Attachment_M_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 381 KB Posted

Attached to
Fort Knox - Full Food Services (FFS)
Solicitation number
W9124J-19-R-0018
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and federal contract opportunity notice for full food services at Fort Knox, Kentucky. The Mission and Installation Contracting Command - Fort Sam Houston Contracting Center is soliciting proposals for indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for dining facility management, food preparation, sanitation, and janitorial services to support Army installations. The base period of performance is 1 February 2020 through 31 July 2025, including option periods. Offerors must attend a mandatory site visit on 5 November 2019 and submit any clarification questions by 7 November 2019. This is a 100% small business set-aside for North American Industry Classification System code 722310 with a size standard of $41.5 million. The state licensing agency will be given preference under the Randolph-Shepherd Act. The past performance questionnaire requests information on an offeror's record on small business goals, technical performance, contract management, and would be used to evaluate proposals submitted for this food services requirement.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment G - 11.12.19_Knox Pricing Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment O - Fort Knox Questions 11-15-19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment C - Dining Facility Drawings Ft Knox 14 Nov 2019.pdf PDF
Attachment B - AFMIS Headcounts FY16 - FY19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment E2 - Durables List 14 Nov 2019.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9124J19R0018 Modification 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment N - Sign-In Sheet 11-5-19.pdf PDF
Attachment _D_ Dining Facility_Equipment_ List 15 Nov 2019.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_B_-_AFMIS_Headcounts_FY16_-_FY18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_A_-_Dining_Facility_Location_Map.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_190920_Knox_Pricing_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_E1_-_Expendables_List__12_OCT_2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_D_-_Dining_Facility_Equipment_List_20_Feb_2019.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_I1_-_CBA_3-1-13_to_2-29-16_-_signed.pdf PDF
Attachment_J_-_photos_of_Dining_Facilities.PPTX PPTX presentation
Attachment_I2_-_CBA_2018_Rivercity_Addendum__Signed.pdf PDF
Attachment_L_-_Specific_Relevant_Contracts_Reference_Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_E2_-_Durables_List__12_OCT_2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W9124J-19-R-0018_Fort_Knox_FFS_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Knox_Staffing_Matrix_10.23.19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_C_-_Dining_Facility_Drawings_Ft_Knox_02-12-19.pdf PDF
Attachment_K_-_SubContractor_Consent_Form_for_Release_of_Past_Performance_Info.pdf PDF
Attachment_I3_-_CBA_River_City_Fort_Knox_2019_to_2022.pdf PDF
Attachment_F_-_Estimated_Workload_190514_Attach_F_Template_Knox.docx DOCX document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Note: Questionnaire submitted by some other entity other than the reference will not be accepted.

When filled in, this document is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor __________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code _________________________________________________________________

C. Contract Number ____________________________________________________________

D. Contract Type _______________________________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance ________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost $__________________________________________________________

H. Current/final contract cost $____________________________________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs

J. Description of service provided _________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name _____________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description _________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name ___________________________________________

B. Title ____________________________________________

C. Phone/Fax

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an X in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Level

S Satisfactory – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M Marginal – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA Not Applicable – Unable to provide a score.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation S M US NA

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Technical Performance S M US NA

T1. Overall Contract Management.

T2. Adequacy of Contractor Workforce to Perform Contract.

T3. Quality Control.

T4. Government Furnished Property Administration.

T5. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

T6. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

T7. Understand/complied with contract objectives and technical requirements.

T8. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

T9. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

T10. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T11. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US

(Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contract Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes _____ Default _____ Convenience _____ Pending Terminations _____ No _____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

Please return this completed questionnaire via email to the following Contracting Officer and

Contract Specialist at: samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and juan.juarez.civ@mail.mil.

mailto:Christina.m.mokrane.civ@mail.mil mailto:Karina.s.haddix.civ@mail.mil

Sample Questionnaire Cover Letter

Letterhead

Date

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Mission and Installation Contracting (MICC) – Fort Sam Houston (FSH) Contracting Center is in the process of selecting a contractor for Army Food Services. The services required are for the Army Sustainment Command’s Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) at Fort Knox’s Dining Facilities in support of the installation food services program that support the Warfighter with flexible, efficient and cost effective service. The service encompasses dining facility management functions, food preparation, facility sanitation, and janitorial duties.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort.

We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than (INSERT DATE) after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed to the following Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at:

samuel.j.colton.civ@mail.mil and juan.juarez.civ@mail.mil. Please email or call the Contracting

Officer or Contract Specialist at: 210-466-2251 or 210-466-2235 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a apart of the official Source

Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

mailto:Christina.m.mokrane.civ@mail.mil mailto:Karina.s.haddix.civ@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .