Atch 01 PWS SMDIS III 11 Mar 2009.pdf
PDF 266 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91260-09-R-0002
About this file
Atch 01 PWS SMDIS III 11 Mar 2009
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
i
SPACE AND MISSILE DEFENSE INITIATIVES SUPPORT III (SMDIS III)
Scientific, Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA)
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
USASMDC/ARSTRAT
350 VANDENBERG STREET
PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, CO 80914-4905
11 Mar 09
SOLICITATION W91260-09-R-0002
Attachment 1 ii
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command / Army Forces Strategic Command
350 Vandenberg Street Peterson AFB, CO 80914-4900
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i1.0 Overview
1.1 Objective
1.2 Background
1.3 Vision & Goals
1.4 Ordering Period:
2.0 Scope
2.1 Work
2.2 Customers
2.3 NonPersonal Services
3.0 Core Mission Task Areas
3.1 Space
3.2 Missile Defense
3.3 Information Operations (IO)
iii
3.4 Global Strike
3.5 C4ISR
4.0 General Mission Task Areas
4.1 Infrastructure, Organization Analysis, and Evaluations
4.2 Intelligence Requirements
4.3 Systems Engineering and Systems Integration Analysis
4.4 Simulation and Modeling Development
4.5 Rapid Prototyping, Limited Procurement, & Fielding
4.6 Software, Network Development, and Information System Support
4.7 Integrated Logistics Support
4.8 Emerging Technologies Analysis
4.9 Meetings & Conference Organization and Support
4.10 Staff Support
4.10.1 Administrative Services
4.10.2 Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Support Services
4.11 Operations Support
4.11.3 Exercise Planning and Execution Support
4.12 Organizational Analysis
iv
5.0 General Requirements:
5.1 Contractor Personnel Requirements
5.2 Security Requirements
5.3 Data Delivery and Storage
5.4 Place of Performance
5.4.1 Facilities
5.5 Contractor Resource Scheduling
5.6 Travel
5.7 Intellectual Property / Data Rights
5.8 Publications
5.9. Quality Program
5.10 Performance Assessment
5.11 Government Furnished Equipment, Materials, Services & Information
5.12 Contractor Purchases
1.0 Overview
1.1 Objective. The objective of SMDIS III is to provide Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) and operational support services under a multiple award, indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity (IDIQ), task order type contract for U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command (USASMDC) / Army Forces Strategic Command (ARSTRAT) and agencies which collaborate with them on definition, planning, development, and execution of Space, Missile Defense, Global Strike, Information Operations, C4ISR, and related missions.
1.2 Background. USASMDC/ARSTRAT elements are located worldwide. The command is organized to lead and focus the Army’s efforts to integrate space and missile defense capabilities into tactical operations and to protect the nation and our deployed forces from missile attack.
USASMDC/ARSTRAT has gone from an organization focused on developing an effective counter to missiles like the German V-2, to the current organization as the Army command focused on exploring and exploiting the opportunities of space, meeting the challenges of missile defense, and serving as the Army Service Component Command (ASCC) for US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM). USASMDC/ARSTRAT is focused on customer needs and the future.
1.3 Vision & Goals. USASMDC/ARSTRAT’s vision is “To provide dominant space and missile defense capabilities for the Army and to plan and integrate Army capabilities in support of USSTRATCOM missions.” In pursuit of this vision, USASMDC/ARSTRAT conducts space and missile defense operations and provides planning, integration, control, and coordination or Army forces and capabilities in support of USSTRATCOM missions; serves as proponent for space and ground-based midcourse defense; is the army operational integrator for global missile defense; conducts mission-related research, development, and acquisition in support of Army Title 10 responsibilities and serves as the focal point for desired characteristics and capabilities in support of USSTRATCOM missions. Helping commands to “Provide dominant capabilities and force enhancement to the Army and Joint Warfighter” and “Improve infrastructure and support to enable the force to fulfill its strategic roles and missions” are major goals of this contract.
1.4 Ordering Period: 29 September 2009 through 28 September 2014.
2.0 Scope.
2.1 Work. The scope of this effort will span the breadth of USASMDC/ARSTRAT’s operational mission requirements, to include those of collaborating stakeholders. This Performance Work Statement (PWS) provides a general depiction of the types and kinds of non-personal services that may be ordered. Specific services required will be further detailed in individual task orders, as requirements are defined and
2.2 Customers. SETA support is required by the principal agencies involved in Space, Missile Defense, Global Strike, Information Operations, C4ISR, and related missions. Organizations include USASMDC/ARSTRAT, USSTRATCOM, Northern Command (NORTHCOM), Naval Network and Space Operations Command (NNSOC), Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), Ground Based Mid-Course Missile Defense (GMD), and the Joint National Integration Center (JNIC) may be supported through this PWS. Related efforts by other agencies, such as Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA); Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Space and Strategic Systems (SARD-TS); various Program Executive Offices (PEOs) and their subordinate Program Managers (PMs); CECOM Space Systems Directorate; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA); U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Schools and Battle Labs; Laboratory Command (LABCOM); Missile Defense Agency (MDA);
and 32d Army Air & Missile Defense Command (AAMDC) are also key organizations that will be supported by this effort. Relevant efforts by other DoD agencies collaborating with above organizations may also be supported by this PWS.
2.3 NonPersonal Services. The contractor shall provide personnel, supplies, materials, facilities, equipment (other than that which is stated as Government Furnished), engineering, technical and analytical support and perform task orders for customers and missions described, above. The contractor shall support all functional areas to include, but not limited to: vision statements and doctrine; development of architectures; program support e.g., planning, development, fielding documentation, modeling and simulation, system analysis and integration, integrated logistics support, development of strategy, support to the warfighter, contingency and mission support, program oversight, independent verification validation and test evaluation, prototype development, sustainment and operation, training, and analysis of emerging technologies. Other areas for support include Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR); Space; Missile Defense; Information Operations (IO); Global Strike; Infrastructure, Organization Analysis, and Evaluations;
Intelligence Requirements; Systems Engineering and Systems Integration Analysis; Simulation and Modeling Development; Rapid Prototyping and Limited Development; Software Development, Network Development, and Information Systems Support; Integrated Logistics Support; Emerging Technologies Analysis; Meetings and Conference Organization Support;
Staff Support; Space Operations Support, and Homeland Security. The effort detailed herein will be evolving over the course of this contract. New technologies, capabilities and initiatives will be supported. As such, the contractor shall be responsive to new and revised efforts. However, it shall be clear that any effort that involves Space, Missile Defense, Global Strike, Information Operations, C4ISR, and related missions for supported organizations are included in the scope of this effort. Under no circumstances shall contractor provide “Personal Services” or perform “Inherently Governmental Functions.”
3.0 Core Mission Task Areas
3.1 Space.
3.1.1 Space, Space Control Integration, Analysis and Training Support, Mission Analysis and Missile Defense (Space Elements). The contractor shall provide support to analyze the space and missile defense systems concepts, architectures, plans, doctrines, and requirements studies. The contractor shall analyze space and missile defense systems missions and mission areas as they are promulgated and provide support to the drafting and review of requirements documents (e.g., Concepts of Operations (CONOPS), Mission Needs Statements (MNS), Operational Requirements Documents (ORDs), etc.). The contractor must consider intelligence threats and coordinate with integrated strategic and tactical defense plans, and other related studies, plans and programs. The contractor must consider all battlefield operating systems issues in coordination with integrated strategic and tactical defense plans as well as other related studies, plans and programs. The contractor shall collect and evaluate historical and existing space and missile defense systems-related policies, directives, concepts, plans, doctrine, and requirements studies. The contractor shall provide analytical support to determine their applicability to space and missile defense systems mission and mission hierarchy. The contractor shall condense this information and identify areas in which additional analysis is required.
3.1.2 Survivability. The contractor shall identify mechanisms for positive control of all ground, space and missile defense systems, and communication elements of space and missile defense systems which ensure survivability and connectivity under threat conditions. The contractor shall identify and define key survivability issues with the proposed architectures assess vulnerability, technological risk, cost, training implications, training operational flexibility and practicality.
The contractor shall examine self defense issues; integrated attack implications; develop strategies and tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP) at system, segment, element, and subsystem levels to ensure mission survivability and system endurance against threats. The contractor shall conduct sensitivity analyses to define system robustness and resilience and to clarify critical operational and technological shortcomings. Key survivability issues shall include nuclear and Radio Frequency (RF) weapon effects, including initial nuclear radiation and electromagnetic pulse environments. The contractor shall perform planning, analysis, development, installation, and sustainment in support of space. Support activities include, but are not limited to requirements analysis, mission and operational concepts development, simulation, modeling, exercises, training, support of hardware and software development, and installation and integration. The contractor shall support DoD’s development and evolution of space and missile defense initiatives pertaining to Space Control. These initiatives embed space and missile defense concepts and applications across battlefield operating systems and identify potential applications to enhance warfighting architectures and capabilities during all phases of military operations. Support shall encompass visionary endeavors to enhance warfighting and operational capabilities across the space and missile defense spectrum. Architecture development and concept of engagement, operation, and sustainment must then be developed to set the stage for doctrinal and programmatic support.
3.1.3 Space Education and Literacy.
3.1.3.1 Training & Doctrine Development. The contractor shall analyze, plan, develop and conduct education and training services. Support may include, but is not limited to defining training solutions for input into service channels for mission requirements, training operators and Warfighters on Government or contractor developed hardware and software systems, and recommending and developing innovative training methodologies to include procedures and technologies necessary to support for all services to include training for space, missile and related systems. The contractor shall support the development and execution of space, missile defense, and other training to include plans, curriculum, and programs of instruction. Tasks shall be performed in accordance with applicable regulations as spelled out in each individual task order.
3.1.3.2 General Training Support. The contractor shall conduct studies on training encroachment and sustainment issues, and policy development. The effort requires management, communications, and analytical services. The contractor shall address encroachment on land, air, sea, and space training and testing ranges worldwide. Key aspects of this effort shall include support in the preparation and implementation of range sustainment policy; analysis of encroachment threats to ground, air, sea, and space training and testing; identification of training range issues, and inventory problems facing training ranges across the Department of Defense.
The contractor shall assist DoD in understanding the contribution of Service and existing DoD efforts to deal with these issues and in developing a multiyear agenda to address them across the DoD. The contractor shall support the development of an effective outreach and stakeholder involvement framework for coordinating OSD and Service staffs and programs, establishing and maintaining beneficial partnerships with other stakeholders, and in dealing comprehensively with training range problems on a national, international, regional, and local basis.
3.2 Missile Defense.
3,2,1 Integration. The contractor shall provide support in the area of missile defense, specializing in the offense-defense integration issues associated with deployment of space and missile defense systems. The contractor shall support the development of a methodology to derive offensive and defensive integration requirements or support the customer in the development of a methodology to derive offensive and defensive integration requirements. The contractor shall determine general and specific capabilities which would enhance space and missile defense systems. The contractor shall provide analysis for development of offensive-defensive integration requirements and shall identify issues surrounding offensive-defensive relationship and integrated capabilities. The contractor shall support DoD’s development and evolution of space and missile defense initiatives pertaining to Missile Defense. These initiatives embed space and missile defense concepts and applications across battlefield operating systems and identify potential applications to enhance warfighting architectures and capabilities during all phases of military operations. Support shall encompass visionary endeavors to enhance warfighting and operational capabilities across the space and missile defense spectrum.
Architecture development and concept of engagement, operation, and sustainment must then be developed to set the stage for doctrinal and programmatic support.
3.2.2 Operational Requirements. The contractor shall assist in the development of missile defense systems operational requirements and other operational requirements supporting the DoD. The contractor shall ensure traceability from top-level requirements to appropriate system architectures and shall ensure that Command, Control, Computers, Communication, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR), support, survivability, and sustainability operational requirements are addressed.
3.2.3 Concepts of Operations. The contractor shall assist in the development and formulation of concepts of operations for space and missile defense systems and other systems supporting the DoD. The contractor shall analyze related policy and treaty issues associated with these systems.
The contractor shall analyze the implications of combined Joint and Multi-Service force operations. The contractor shall define, crosswalk (e.g. ORD to CONOPS), and analyze the operational functions required of these systems in the peacetime, alert, engagement, post attack assessment, and recovery and reconstitution of operational status. Particular emphasis shall be on employment, command and control, connectivity and sustainment. This functional analysis will be the basis for developing a concept of operation. The contractor shall recommend the concepts of operation to a level of detail sufficient for the Government to establish preliminary system and subsystem performance characteristics, requirements and interfaces, and to provide guidance for the development of specific systems.
3.2.4 Defense Forces Integration Analysis. The contractor shall identify and examine overall defense integration issues and provide concept development and analysis support to integrate space and missile defense systems and other systems into a unified defense concept. The contractor shall assist in developing integrated defense concept plans and joint defense operations plans for the integrated defense of North America as well as other designated regions, which include consideration of current, near, and far-term integrated defense capabilities. The contractor shall assess the potential for synergism between air, ground, sea, and space and missile defense systems forces and identify operational concepts and approaches that enhance integrated force employment.
3.2.5 Vulnerability Assessments and Defended Assets Analysis. The contractor shall provide support to analyze, assess, provide recommendations, and document potential vulnerabilities and Defended Asset Concept (DAC) that support integrated defense operations. The contractor shall provide new DAC and refine and expand existing DAC to accommodate space and missile defense systems and other systems architecture changes. The contractor shall perform functional analysis of U.S. assets, systems, and networks to identify key processes and functional sets for defense; assist in defining selection scheme and priority structures; analyze defense allocation dynamics over the battle time-frame; support DAC modeling and wargaming; and analyze system characteristics; C4ISR and Information Security requirements needed to support DAC implementation. The contractor shall perform end-to-end operability assessment of defended assets in nuclear environments. The assessment shall consider all nuclear environments and effects in a balanced manner and shall include recommendations for mitigating critical vulnerabilities.
3.2.6 Systems Support
3.2.6.1 System Requirements Analysis. The contractor shall analyze system characteristics and performance requirements necessary to deploy and employ space and missile defense systems and other DoD systems. The contractor shall perform a top-down review of system components and functions to derive the specific requirements necessary to achieve the overall system and program objectives. The contractor shall identify and define the current state of technologies applicable to preferred architectures and concept(s) and provide input that can accomplish the stated objectives. The contractor shall analyze and recommend battle management strategies and TTP. The contractor shall analyze and propose optimal sighting and deployment schemes for mission accomplishment. The contractor shall analyze the impacts of both peacetime and wartime operations and requirements on system design and concepts of operations. The contractor shall provide inputs to a functional, top-level, military requirements plan that leads to concepts of operation. The contractor shall analyze and integrate requirements and concepts to achieve militarily useful defense capabilities. The contractor shall analyze man-in-the-loop and autonomy control issues on system performance and requirements for maintaining positive control. The contractor shall identify and analyze technical trade-offs, costs, system performance characteristics, logistical considerations, reliability and maintainability criteria, and other factors identified in individual tasks.
3.2.6.2 System Integration Support. The contractor shall provide system integration support for evolving and emerging, as well as, existing space and missile defense systems and other DoD systems. Support shall include, but not be limited to: loading new versions of software;
integrating systems; executing software modifications; hardware setup and installation;
evaluation and validation of system performance (to include those developed by other contractors and the government); networking systems; and technical support in the installation of hardware upgrades. The contractor shall coordinate with the managing entity for all systems, components, software and equipment that are under configuration management or license control. The systems are provided to demonstrate the types, kinds, complexity and functional capabilities typical of systems to be supported hereunder. Support will not necessarily be required on these specific systems. The contractor shall be responsible for development, operation and maintenance of test integration and simulation facility as stated per individual task order. The contractor shall be responsible for conducting test and evaluation of system and Independent validation and verification.
3.2.6.3 System Analysis Support. The contractor shall: analyze the life-cycle issues and cost implications of existing and proposed space and missile defense systems architectures and other DoD systems architectures; analyze support and life cycle impacts from environmental effects;
analyze communication networks and examine variations to determine optimal flows; analyze the use of simulation and test resources. The contractor shall also examine cost, schedule, manning, and logistics considerations; examine support issues such as sufficient launch capability for system deployment and assured access to space and missile defense systems, early orbit requirements, Telemetry Tracking & Commanding requirements, and on-orbit station-keeping.
3.2.6.4 Operational Support. The contractor shall perform services to include pre- deployment support to ensure operability during proposed deployment in field environments and remote locations, to the warfighter during wargames, exercises, contingency operations, deployments of space and missile defense systems and other DoD systems, and other environments. Operational support includes the development of Tactics, Techniques and Procedures. Operational support may include operation of equipment during the deployment. Operational support includes the development and conduct of “Home Station Training” which runs the equipment and operators through deployment scenarios to ensure proficiency in operation. Support may be conducted in a tactical field environment and require frequent tactical displacement. Support may require contractors to travel on military ground, air or water transportation to OCONUS locations.
Contractor shall comply with DODI 3020.41, “Contractor Personnel Authorized to Accompany the U.S. Armed Forces.”
3.3 Information Operations (IO) .
3.3.1 Contractor shall support any and all elements and aspects of Joint, Allied, Coalition, Army, and other Service IO. The critical element in the conduct of IO is the ability to gain and maintain Information Superiority (IS). Information Superiority is defined in Joint Publication 3- 13 as the “operational advantage derived from the ability to collect, process, and disseminate an uninterrupted flow of information while exploiting or denying an adversary’s ability to do the same.” Army IO doctrine (FM 3-O), identifies five “Information Tasks:” Information Engagement (IE), Command and Control Warfare (C2W), Information Protection (IP), Operations Security (OPSEC), and Military Deception (MILDEC). IO includes protection of friendly information assets and denying adversaries their information and decision systems and conducting the full scope (offensive and defensive) IO to achieve information superiority to meet Army, Joint, national military objectives.
3.3.2 SMDC/ARSTRAT requires operational and technical planning support for IO forces, capabilities and organizations, to include but not limited to the five Information Tasks listed above, and the related areas of Information Assurance, Physical Security, Counter-Intelligence, Physical Destruction, Civil Military Operations, and Public Affairs. All work should be in accordance with doctrine as outlined in applicable published and draft CJCS and Department of Defense (DOD) directives, instructions, and memorandum; Joint Publication 3-13, Joint Doctrine for Information Operations, dated 13 February 2006; applicable published and draft Army regulations, directives, manuals, and orders; Headquarters, Department of the Army Field Manual 3-13, Information Operations: Doctrine; Tactics, Techniques and Procedures; and USSTRATCOM IO CONOPS and other Implementation Instructions.
