W9123822R0015 AMENDMENT 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0001 is issued to:

1. Correct Attachment 0003, Supplemental Requirements LD amount

2. Update Section 00 22 00 evaluation factors verbiage

3. Incorporate the most current w age determination UT20220091 dated 02/25/2020

4. Update Table of Contents to reflect most recent w age determination

5. Extend solicitation due date from 07 March 2020, 1300 PST to 09 March 2020, 1300 PST

6. Clarified Option CLIN 1003 on Asbestos Pipe diameter

7. Extend Period Of Performance from 12 months to 18 months **A second amendment w ill be forthcoming, incorporating changes in the specif ications**

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Mar-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9123822R0015

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Feb-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Mar-2022

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO

CONTRACTING DIVISION

1325 J STREET

SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922

W91238 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9123822R0015

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION DATE # of Pages Attachment 01 Specifications June 2021 627 Attachment 02 Drawings SEP 2021 45 Attachment 03 Supplemental Contract Instructions 13 Jan 2022 1 Attachment 04 Davis Bacon Wage Determination 7 Jan 2022 4 Attachment 05 Pre-award Survey 20 Dec 2021 4 Attachment 06 Flight Test Apron Site Walk 02 Feb 2022 1 Attachment 07 Utah Residence Office Map 05 Jan 2022 1 Attachment 08 Project Information Form 13 Jan 2022 1 Attachment 09 Past Performance Questionnaire 13 Jan 2022 1 to:

Attachment 02 Drawings SEP 2021 45 Attachment 03 Supplemental Contract Instructions 13 Jan 2022 1 Attachment 04 CWRR UT 20220091 25 Feb 2022 5 Attachment 05 Pre-award Survey 20 Dec 2021 4 Attachment 06 Flight Test Apron Site Walk 02 Feb 2022 1 Attachment 07 Utah Residence Office Map 05 Jan 2022 1

The following have been modified:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Attachment 02 Drawings SEP 2021 45 Attachment 03 Supplemental Contract Instructions 13 Jan 2022 1 Attachment 04 CWRR UT 20220091 25 Feb 2022 5 Attachment 05 Pre-award Survey 20 Dec 2021 4 Attachment 06 Flight Test Apron Site Walk 02 Feb 2022 1 Attachment 07 Utah Residence Office Map 05 Jan 2022 1

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 07-Mar-2022 01:00 PM to 09-Mar-

2022 01:00 PM.

CLIN 1003

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Asbestos/LBP removal shall be accomplished by a certified asbestos/LBP removal contractor.*To be exercised within 365 days of NTP*

To:

Asbestos/LBP removal shall be accomplished by a certified asbestos/LBP removal contractor.

Offerors should assume that asbestos pipe that would be removed has 12 inch diameter.*To be exercised within 365 days of NTP*

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

365 dys. ANP 1 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296 FOB: Destination

W91238

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

18 mths. ANP 1 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

CAGE

365 dys. ANP 432 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

CAGE

18 mths. ANP 432 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1002 has been changed from:

CAGE

365 dys. ANP 1 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

CAGE

18 mths. ANP 1 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1003 has been changed from:

CAGE

365 dys. ANP 500 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

CAGE

18 mths. ANP 500 UTAH RESIDENT OFFICE

DOUGLAS WESEMANN, P.E.

7227 6TH STREET BUILDING 366

HILL AFB UT 84056-5214

(801) 586-3296

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

INSTRUCTIONS, EVALUATIONS,

AND CONTRACT AWARD

1. OVERVIEW

a. This action is a “Lowest Price Technically Acceptable “(LPTA) solicitation for the Flight Apron Repairs, Hill

Air Force Base, Utah. The Contracting Officer will award to the responsible offeror that represents the lowest-price, technically-acceptable proposal, considering all non-price factors described herein.

b. The Government neither intends to conduct discussions nor to request revised proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions, if it is deemed to be in the best interest of the Government in accordance with FAR 15.306 and FAR 52.215-1(f)(4).

2. BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the requirements of Part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

2.2 SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICE, TECHNICALLY-ACCEPTABLE (LPTA) METHOD

The Government will select the offer that represents the best value to the Government by using the LPTA METHOD described in FAR Part 15. The Government shall evaluate the lowest-priced offeror. Should that offeror’s proposal be found to be technically acceptable in all non-price factors, the Government shall stop evaluations and make direct award to said offeror, assuming their price is found to be fair and reasonable. Should the proposal not be technically acceptable in all non-price factors, or should the price offer not be found fair and reasonable, the Government shall evaluate the next lowest-price offeror. This process will repeat until a technically acceptable offeror whose price offer is fair and reasonable is selected.

2.3 EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

a. Price to the Government will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it reflects a clear understanding of the requirements; and is consistent with the offeror’s Technical Proposal. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

b. Information required to be submitted in the Price Proposal volume in addition to the executed SF 1442 with acknowledgement of amendments and the completed pricing schedule will be used to determine the offeror’s eligibility for contract award in accordance with paragraph 2.1 above (for example, the bid guarantee; and the offeror’s pre-award survey information).

2.4. THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Beginning with the lowest priced offer, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical proposal against the evaluation criteria contained herein in order to determine the proposal’s technical acceptability. The process will continue until a technically acceptable proposal is identified. Once a technically acceptable proposal is identified, proposal evaluation will cease; and the Government will proceed to evaluate the technical acceptable offeror’s price proposal for fair and reasonable pricing, and upon the contracting officer’s affirmative determination of responsibility, the Government will proceed to award the contract. Each of the evaluation factors will be evaluated by the Government and an acceptability rating will be determined by consensus of the Government evaluation board for all technical factors other than past performance. The Past Performance factor will be evaluated by the Government and a relevancy acceptability will be determined by consensus of the Government evaluation board.

b. The evaluation factors correlate directly to the main organizational tabs identified in the proposal submission instructions.

(1) Factor 1: Experience and Capability (separate PDF)

(2) Factor 2: Schedule (separate PDF)

(3) Factor 3: Past Performance (separate PDF)

2.5 GENERAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

a. The offeror’s conformance with the specified format and submission requirements will be considered during the technical evaluation. Failure to comply with the formatting and/or submission requirements may be seen as indicative of the type of problems that could be expected during contract performance. More than a nominal number of errors/mistakes or egregious errors/mistakes may affect the offeror’s ability to clearly meet the minimum requirements. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable. However, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals.

b. Technical proposals which do not provide the specified information in the specified location in accordance with the submission instructions may be found to be unacceptable. The Government is under no obligation to search for information that is not in the specified location.

c. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be found unacceptable. Responses that are essentially blanket offers of compliance are not adequate substitutes for the detailed and complete technical information necessary to establish that an offeror can meet the specified requirements. The proposal submission instructions are written to give prospective contractors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being found unacceptable if inadequate detail is provided.

d. Any prescribed page and formatting limitations will be strictly adhered to and enforced by the Government. The Government will not evaluate any excess information resulting from the offeror’s failure to comply with the submission instructions. Examples: If an offeror were to submit three pages in response to an item with a two page limitation, the information on the first two pages would be evaluated but the information on the third page would not be evaluated.

e. The degree of risk to the Government inherent in the offeror’s technical proposal will be a consideration under every evaluation factor.

f. The Government cannot make award based on an unacceptable offer. Therefore, a rating of “Unacceptable” under any factor will render the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that offeror and the revised proposal is found to be acceptable.

g. Technical Ratings: Other than Past Performance

Table 1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

ADJECTIVAL RATING DESCRIPTION

“ACCEPTABLE” Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

“UNACCEPTABLE”

Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

h. Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the resulting contract requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements.

Past performance shall be used as an evaluation factor within the LPTA process, unless waived by the PCO in accordance with FAR 15.304(c)(3)(iii). It shall be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305 and DFARS 215.305.

However, the comparative assessment in FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. Therefore, past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in Table 2.

Past performance should be initially evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s present/past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant shall be unique to each LPTA source selection. Therefore, the solicitation shall establish the criteria for recency and relevancy in relation to the specific requirement being procured.

In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to what aspects of an offeror’s contract performance history would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the requirements of the contract that is contemplated to be awarded as a result of the evaluation of proposals in the current procurement.

Second, the past performance evaluation should determine how well the offeror performed on the prior contracts.

The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.

Table 2. Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

ADJECTIVAL RATING DESCRIPTION

“ACCEPTABLE” Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note above)

“UNACCEPTABLE” Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation.

Sources are as follows:

• Past performance information may be provided by the offeror, as solicited.

• Past performance information may be obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition.

• Past Performance information may be obtained from established systems such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of entities (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; and may be obtained from other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency, and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, PPQs submitted on prior RFPs, and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

The technical evaluation team will review this past performance information and determine whether the proposal is technically acceptable or unacceptable based on the definition above at Table 1. Per FAR 15.101-2(b)(1), small business offerors that are found to be technically unacceptable will be referred to the Small Business Administration for a Certificate of Competency determination.

3. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

3.1.1 Media, Page Size, Margins, Fonts, and Page Limitations.

Submit only one electronic copy specifically authorized in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. Do not include links to information on websites in lieu of incorporating the information physically into the proposal. Except where another size is specifically authorized for a specific submission, use only 8 1/2” x 11” paper. Use at least 1-inch margins, which may include headers and footers. Do not justify the right margin. Ensure that all text and graphics are clearly legible.

Do not use a font size smaller than 10, unusual font styles such as script, or condensed fonts. For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, a foldout sheet will count as one page. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider A = Actual which means it has been completed tabs, are excluded from page limitations.

3.1.2 Proposal Binding.

This will be an electronic submission. Please follow instructions (proper Tabbing, etc.) for preparing the electronic file.

3.1.3 Conditioning of Offer.

Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal volumes. Inclusion of any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in a determination that the offer is unacceptable and thus ineligible for award. Resolve questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements of the solicitation prior to submission of the offer; see “Inquiries”, located in Section 00 21 16, for points of contact. Notwithstanding the above, the offeror must clearly describe in the proposal cover sheet submitted with the price volume any exceptions, within the offer, to the contractual and/or technical terms and conditions of the solicitation.

3.1.4 Restrictions on Offeror-Provided Information.

“Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must clearly mark the information in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror – Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”. Files shall not contain classified data.

4. GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION.

The proposal shall be submitted as summarized below and as required by the specifications.

(1) Volume I – Technical Volume (a) Factor 1: Experience and Capability (separate PDF)

(b) Factor 2: Schedule (separate PDF)

(c) Factor 3: Past Performance (separate PDF)

(2) Volume II – Price Volume (separate PDF) (a) Proposal Cover Sheet

(b) Standard Form 1442, Acknowledgement of Amendments, Joint Venture Agreement

(c) Pricing Schedule

(d) Line Item Breakdown

(e) Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

(f) Bid Guarantee

(g) Pre-Award Survey Information

Each offeror must submit a proposal consisting of both a “price” volume and a “technical” volume. The price volume includes the signed offer and the offeror’s proposed prices. The technical volume includes all required information relating to the “non-price” evaluation factors. The two volumes must be submitted as separate, distinct volumes (in this case, separate PDF files). Both volumes must be received electronically, not later than the date and time specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. The information in the two volumes is evaluated separately and independently. Therefore, all information intended by the offeror to be evaluated as part of the price volume must be submitted as part of the price volume. All information intended by the offeror to be evaluated as part of the technical volume must be submitted as part of the technical volume. Do not merely cross-reference similar material between the technical and price volumes.

This submission will be electronically submitted. Digital submissions will occur using Department of Defense Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) https://safe.apps.mil/ using the link sent by the contract specialist to a SAM-registered POC email address. Offerors shall request a password to submit their proposal at least three days before the close of the Request for Proposal (RFP). The request email shall have the project title and solicitation number in the Subject line. Send email request for password to Harold.e.teague@usace.army.mil no later than three days before the close of the RFP date/time.

4.1.1 Marking of Proposal Volumes.

Mark each volume as either the “Price Volume” PDF or the “Technical Volume” PDF. This will be an electronic submission. The Technical Volume and Price Volume will be separate searchable Adobe PDF.

4.1.2 Tabbing of Proposal Volumes.

Offers are to be formatted and tabbed in accordance with the instructions that follow for each proposal volume.

4.1.3 Table of Contents.

Include a table of contents for each proposal volume.

5. TECHNICAL VOLUME

5.1 NUMBER OF SETS OF THE TECHNICAL VOLUME.

Submit the Technical proposal volume in an electronic format, using a searchable bookmarked “pdf” file format which will become part of the contract.

5.2 FORMAT, CONTENTS, AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE TECHNICAL VOLUME.

Use 8-1/2” x 11” pages for the narrative portions of the proposal. There is not a page limit for the overall technical proposal; however, there may be limits imposed at the tab level. Organize your technical proposal as indicated below. The tabs directly correlate to the technical evaluation factors. Although the Government may use information contained anywhere within the technical proposal in its evaluation of any technical evaluation criteria, the Government is not obligated to search for or to consider information that is not located in the specified location.

Number the pages. Do not include information pertaining to your proposed pricing for this project in the technical proposal. Limit your submittals to the information specified; excess evaluated. For purposes of the electronic version of the proposal, “tabs” means searchable PDF bookmarks.

TAB CONTENTS

1. FACTOR 1 – Experience and Capability (separate PDF)

2. FACTOR 2 – Schedule (separate PDF)

3. FACTOR 3 – Past Performance (separate PDF)

5.2.1 FACTOR ONE – EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITY

Offerors shall submit at least two (2) example projects, but no more than four (4) for the proposed “relevant” projects demonstrating that the prime and subcontractor(s) demonstrate recent and relevant experience and capability to successfully perform work similar in size, scope, and complexity to the project described in this solicitation.

For this factor, a proposal will be considered relevant and therefore “acceptable”, only if at least TWO of the submitted projects meet all of the following criteria:

(a) Example project shows experience as a prime contractor on a project of similar size and scope.

(b) Example project includes airfield paving on or near an active flight line.

(c) Example project shows experience Valued at $5M or greater

(d) Example project was completed within the last 5 years

Projects considered “recent” must have been completed and turned over within the 5 years preceding the date of this solicitation to the time that proposals are due. Do not submit construction projects that are not either complete or substantially complete. For this purpose, “substantially complete” means that only punch list items remain for project acceptance or that the 95% of the elements of the project have been turned over to the customer for beneficial occupancy.

If an Offeror presents a project that is less than 95% complete, the proposal must include an explanation why that project should be considered substantially complete.

Complete the Attachment – Contractor’s Project Experience Form for example projects in Factor 1.

If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies, state if the example project represents a joint venture of the listed parties.

Please number your project submissions and include a matrix similar to the one below for purposes of matching your submissions to their applicable experience areas:

Evaluation Areas Project #1 Project #2 Prime Contractor / Sub-Contractor

Airfield Paving on or near an active flight line

Project valued at $5M or greater

Completed within the last 5 years

Offerors shall provide all of the information requested herein and complete the form Attachment-Contractor’s Project Experience for each project submitted for Relevant Experience Subcontractor(s).

A Letter of Commitment and Authorization from the appropriate subcontractor(s) shall be provided in the proposal.

This letter states the business concern’s intent to work on this project in the proposed specified capacity if the offeror is awarded the contract.

Where performance of a base contract and one or more options is relied upon by an offeror to meet any criterion under this Factor, the same base contract and contract option(s) will be evaluated for purposes of the remaining criteria for Relevant Experience (and Past Performance).

The narrative is limited to ten (10) 8-1/2” x 11” pages.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

If any of the above requirements are not met in Factor 1 above, Factor 1 will be given a rating of ‘Unacceptable’.

See Table 1- Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings in Section 2.5.

5.2.2 FACTOR 2: SCHEDULE

The schedule must show adequate detail, logic and sequences to demonstrate Offeror’s can meet the required completion date. The Offeror shall use a critical path method in either the Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) or the Arrow Diagram Method (ADM); however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The construction schedule must show that all construction activities (Base contract plus Options) are complete within the period of performance, using the assumptions and required minimum milestones listed below.

The schedule must include all required milestones, identify the critical path(s), include appropriate timing of long lead time elements, and meet the required construction period of performance from NTP. The schedule must be provided in Primavera 6. Electronic copy is required in PDF format for the evaluation review board.

Narrative Report. Offerors are required to include a Narrative Report that describes and discusses the rationale, assumptions and thought process used in generating the schedule to support project delivery performance. It must include a description of activities along identified critical path(s), a description of any anticipated problem areas or delaying factors and their potential impact, and an explanation of mitigating actions that will be required.

