Question and Answer related to Projnet question 8737383.pdf
PDF 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9128F-20-R-0079
About this file
This document contains a question and answer related to a federal contract solicitation for construction services. The solicitation is for the General Billy Mitchell ANGB in Wisconsin and involves constructing a new consolidated fueling facility including aboveground fuel storage tanks, a pump house, product recovery tank, POL operations building, refueling vehicle parking, truck loading and unloading points, motor gas storage tank, diesel storage tank, and supporting facilities. The question clarifies that the contractor is responsible for all utility installation work rather than assuming the local power company will perform related services. The response indicates the design drawings do not require the power company to install utilities and that the contractor is responsible for this scope of work under the terms of the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Question:
By response to Projnet question 8737383 it has been determined that the contractor is responsible for the electric, gas and water utility costs that are owned by the private utility company. If WE Energy will not provide a bid for utilities would it be acceptable to move forward with a bid, excluding utility costs?
Answer:
Contractor should assume design in accordance with the solicitation design drawings and the contractor should assume they are responsible for the work associated. Design drawings do not assume the power company is required to install. The RFP assumes contractor is responsible for install not the power company. If the power company insist on doing the install themselves then this will be handled post award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .