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 22 16 - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA, AND BASIS

OF AWARD. SEE BELOW FOR CHANGES INDICIATED WITH (AM 4).

DELETE THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND REPLACE WITH THE ATTACHED REVISED

SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SAME NUMBER (IN THEIR ENTIRETY).

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

REVISED THE FOLLOWING DRAWINGS IN APPENDIX A (SEE ATTACHED APENDIX A_A0004 FOR FULL

DETAILS).

1PD100 DEMOLITION PLAN - TUNNEL

1PD110 DEMOLITION PLAN – LEVEL ONE

1PP100 NEW WORK PLAN - TUNNEL

1PP111 OVERALL SANITARY PLAN

1P-601 PLUMBING SCHEDULES

1E-001 ELECTRICAL LEGEND

1T-001 COMMUNICATIONS LEGEND, GENERAL

NOTES, AND ABBREVIATIONS

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION 00 22 16

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1 WHO CAN SUBMIT

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

3.2 DISCUSSIONS

3.3 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.4 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

3.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

4.0 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

5.0 VOLUME ONE (1) – FACTOR ONE (1) – TECHNICAL

5.1 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB A: SUBFACTOR ONE (1) - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: PRIME

5.2 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB B: SUBFACTOR TWO (2) - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: KEY

SUBCONTRACTORS

5.3 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB C: SUBFACTOR THREE (3) – KEY PERSONNEL

5.4 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB D: SUBFACTOR FOUR (4) – ORGANIZATIONAL AND

TECHNICAL APPROACH

5.5 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB E: SUBFACTOR FIVE (5) – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION

AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

6.0 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB F: FACTOR THREE (3) – PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

7.0 VOLUME TWO (2) – PRICE PROPOSAL

7.1 GENERAL

8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

8.1 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD

8.2 EVALUATION

8.3 DEFINITIONS

8.4 EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

8.5 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

ATTACHMENTS:

ATTACHMENT ONE (1): COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

ATTACHMENT TWO (2): NAVFAC/UASCE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT THREE (3): KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

ATTACHMENT FOUR (4): LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

ATTACHMENT FIVE (5): LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY SUBCONTRACTORS

1.0 OVERVIEW

This is a competitive best value trade off solicitation for the construction project entitled AFLCMC, WAG Group Facility, B9201 located at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible firm whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

The selected contractor shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1.1 WHO CAN SUBMIT:

1.1.1 Firms formally organized as construction contractors, firms associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms, or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors.

1.1.2 Organization Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Disclosure: The Offeror shall provide a disclosure statement with its proposal which concisely describes all the relevant facts concerning past or present organizational conflicts of interest relating to work on this project. In the same statement, and if applicable, the Offeror shall provide information to assure the Government that the conflicts of interest have been mitigated and/or neutralized to the maximum extent possible. If a conflict of interest is discovered after award of this contract, the Contracting Office will decide whether to terminate the contract.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer intends to award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. Al technical factors are signifcantly more important than price. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal for the required work. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract if the proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. The Government reserves the right to reject any offer if the offer is not in the best interest of the Government.

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

3.1.1 Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The price proposal and the technical proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Ensure that the outside of each separate volume is clearly marked to indicate its contents and the identity of the Offeror. Additionally, clearly identify the “original” price proposal and the “original” technical proposal on the outside cover.

3.1.2 The price proposal and the technical proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

3.1.3 No dollar amounts from the price proposal are to be included in the technical proposal.

3.1.4 All information intended to be evaluated as part of the technical proposal must be submitted as part of the technical proposal (Volume 1). Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the price proposal, or vice versa. Do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

3.1.5 Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation are not allowed.

Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the proposal may be deemed “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award.

Any questions related to specific terms and conditions of the solicitation must be resolved prior to submission of the proposal. If the Offeror must make any assumptions prior to submitting the proposal, the Offeror shall list and describe in detail the assumptions on the first page of each tab. All assumptions shall be fully supported with the offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. The offeror shall clearly describe on the proposal cover sheet submitted with the price proposal any assumptions made concerning contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. This information will not be evaluated separately but may impact the evaluation of other factors.

