W911YN-18-R-0001-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

1. Notice of Site Visit for seed projects. An organized site visit is scheduled for Wednesday, April 11, 2018, beginning at 9:30 am Eastern.

Follow instructions in solicitation Section 00100, paragraph 1.5., for requirements to attend. Participants arriving at the main gate after 9:30 am may be denied access by security forces. Participants shall sign in on the attendance roster.

2. Section 00010 changes. Attachment 7- Asbestos Survey and Lead-Based Paint Inspection for Buildings 19 and 20, is added.

Attachments D-1 and D-2 are revised to remove language providing instructions in the "Detailed Price Proposal" section. Section 00110 is revised at section 2.1, "Volume 2, PART I --Technical Capability Proposal", in order to remove language limiting this part to 20 pages. Section 00110 as changed appears in the continuation. Section 00120 is revised at section 1.A, in order to correct language regarding the number of contracts the government intends to aw ard. Sections 00010, 00110, and 00120, as changed, are in the continuation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911YN-18-R-0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Mar-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Apr-2018

CODE

USPFO FOR FLORIDA

P O BOX 1008

189 MARINE STREET

ST AUGUSTINE FL 32085-1008

W911YN 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911YN-18-R-0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The following have been modified:

00010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD SF 1442 and SF 1442 BACK

SECTION 00010 - PRICING SCHEDULE, NOTES

SECTION 00100 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS (to be removed in award)

SECTION 00600- REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (to be removed in award)

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1 – PLANS Seed Project # LSGA132007 Dated December 13, 2017

ATTACHMENT 2 -- SPECIFICATIONS See Project LSGA132007 Dated January 6, 2016

ATTACHMENT 3 – PLANS Seed Project LSGA132001 Dated December 13, 2017

ATTACHMENT 4 -- SPECIFICATIONS Seed Project LSGA132001 Dated February 22, 2016

ATTACHMENT 5- SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS DOCUMENT

DATED to be inserted at award

ATTACHMENT 6 - MATOC DIVISION 01, SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

ATTACHMENT 7 - Asbestos Survey and Lead-Based Paint Inspection Buildings 19 and 20

Note: Master Specs to be provided at time of Award

EXHIBIT A - PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY QUESTIONNAIRE

EXHIBIT B - SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING INFORMATION AND CONSENT FORM

EXHIBIT C - PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

EXHIBIT D-1 Rev 1 SEED PROJECT INFORMATION AND PRICING SOLICITATION Project # LSGA132007 EXHIBIT D-2 Rev 1 SEED PROJECT INFORMATION AND PRICING SOLICITATION Project # LSGA132001

EXHIBIT E - LETTER OF INTENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

NOTES

The following apply to this contract:

1. Task orders in the following location(s) are applicable to this contract: (to be completed by the

Contracting Officer at time of award)

2. In addition to Task Orders issued on a small business set-aside basis Contractor is eligible to compete for Task Orders set-aside for: (to be completed by the Contracting Officer at time of award)

3. Applicable Maximum order dollar values (to be completed by the Contracting Officer at time of award).

4. Contractor’s attention is invited to Attachment 6, MATOC Division 01 Special Contract Requirements.

Important information on the Task Order process is contained therein. Offerors are encouraged to read this section in its entirety to reach a better understanding of the Multiple Award Task Order Process.

The minimum guaranteed Task Order amount for the entire contract period, to include any exercised option periods, is $2,000.00 per IDIQ contract awarded.

5. The term “Contracting Officer” is applicable to this Solicitation and resulting contract(s).

6. Reference Contract Clause 252.236-7008, CONTRACT PRICES – BIDDING SCHEDULES. The term

Bidding Schedule shall also be construed to mean Offer Schedule or Schedule. The terms “bid” and “offer” shall be construed as having the same meaning in this solicitation and resulting contract(s) and any future Task Orders.

7. Reference Contract Clause 52.228-15, PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. Applicability will be defined in individual MATOC orders. A bid bond shall be required with all proposals submitted in response to a request for proposal that is estimated above $150,000.

8. The Government intends to execute Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) with an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contracts pursuant to this solicitation. Federally warranted Contracting Officers at any National Guard activities in the State of Florida may place Task Orders against resulting contracts. See Attachment 6, MATOC Division 01 Special Contract Requirements.

9. DO NOT insert prices in the Basic CLINs provided immediately after the SF 1442. Instructions for the preparation of proposals are located in Sections 00100, 00110 and 00120.

AREAS OF CONSIDERATION – OFFERORS MUST RETURN THE FOLLOWING WITH THEIR PROPOSAL

NOTE: OFFERORS MUST COMPLETE AREAS OF CONSIDERATION BELOW AND RETURN WITH

PROPOSAL.

1. LOCATIONS OF WORK – Contractors shall identify all location(s) they desire to be considered for award of individual task orders. Contractors will be provided a fair opportunity to compete for Task Orders at those locations checked within the dollar range selected below, if they are awarded a contract.

PLACE AN “X” IN THE BLOCK (OF ALL THAT APPLY) IF YOUR FIRM WILL ACTIVELY PURSUE

PROJECT(s) AT THESE LOCATIONS

125TH Fighter Wing, JACKSONVILLE, FL

CAMP BLANDING JOINT TRAINING CENTER

STARKE, FL

MacDill AFB Tampa, FL

Space Coast

Cape Canaveral AFS Patrick AFB Cape Canaveral, Fl Cocoa Beach, FL

All other areas of FL not listed with the following stated exceptions:

2. DOLLAR VALUE OF PROJECTS

Each Contractor must be interested in receiving consideration for each order under the MATOC within the contract limits of $2,000-$5,000,000.

End of Section 00010

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00110

SECTION 00110

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:

1.1. These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposal data. They are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals. Carefully review this section prior to commencing proposal preparation. In order for proposals to receive full consideration for award, offerors should ensure that the information furnished in support of the proposal is factual, accurate, and complete.

1.2. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and elimination from consideration for award. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with FAR Clause 52.215-1, and Instructions to Offerors.

2. PROPOSAL CONTENT:

2.1 Prospective offerors shall submit the proposal in two separate binders.

Submit Volume 1, Price proposal, pro forma documents, in one (1) original, three (3) hard copies, and one

(1) electronic copy on a CD in accordance with the instructions contained herein.

Submit Volume 2 in one (1) original, three (3) hard copies, and one (1) electronic copy on a CD in accordance with the instruction contained herein.

Volume 2, PART I --Technical Capability Proposal Subfactor 1 – Experience and Capability Subfactor 2 – Organization

Subfactor 3 – Specific Personnel Subfactor 4 – Quality Control Subfactor 5 – Scheduling Methodology Subfactor 6 – LEED

Volume 2 – PART II --Past/Present Performance Information

2.1.1. Although the assessment of Past/Present Performance as a specific evaluation factor is separate and distinct from the Determination of Responsibility required by FAR Part 9, Past/Present Performance information obtained herein will be used during the Government’s responsibility determination. In addition contractors shall submit a single copy of the following information in a sealed envelope with their name on the outside. This information is sought pursuant to FAR 9.105-1 and will be opened and utilized only if the contractor is selected for award. Information will be used in determining the contractor responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9. If an award is not being offered the envelope will be filed unopened with the original proposal.

2.1.2. Documentation of adequate financial resources: Provide letters of reference from financial institutions(s) concerning credit worthiness and from bonding companies indicating capability to bond to, at a minimum, the price proposed. Reference 3.1.6.2.

2.1.3. Offerors are cautioned to carefully review the proposal requirements for these Volumes and ensure a complete proposal is submitted.

2.2. PROPOSAL DUE DATE SCHEDULE:

2.2.1. The entire proposal (Volumes 1 and 2 and the CD/DVD copy) are due by the date and time set for the receipt of proposals shown in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Past/Present performance references should provide questionnaire responses to the Contracting Officer not later than the closing date of the receipt of proposals.

2.3. After compiling all required information, submit original and specified number of copies to the following office: USPFO for Florida, P&C, 189 Marine St, St Augustine, FL 32084 Mark the front of the envelope/box with the following: “PROPOSAL NO. W911YN-18-R-0001, DO NOT OPEN –Competitive Acquisition”.

2.4. PROPOSAL FORMAT:

2.4.1. Purpose: These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposed data. The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation.

2.4.2. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

2.4.3. Offerors are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the evaluation committee to fully ascertain each offeror’s capability to perform all of the requirements contemplated by this solicitation. All commitments made in the proposal may become a part of the resultant contract. The data submitted with each proposal should be complete and concise, but not overly elaborate. Excessive reliance on promotional brochures is discouraged.

2.4.4. Written proposals shall be prepared on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper (charts may be landscaped but must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper) and shall be in a legible font size (10 min.). All pages of each proposal shall be appropriately numbered, and identified with the RFP number. For ease of reference, consecutive page numbering with tabs is required.

Type size for graphics, charts, diagrams and tables shall be of an appropriate font and size for the application, and must be clearly readable without magnification assistance to the normal eye. Text lines will be no less than single-space. To the maximum extent practicable, proposal submission shall be double sided. Where page limits exist a page is defined as one single side of a page. Double sided pages count as 2 pages. Unless otherwise stated, tabs, indexes and dividers do not count in the page count.

2.4.5. Binding: Elaborate format and binding are neither necessary nor desirable. All binders will be capable of lying flat when opened. Three ring binders are preferred. The cover and spine of each binder will clearly identify the offeror’s name, Part number, RFP number, RFP title and copy number, (e.g. copy 2 of 3). The original for each volume will be clearly identified on the cover and the spine. All binders will allow for easy removal and replacement of pages.

2.4.6. Indexing: Each volume will contain a “Table of Contents” for that volume. The “Table of Contents” will identify major areas, paragraphs and subparagraphs by number and title as well as by page number and volume locations.

Tab indexing will be used to identify sections as appropriate.

2.4.7. Electronic Copy: Provide one (1) electronic copy of all of the proposal information. Electronic copies are to be submitted on DVD or CD-ROM saved in Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat format. Data provided on a flash drive or any other USB read/write media are not acceptable.

2.4.8. The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in his/her proposal, including that information provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected or removed from the competition.

3. PROPOSAL VOLUME CONTENTS: Each offeror’s proposal shall be submitted as set forth below and all information shall be confined to the appropriate part to facilitate independent evaluation. Proposals which do not include the requested minimum information may be eliminated from further consideration for award.

3.1. VOLUME 1, Part I, PRICE/COST INFORMATION AND PRO FORMA DOCUMENTS:

3.1.1. Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for Government's analysis and evaluation of price/cost for the project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation. The Government is not, and does not intend on, requesting certified cost or pricing data. Offerors may be required during the evaluation process to provided sufficient price/cost information that will enable the Government to perform a meaningful evaluation.

3.1.2. Provide an introductory page to include CAGE Code, DUNS Number, Tax Identification Number (TIN), points of contact, authorized negotiators, contact phone, facsimile numbers, and email addresses. Also, include your business socioeconomic status, e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, HUBZone small business, etc.

3.1.3. Offer and Section 00010 – Complete in its entirety the “Offeror” portion of the Standard Form (SF) 1442.

An official having the authority to contractually bind your company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with FAR 4.102.

3.1.4. Section 00010 –Areas of Consideration. Mark your selections for the Areas (Location, Price) for which you want consideration. Please note that evaluation will consider all price levels. However, you must demonstrate experience at the highest level requested to receive full consideration. If you have not performed at the higher limits consider requesting on the ascending scale. The base year will be evaluated for the level requested.

3.1.5. Representations and Certifications- Section 00600- insert the required certifications and representations and return only those shown in section 00600. Return the entire Section 00600 with your proposal. All other required representations and certifications are to be completed on line in the System for Award Management (SAM) www.sam.gov.

3.1.6. Seed Project Requirements: All offerors, regardless of the areas of consideration selected shall price the

Seed projects for evaluation purposes. Failure to provide a price with the Section 00010, Bid Schedule for the seed projects, Exhibit D-1 and D-2, is considered non-compliant with the solicitation requirements and grounds for elimination from consideration/evaluation.

3.1.6.1. Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for Government's analysis and evaluation of price/cost for the project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation.

3.1.6.2. One copy in a sealed envelope of documentation of adequate financial resources: Provide letters of reference from financial institution(s) concerning credit worthiness and from bonding companies indicating capability to bond to, at a minimum, the highest task order limit under the MATOC, $5,000,000.00. See Exhibits D-1 and D-2 for requirements for bid bond, performance and payment bonds.

3.1.6.3. Joint Venture Requirements - Parties wishing to propose as a joint venture must submit, with the Pro Forma documents, an executed copy of the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement shall be executed in accordance with FAR 4.102(d). Each joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its Board of Directors has approved its participation in the joint venture or by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity. Offerors are reminded that to obtain an award the awardee, to include a joint venture, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. Applicable to set-aside solicitations: Joint Ventures must meet applicable size standards (See FAR Subpart 19.1). Submit with the proposal any size determination for the Joint Venture entity received from the Small Business Administration. A Joint Venture where-in one party is not a small business may be referred to the Small Business Administration (IAW FAR 19.302 (b)) to determine eligibility. All questions regarding Joint Ventures must be directed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and not the Contracting Officer.

3.2. VOLUME 2, Part I, OFFEROR TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROPOSAL

Volume 2 Technical, Part 1 is comprised of six (6) subfactors:

Subfactor 1 – Experience and Capability Subfactor 2 – Organization Subfactor 3 – Specific Personnel Subfactor 4 – Quality Control Subfactor 5 – Scheduling Methodology Subfactor 6 – LEED

3.2.1. The Technical proposal shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions contained in the solicitation.

The Government acknowledges that this will involve discussion of some of the same projects/contracts discussed in the Present/Past Performance volume. While Present/Past Performance examines how an offeror performed in the past, so as to determine the probability of success on future projects, this subfactor examines the offeror’s experience with multidiscipline project management and execution and how the offeror demonstrates an understanding of the contract’s requirements taking this experience into consideration. The Government may use Exhibit A Part 1 information in the evaluation of experience. A reiteration of the information provided in Exhibit A is neither required nor desired. Offeror should reference this information by providing a short summation of their relevant experience to meet the submission requirements of this subfactor.

3.2.2. In order for the Government to evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the contract requirements, offerors are required to discuss their technical and administrative capabilities in a manner that clearly demonstrates these are adequate to meet contract requirements. Offerors shall submit information related to each subfactor in a logical manner within the proposal. Be sure to “tab” each of the subfactors: Experience and Capability, Organization, Specific Personnel, etc. in a logical manner.

3.2.3. Offerors are cautioned to read FAR Clause 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting. Resulting task orders for general construction will require a minimum of 15% of the work to be self-performed, and special trades construction will require a minimum of 25% of the work to be self-performed. Special trades construction are those with a NAICS starting with 238 where the preponderence of work to be performed will be by a specific trade. Firms must be capable of self-performing at least the minimum. The contracts resulting from this solicitation are not intended for management firms or construction firms who self-perform only administrative or management functions.

3.2.4. Subfactor 1. Experience and Capability: The Capability and Experience Proposal is limited to 20 single pages, exclusive of table of contents, tabs, and dividers. Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated. The proposal discussion should address familiarity with construction in the locations selected, relationships with local subcontractors, and familiarity with issues pertaining to work in this/these areas, including involvement of the local workforce.

3.2.5. Subfactor 2. Organization: Include an Organizational Chart listing company personnel and their roles for the areas of consideration required. Include a narrative describing personnel to include their names, duties and level of responsibility for key personnel: Project Manager, Site Superintendent(s), Quality Control Manager and Safety Manager.

State the lines of authority and duties such as overall project management, site superintendence, quality control, and safety.

Demonstrate capability to self-perform 15% of the work on general construction, and 25% of the work on special trade construction projects. If applicable, address support and interface with home office or corporate headquarters for such aspects as financial, management and technical support.

3.2.6. Subfactor 3. Specific Personnel: Provide resumes for each proposed key personnel: Project manager(s), site superintendent(s), quality control manager(s), and safety manager(s). The detailed background, education, and experience provided must meet any applicable experience qualifications included in the special contract requirements specifications. If proposed personnel are not currently on the offeror’s staff, letters of intent (Exhibit E) should be provided.

Include a narrative describing the experienced key personnel’s ability to manage multi-disciplined construction projects, which is comparable to the work requirements of this solicitation and at the dollar level and at the locations requested in areas of consideration. Refer to Attachment 6 MATOC Division 01, Special Contract Requirements, Section 8, for minimum qualifications for these key personnel and requirements for substitution and dual roles.

3.2.7. Subfactor 4. Quality Control: Provide a quality control plan that addresses the company’s program to include, but not limited to, inspections, submittal reviews, corrections of non-compliant work, and how the company addresses quality control failures and timely adjudication to include measures to assure non-reoccurrence.

3.2.8. Subfactor 5. Scheduling Methodology: Provide a construction schedule in a Gantt chart that shows the complete project schedule for each Exhibit D task order project from notice to proceed, to include all construction activities as well as concurrent activities, and outline the critical path activities that will show successful execution of the construction project within the period of performance requirements outlined in Exhibit D-1 and D-2. Also include a narrative discussing the scheduling processes and resource allocation that ensure completion and control of schedule progress from beginning to the end of the project. Each seed project shall have its own schedule; DO NOT COMBINE.

3.2.9. Subfactor 6. Experience with building to United States Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED® standards: Provide a narrative of previous projects that achieved USGBC LEED® certification, any level of recognition.

Additionally, indicate the key construction personnel who have experience and required qualifications in assigned roles with building to USGBC LEED® standards. If no experience is indicated, the proposal shall state in detail how this lack of experience is being overcome. In the event the intended key construction personnel are not part of the offeror’s organization at the time the proposal is submitted then a completed Exhibit B, “Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form” is also required or the information will not be considered.

3.3. VOLUME 2, Part II, PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

3.3.1. Volume 2 Part II is obtained for the purpose of evaluating Past/Present Performance. Past/Present

Performance includes current/on-going performance that is complete to 70% or greater. Volume 2 includes the offeror’s Performance Relevance Questionnaire, Exhibit A, Parts 1 and 2; and any discussion and or additional information, awards, letters, etc. concerning past/present performance the offeror includes. Offerors are cautioned to complete all the questions on the Exhibit A Parts 1 and Part 2. Detailed instructions are included in Exhibit A.

3.3.2. Offerors shall use the Reference Package, Exhibit C, to obtain references from past and present clients.

3.3.3. Offerors shall discuss their performance using the Performance Relevancy Questionnaire format, Exhibit

A, Part 1. Prepare a minimum of three (3) but not more than five (5) of these documents. Contractors should select their projects carefully because the quality of the contractor’s relevant performance is more important than the quantity of projects submitted.

3.3.4. Use the Exhibit A format to provide information that demonstrates a history of performance on contracts that are similar in scope, complexity, and cost magnitude to this project’s plans and specifications. Explain what aspects of the contract you find relevant to the proposed effort and identify how each contract ranks, in terms of relevancy, with respect to the other contracts addressed in proposal.

3.3.5. Offerors should consider the currency and relevancy of the past/present performance information to be considered, the performance must have been completed during the past five (5) years. The period begins five (5) years prior to the solicitation release date and includes current performance. Performance that is more current may have greater impact than older performance.

3.3.6. In determining relevancy to the solicitation requirement, offerors should consider the similarity of construction methods employed, size, scope, cost magnitude, location, client type (e.g. federal government) and complexity of work performed to those required for the proposed effort. Location should also be considered.

3.3.7. Offerors are encouraged to include with their proposal information any problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror's correction actions.

3.3.8. Offerors lacking relevant present/past performance experience may submit information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement if such information is relevant to this acquisition. Such information shall, as a minimum, include:

Name(s) of Predecessor Company/Subcontractor and/or Key Personnel Complete Address Telephone, Fax Number and email address Brief synopsis of the experience- A resume may be submitted for "Key Personnel" Describe relevancy to this project

3.3.9. Provide three (3) references, for each Predecessor Company, Subcontractor or Key Personnel. Clearly identify the contractor/individual for whom the reference information concerns.

3.3.9.1. Each proposed subcontractor/Teaming Partner must also complete an Exhibit B, “Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form”, to be considered.

3.3.10. Past Performance References – REQUIRED – A “Final” Performance Evaluation (Construction) (also referred to as a Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) Evaluation) issued for a project may be included in lieu of sending out reference package for the project OR Offerors shall prepare and submit to prior client(s) of all the projects listed on your Exhibit A submission a Reference Package (Exhibit C) (Detailed instructions are included in Exhibit C Package). This includes correspondence explaining the requirement to obtain an independent evaluation of prior contract performance, and the Past Performance Questionnaire for use in evaluating Present/Past Performance. Inform references that completed Performance Questionnaire should be returned to the Contracting Officer via email at:

Rutha.T.Lawrence.civ@mail.mil and brian.j.williams9.mil@mail.mil, to arrive no later than the closing date for receipt of proposals. Offeror must not review the Present/Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission. They are to be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the Contracting Officer. Offeror's should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner.

3.3.11. In assessing past performance, the Government may also consider the past/present performance of the offeror’s key personnel, Project Manager, Quality Control Manager, Site Superintendent, and Safety Manager as it relates to previous projects.

3.3.12. Each key person without prior past performance history demonstrated on the submitted Exhibit A shall provide a summary of experience or a resume. In the event the intended person is not part of the offeror’s organization at the time the proposal is submitted then a completed Exhibit B, “Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form” or Exhibit E, "Letter of Intent of Key Personnel", is also required or the information will not be considered. The Government may seek additional references and reserves the right to use the information provided to obtain additional references.

3.3.13. Offerors are advised that the Government may use all data provided by the offeror in this volume and data obtained from any other sources, to include, but not limited to, data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program/Project Managers, Contracting Officers or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror. The Government reserves the right to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing current accurate and complete past/present performance information rests with the offeror.

END OF SECTION 00110

SECTION 00120

SECTION 00120 PROPOSAL EVALUATIONS AND BASIS FOR AWARD

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD (Section 00120)

The award(s) will be made based on the best overall (i.e. best value) proposals that are determined to be the most be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors:

Technical, Price, and Past Performance. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Source Selection Authority will integrate the evaluation of Past/Present Performance, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation. In terms of the relative importance of the factors, the Technical factor is somewhat more important than Present/ Past Performance and when combined however, the non-cost factors are approximately equal to the Price Factor. The firms that represent the best value to the Government will be selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.1 Source Selection Processes and Techniques.

This solicitation is for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ). The Government intends to award two (2) to five (5) contracts, but reserves the right to award more or less, to qualified offerors deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.101-1 whose proposal conforms to all the RFP's requirements and are judged to represent the Best Value to the Government. The Best Value is the most advantageous offer, price and other factors considered, and consistent with the Government’s stated importance of evaluation criteria. The awards will be made based on the best overall (i.e.

best value) proposals that are determined to be the most be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Technical, Present/Past Performance, and Price.

The source selection process will be conducted in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.3, Source Selection procedures.

Offers will be evaluated using the criteria listed in “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the RFP requirements may raise serious questions regarding an offeror’s technical ability, past performance and/or pricing and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

The Contracting Officer will begin the evaluation process by conducting a proposal compliance review for all timely-received proposals for determination of basic proposal adequacy prior to providing the proposals to the evaluators. Failure to provide a complete proposal may result in the proposal being removed from further consideration for award. Failure to address any factor Technical, Past Performance and Price or any technical subfactor shall be grounds for elimination from evaluation and consideration for award.

Offerors must ensure that no pricing information is displayed in Volume 2, Technical and Past Performance Proposal.

ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (if applicable e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval (See Division 01, Special Contract Requirements, Paragraph 8 for additional information regarding substitutions).

B. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below.

Factor 1. Technical Capability: The Technical Capability factor is divided into the following six subfactors:

1. Experience and Capability

2. Organization

3. Specific Personnel

4. Quality Control

5. Scheduling Methodology

6. LEED

The subfactors 1-6 will be rated in descending order of importance with subfactor 1, Experience and Capability being the most important.

Evaluation of the offeror’s proposal shall address each subfactor as it applies to the seed project and future requirements as detailed in the RFP. A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the “Evaluation Approach”, Paragraph C of this section. During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings; however the overall evaluation will be at the factor level.

Factor 2. Past Performance: Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine relevancy and confidence assessment.

Factor 3. Cost/Price. The resulting award will be a firm fixed price contract type. Price Reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of the Firm-Fixed price effort. Pricing of seed projects will be used for establishing Price Reasonableness.

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed task and technical requirements within the required schedule.

Factor 1. Technical Capability: The Technical Capability rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal. This is a combined rating that includes risk associated with the technical approach in a single rating. Ratings will be assigned at the subfactor level as well as an overall factor level rating. Based on evaluation results, the Government will assign a technical rating for each of the six (6) subfactors as well as the overall technical proposal. The subfactors, 1-6, will be rated in descending order of importance with Subfactor 1, Experience and Capability being the most important. An offer which fails to provide information in any of the specified areas may be deemed incomplete, and eliminated from the competition and ineligible for further consideration for award.

The Government intends to award without discussions. Due to the evaluation process the Technical Proposal must contain all the required information for a complete evaluation.

Subfactor 1. Experience and Capability:

The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of related experience, and determine if the offeror has the experience to manage multi-disciplined construction projects, which is comparable to the work requirements of this solicitation considering the dollar level and at the locations requested in areas of consideration. The proposal must demonstrate that the offeror has experience with management of multi-disciplined construction projects, as well as the capability to perform multiple projects at one time at the dollar levels and locations requested in Areas of Consideration.

Self-performance of a major discipline may offset limited multi-discipline experience. An offeror who has the capability to perform both as a prime contractor for multi-discipline projects and self-perform a major element of construction, for example, Electrical, or Mechanical or Roofing may be afforded additional consideration in the evaluation.

The proposal must demonstrate capability and plans for meeting Government requirements and shall address as a minimum, but not limited to, the following:

Specification Section 010000 - Division 01, Special Contract Requirements, Section 4 Ordering Procedures For Competitive Task Orders, including, but not limited to, the emergency response requirements specified in this special contract requirement (SC); Note that response to a task order notice must be made by the prime contractor (Contract holder) or employee of the prime contractor. Response cannot be made by a subcontractor representing the contractor and to propose this method will be found unacceptable; and the proposal shall demonstrate understanding of and plan to be in compliance with contract Clause FAR 52.236-6, Superintendence by the Contractor. The proposal must demonstrate the technical and administrative capabilities that are adequate to meet contract requirements within the offeror’s chosen areas of consideration.

Subfactor 2. Organization.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s response concerning overall organization, organization chart, as well as number of personnel and the duties of proposed technical staff to determine if offeror has an adequate staff to manage projects within the areas of consideration chosen without significant difficulty. Note: The specific criterion proposed (skill levels, experience, and background) for personnel required in the element specific personnel, if adequate, may be utilized to help determine the organization adequate.

The Organizational Chart listing company personnel and their roles appears adequate for areas of consideration required. The proposal narrative should adequately address personnel to include their names, duties and level of responsibility for key personnel to include Project Manager, Site Superintendent(s), Quality Control Manager and Safety Manager. The lines of authority and duties are consistent with good business practices for performing such duties as overall project management, site superintendence, quality control, and safety. Refer to Attachment 6, Division 01, Special Contract Requirements, Section 8, for minimum qualifications for these key personnel and requirements for substitution and dual roles.

Limitations on Subcontracting and Small Business Participation. The proposal must demonstrate self-performance capabilities for 15% of the work on general construction projects, and 25% of the work on special trades construction projects. In house trades should be sufficient to indicate the contractor has the capability to perform 15% with own workforce on general construction and 25% on special trades construction. Proposals that cannot demonstrate 15% or 25% self-performance and from the organization information provided appear to be mainly management may be found to be unacceptable as these contracts are not intended for construction management firms.

If applicable, the support and interface with home office or corporate headquarters for such aspects as financial, management and technical support are adequately defined.

Subfactor 3. Specific Personnel

The proposal must demonstrate the offeror has adequately experienced key personnel to manage multi-disciplined construction projects, which is comparable to the work requirements of this solicitation and at the dollar level and at the locations requested in areas of consideration. Evaluation will consider the following:

Project management, site superintendence, quality control manager, and safety manager, as well as the list of major subcontractors who will be utilized throughout the life of the contract. A resume or information provided for each proposed personnel should be included. The detailed background, education, and experience provided must meet any applicable experience qualifications included in the special contract requirements specifications. If proposed personnel are not currently on the contractor’s staff, letters of intent (Exhibit E) are provided where required.

The proposed subcontractors are verifiable, and information provided indicates a good professional relationship with Electrical, Mechanical, Roofing, Horizontal disciplines, Civil Site Work subcontractors. Subcontractors shall have completed Exhibit B in Volume 2, to be considered.

Subfactor 4. Quality Control

The proposal narrative demonstrates that the quality control staff, with lines of authority, is adequate to meet the contract’s requirements. The proposed Quality Control Plan should provide a detailed explanation of how quality issues are dealt with on various types of construction projects and as a minimum, meetings, inspections, submittal reviews, correction of non-compliant work and how you intend to ensure non-reoccurrence and reporting of quality problems to Government officials.

Subfactor 5. Scheduling Methodology

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability in scheduling methodology to determine if they have scheduling processes that ensure completion and control of the project from beginning to end. The schedule narrative should demonstrate an understanding of the limitations of a schedule as well as an understanding that an appropriate schedule will result in successful completion of projects.

A successful project schedule will provide the Government confidence that the project is structured to be executable for the resources indicated, is task oriented and indicates dates on which milestones will be achieved, and shows a total completion date within the time required by both Exhibits D-1 and D-2. A separate schedule for each seed project will be evaluated.

Subfactor 6: Experience with building to United States Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED® standards

Offeror has indicated previous projects that achieved USGBC LEED® certification, any level of recognition.

Additionally, indicate the key construction personnel and demonstrate they have experience and required qualifications in assigned roles with building to USGBC LEED® standards. If no experience indicated, the proposal stated in detail how this lack of experience is being overcome. In the event the intended key construction personnel are not part of the offeror’s organization at the time the proposal is submitted then a completed Exhibit B, “Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and Consent Form” is also required or the information will not be considered.

COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATING METHOD

Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Factor 2. Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the Plans and Specifications.

The Past/Present Performance evaluation will consist of a “relevancy” rating and a “confidence” rating. Although there are subfactors listed below, the “confidence” ratings will be at the factor level only. Stated differently, the subfactors will be considered, but they will not receive individual confidence ratings. The Past/Present Performance evaluation will consider such things as an offeror's business practices, customer relationship, ability to successfully perform as proposed, and other considerations as described in Past/Present Performance Sub-factors, elements and other considerations. Past/Present Performance includes current/on-going (present) performance complete to 70% percent or greater. Projects currently in progress for the National Guard will also be considered regardless of percentage complete.