Pre-Proposal Conference Script.pdf
PDF 126 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91238-10-R-0026
About this file
Pre-Proposal Conference Script
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W91238-10-R-0026 October 13, 2010 FY11 General Instruction Building Presidio of Monterey
Pre-Proposal Conference Meeting Minutes for the Contractual Segment
Presentation by Gregory Tom on October 13, 2010 at 9:30am at Presidio of
Monterey, California
On behalf of the Corps of Engineers, I’d like to welcome you to today’s Pre-proposal
Conference for Solicitation W91238-10-R-0026, titled “FY11 General Instruction
Building at Presidio of Monterey.” My name is Gregory Tom. I am the contracting officer helping Mrs. Samantha Plank who is the primary point of contacts throughout the solicitation process. Mrs. Plank’s telephone number and email address are found in the synopsis that is posted on FedBizOpps and also in Section 00100 of the Request for
Proposal (RFP).
If you have any questions, whether contractual, technical, or otherwise, you must submit them via the Bidder Inquiry System. This database is being required to be utilized in an effort to ensure that unfair advantages are not given to anyone, even a perceived advantage. In order to submit a question, you will need to use the “Bidder’s Inquiry
Key”, which is a 12-digit pass-code found under Section 00100 of the RFP. When a question is submitted, it is assigned to the appropriate individual for evaluation; once the evaluation is provided, the question/comment is then replied to and then becomes viewable by anyone, as long as they use the Bidder’s Inquiry Key to log in. As I stated earlier, by using this system a more appreciably level playing field is fostered. It may seem a bit cumbersome to some, but this is done so that everyone is able to see the questions and answers exactly the same. One note of caution: Questions will not be accepted in Bidder’s Inquiry System beginning 10 days prior to the proposal due date. These Pre-proposal Conference Meeting minutes that I’m reading from right now and the sign-in sheet will be posted to the FedBizOpps website. I strongly encourage each of you to register to receive notification of changes to the solicitation on
FedBizOpps.
I need to emphasize at this point that nothing said here today qualifies or changes the terms and conditions of the solicitation. The solicitation can only be changed by formal amendment (Standard Form 30) to the RFP.
So far, no amendments have been issued. Again, amendments will be posted on
FedBizOpps, but it is the contractor’s ultimate responsibility to check FedBizOpps regularly for any updates. A future amendment will be issued to add the missing Factor 5 instructions and evaluation criteria.
The purpose of my briefing today is to briefly discuss the contractual aspects of the solicitation, with emphasis on the submission of your proposal and the evaluation process. We take the time to do this because many firms may not be familiar with the process we will be using, which is usually called either “competitive negotiation” or “best value trade-off source selection”. We have found from past experience that a small investment of our time, up front, greatly improves the quality and accuracy of proposals and reduces the likelihood that we will have to reject a proposal due to non-conformance with the solicitation’s submission requirements.
The information I’m going to review, and all information in the RFP, is very important.
The RFP procedures vary substantially from the sealed bidding/IFB process.
There will not be a public bid opening as occurs with Invitation For Bids, or IFBs.
Nonetheless, offers must be received by the specified time at the specified place.
Presently, offers are due by November 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM Local Time in our
Sacramento District office. There is no parking in our building, so if you plan to hand-carry your proposal on the due date, be sure to allow sufficient time to find parking and submit your proposal package to the individual in our building’s lobby at 1325 J Street.
We utilize a satellite clock for time accuracy and once the clock reaches 3:00 pm, any additional offers will be rejected in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. You are urged to pay attention to the Directions for Submitting Offers, which are spelled out on the first few pages of Section 00100 of the RFP.
Under a competitive IFB situation, after a bid opening the bids become public information. That is not the case in the RFP process. The only information you will receive during the evaluation process will pertain to your own proposal. We will not release the names of the firms that submitted offers. Even under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), if RFP procedures are used, U.S. Code limits releasable information after contract award. Specifically, only the contract number, contract awardee and address, and contract amount is releasable; this is the same information that will be posted as an Award Announcement in FedBizOpps.
The RFP process takes much longer to get to an award than sealed bidding, since both price and technical evaluations are required. This solicitation requires a 60-day government acceptance period.
At this point, I’d like to go through the solicitation and point out areas of special concern based on commonly made mistakes, and the general organizational structure of the RFP.
STANDARD FORM 1442
This form is used for soliciting offers, submitting offers, and making the award. The bottom of the form provides the time and date set for receipt of proposals as previously discussed. It also indicates that an offer guarantee is required. The required amount is
20% of the total price, but Not To Exceed (NTE) $3 million. It also informs you the number of days the performance and payment bonds must be furnished after contract award. The second page of the SF1442 (technically the reverse side of page 1) is critical.
In Block 14, you must enter your company’s name and address exactly as it appears in
Central Contractor Registration (CCR) and provide your CAGE code in the ‘Code’ block.
Your telephone number is entered in Block 15. You must acknowledge all amendments
(both Amendment number and date) in Block 19. Lastly, Block 20A is the typed or printed name of the individual authorized to sign the offer with their signature in Block
20B, and the signature date is entered in Block 20C. If you are a joint venture, partnership, or corporation, you must also complete the continuation pages, three and four.
PRICING SCHEDULE
Behind the SF1442 continuation sheets is the pricing schedule. Prices must be submitted for all items as indicated. Please verify your calculations…errors are too common. Excel is a wonderful program; however do not “round off” extended totals and use only two decimal places. Using more than two decimal places creates mathematical issues. As you look through the Pricing Schedule, please note that the project is structured with
Base Items and NO Option Items. Please note the last page of the Pricing Schedule, as it contains notes that should be read and understood. For this acquisition, the HUBZone price evaluation preference WILL apply in accordance with FAR clause 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns. The Small
Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Price Evaluation Adjustment will NOT apply to this procurement as it is currently suspended for DoD.
SECTION 00100
Section 00100 is next. The RFP includes the FAR and DFARS provisions pertaining to this solicitation as well as any local supplements. Please note that this section specifies that FAX and telegraphic offers will not be accepted. The provision at FAR 52.215-1, ‘Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition” summarizes the rules of the source selection process that we will use. It should be read very carefully. Note that it says that you need to submit your best offer up front, as you may not get another chance. Also note that a proposal can be rejected by the Government if the pricing is materially unbalanced.
The provision 52.216-1, Type of Contract says the Government contemplates award of a
“firm, fixed-price construction contract”.
If an offeror is considering use of a foreign construction material, pay close attention to
FAR 52.225-12, Notice of Buy American Act Requirement – Construction Materials
Under Trade Agreements. This provision cross-references Contract Clause 52.225-11
Buy American Act – Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements of Section 00700.
SECTION 00111
PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS, BASIS OF AWARD,
AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
Section 00111 provides detailed instructions how to prepare and format your proposal for submission. In addition, it separates the Price Proposal Volume from the Technical
Proposal Volume and lists the respective submittals for each as Tabs 1 through 8 and
Tabs 1 through 5 respectively.
To reiterate, Section 00111 provides detailed instructions for preparing and submitting your proposal, which will consist of both a price proposal and a technical proposal. The technical and pricing proposals are to be submitted separately. You are required to submit one (1) original price proposal and no copies. For the Technical Proposal, submit one (1) original plus five (5) copies. In addition, we need one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) in PDF format.
In preparing your offer, do not presume that the Government has any prior knowledge of your firm. Be sure to structure your proposal in strict compliance with the instructions in the solicitation. Use the specified formats exactly; doing so is to your benefit and will aid the Source Selection Board evaluators in reviewing your proposal. In some areas, we may be requiring very specific information in specified formats and with page limits in order to streamline the evaluation.
The following suggestions are provided to help you avoid making mistakes that could negatively impact your competitive standing:
- When submitting information using a specified format, you do not have to include the instructions we give you for completing each block in your submission. Just identify the block with the number and heading and provide the required information.
If you have any questions as to our intent, please enter your question in the Bidder’s
Inquiry System. Remember, Bidder’s Inquiry System will become inoperable beginning
10 days prior to the proposal due date, so please don’t delay entering your questions.
--If a Key Subcontractor provides information to you about their experience in a different format than what the solicitation requires, you are responsible to modify that information into the required format. If you just submit the information “as is”, more than likely critical information will be missing that could impact your evaluation results.
Starting at paragraph 4 of Section 00111, the Price Proposal Volume is discussed. The format for the price proposal is shown as Tabs 1 through 8. Please ensure that the specified requirements are complied with. Tab 4 is asking for a price breakout for 20 work breakout structures. Submit fully burden amounts for each of these elements.
Special Note for Unrestricted Procurements
The pre-award survey and the subcontracting plan often cause confusion, because there may be some overlap with the information required in the technical proposal. Include the appropriate information in both places exactly as specified in the RFP. The Price and
Technical Proposals are evaluated separately.
At this time, I’d like to briefly review the Technical Proposal Volume, which begins in paragraph 5. These are critical pages to understand because it identifies the format, contents and list of Tabs for the Technical Proposal Volume. Each Tab and its required content are identified on the subsequent pages. The Evaluation Factors are: 1) Technical
Approach; 2) Experience and Capability; 3) Past Performance; 4) Key Personnel; and 5)
Socio-Economic Consideration. There are sample submission documents within Section
00111 that you can refer to when preparing your proposal.
Preface
Discussion of this submission begins in paragraph 5.3. The preface introduces the team proposed to perform on this project with an introduction narrative and a summary list.
The narrative provides information about the Prime and Key Subcontractor(s) to include their role, authority, and major work elements they will perform and Key Personnel to include their duties, responsibilities and authorities.
Factor 1: Technical Approach
Factor 1 has three parts; a technical narrative, project schedule, and statement of compliance. The technical narrative describes the offeror’s approach to the construction of the General Instruction Building from site prep to clean-up, any significant problems or major difficulties anticipated in performing or accomplishing the work, and to the safety and quality control. The project schedule graphically illustrates the proposed integration, scheduling, and phasing of the major features on the critical and near-critical path broken down to the “Feature of Work.” The Offeror’s statement of compliance is only required to be submitted and signed if proposing a shorter duration than 720 calendar days.
Factor 2: Experience and Capability
Factor 2 requires the offeror to provide specific information regarding both their own experience as well as any proposed Key Subcontractors and corporate resumes. The offeror is required to submit at least two example projects for themselves and the Key
Subcontractors proposed to perform one of the five capability areas. The “example projects” must demonstrate capabilities in the following areas: 1) construction/project management as a Prime Contractor; 2) steel frame construction effort; 3) erecting/operating the crane effort; 4) electrical construction effort; and 5) mechanical construction effort. Example projects completed after 2005 are considered recent. For each example project use the Project Information Form format to provide the requested information.
Factor 3: Past Performance
This factor concentrates on information that will be used to evaluate the past performance record of the offeror and proposed Key Subcontractors. Past performance evaluation information should be provided on the example projects submitted under the Experience and Capability factor. If an official written performance rating or evaluation is not available (e.g., Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS)), have a reference submit a completed Past Performance Questionnaire. The Government may utilize information other than that supplied by the offeror in its evaluation of past performance.
For each example projects provide under Factor 1, additional information is used in the evaluation of past performance: Compliance with socio-economic requirements, safety record, performance problems, quality awards, contract prices, and completion dates.
Letters of Commitment and Authorization must be submitted from each proposed Key
Subcontractor.
Factor 4: Key Personnel
The resume describes the experience and qualification on similar construction project(s) for the proposed on-site Project Manager, construction on-site Project Superintendent, Contractor Quality Control System Manager, and the Project Scheduler. For each resume use the provided sample resume format for key personnel. Dates must include months and years.
Factor 5: Socio-Economic Consideration
Offeror provide their proposed small business participations by the various categories, e.g. woman-owned, service disable veteran, historically black colleges and universities/minority institutions, and small disadvantaged businesses, etc. Provide the information using the sample format even if none are proposed.
EVALUATION
Section 00111 includes information on how the price and technical proposals will be evaluated. Paragraph 2.4 and 2.5 states how the price proposal and technical proposal submissions will be evaluated.
Paragraph 2.3 is very important, as it gives the relative importance of technical and price considerations. In this solicitation, technical (non-price) factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The Relative Weighting of the Technical Evaluation Factors and their relative weights are identified in paragraph 2.6. For this project, Factor 1 – Technical Approach is the most heavily weighted factor.
Factor 2 – Experience and Capability is weighted less than Factor 1, Factor 3 – Past Performance is weighted less than Factor 2, Factor 4 – Key Personnel is weighted less than Factor 3, and Factor 5 – Socio-Economic Consideration is the least heavily weighted factor it is weighted significantly less than any other evaluation factor.
How each Factor will be evaluated is described in more detail within each Factor’s requested information under the subparagraph entitled “Evaluation Criteria”. These subparagraphs explain how the Government intends to evaluate the proposals that are received.
In summary, we strongly recommend that you read and become familiar with this
Section. Refer to it often while preparing your technical proposal and then review it again before you finalize your technical proposal. Ensure that your technical proposal has accurately presented your company’s and your key subcontractors’ ability to successfully complete this project. Be sure that all required information has been provided, and prepared in the prescribed format, because with the exception of past performance, our evaluation must be based strictly on the information presented in your technical proposal. Omitted information could cause your proposal to be considered unacceptable, and therefore ineligible for award. Pay attention to the words “must” and
“shall”. If you fail to provide information the government tells the offeror he/she must or shall provide and he/she fails to provide it, it would likely result in a material omission and thereby a deficiency in the proposal.
You also need to be aware of the potential impacts of submitting excess information.
Excess information will NOT be evaluated. For example, if you were to submit three pages when only two pages were allowed, the third page would not be evaluated. This could have a major impact on your evaluation results if critical information is not considered because it was on the third page. This also applies to the example projects. If it is not clear what example projects demonstrate what capability, the first example project will be considered the first until the maximum number of allowable example projects are evaluated and then the remaining example projects will be considered excess.
AWARD
Next I would like to briefly summarize the evaluation, selection, and award process.
Initially the price and technical evaluation of your proposal are done separately. This prevents the technical evaluators from being influenced by any pricing considerations.
After the conclusion of these two separate evaluations, the Contracting Officer will determine whether or not award can be made on the basis of initial offers. If this can’t be done, the Contracting Officer will determine the competitive range for the project. If and when the Contracting Officer determines the competitive range for the project, we will inform those offerors determined to be in the competitive range, that they are included in the competitive range for the purpose of discussions (negotiations). The competitive range will consist of the most highly rated proposals. When necessary, the competitive range can be further reduced for purposes of efficiency. Discussions may involve one, or multiple, revisions to an offeror’s proposal and could often include solicitation amendments. All firms still in the competitive range at the conclusion of discussions will be given the opportunity to submit a final proposal revision. But, I need to repeat… you need to submit your best offer initially. There may not be a second chance if you are eliminated from the competitive range on the basis of your initial offer.
The Contracting Officer will select for award the proposal which offers the best value to the Government, which may not be either the lowest priced offer or the offer with the highest technical rating. The decision will involve a comparison of the strengths, weaknesses, and risks in each proposal along with the prices offered. The award will be made to the Offeror that provides the best combination in the judgment of the Contracting
Officer, who will be the Source Selection Authority.
SECTION 00600
REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
The next section of the solicitation is 00600, which contains the Representations and
Certifications that must be completed by each offeror. For Joint Ventures, separate forms must be submitted. The forms must be completed in their entirety and submitted with your pricing proposal. Please be very sure to correctly indicate the proper size status for your company.
SECTION 00700
CONTRACT CLAUSES
Section 00700 contains the FAR and DFARS contract clauses required by law and regulation. They are either provided in full text or not. Full text can be found on http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ or similar website. These clauses contain important information, including the following:
--The performance period is 720 calendar days after notice to proceed as identified on the
SF Form 1442.
--Performance and payment bonds, each equal to 100% of the contract price, will be required (FAR 52.228-15). The successful offeror will be required to provide payment and performance bonds within 10 calendar days after award of the contract.
--Progress payments will be made monthly or more frequently based on percentage of work satisfactorily completed (FAR 52.232-5).
--The due date for invoice payments is 14 calendar days after receipt of a proper payment request by the designated billing office (FAR 52.232-27).
--The contractor is required to perform on the site, with its own organization, work equivalent to at least 20% of the total amount of work to be performed under the contract
(FAR 52.236-1).
-- Permits and Responsibilities (FAR 52.236-7). This clause states that it is the contractor’s responsibility to obtain any necessary licenses and permits, at no additional cost to the Government. In addition, the contractor is responsible for compliance with any Federal, State, and municipal laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the performance of work. Contractors are responsible for all damages to persons or property that occur as a result of the Contractor’s fault or negligence; and contractors are responsible for all materials delivered and work performed until completion and acceptance of the entire work, except for any completed unit of work which may have been accepted under the contract.
SECTION 00800
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
Section 00800 includes critical information, including the following:
--Minimum Insurance Requirements - This clause list the various minimum required insurance.
--Partnering - The Government intends to encourage the foundation of a cohesive partnership with the Contractor and its subcontractors. The objectives are effective and efficient contract performance and intended to achieve completion within budget, on schedule, and in accordance with plans and specifications.
This concludes my formal remarks. I need to remind you that all questions must be submitted via the Bidder’s Inquiry System, which will be unavailable beginning 10 days prior to the proposal due date.
I would also like to remind you that anything discussed here today does not change the solicitation, unless incorporated into the solicitation by a formal amendment. This concludes our pre-proposal conference. I realize that your time is valuable and would like to thank you for your time to attend today, your attention and your interest in this project. We look forward to your proposals.
COMMENTS MADE AT PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE WALK
Factor 2 key subcontractor for steel frame structure construction effort will be clarified if the fabricator or the erector.
Comment about the soil at the parking lot area will be addressed via Bidder Inquiry
Comment on the STC rating will be looked into and clarified
The legal completion date for the FY09 GIB will be provided
Copies of ORCA pages do not need to be submitted (the offeror must complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in Section 00600 of the solicitation)
Stated that a specification modification will be forth coming addressing
1) water distribution line. working the final connection for the building (environmental concerns with endangered species habitat surrounding the water tank). This will impact sheets C170-175.
2) cistern design. The building cistern design is changing and will incorporate specifications and require changes for sheets P-552 and C162.
3) storm water specification. The storm water specification is not complete based on the JUL10 regulatory changes - the specification is being tailored to POM. Temporary storm water control specification will be replaced, 01 57 23.00 41
4) contour line intervals elevations. Reproduction error created unreadable black boxes around elevations for sheets V-100 to V-104
5) sidewalk design at lower parking lot.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .