Am-0011_W9128F-20-R-0085.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0011 W9128F

SOCNORTH THEATER OPERATIONAL SUPPORT FACILITY, PN TDKA 143002 (FY20), PETERSON AFB, COLORADO

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions to solicitation

Date for receipt of proposals is 03 FEB 2021 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Bill Rawe, Contract Specialist, William.T.Rawe@usace.army.mil

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Rocky Mountain Area Office Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT-M) 5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

See Item 6

W9128F-20-R-0085

01/19/2021

10/06/2020

01/19/2021

Am #0011 - 1

Am #0011 - 2 (Continuation SF 30)

19 January 2021 Solicitation No. W9128F 20 R 0085

Date of Issue: 13 NOV 2020 Date of Receiving Proposals: 03 FEB 2021

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0011 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Construction of SOCNORTH THEATER OPERATIONAL SUPPORT FACILITY.

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications. (Descriptive Changes.)

(1) Section 00 21 00, Page 18, paragraph 1.20.1 “BIDDER INQUIRY”, delete the first sentence “Technical inquiries and questions...receipt of offers.” and substitute the following:

“Technical inquiries and questions relating to technical requirements, proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at: https://www.projnet.org/projnet/ No Later Than COB on 21 JAN 2021, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.”

(2) Section 00 21 00, Page 19, paragraph 1.20.1 “BIDDER INQUIRY”, delete item c in its entirety and substitute the following:

“c. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquires after COB on 21 JAN 2021 in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.”

(3) Section 01 30 00.24 Attachments, delete General Wage Rate Decision Number CO20200002 in its entirety and substitute General Wage Rate Decision Number CO20210002 dated 01/01/2021. General Wage Rate Decision Number CO20210002 dated 01/01/2021 is included as an attachment to this Amendment.

(4) Section 01 30 00.24 Attachments, delete General Wage Rate Decision Number CO20200022 in its entirety and substitute General Wage Rate Decision Number CO20210022 dated 01/01/2021. Wage Rate Decision Number CO20210022 dated 01/01/2021 is included as an attachment to this Amendment.

b. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment. For convenience, on the revised specification pages, changes have been identified with highlighting, all portions of the revised specification pages apply regardless of whether changes are shown with highlighting.

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 22 00 00 22 00 01 81 00 01 81 00 01 82 00 01 82 00 01 86 10 01 86 10

Am #0011 - 3

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 01 86 29 01 86 29

c. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawings are revised with latest revision date as shown in the drawing border and reissued with this amendment.

1. SHEET G-301, FIRST FLOOR SECURITY REQUIREMENTS PLAN

2. SHEET G-302, SECOND FLOOR SECURITY REQUIREMENTS PLAN

3. SHEET A-101, COMPOSITE FIRST FLOOR PLAN

4. SHEET A-101A, FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA A

5. SHEET A-102A, SECOND FLOOR PLAN -AREA A

6. SHEET A-104, FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR FINISH PLANS

7. SHEET A-402, CASEWORK ELEVATIONS

8. SHEET A-501, BUILDING WALL SECTIONS

9. SHEET A-601, FIRST FLOOR ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

10. SHEET A-602, SECOND FLOOR ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

11. SHEET A-603, FIRST FLOOR DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE

12. SHEET I-101A, FIRST FLOOR FURNITURE PLAN - AREA A

13. SHEET P-101A, FIRST FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN - AREA A

14. SHEET P-101B, FIRST FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN - AREA B

15. SHEET P-102A, SECOND FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN - AREA A

16. SHEET P-102B, SECOND FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN - AREA B

17. SHEET M-101A, FIRST FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA A

18. SHEET M-101B, FIRST FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA B

19. SHEET M-102A, SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA A

20. SHEET M-102B, SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA B

21. SHEET M-103, FIRST FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN - MECHANICAL AREA

22. SHEET E-001, ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND GENERAL NOTES

23. SHEET E-101, FIRST FLOOR LIGHTING PLAN - AREA A

24. SHEET E-201, FIRST FLOOR POWER PLAN - AREA A

25. SHEET T-101A, FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA A – TELECOM

26. SHEET T-101B, FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA B – TELECOM

27. SHEET T-102A, SECOND FLOOR PLAN - AREA A – TELECOM

28. SHEET T-102B, SECOND FLOOR PLAN - AREA B – TELECOM

29. SHEET AV-101A, FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA A – AUDIOVISUAL

30. SHEET AV-101B, FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA B – AUDIOVISUAL

31. SHEET AV-102A, SECOND FLOOR PLAN - AREA A – AUDIOVISUAL

32. SHEET AV-102B, SECOND FLOOR PLAN - AREA B - AUDIOVISUAL

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged.

Am #0011 - 4

3. Electronic Proposals. Provide proposals via the instructions provided in Section 00 22 00 of the Request for Proposal.

4. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 03 FEB 2021.

Attachments:

General Wage Rate Decisions CO20210002 dated 01/01/2021

CO20210022 dated 01/01/2021 Specifications listed in 1.b., above Drawings listed in 1.c., above

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

19 JAN 2021

nep/2160

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 1 01/01/2021

General Decision Number: CO20210002 01/01/2021

Superseded General Decision Number: CO20200002

State: Colorado

Construction Type: Heavy

Counties: Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas, El Paso, Jefferson, Larimer, Mesa, Pueblo and Weld Counties in Colorado.

HEAVY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.95 for calendar year 2021 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015.

If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.95 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2021. If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate, if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/01/2021

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 2 01/01/2021

ASBE0028-001 07/01/2019

Rates Fringes

Asbestos Workers/Insulator (Includes application of all insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings and finishings to all types of mechanical systems)....................$ 32.98 14.73

BRCO0007-004 01/01/2019

ADAMS, ARAPAHOE, BOULDER, BROOMFIELD, DENVER, DOUGLAS,

JEFFERSON AND WELD COUNTIES

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 29.52 10.48

BRCO0007-006 05/01/2018

EL PASO AND PUEBLO COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 25.88 10.34

ELEC0012-004 06/01/2019

PUEBLO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN

Electrical contract over $1,000,000..................$ 27.50 12.50+3% Electrical contract under $1,000,000..................$ 24.85 12.50+3%

ELEC0068-001 06/01/2020

JEFFERSON, LARIMER, AND WELD COUNTIES

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 38.00 16.97

ELEC0111-001 09/01/2020

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 3 01/01/2021

Line Construction:

Groundman...................$ 22.04 24.25%+6.80 Line Equipment Operator.....$ 35.61 24.25%+6.80 Lineman and Welder..........$ 49.45 24.25%+6.80

ELEC0113-002 06/01/2020

EL PASO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 33.25 3%+15.75

ELEC0969-002 06/01/2019

MESA COUNTY

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 25.20 10.06

ENGI0009-001 05/01/2020

Rates Fringes

Power equipment operators:

Blade: Finish...............$ 30.37 11.15 Blade: Rough................$ 30.37 11.15 Bulldozer...................$ 30.37 11.15 Cranes: 50 tons and under..$ 30.20 11.15 Cranes: 51 to 90 tons......$ 30.47 11.15 Cranes: 91 to 140 tons.....$ 31.55 11.15 Cranes: 141 tons and over...$ 33.67 11.15 Forklift....................$ 29.67 11.15 Mechanic....................$ 30.53 11.15 Oiler.......................$ 29.29 11.15 Scraper: Single bowl under 40 cubic yards........$ 30.20 11.15 Scraper: Single bowl, including pups 40 cubic yards and over and tandem bowls.......................$ 30.37 11.15 Trackhoe....................$ 30.20 11.15

IRON0024-003 11/01/2020

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL...........$ 32.00 12.01

Structural

LABO0086-001 05/01/2009

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 4 01/01/2021

Laborers:

Pipelayer...................$ 18.68 6.78

* PLUM0003-005 06/01/2020

JEFFERSON, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES

PLUMBER..........................$ 43.63 16.67

PLUM0058-002 07/01/2018

EL PASO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Plumbers and Pipefitters.........$ 32.75 14.85

PLUM0058-008 07/01/2018

PUEBLO COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Plumbers and Pipefitters.........$ 32.75 14.85

PLUM0145-002 07/01/2016

MESA COUNTY

Rates Fringes

Plumbers and Pipefitters.........$ 35.17 11.70

PLUM0208-004 06/01/2016

JEFFERSON, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES

PIPEFITTER.......................$ 37.10 16.62

SHEE0009-002 07/01/2019

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 5 01/01/2021

Sheet metal worker...............$ 34.62 17.95

TEAM0455-002 07/01/2020

Rates Fringes

Truck drivers:

Pickup......................$ 22.66 4.42 Tandem/Semi and Water.......$ 23.29 4.42

SUCO2001-006 12/20/2001

Rates Fringes

BOILERMAKER......................$ 17.60

Carpenters:

Form Building and Setting...$ 16.97 2.74 All Other Work..............$ 15.14 3.37

Cement Mason/Concrete Finisher...$ 17.31 2.85

IRONWORKER, REINFORCING..........$ 18.83 3.90

Laborers:

Common......................$ 11.22 2.92 Flagger.....................$ 8.91 3.80 Landscape...................$ 12.56 3.21

Painters:

Brush, Roller & Spray.......$ 15.81 3.26

Power equipment operators:

Backhoe.....................$ 16.36 2.48 Front End Loader............$ 17.24 3.23 Skid Loader.................$ 15.37 4.41

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 6 01/01/2021 health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 7 01/01/2021 the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Am #0011 CO20200002 - 8 01/01/2021

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 1 01/01/2021

General Decision Number: CO20210022 01/15/2021

Superseded General Decision Number: CO20200022

State: Colorado

Construction Type: Building

County: El Paso County in Colorado.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family homes or apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.95 for calendar year 2021 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.95 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2021. If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate,if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/01/2021 1 01/15/2021

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 2 01/01/2021

ASBE0028-002 07/01/2019

ASBESTOS WORKER/HEAT & FROST

INSULATOR - MECHANICAL (Duct, Pipe & Mechanical System Insulation)......................$ 32.98 14.73

ELEC0113-005 06/01/2020

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (Includes Low Voltage Wiring)..................$ 33.25 3%+15.75

* ELEV0025-001 01/01/2021

Rates Fringes

ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 48.09 35.825

FOOTNOTE:

a.Vacation: 6%/under 5 years based on regular hourly rate for all hours worked. 8%/over 5 years based on regular hourly rate for all hours worked.

b. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day; Labor Day; Veterans' Day; Thanksgiving Day; the Friday after Thanksgiving Day; and Christmas Day.

ENGI0009-017 05/01/2018

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

(Crane) 141 tons and over...........$ 31.07 10.70 50 tons and under...........$ 28.40 10.70 51 to 90 tons...............$ 28.57 10.70 91 to 140 tons..............$ 29.55 10.70

IRON0024-009 11/01/2020

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, ORNAMENTAL...........$ 32.00 12.01

IRON0024-011 11/01/2020

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL...........$ 32.00 12.01

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 3 01/01/2021

PAIN0079-009 08/01/2017

PAINTER (Spray)..................$ 20.50 8.41

PLAS0577-002 05/01/2020

Rates Fringes

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 29.00 12.95

PLUM0058-003 07/01/2020

Rates Fringes

PLUMBER (Excludes HVAC Duct, Pipe and Unit Installation)......$ 34.85 15.77

PLUM0058-004 07/01/2020

Rates Fringes

PIPEFITTER, Includes HVAC Pipe Installation (Excludes HVAC Duct and Unit Installation)....................$ 34.85 15.77

* SFCO0669-002 01/01/2021

Rates Fringes

SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire Sprinklers)......................$ 38.23 25.30

SHEE0009-005 07/01/2019

Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER (Excludes HVAC Duct, Pipe and Unit Installation)....................$ 34.62 17.95

SUCO2013-008 07/31/2015

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 21.96 0.00

CARPENTER........................$ 22.63 6.98

LABORER: Common or General......$ 13.40 1.40

LABORER: Mason Tender - Brick...$ 15.99 0.00

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 4 01/01/2021

LABORER: Mason Tender - Cement/Concrete..................$ 16.00 0.00

LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 16.96 3.68

OPERATOR:

Backhoe/Excavator/Trackhoe.......$ 20.26 8.62

OPERATOR: Bobcat/Skid Steer/Skid Loader................$ 18.58 2.42

OPERATOR: Grader/Blade..........$ 21.50 0.00

PAINTER (Brush and Roller).......$ 17.20 0.00

ROOFER...........................$ 16.71 0.00

SHEET METAL WORKER (HVAC Duct Installation Only)...............$ 25.18 6.30

SHEET METAL WORKER (HVAC Unit Installation Only)...............$ 24.00 2.18

TRUCK DRIVER: Dump Truck........$ 17.34 0.00

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 5 01/01/2021

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 6 01/01/2021

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Am #0011 CO20210022 - 7 01/01/2021

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

Am #0011 TC –1

SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS,

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

Table of Contents

1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

2 BASIS OF AWARD

3 PROPOSAL FORMAT

4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

5 SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

6 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

7 FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

7.1 TECHNICAL FACTORS 1, 2, 3, AND 4

7.2 TECHNICAL FACTOR 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

8 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

8.1 PREFACE

9 VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

9.1 FACTOR 1 – OFFEROR’S SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

9.2 FACTOR 2 – RISK MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL APPROACH

9.3 FACTOR 3 – TECHNICAL OFFEROR’S KEY PERSONNEL

9.4 FACTOR 4 - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

9.5 FACTOR 5 – PAST PERFORMANCE

10 VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

10.1 FACTOR 6 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

11 COMPETITIVE RANGE

12 CLARIFICATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS

13 FINAL REVISIONS AND SELECTION

14 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD REPORT

15 COMPETITIVE RANGE EXCLUSION NOTIFICATION

16 SOURCE SELECTION DECISION DOCUMENT

17 AWARD OF CONTRACT

18 DEBRIEFING

Am #0011 TC –2

Attachments:

1 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME

CONTRACTOR

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN

CAPABILITY

[*Am-3]

3 – NOT USED

4 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TELEPHONE INTERVIEW

QUESTIONNAIRE

5 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

6 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

7 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR (DESIGN FIRM OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR)

8 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

W9128F-20-R-0085

Am #0006 Section 00 22 00

SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

This is a single step best value tradeoff solicitation for the design and construction of the SOCNORTH Theater Operational Support Facility, Peterson AFB, Colorado (SOCNORTH).

The intent of this Request for Proposal (RFP) is to solicit proposals and award a firm-fixed price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government. The Government reserves the right to award a contract without discussions in accordance with (IAW) FAR 52.215-1. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a technical and cost/price standpoint. Offerors shall organize their proposals as described herein. Proposals may be determined non-compliant for failure to follow this format, and may be rejected from further consideration.

The proposal shall describe the capability of the offeror to perform the requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW). The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail; and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government.

Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an offeror's evaluation.

2 BASIS OF AWARD

[*Am-2] To arrive at a source selection decision, the Government will evaluate the factors and proposed costs/price. The Government intends to award to the firm providing the proposal which is considered by the SSA to be the best value to the Government using best value trade-off methods. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. The Contract award should not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 00 ($47,000,000). The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. The cost limitation applies only to the basic bid CLIN’s.

3 PROPOSAL FORMAT

Written materials (other than organizational chart): 8 ½” x 11” format, using 10 point or larger font size. For each factor, provide a title sheet on the cover, Table of Contents, and file titled with appropriate factor number. Provide a title sheet within each electronic file identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, fax and email address and point of contact.

Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm. Volume 1 shall have bookmarks, at a minimum, corresponding to each factor.

Document name and factor number shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number and revision date for the amended page, if necessary).

Note: the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, as indicated below. For this solicitation, a page is considered a single sided page or sheet. Double sided pages will be considered two pages when determining page limits. Blank pages used to separate sections will not be counted when determining page limits.

4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

This solicitation is available for full and open competition, on an unrestricted basis. All proposers, including joint ventures, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have completed their Representations and Certifications through SAM.

There will be no public opening. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly indicate compliance with the proposal submission requirements. The Government intends to award without discussions. Therefore, proposals submitted should include the most favorable terms from a technical and price standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposal.

5 SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

Proposals shall be submitted by the time and date as specified in Section 00 10 00, Page 1. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software. The two (2) volumes listed below shall be submitted as “SEPARATE” single files.

Due to heightened security at Government installations, the proposal shall be emailed to the following. If the proposal is too large for email, Offers may be submitted electronically via DOD Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) at https://safe.apps.mil/ to the following recipients:

1. Bill Rawe, william.t.rawe@usace.army.mil

2. Christine Wilson, christine.l.wilson@usace.army.mil

**Offerors accessing the DOD SAFE site as a GUEST (a “Guest” is defined as a user who is not assigned a CAC) must request a package invitation from the Contract Specialist listed in Section 00 22 00 a minimum of 48-business hours prior to the close of the RFP.**

For the purposes of determining whether the proposal was received "late" in accordance with FAR 15.208, the date and time the file(s) are received by the USACE Outlook Server or uploaded into the DOD SAFE website as identified in the DOD SAFE notification e-mail sent to the Contract Specialist(s)/ Contracting Officer will be the time and date the Government received the proposal. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal.

Coordinate directly with the Contract Specialist for any questions related to submission requirements or format.

Volume I: Technical Volume II: Price and Pro Forma Information

Title the single files in the following format:

W9128F-20-R-0085_CompanyName_Volume_I_Technical W9128F-20-R-0085_CompanyName_Volume_II_Price_and_Pro_Forma_Information (Note: Company name may be abbreviated)

It is imperative that none of the pricing or Volume 2 information show up in Volume 1.

6 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

All proposals and documentation which have been properly submitted will be evaluated.

Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the factors stated in the solicitation to select the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government. Because of the number of proposals anticipated, uniformity of all proposals is essential to assure fair and accurate evaluation. All proposals must comply with the instructions in the solicitation. Proposals that do not conform to the RFP requirements may be considered to have a “deficiency”. If a proposal is suspected of having a deficiency, it will be brought to the immediate attention of the SSA. If the determination is made that a deficiency exists, the proposal will not be evaluated further and will be eliminated from further consideration. The affected offeror will be promptly notified of the decision. Properly conforming proposals will be forwarded to the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) for evaluation.

Evaluations will be conducted in accordance with the Tradeoff Process, FAR 15.101-1. This process allows for a tradeoff between non-cost factors and cost/price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically- rated proposal to achieve a best–value contract award. Proposal evaluation is an assessment of the proposal and the Offeror's ability to perform the resultant contract successfully. Proposals will be evaluated to identify strengths, significant strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies contained in them and to determine ratings for stated evaluation factors. See definitions and descriptions of terms and ratings below.

Evaluation Definitions.

Strength. Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Clarification. Clarifications are limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. If award without discussions is anticipated, offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposals or to resolve minor or clerical errors.

Communications. Communications are exchanges between the Government and offerors after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range.

Discussions. Discussions are negotiations conducted in a competitive acquisition and take place after establishment of the competitive range.

7 FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offerors whose proposal represents the best value to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors described below.

Factors 1 and 5 are equal in importance and are the most important factors, factor 2 is the second most important factor, and factors 3 and 4 are the third most important factors. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are significantly more important to cost or price. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer.

This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal.

VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Specialized Experience Factors 1 and 5 are equal in importance and are the most important factors.

FACTOR 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Risk Management, Technical Approach

2nd most important factor

FACTOR 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Key Personnel Factors 3 and 4 are approximately equal and 3rd most important factor.

FACTOR 4

Vol. 1 TAB D

Small Business Participation Plan

Factors 3 and 4 are approximately equal and 3rd most important factor.

FACTOR 5

Vol. 1 TAB E

Past Performance

Factors 1 and 5 are equal in importance and are the most important factors.

VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 6

Vol. 2 TAB A

Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

Factors 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 combined are significantly more important than Factor 6 (price).

N/A

Vol. 2 TAB B

Evidence of Bondability

Not Rated

Vol. 2 TAB C Required Pre- Award Information

Vol. 2 TAB D Subcontracting

Plan

7.1 TECHNICAL FACTORS 1, 2, 3, AND 4.

Each factor’s technical/risk rating shall be evaluated and assigned a rating based on the following:

Color Rating

Adjectival Rating

Definition

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

NOTE: If, at any level of evaluation, an Offeror’s proposal is evaluated as not meeting a minimum requirement (that is, Red-Unacceptable) this must be detailed in the narrative assessment. A Red-Unacceptable rating at any level must be carried to the factor level.

7.2 TECHNICAL FACTOR 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.

The following ratings will be used for assigning performance relevancy to the offeror’s past performance:

Adjectival Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

A performance confidence assessment rating will be assigned for each offeror after evaluating the offeror's recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the current procurement.

Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Offerors for which no relevant past performance record is available will not have that factor evaluated, either positively or negatively, in the evaluation of the proposal package. An “unknown/neutral” rating shall be assigned when an offeror provides no past performance data and/or where none can be readily obtained. When arriving at a consensus score for past performance, evaluators shall consider a “neutral” rating as one that neither helps nor harms an offeror’s chances of being awarded a contract.

Information obtained from owners, contract administrators, or other points of contact from past performance questionnaire or Contractor Performance Assessment System (CPARS) evaluations and personal knowledge of the SSEB members may affect the evaluation rating given for the Past Performance factor being evaluated. The Government reserves the right to contact any owner, contractor administrator or other points of contract furnished by the offeror to verify accuracy of information submitted for Factors 1 and 3.

8 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

All proposals should contain the information stated herein. Proposal clarity, organization (as defined in this solicitation) and cross-referencing is mandatory. No material (information not part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. Material not specifically identified below will not be evaluated. If proposers do not want the data contained in the proposal disclosed by the Government, the proposer shall follow the procedure specified in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS, paragraph: RESTRICTION ON DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DATA. However, portions of the selected proposal will be incorporated into the contract and are subject to disclosure notwithstanding restrictive markings.

Teaming Arrangements - For purposes of this RFP, an “Offeror” may include a group of two (2) or more entities that have formed a “contractor team arrangement,” as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Section 9.601. In the case of entities that have formed a contractor team arrangement, the experience and performance history of any member of the team, whether or not gained while working with the other member(s) of the currently-proposed contractor team arrangement, will be considered as a part of the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal. In the case of subcontractor submissions, the subcontractor must submit the final cost of their portion of the project.