This Narrative Report should convey to the Government the Offeror’s thorough analysis of the schedule output with overlapping features of work, and its plans to compensate for any problems either known or potential, which are revealed through that analysis.

ASSUMPTIONS:

All Offerors must use an anticipated notice to proceed (NTP) date of 25 April 2022 to begin the 18-calendar month Period of Performance; and schedule to assume exercise of the Options unilaterally at the time of award.

The Schedule must include activities on or near the critical path, including the following MINIMUM activities and/or milestones (in no particular order):

i. NTP

ii. Mobilization

iii. Initial Partnering Session iv.Construction Activities detailed to the “Feature of Work” level, including:

v.Adverse Weather vi.Long Lead Items (if applicable) vii.Final Commissioning System Testing (if applicable) viii.Electrical System Testing (if applicable) ix.Pre-Final Inspections x.Final Inspections xi.Substantial completion date xii.Project Completion

The schedule is limited to six (6) 11” x 17” pages.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Factor 2 shall be considered “Acceptable” if all of the following requirements are met:

• Does the schedule show completion of the project within the POP as listed on page one of the solicitation?

• Are all the milestones included within the schedule?

If any of the above requirements are not met in Factor 2 above, Factor 2 will be given a rating of ‘Unacceptable’.

See Table 1- Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings in Section 2.5.

5.2.3 FACTOR THREE – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.2.3.1 Offerors shall provide past performance information for each project submitted for Factor One – Relevant Experience.

In addition to the information provided for Factor One – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF SUBCONTRACTOR, offerors shall provide for each submitted project a copy of any interim and the final performance evaluations for the project, and any letters of appreciation or awards.

For any projects that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions.

Offerors shall provide a copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received by the offeror for each submitted project and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror and its team members to submit to the client for each project submitted under Factor 1. Submit completed PPQs with the proposal. If the offeror cannot obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal due date, then complete and submit the first page of the PPQ showing all contact and client info with the proposal. The Offeror shall provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information in a timely manner.

If the client requests, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, via email at Harold.e.teague@usace.army.mil NO LATER THAN seven (7) days prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs by reference. Offerors may also include performance recognition documents received within the last 3 years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, PPQs submitted on prior RFPs, past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of entities (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS);

and other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, Fee Determining Officials, and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

For reference and evaluation purposes the Offeror shall identify who will perform the major or critical aspects of the project.

The Government reserves the right to evaluate the past performance of any subcontractor identified in the offeror’s proposal as part of its assessment of the acceptability of that offeror’s proposal.

Regardless of the rating or evaluation terminology used in any past performance information, the Government will make an independent determination of the acceptability or non-acceptability of an offeror’s past performance based on the totality of information considered.

Past performance shall be considered ‘Acceptable’ if the following requirement is met:

• There is a PPQ or CPARS report provided for each sample project listed for Factor 1 that is rated at least Satisfactory or above.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

If the above requirement is not met for Factor 3, Factor 3 will be given a rating of ‘Unacceptable’. See Table 2 - Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings.

6. PRICE VOLUME

6.1 NUMBER OF SETS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

The Price Proposal is to be submitted in one complete electronic PDF copy. The tabs below should be bookmarked in a searchable ‘pdf” file.

6.2 FORMAT, CONTENTS, AND LIST OF TABS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Use only 8-1/2” x 11” pages. There are no page limits for the price proposal; however, limit responses to required information. Excess information will not be evaluated. Organize your price proposal as indicated below. For the price volume only, “tab” means a bookmark on a searchable PDF document. If a tab is not applicable to your proposal, omit that tab but do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

1. Proposal Cover Sheet

2. SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments: Joint Venture

3. Pricing Schedule

4. Line Item Breakdown

5. Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

6. Bid Guarantee

7. Pre-Award Survey

6.3 DETAILED SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Tab 1 of the Price Proposal: Proposal Cover Sheet.

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c)(2). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition” is incorporated by reference in Section 00 21 00. The format and content for the proposal cover sheet follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, DUNS Number, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror.

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the Solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

(End of Proposal Cover Sheet)

Tab 2 of the Price Proposal: SF 1442; Acknowledgement of Amendments; Joint Venture Agreement.

The Standard Form (SF) 1442 must be completed by the offeror and duly executed with an original signature by the official(s) identified in the proposal cover sheet as authorized to bind the offeror in accordance with FAR 4.102, which includes specific instructions pertaining to individuals, partnerships, corporations, Joint Venture participants, and agents. Include the offeror’s DUNS number in block 14 of the SF 1442, along with the offeror’s address. All amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment. If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV agreement and indicate its status.

Tab 3 of the Price Proposal: Pricing Schedule.

Submit the completed Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN) Schedule (Section 00 10 00) with the offeror’s proposed contract prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for all contract line items (except for those CLINs deleted from the solicitation). Unit prices must be extended to the actual “dollar and cents” amounts (e.g., to two decimal places). Do not round off the extended prices to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission. Any qualification of pricing may render the proposal unacceptable and therefore not eligible for award. However, offerors are encouraged to use callouts, footnotes, etc. to explain their lines of thinking where it would aid in the Government finding the price(s) fair and reasonable.

Tab 4 of the Price Proposal: Work Breakout Structure Submit a Work Breakdown Structure of the offeror’s proposed contract prices, for each line item in the CLIN Schedule, using the format below, in accordance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-740-05.

01 SUBSTRUCTURE 11 ELECTRIC POWER AND LIGHTING

02 SUPERSTRUCTURE 12 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

03 EXTERIOR CLOSURE 13 EQUIPMENT

04 ROOFING 14 FURNISHINGS

05 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION 15 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION

06 INTERIOR FINISHES 16 SELECTIVE BUILDING DEMOLITION

07 CONVEYING SYSTEMS 17 SITE PREPARATION

08 PLUMBING 18 SITE IMPROVEMENTS

09 HVAC M2 19 SITE CIVIL/MECHANICAL UTILITIES

10 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 20 SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITIES

21 DESIGN EFFORT

Tab 5 of the Price Proposal: Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors.

The offeror must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the “System for Award Management” (SAM) website in accordance with FAR 52.204-8. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete. In addition, the offeror must also complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in Section 00 45 00 of the solicitation.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must complete the beta.sam.gov Representations and Certifications and Section 00 45 00.

Tab 6 of the Price Proposal: Bid Guarantee.

Bid Guarantee. All Offerors must submit a bid guarantee, (e.g., Standard Form 24, Bid bond) which complies with the requirements of FAR 28.101 Bid Guarantees, and any Defense and Army supplements thereto.

Tab 7 of the Price Proposal: Pre-Award Survey Information.

a. The contracting officer is required to make an affirmative pre-award determination of the prospective contractor’s responsibility in accordance with the mandatory requirements of Part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its supplements. The contracting officer must have sufficient information available to determine that a prospective contractor meets these minimum standards. Therefore, the offeror is requested to provide the pre-award survey information described below with its price proposal:

(1) The completed Construction Contractor Data Form with Supplemental Schedules A-C (see format which follows). If the offeror is a large multi-segmented business concerns, the data provided on the supplemental schedules may be limited to information that directly pertains to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) proposed to perform work under the prospective contract with its own work force. If the offer is being submitted by a Joint Venture, submit a separate form for each Joint Venture participant. The offeror may submit pre-award survey information in another format, provided that the information furnished is substantially the same as that which would be furnished on the Construction Contractor Data Form and its supplemental schedules.

(2) Current financial statements. If the financial statement is more than 60 days old, submit a certificate stating that the firm's financial condition is substantially the same, or, if not the same, state the changes that have taken place. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each participant in the Joint Venture.

(3) Banking information. Provide letters from banks or other financial institutions with which the contractor conducts business. The letters should contain information about your firm's accounts, loans, lines of credit, etc. The Government is interested in financial stability, timely payments, the length and nature of the relationship between the firm and the financial institution, and the firm's financial ability to perform the contract. The letters should also provide the name and telephone number of the bank representative the Government may contact. If a Joint Venture, provide this information for each Joint Venture participant.

b. The Government will treat the pre-award survey information submitted by the offeror as proprietary.

(End of Summary of Changes)