3.2 DISCUSSIONS

The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to making an award. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined, and offerors will be notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

3.3 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.3.1 Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages should be numbered.

3.3.2 Use only 8 ½ by 11-inch page size formatting unless another page size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use foldouts (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sizes) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide but may include headers and footers.

3.3.3 “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal.

3.3.4 Proposals containing information that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisition,” paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data.”

3.3.5 For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: one side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page. Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

3.3.6 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall: be numbered; be clearly marked “REVISED;” show the date of revision; be submitted in appropriate number of copies (e.g., if two (2) copies of the original page were required, then two (2) copies of the revised page will also be required); and shall be a different color than the original pages they are to replace.

3.4 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

3.4.1 Number of Sets for Technical Proposal. The Offeror shall provide the complete Technical

Proposal electronically and the complete Price Proposal in a separate electronic document. The submission shall contain the entire Technical Proposal in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software; do NOT scan the document(s) into a .pdf file. The text portion of the complete Technical Proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file and Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order.

3.4.2 Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The original copy of the

Technical Proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the chart below.

3.4.3 Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each Factor/Subfactor:

FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL

SUBFACTOR 1 SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: PRIME

Limited to 10 pages. Two (2) pages per project; maximum of five (5) projects.

SUBFACTOR 2 SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: KEY SUBCONTRACTORS

Limited to 15 pages. One (1) page per project and a maximum of five

(5) forms per subcontractor (see para 5.2.1).

SUBFACTOR 3 KEY PERSONNEL

Limited to two (2) pages for each resume provided. No further page limitation.

SUBFACTOR 4 ORGANIZATION / TECHNICAL APPROACH

Limited to 12 pages.

SUBFACTOR 5 PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

No Page Limit; may be fold-out, alternate paper size (11”x14” or 11”x17”)

FACTOR 2 PAST PERFORMANCE

No page limit.

3.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

3.5.1 There are no page limits set for the Price Proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

3.5.2 The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart in 4.0. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab (such as a JV Agreement) in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

4.0 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME ONE (1) – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor / Subfactor / Element Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR ONE (1)

TECHNICAL

Most Important Factor; all technical factors/subfactors are significantly more important than price.

Subfactor One (1) Vol. 1 Tab A Specialized Experience:

Prime

Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor Two (2)

Vol. 1 Tab B Specialized Experience:

Key Subcontractors Second Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor Three (3)

Vol 1. Tab C Key Personnel Third Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor Four (4) Vol. 1 Tab D Organization and Technical Approach Fourth Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor Five (5) Vol. 1 Tab E Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

Fifth Most Important Subfactor

FACTOR TWO (2)

Vol. 1 Tab F PAST

PERFORMANCE

Less Important than Factor 1, more Important than Factor 3.

VOLUME TWO (2) – PRICE PROPOSAL

Factor / Subfactor / Element Location Description Relative Importance

N/A

Vol. 2 Tab A Proposal Cover Sheet Not Rated

N/A Vol. 2 Tab B

Signed Letter Responding to RFP, SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

Not Rated

FACTOR THREE (3)

Vol. 2 Tab C SECTION 00 11 00, PRICING SCHEDULE

All technical factors, combined with past performance, are Significantly more important than price

Vol 2. Tab D Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) Not Rated

Vol. 2 Tab E Representations and Certifications Not Rated

Vol. 2 Tab F JV Agreement (If Applicable) Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME ONE (1) – FACTOR ONE (1) – TECHNICAL

Most Important Factor

5.1 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB A: SUBFACTOR ONE (1) – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE:

PRIME

Most Important Subfactor

5.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The prime contractor shall demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects using the Company – Specialized Experience form – (Attachment 1) at the end of the section. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements as outlined in the Division 01 documents. If the Offeror is a joint venture or teaming arrangement, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Offeror shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement or letters of commitment for all teaming contractors, agreements and letters of commitment will not count towards the page limitations. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Prime contractor must submit at least one project involving renovation of an existing facility with a value of $5 million or greater, and (AM 2) at least one project that involves Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 construction with a value of $5 million $15 million (AM 2) or greater, and at least one project that involves construction of a facility with a value of $10 million or greater. (AM 2) These may be the same or separate projects. The prime contractor shall submit at least three (3) projects but no more than five (5) projects. Each project submitted shall be limited to two (2) page per project.

5.1.1.1 The offeror may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists), not to exceed two (2) pages, explaining how any corporate experience that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit.

5.1.1.2 The Offeror should describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the project list. The above information is limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

5.1.2 Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the prime contractor as relevant to their role on this project. Experience on the similar projects identified in the project lists will receive more consideration than experience provided in the supplemental narrative.

The Government will place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

5.1.2.1 To determine strengths and weaknesses, the agency will evaluate the following. This list is not all-inclusive:

(1) Projects constructed on Military installations.

(2) Projects involving Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 construction.

(3) Projects involving renovation of an existing facility.

(4) Projects with a value of $10 million $15 million (AM 2) or greater.

(5) Fully completed projects, rather than substantially complete projects.

(6) Projects completed after May 2017.

(7) Experience in projects that required High Performance and Sustainable Building (HPSB)

Guiding Principles certification per UFC 1‐200‐02 or third-party sustainability certification.

(8) Projects demonstrating experience of the prime contractor personnel proposed in Sub-Factor

3 in the same role as their proposed role on this project. (i.e. construction personnel will be evaluated on the projects submitted for the prime contractor.)

5.1.2.2 To receive credit for item “8”, the contractor shall clearly indicate on the Specialized

Experience forms that the proposed personnel on this project acted in the same role on the submitted project.

Additionally, the key personnel resumes shall show the projects submitted under this Factor indicating that they served in the same role as is being proposed for this project. Failure to provide these cross references shall result in no credit being given for item “8”.

5.1.2.3 The Offeror shall submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience, for the facility types (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this contract, as described in this section. Recent experience includes projects well underway (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within five (5) years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for construction experience. Joint Venture partners or teaming partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project. If any of the information required is not included in the forms (Attachment 1), then the Contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

5.1.2.4 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), other databases; or interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.1.2.5 To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project. If Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, the proposal shall clearly identify the contractual responsibilities of each firm and the work to be performed by each; describe the nature of the association; indicate whether the firms have experience working together in construction ventures, including how long and how many projects. In addition, each company, including joint ventures, shall list their Government contract experience. Provide a copy of the commitment letter of the firms (see Attachment 5) or the Joint Venture Agreement. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) may be appended to the plan under Factor 2 (not included in the page limitation).

5.1.2.6 The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(1) Number, size, type work, complexity, location

(2) Dates (well under way or completed no more than five (5) years preceding date of Solicitation)

(3) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “placing the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience)

5.1.2.7 The Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members, JV partners or key teaming subcontractors, as value added, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.

5.2 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB B: SUBFACTOR TWO (2) - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE:

KEY SUBCONTRACTORS

Second Most Important Subfactor

5.2.1 Submission Requirements: Demonstrate the specialized experience of the key subcontractors, on projects same/similar in size and complexity to their role on the project as described in the solicitation for same/similar construction services. The following Key subcontractors as a minimum if not self-performing the work will be identified:

(1) Electrical: The contractor will be required to show that they have experience in completing the electrical installation for projects involving renovation of an existing facility. and projects involving Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 construction. (AM 4)

(2) Mechanical: The contractor will be required to show that they have experience in completing the mechanical installation for projects involving renovation of an existing facility. and projects involving Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 construction. (AM 4)

(3) Fire Protection: The contractor will be required to show that they have experience in completing the fire protection installation for projects involving renovation of an existing facility. and projects involving Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 construction. (AM 4)

5.2.1.1 Provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key subcontractors. Use the form letter (Attachment 5) at the end of this section.

5.2.1.2 If, because of reasons beyond the control of the offeror, the subcontractors named in this proposal are not able to participate as identified, replacement subcontractors for this project shall be required to have qualifications and experience meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal.

Replacement subcontractors shall be presented for acceptance and approval by the Contracting Officer.

5.2.1.3 The subcontractors shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section (Attachment 1), in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete and completed within the last 5 years. Each project submitted shall be limited to one (1) page per project. In order to demonstrate past performance, completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ-0 from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ-0, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The ratings may be from either the owner or the prime contractor, if the firms were subcontractors on the cited projects.

5.2.2 Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the Key Subcontractors in regard to their role on this project. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

5.2.2.1 The key subcontractors must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in construction, for their role in the project included in this solicitation. Recent experience includes projects well underway or those completed and turned over within 5 years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for construction experience. If any of the information required is not included in the form (Attachment 1), then the Contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

5.2.2.2 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects not submitted by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), or other Government appraisal systems, or to interview owner or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. An Offeror will be afforded the opportunity to reply to or explain adverse performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to address.

5.2.2.3 To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Key Subcontractors shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

5.2.2.4 To determine strengths and weaknesses, the agency will evaluate the following. This list is not all-inclusive:

(1) Projects constructed on Military installations.

(2) Projects involving Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 construction.

(3) Projects involving renovation of an existing facility.

(4) Projects with a total value of $10 million $15 million (AM 2) or greater. (AM 3)

(5) Fully completed projects, rather than substantially complete projects.

(6) Projects completed after May 2017.

(7) Experience in projects that required High Performance and Sustainable Building (HPSB)

Guiding Principles certification per UFC 1‐200‐02 or third-party sustainability certification.

5.2.2.5 The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(1) Number, size, type work, complexity, location.

(2) Dates (well under way or completed no more than five (5) years preceding date of solicitation).

(3) Firm's role and extent of work performed.

5.2.2.6 All personnel working on this project must be U.S. citizens or documented U.S. workers and must be able to provide proof of U.S. citizenship or other authorized documentation (See Contract Clause 52.0000-4515 Security Contract Language for All Corps of Engineers’ Unclassified Contracts).

5.3 VOLUME ONE (1) - TAB C: SUBFACTOR THREE (3) - KEY PERSONNEL

Third Most Important Subfactor

5.3.1 Submission Requirements: Offeror shall provide resumes for key personnel; including team members, which demonstrate the qualifications necessary for this project, which includes proposed role, relevant education, and training; and previous relevant experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform construction. Resumes shall include detailed experience in proposed role, relevant education & training, total relevant experience. Clearly indicate whether each individual has had a significant role in any of the cited project examples from Sub-Factor 1. If re-assignment of personnel is considered possible, provide alternate professionals in each assignment. For each person provide a brief resume, using the Key Personnel Resume forms (Attachment 3) at the end of this section, minimum years of experience must be verifiable, with example projects from the present back the minimum number of years, to include dates of work performed. Limit each resume to not more than two (2) pages. Key personnel shall at a minimum include Project Manager responsible for construction, site safety manager (SSHO), the on-site Quality Control manager (CQC System Manager), and construction Site Superintendent. Provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel not currently employed by the prime contractor. Use the form letter (Attachment 4) at the end of this section.

5.3.2 Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary to perform construction. Minimum qualifications of key personnel include:

5.3.2.1 Project Manager: Bachelor’s degree and five (5) years construction experience.

5.3.2.2 Construction Quality Control Systems Manager (CQCSM): Meets the qualifications of any of (A), (B), or (C): (A) Licensed Professional Engineer with 3 years’ construction experience -OR-

(B) Bachelor’s degree of Engineering or Construction Management (or equivalent) with 5 years’ construction experience -OR- (C) 10 years relevant construction experience. Relevant construction experience includes any work requiring oversight of construction quality and adherence to plans and specifications this includes work as a crew foreman, QCM, Assistant QC, Superintendent, or combination thereof to meet the 10-year requirement.

5.3.2.3 Site Safety Health Officer (SSHO): Shall meet the qualifications requirements of EM

385-1-1.

5.3.2.4 Construction Superintendent: Ten (10) years construction experience with at least one demonstrated project involving the renovation of an existing facility with a value of $5M or greater and construction of a new facility with a value of $10M or greater.

5.3.2.5 To determine strengths and weaknesses, the agency will take the following into consideration. This list is not all-inclusive:

(1) Proposed key personnel who exceed the qualifications described above.

(2) Key personnel that worked on Factor 1 projects in the same role as their assignment on this project.

5.3.2.6 If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference.

5.3.2.7 If, because of reasons beyond the control of the Offeror, the key personnel named in this proposal are not able to participate as identified, replacement personnel for this project shall be required to have qualifications and experience meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal. Proposed substitutions of key personnel shall be presented for acceptance and approval by the Contracting Officer.

5.4 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB D: SUBFACTOR FOUR (4) – ORGANIZATION AND

TECHNICAL APPROACH

Fourth Most Important Subfactor

5.4.1 Submission Requirements: Provide information that describes the offeror’s organization and intended technical approach to executing the construction contract per the detailed requirements herein.

Clearly but concisely describe the organizational and technical approach to project management and execution.

(1) Organization: Describe what firms, their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) may be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s). Present a matrix of responsibilities for each firm in executing the key work breakdown structure activities of the project, including construction activities for each major feature. Identify the firms chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed, Offerors will be required to identify the specific firm(s) chosen for Electrical, Mechanical, and Fire Protection work. The Offeror shall be required to obtain the Contracting Officer’s approval for any substitution of firms listed. Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing how the construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team.

Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations, their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the firms, and with the list of key personnel.

(2) Technical Approach for Construction: Describe the technical approach to construction for the facility. Describe any proposed phasing plan for renovations of the Bldg. 9201. Describe interactions within the team and with the Corps of Engineers during construction.

(3) Subcontractor Approach and Management: Describe how subcontractors are managed by the contractor. Discuss how subcontract relationships are structured to assure proper balance and flow-down of contract requirements, duties, responsibilities, and properly balanced and proportioned risk management.

Discuss how non-performance by subcontractors is handled by the general contractor. Discuss the types of relationships the general contractor has with local small business subcontractors and how the general contractor promotes the development of small business subcontractors to include training, development, and mentoring. The Government wants to understand that the general contractor places emphasis on strong business relationships with subcontractors to maximize the number of quotes the general contractor obtains during proposal preparations that demonstrates market competition and the best valued prices are being provided to the Government. General Contractors that do not maintain solid business practices with small business subcontractors increase business costs to the Government.

(4) Self-Performed Work: Generally, describe the items the Offeror will self-perform to comply with the requirements in Section 00 72 00 for self-performed work. All other items not self-performed will be assumed by the government to be subcontracted. It is the position of the government that self-performance of items allows the general contractor greater control of the work and yields in cost savings to the government as the amount of subcontracted markups are reduced and provide a cost savings to the government and government customers.

(5) Quality Control: Describe the team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. Describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan. Provide information on how you will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation; failure to address these areas at a minimum within the Quality Control section will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable. There is no need to submit a quality control plan as the successful offeror will provide that after award.

(6) Safety Plan: Describe the team’s safety approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain safety requirements during construction. Describe the proposed safety organization, including the proposed staffing plan. The intent is to provide enough detail to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the project; however, it is not the intent for the Offeror to provide the amount of detail that will be required in the pre-work submittals contained in Division 01 of this RFP.

5.4.2 Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and any deficiencies in the contractor’s approach. The Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding of the requirements described in the Division 01 requirements and the plans and technical specifications of the Solicitation and the capability to execute the project. Some additional specific evaluation considerations are listed below. This list is not all-inclusive.

(1) Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. If applicable, joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

(2) Technical Approach for Construction: The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction, manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs and support aggressive schedules while upholding strict safety standards. In addition, clear and concise proposed phasing plans for renovations of Bldg. 9201 will be viewed more favorably.

The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces on-site craft labor and susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

(3) Subcontractor Approach and Management: The government will evaluate the general contractor’s ability to develop and maintain strong subcontractor and small business relationships. The Government will evaluate the general contractor’s subcontractor management model and processes.

(4) Self-Performed Work: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal to ensure that the self-performed work complies with the requirements of Section 00 72 00 for self-performed work.

(5) Quality Control. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s capabilities and understanding of the contractually required quality control processes for construction. The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the staffing plan to cover all required tasks and responsibilities.

(6) Safety Plan: The Government will evaluate the narrative for realism, logic, and understanding of the contractual requirements in regard to the safety plan.

5.5 VOLUME ONE (1) – TAB E: SUBFACTOR FIVE (5) TWO (2) (AM 3) – PROPOSED

CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

Second Most Important Subfactor

5.5.1 Submission Requirements: The Offeror shall propose a contract duration in the appropriate location on the Pricing Schedule not to exceed the maximum contract duration specified in the Special Contract Requirement (SCR) entitled COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK. The proposed duration shall become the required contract duration. The contractor will also clearly indicate the proposed contract duration from the pricing schedule under Vol. 2 - TAB C.

5.5.1.1 Submit a summary level schedule for construction including any construction phasing.

Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be clearly labeled as Tab E. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved.

Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed summary schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features:

(1) Show the overall construction phase for major items. At a minimum the contractor shall identify Interior Demolition, major interior construction tasks, Electrical, Mechanical, long lead item equipment required ordering and delivery dates, and commissioning.

(2) Show turnover of the project. Identify any proposed phased turnovers (if applicable). The time to complete the project and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(3) Show submission of As-built Drawings and O&M Manuals.

(4) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

5.5.1.2 The intent is to provide enough detail to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the project; however, it is not the intent for the Offeror to provide the amount of detail that will be required in the pre-work submittals contained in Division 01 of this RFP.

5.5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.5.2.1 Proposed Contract Duration: This duration will become the contractually binding completion period. The Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the Offeror in the Pricing Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration shown in the SCR entitled COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum allowed duration will receive additional rating consideration, provided it is realistic and deemed to be achievable. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government, or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment. During the subsequent comparison between proposals, differences between proposed contract durations of at least three weeks (differences of 21 calendar days between proposals) will be considered an advantage to the Government, with greater differences also considered, accordingly. No advantage will be considered between proposals for differences less than 21 calendar days.

5.5.2.2 Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for construction.

The length of the schedule must match the proposed contract duration. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it offers no advantage to the Government because it is non-binding, only representing a preliminary planned schedule. A schedule shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required contract completion period. Both parties shall assume field overhead costs are included in the contract price for the full proposed contract duration. Therefore, the Government believes that there is no valid need to shorten the schedule less than the full proposed contract duration. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting, long lead items, phasing, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating submittals, the firm's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

6.0 VOLUME 1 -TAB F: FACTOR TWO (2) - PAST PERFORMANCE

Less Important than Factor 1 and More Important than Factor 3

6.1 Submission Requirements: There is no page limit for this factor. For each of the projects submitted under Factor 1, to ensure the agency has all relevant past performance information, the offeror shall submit copies of Federal/DoD/Navy/Army performance reviews that are likely already in the agency’s databases or likely within the agency’s arm’s reach, i.e., Contractor’s copy of CCASS or CPARS evaluations.

6.1.1 Each project under Factor 1 that does not have a CPARS evaluation, offerors shall provide a Past Performance Questionnaire form PPQ-0 (Attachment 2) to a representative of the owner that can provide the owner’ s opinion of the offeror’ s past performance for the project. The Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Offerors should organize all Past Performance Information based on the Factor 1 Projects, which normally have project titles and are numbered 1-5, so that reviewers can match the owner’ s opinion with the corresponding Factor 1 Project.

6.1.2 Form PPQ-0 at Attachment 2 shall be utilized and offerors shall submit the PPQ with their proposal submission to the Contracting Office designated proposal submission location. The contract specialist or Contracting Officer will not require the PPQ to be sent directly from the client. The offeror may submit the completed PPQ-0. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Daniel Jernigan via email daniel.k.jernigan@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the contract specialist at (918) 669-7483.

6.1.3 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

6.1.4 The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the completed questionnaires are submitted by the closing date.

6.1.5 The Government will evaluate the responses from the customers from…