3.3.3 IO R&D Support. The contractor shall provide support in areas of research, analysis, planning, program management and execution of IO. The contractor shall evaluate or support the evaluation of operational and technological shortcomings with regard to defensive and offensive Information Operations parameters. This shall include but not be limited to the parameters outlined in PPD-63, "Critical Infrastructure Protection," and applicable DOD, Joint and Army Regulations and Manuals on Research, Development and Acquisition. Focus should be on areas where IO capabilities can be developed to meet immediate and emerging COCOM and Army requirements.
3.3.4 Contractor shall support any and all elements and aspects of Joint, Allied, Coalition, Army, and other Service Cyberspace Operations (CO). Cyberspace is defined by the Department of Defense as, “A global domain within the information environment consisting of the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures, including the Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers.”
Emerging Army Cyberspace doctrine considers it a man-made domain that uses the electromagnetic spectrum and is contiguous to and increasingly pervasive throughout the four traditional domains (land, air, maritime, and space). As is the case with the four traditional domains, cyberspace is part of the operational environment and may be contested and become the venue for its own unique form of operational activity (hacker wars, for example). It can also serve as a medium through which combat power can be projected and create cognitive (human and machine) and physical effects in the other four domains.
3.3.5 SMDC/ARSTRAT requires operational and technical planning support for CO forces, capabilities and organizations, and must monitor changes in Cyberspace that are driven in large part by private industry research and development. The interdependence and innovation of commercial technologies and the communications industries have a direct impact on Cyber security and military effectiveness. All work should be in accordance with doctrine as outlined in applicable published and draft CJCS and Department of Defense (DOD) directives, instructions, and memorandum; emerging Joint doctrine and directives; applicable published and draft Army regulations, directives, manuals, and orders; emerging Headquarters, Department of the Army Field Manual 3-13 and 3-XX; emerging Doctrine; Tactics, Techniques and Procedures;
and USSTRATCOM CO CONPLANS and CONOPS; and other Implementation Instructions.
3.3.6 CO R&D Support. The contractor shall provide support in areas of research, analysis, planning, program management and execution of CO. The contractor shall evaluate or support the evaluation of operational and technological shortcomings with regard to defensive and offensive Cyberspace Operations parameters. This shall include but not be limited to the parameters outlined in PPD-63, "Critical Infrastructure Protection," and applicable DOD, Joint and Army Regulations and Manuals on Research, Development and Acquisition. Focus should be on areas where CO capabilities can be developed to meet immediate and emerging COCOM and Army requirements.
3.4 Global Strike.
3.4.1 The contractor shall provide mission support to the Department of the Army General Staff, USSTRATCOM, USASMDC/ARSTRAT, and other organizations in Global Strike mission development and execution. Contractor shall have knowledge of Global Strike mission planning, development, and execution. US Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command (USASMDC/ARSTRAT), as the Army Service Component Command (ASCC) to USSTRATCOM, will work with the Army to plan, coordinate, and integrate Army Information Operations, Global Missile Defense, Space Operations, and C4ISR to accomplish the Global Strike mission. The contractor shall provide deliberate and crisis action planning support. The contractor shall understand the mission of ARSTRAT as the ASCC to USSTRATCOM and support the Global Strike plans, policies, and procedures as directed.
3.5 C4ISR.
3.5.1 The contractor shall assist in the development and formulation of C4ISR support for space and missile defense systems and other DoD systems. Considerations shall include evaluation of current threat assessments, mission requirements and system architectures. The contractor shall review and assist in the development of documented system interface requirements necessary to link C4ISR processing and dissemination systems within appropriate command decision centers.
Based on defined C4ISR requirements, the contractor shall recommend display formats (i.e.
screen displays) which best support decision makers regarding the positioning, posturing, and employment of forces. Displays shall also convey enemy actions to increase the readiness of their offensive and defensive suppression forces in the peacetime environment up to warning of impending employment. In determining appropriate C4ISR display formats, the Contractor shall give special consideration to limitations in human information processing, utility of information to different users during various scenarios, and information reliability and perishability. Areas which may impose special requirements or restrictions on C4ISR display availability shall be explored also. Such areas include, but are not limited to, connectivity with mobile centers, and other strategic and theater C4ISR systems interfaces.
4.0 General Mission Task Areas.
4.1 Infrastructure, Organization Analysis, and Evaluations. The contractor shall perform as the Subject Matter Expert when conducting Infrastructure, Organization Analysis, and Evaluations for the Department of Defense. The contractor shall consider the following variables: vulnerability assessments of information delivery mechanisms that are space or ground based and dependent on WWW Internet access; infrastructure contingency plan development based on space based asset failures due to intentional or natural events (Solar Max will be affecting satellite based communications systems during the performance of this contract); and evaluation of current and future technology to maintain and accelerate infrastructure deployment and modernization plans.
4.2 Intelligence Requirements. The contractor shall provide all-source analytical and intelligence planning support and other intelligence support as required. The contractor must have a thorough understanding of the Military Decision-Making Process (MDMP) in order to provide support to staff planning efforts in the development of Operations Plans (OPLAN) and Operations Orders (OPORD), conduct research and analysis, produce integrated, all-source finished intelligence, and develop and maintain databases on foreign space, ballistic missile threat, and Information Operations. The contractor must be familiar, at the operator level, with Windows and NT operating systems as well as the classified networks. The contractor shall provide intelligence support to air defense operational requirements. Contractor shall provide air defense intelligence estimates and studies in support of air defense planning missions. The contractor shall be operationally proficient on the following programs: Techniques Effectiveness Model (TEM), Space and Missile Analysis Tool (SMAT), Space Battle Management Core System (SBMCS), BattleScape NT, Broadcast Request Imagery Technology Experiment (BRITE), and Tactical Receive Segment (TRS).
4.3 Systems Engineering and Systems Integration Analysis. The contractor shall perform systems engineering and systems integration analysis. Systems engineering shall include the conduct of studies, independent analyses and simulations, providing technological assessments, systems definition and technology demonstrations. System integration analysis shall include technical analysis and assessments of integration approaches in the evolutionary development of space and missile defense systems and other DoD systems; define preferred systems approaches for integration into existing tactical, operational and strategic systems; and, provide considerations of new system cost and technical feasibility. The contractor shall analyze integration concepts to determine their utility in meeting the space and missile defense systems requirements and other DoD systems requirements in support of selected theaters of operations.
4.4 Simulation and Modeling Development. The Contractor shall provide support in the development and analysis of simulation, modeling, or decision support systems, tools or capabilities. The development effort shall include proof-of-concept; evaluation of software and hardware products for application to the system architectures; development of system-level information flow diagrams; incorporation of phased system modifications; implementation program control support; and the preparation of position papers and engineering notes addressing implementation goals, approaches, issues, technical assessments, and program strategies.
Modeling and simulation may be required to be produced in accordance with Validation and Verification process and accreditation. Development efforts shall consider the viability of using existing and known models and simulations prior to development of new models or simulations.
Simulation and models developed shall consider operational impact in addition to other consideration set forth in individual task orders. Similarly, evaluation of models or simulation shall encompass viability of existing models and simulation, as well as evaluation of the impacts to operational elements.
4.5 Rapid Prototyping, Limited Procurement, & Fielding. The contractor shall support rapid prototyping, limited procurement and fielding support for Space, Missile Defense, Global Strike, Information Operations, C4ISR, Homeland Security, and related systems in response to Warfighter requests. Support shall include limited acquisition of equipment, operations & maintenance, and contractor logistics support, as required to support fielded or experimental equipment. Support shall include short-term travel to locations of deployed systems, as necessary.. Rapid prototyping and limited procurement may also include development and modification of system operating software and other software programs. The contractor shall conduct technology evaluations of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and non-developmental equipment, as well as items requiring development. The contractor shall develop system and subsystem specifications and product conceptual design that includes engineering drawings and subsystem interfaces. The interface designs must identify and comply with industry standards and Government standards as set forth in individual Task Orders. The contractor shall develop necessary test plans, operating and maintenance plans, logistical support plans, and concept of operations for the system(s) being developed for rapid prototyping, limited production or procured. The contractor shall integrate Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) and COTS to produce a rapid prototype that is capable of meeting requirements as set forth by the Government in individual Task Orders. The contractor shall support all required design, integration, fabrication, testing, operations, maintenance, documentation, training, and logistical support of the system or item being prototyped or procured. The contractor shall provide operational support for prototypes in controlled as well as tactical environments; operational support of prototypes may include manning during contingency operations.
4.6 Software, Network Development, and Information System Support. The contractor shall develop, provide support, service, and modify automated program support systems to support routine day-to-day operations and training. This includes development and modification of menus, database population, input and query forms, report, database structure, and algorithms needed to meet long range plans, satellite networks and ground terminal system requirements.
All software development shall include a user’s manual as a minimum, and any other documentation included in the specific Task Order. This may include software source code on a case-by-case basis. The contractor shall develop new information management systems to meet requirements stated in individual Task Orders. Such systems shall include programs, training tool, algorithms, database, satellite and terminal system models, command and control communications models, general performance models (link budgets, networks, orbits, etc.) rule-based expert systems, text retrieval system, program planning tools, and in support of presentations. All design and development shall be done on a hardware and software suite functionally equivalent to and compatible with that of the requiring activity’s equipment.
The contractor shall consider the use commercial-off-the-shelf software or previously developed software modules to meet contract requirements. The design, development and modification process shall include the following areas of consideration: human engineering factors (man-machine interface, ease of operator training and use, varying levels of operator competence and graphical interpretation), database inputs, operational scenarios and modules and subsystems, and decision aids to build toward coherent system architecture.
4.7 Integrated Logistics Support. The contractor shall support the development of space and missile defense systems logistics doctrine and policy and other DoD logistics doctrine and policy. This support may include system level logistics planning including systems sustainability, operational effectiveness, and suitability requirements. The contractor may be required to: evaluate and analyze the impact of milestone decisions; life cycle costs; cost and performance schedule tradeoffs; risk assessments supporting logistic models; manpower estimates; operational and logistic concepts and plans; and, participate in working groups. The contractor shall support planning and conduct of C2 Simulations and participate in logistics working groups and Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) as required. This support includes coordinating Component Service logistic support and sustainability processes.
4.8 Emerging Technologies Analysis. The contractor shall support the exploration of emerging technologies which shall include the capability required to perform evaluations and analysis of technologies and products which may be in conceptual, prototype or operational forms. This shall encompass conduct studies; concept definitions, system definitions, field and lab testing at a location to be determined, and capability assessment. The contractor shall analyze, critique, and assess the adequacy, timeliness, and effectiveness of these emerging technologies. The contractor may be required to project how these emerging technologies impact the battlefield of the future. The contractor shall be required to be familiar with the Joint Technical Architecture (JTA) and Army Technical Architecture (ATA). The contractor shall ensure new systems and subsystems satisfy the requirements of the ATA for the future Army.
4.9 Meetings & Conference Organization and Support. The contractor shall provide the capability to coordinate, develop, organize, support, and conduct conferences and meetings on any subject area of the PWS. This includes the ability to prepare, coordinate, and obtain speakers, conference agendas and supporting material, coordination of facilities and conduct of conferences up to the SCI classification level. The contractor shall be able to conduct such conferences either in commercial or Government facilities as specified by the Government at the time of conference development.
4.10 Staff Support. Staff elements of USASMDC/ARSTRAT and other DoD staff elements support all operational and research missions and are responsible for the linkage of operational needs with future capabilities. This includes coordination across Headquarters Department of the Army (HQ DA), Army MACOM's, Joint Services, various Unified Commands, and non- DOD organizations. The Contractor shall provide support to staff elements to help accomplish their functions and missions.
4.10.1 Administrative Services. The contractor shall provide administrative services for conferences, office automation, records management and automation, scheduling functions, meeting and conference support, briefings, and routine office management. Such support shall be carefully managed to prevent performance of “personal services” prohibited under this contract, that is, to prevent creation of employer-employee relationships between the Government and the contractor's personnel. At a minimum, administrative services shall be explicitly under the supervision and control of other contractor employees and proposals shall specify contractor tasking/reporting relationships planned to prevent personal services relationships from accidentally developing between Government and contractor personnel and tasks shall be clearly differentiated from those requiring performance by Government employees.
4.10.2 Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Support Services. The contractor shall develop and formulate comments, recommendations, position papers, white papers, etc.
related to Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) of funding for Space, Missile Defense, Global Strike, Information Operations, C4ISR, and related systems. Contractor shall produce draft PPBE documents for Government approval and submission through official processes.
4.10.3 Doctrine, Organization, Training, Material, Leadership, and Education, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) Support. Contractor shall review existing DOTMLPF constructs, combat development efforts, force development, and system engineering efforts, recommend improvements, and assist with staffing required to implement improvements. The contractor shall analyze missions and mission areas as they are promulgated and provide support to the drafting and review of requirements documents (e.g., Concepts of Operations (CONOPS), Mission Needs Statements (MNS), Operational Requirements Documents (ORDs), etc.).
4.11 Operations Support. The contractor shall provide expert support services for Space, Missile Defense, Global Strike, Information Operations, C4ISR, and related operations.
4.11.1. Contractor shall support operations such as Space-Based Blue Force Tracking Mission Management Center and related missions. The contractor shall support the systems and devices used in the blue force tracking mission. The contractor shall support integration and implementation of new blue force tracking hardware and software. The contractor shall provide operational support to the SB-BFT MMC watch center.
4.11.2. Contractor shall provide support to the Joint Functional Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense (JFCC-IMD) for missile defense operations and planning in support of United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM). The effort shall include missile defense planning, current operations, and logistical expertise, training and exercise support supporting USSTRATCOM and Combatant Command (COCOM) current and future operations for the JFCC-IMD. The support shall include but is not limited to: current operations support, BMDS Asset Management, Training requirements, future operations and crisis action planning, missile defense planning, and briefings. Contractor services are required to provide base planning, surge and full planning as described in the following specific tasks:
4.11.3 Exercise Planning and Execution Support. The contractor shall provide exercise planning and execution support for the accomplishment of the US Army Space & Missile Defense Command / Army Forces Strategic Command (SMDC/ARSTRAT) Exercise Plan in accordance with the SMDC/ARSTRAT Annual Training Guidance. The contractor will be involved in developing, planning, coordinating, integrating and controlling exercise requirements for SMDC/ARSTRAT in major training events and providing mission capabilities assessments in support of SMDC/ARSTRAT, USSTRATCOM, geographic COCOMs, Joint Forces Command (JFCOM), Commanders of Army Echelons above Corps, Corps, Divisions, and Separate Brigades and their staffs with exercise support along with the U.S. Army's Battle Command Training Program (BCTP). In addition, the contractor supports the development of emerging doctrine and TTPs across SMDC/ARSTRAT mission areas through exercises.
4.11.4 Training Support. The contractor shall analyze, plan, develop and conduct education and training services. Support shall include defining training solutions for input into service channels for mission requirements, training operators and War-fighters on Government or contractor developed hardware and software systems, and recommending and developing innovative training methodologies to include procedures and technologies necessary to support mission requirements. The contractor shall support the development and execution of training to include plans, curriculum, and programs of instruction. Tasks shall be performed in accordance with applicable regulations as spelled out in each individual task order. The contractor shall collect and evaluate historical and existing related curriculum, policies, directives, concepts, plans, doctrine, and requirements studies. The contractor shall provide analytical support to determine their applicability to mission and mission hierarchy. The contractor shall condense this information and identify areas in which additional analysis is required. The contractor shall conduct studies on training and sustainment issues, and policy development. The contractor shall provide support to analyze concepts, architectures, plans, doctrines, and requirements studies.
4.12 Organizational Analysis: The contractor shall analyze, critique, and assess the adequacy, timeliness, and cost effectiveness of organizations and ongoing work performed by other contractors and Government personnel in order to recommend organizational and/or methodology improvements. The contractor shall not provide assessments of other SMDIS III contractors or subcontractors as part of these assessments or in any way violate organizational conflict of interest provisions set forth in Section H, however, they may provide recommendations regarding ways to improve their own SMDIS III work (including subcontractors working for them) as part of continuous process improvement for ongoing tasks.
Furthermore, the contractor shall not provide any assessments of individual Government employees, nor individual contractor employees not their own.
5.0 General Requirements: (Applicable to all task orders)
5.1 Contractor Personnel Requirements
5.1.1 Program Manager - The technical effort shall be under the direction and coordination of a single Program Manager (PM) who shall be resident in the Colorado Springs, Colorado area.
The PM provides overall management of program, projects, cost and budgets, personnel, planning, quality control, direction, coordination, deliverable submissions, task order proposals, and reviews necessary to assure effective contract performance and acts as single point contact for Government Program Manager/Contracting Officer Representative on these and related issues. As a minimum, the Program Manager shall possess TOP SECRET / SCI and program access clearances or be eligible for immediate adjudication by the cognizant security authority upon award of the contract. The PM shall also train, organize, and control contractor personnel and monitor support to ensure employees are not performing Inherently Governmental Functions (IGF) or personal services on any task order, reporting such taskings to the Government KO and PM for clarification and validation prior to acceptance or accomplishment of such work.
5.1.2 Key Personnel - The contractor's key personnel shall demonstrate adequate levels of recent and relevant expertise required services for the tasks proposed. Each Task Order shall provide special requirements, if needed. Contractor shall submit resumes for key personnel and solicit Government review and comment on qualifications/suitability of key personnel to accomplish required tasks both upon initial proposal and upon replacement of “key personnel.”
5.1.3 Personnel Qualifications - The Contractor shall utilize personnel with skill sets, experience, and qualifications appropriate to the mission and scope of work, in sufficient quantities to accomplish the work required by this contract.
5.1.4 Supervision of Employees
5.1.4.1 The Government shall not supervise or otherwise direct contractor employees. The Contractor shall not supervise or otherwise direct government employees, nor shall the Contractor supervise employees of other contractors outside the Contractors’ own subcontracting/teaming arrangements. Contractor shall ensure that all support provided to the Government is coordinated, approved, and directed by contractor task leads and that their subordinate employees do not work directly or constructively for Government employees in an “employee-like” relationship that could result in personal services.
5.1.5…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .