Solicitation Amendment W911RX26QA0500002 SF 30.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The Government has re-programmed Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

funding committed to this project in FY26. The requirement remains an active solicitation with anticipated award in early FY27.

The solicitation Closing Date / Response Due Date is extended to 10:00A.M. (CDT), 15OCT2026.

A subsequent Amendment will be issued providing answers and updates to timely submitted Industry Questions. Amendment 0003 is anticipated 14-18SEP2026.

The Period of Performance is updated; the PCO email address is corrected in Addendum, 52.212- 1 Instructions to Offerors; and an administrative error (acronym CPARS) was corrected in Addendum, 52.212-2, Evaluations- Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

Solicitation/Contract Form Continuation

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date

10 Sep 2026 15 Oct 2026

Continuation of Deliveries or Performance

The delivery information for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance

17 Sep 2026 to 16 Sep 2027 28 Oct 2026 to 27 Oct 2027

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance

17 Sep 2026 to 16 Sep 2027 28 Oct 2026 to 27 Oct 2027

W911RX26QA0500002

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance

17 Sep 2026 to 16 Sep 2027 28 Oct 2026 to 27 Oct 2027

Addendum to 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) (Deviation 2026-O0038)

The following instructions are added as an Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 to clarify and customize the proposal preparation and submission requirements for this solicitation. These instructions mirror the evaluation criteria set forth under FAR 52.212-2.

(a) Proposal Submission and Structure

1. Submission Method: Proposals must be submitted electronically via email to the Contract Specialist (phyllis.m.senn.civ@army.mil) and the Contracting Officer (christopher.a.richie.

mil@army.mil) no later than the date and time specified in Block 8 of the SF 1449 or as amended by Blocks 11 & 14 of the SF 30.

2. Structure: Offerors must submit their proposals in three (3) separate volumes as outlined below:

V ol u m e

Title Page Limit

Required Contents

V ol u m e I

Techn ical Pr oposa l

Pages (e xcluding resumes)

1. Technical & Management Approach Narrative 2. Key Personnel Resumes (Contract Manager & Lead/QC Technician) 3. Draft Contractor Work Plan

V ol u m e

II

Price & Ad minist rative

None 1. Completed, signed SF 1449 (including Blocks 12, 17a, 23, 24, 30a, 30b, 30c). Note: CAGE code must be in Block 17.

V ol u m e

III

Past Perfor manc e

None 1. All Offerors shall submit information substantiating the Offeror's Recent and Relevant past performance with installing Lenel OnGuard systems and their compliance with FAR 52.219-8.

(b) Volume I: Technical Proposal Instructions

Offerors must prepare Volume I to address the following technical evaluation subfactors:

Section 1: Technical & Management Approach (Subfactor 1.1)

Offerors must provide a detailed narrative describing their schedule, technical approach, and installation methodology for upgrading the 380 door lock systems at Irwin Army Community Hospital (IACH) to the Lenel OnGuard system.

The narrative must detail the server and data migration plan and explain the technical safeguards the contractor will use to guarantee zero data loss during the transition.

The narrative must explain how the contractor will test and verify the successful integration of the upgraded door systems with existing hospital security and safety infrastructures, specifically the fire alarm system and the HUGS infant protection system.

Section 2: Key Personnel Experience (Subfactor 1.2)

1.

2.

1.

2.

3.

1.

2.

3.

The offeror must submit resumes/CVs for the following key personnel roles:

Contract Manager / Alternate Contract Manager: Must demonstrate a minimum of three (3) years of experience managing physical security, IT, or commercial installation projects.

Quality Control / Lead Technician: Must demonstrate a minimum of two (2) years of relevant quality control or physical security system installation experience. (Note: This role may be performed collaterally by the Contract Manager or Lead Technician).

No technical, proprietary, or manufacturer certifications are required to be submitted with the proposal.

Section 3: Draft Contractor Work Plan (Subfactor 1.3)

The offeror must submit a draft Work Plan in accordance with PWS 1.5.4.3.1. This plan must outline:

Proposed schedules of the door badging device installation by floor, wing, or department.

Programming timelines and server switchover methods.

Methods of maintaining facility access and safety during the physical lock replacement.

(c) Volume II: Price & Administrative Proposal Instructions

Offerors must prepare Volume II to address the following pricing and administrative requirements:

SF 1449 Page 1 Completion: The offeror must complete, sign, and date Blocks 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c of the SF 1449.

CAGE Code (Critical for SPRS): The offeror must enter their Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code in Block 17 of the SF 1449. This is mandatory to allow the Contracting Officer to retrieve the offeror's Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) score for evaluation under Factor 2 of FAR 52.212-2.

CLIN Pricing: The offeror must insert their unit and total Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) for CLIN 0001 (1 Job) in Block 23 (Unit Price) and Block 24 (Amount), CLIN 0002 (1 Job) in Block 23 (Unit Price) and Block 24 (Amount), and CLIN 0003 (1 Job) in Block 23 (Unit Price) and Block 24 (Amount) of the SF 1449.

(d) Volume III: Past Performance Instructions

The government will review the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed recent and relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The government will use information submitted by the offeror, references, and other sources such as the System for Award management (SAM) and the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other federal government offices and commercial sources to assess performance.

Offerors must prepare Volume III to address the following past performance requirement(s):

Section 1: Recency (Subfactor 3.1)

Offerors shall submit a minimum of three past performance contracts/projects completed within the previous 36 months from the Solicitation Closing date.

Section 2: Relevancy (Subfactor 3.2)

Offerors shall submit a minimum of three past performance completed (or substantially completed, i.e., >80%) contracts/projects that are of the same, similar or larger size, scope, and magnitude of this solicitation.

Section 3: Compliance with Utilization of Small Business IAW FAR 52.219-8 (Subfactor 3.3)

1. All Offerors shall submit information substantiating the Offeror's past performance in complying with FAR 52.219-8, "Utilization of Small Business" to maximize opportunities for U.S.

small business subcontractors.

2. Offerors shall also provide a statement indicating whether any negative information has been reported in the past three years concerning the Offeror's past compliance with FAR 52.219-8. If any such negative information has been reported, the Offeror may submit explanations or comments responding to such negative information. Offerors with no prior contracts containing FAR 52.219-8 shall certify the same.

3 All Offerors shall provide descriptive information for all small business categories. Any information concerning long-term relationships with small business subcontractors, such as mentor-protege relationships, should also be addressed.

(End of Addendum)

Addendum to Evaluation - Commercial Product and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluations--Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) (Deviation 2026-O0038)

Basis for Award:

(1) This is a Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Overhaul (RFO FAR) Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS), and identified Deviations. The Government intends to make a single contract award to the successful offeror provided they satisfy the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and requirements set forth in the solicitation. Award will encompass the entire PWS. Partial awards will not be made. Offeror must propose to perform all aspects of the PWS and address all factors/subfactors in the evaluation criteria. The award will be based on the best value to the Government and must show that Offeror's proposal is beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the evaluation factors specified below.

(2) To be eligible for award, Offerors must be (a) deemed responsible in accordance with the RFO FAR Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, (b) represent as a Small Business, in accordance with RFO FAR 19.104-1, (c) submit proposals which conform to the solicitation requirements, and (d) receive an acceptable technical proposal and past performance rating. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

(3) The LPTA process does not permit tradeoffs among price and non-price factors

(4) The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical proposal to ensure that it reflects a sound understanding of this requirement and complies with the requirements in the solicitation. An evaluation will be made to verify that the contractor is capable of providing the required Lenel OnGuard services at a fair market price. Award is also subject to acceptance of all terms and conditions of the contract and a determination of a fair market price. The RFO FAR, as supplemented by the DFARS) and the AFARS will be used to evaluate the offer and award this requirement

(5) Technical Acceptability, Determination of Fair Market Price, and Responsibility:

As Authorized procedures under RFO FAR Part 12, Commercial items and Commercial Services and RFO FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation procedures will be used to evaluate the Offeror's offer and award this requirement. The Government will evaluate the contractor's technical proposal to ensure that it reflects a sound understanding of this requirement. The proposed price will be evaluated in accordance with RFO FAR Subpart 15.4, using the Independent Government Estimate (IGE) to estimate the fair market price of the work to be performed and will make a determination that the offered price does not exceed the fair market price. The Government will complete a determination of responsibility utilizing the System of Award Management (SAM).

Regarding Past Performance information, the Contract Performance and Reporting System (CPARS) will be utilized. The Government intends to award this procurement based on contractor's responsibility, technical acceptability, and determination of a fair market price that complies with the requirements in the solicitation.

(6) As part of the fair market price determination, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding half of the offeror's Base Period price to the offeror's total price. The offeror submit a price for the potential 6-month extension of shall not services period. Per the solicitation, the Offeror understands that the Government may choose to exercise the Extension of Services at the end of any performance period, utilizing the rates of that performance period, given prescribed Preliminary Notifications IAW FAR 52.217-8.

(7) Award Without Discussions: IAW RFO FAR 15.105-2, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.202(a)(2), Clarifications, and award without discussions. Accordingly, offerors are advised to submit initial proposals that are fully and clearly satisfactory without the need for additional information or explanation and contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer determines them to be necessary.

Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation criteria consist of factors and subfactors. The proposals will be evaluated under three evaluation factors: Price, Technical Acceptability and Past Performance.

Factor 1, Price: Price was not assigned an adjectival rating. All pricing information was addressed within this proposal volume. The offeror's CLIN prices will be evaluated for reasonableness and balance. Regarding reasonableness, Price Analysis techniques in accordance with RFO FAR 15.404-1(b) is being used to validate price reasonableness. Total Evaluated Price (TEP) - The TEP to be used for the determination of price Reasonableness will be calculated as follows:

The sum of all CLINs', the base period and 1/2 of the base period price as an evaluation of potential pricing under FAR Clause 52.217-8.

Factor 2, Technical Acceptability: Technical Acceptability include: subfactor (1) Technical and Approach; subfactor (2) Key Personnel Resumes: and subfactor (3) Contractor Work Plan.

Technical Acceptability- The Technical Acceptability Factor evaluation shall provide an assessment of the offeror's capability to satisfy the Government's minimum requirements.

Subfactor 1 Technical and Management Approach - The Government will evaluate Offeror's proposed methodology for all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items necessary to perform services as described in the PWS and associated contract documents, except for those items specified in Part 3 Government Property and Services. The document will be evaluated based on the soundness of the approach, the feasibility of the approach, and the comprehensiveness of the document. The Government will evaluate the offeror's Quality Control Plan IAW Para(s) 1.5.1.

Subfactor-2 Key Personnel Resumes: The Government will evaluate how the Offeror identified personnel/ labor categories (positions essential for contract performance) deemed necessary to satisfy the requirement of the PWS. The Government will evaluate how proposed personnel fit into the overall organization and how they describe the proposed responsibilities for each position. The Government will evaluate the personnel qualifications to ensure qualifications are commensurate of PWS requirements. The Contract manger should demonstrate minimum of five (5) years of experience managing projects of similar size and complexity, preferably involving IT system installation, physical security, or construction within government or healthcare facilities. Experience should include staff supervision, project scheduling, and customer relations. Quality Control manager should demonstrate a minimum of three (3) years of hands-on experience installing and troubleshooting access control systems. This individual should have experience leading installation teams and performing quality control checks to ensure compliance with technical specifications. All personnel performing technical installation and server migration tasks should have relevant industry certifications for the specific access control system being installed or be able to document an equivalent level of manufacturer provided training or field experience acceptable to the Government. The Government will evaluate the offeror's key personnel qualifications IAW Para(s) 1.10.b and 1.10.d, e.g. education, professional experience, specific experience and other relevant activities and achievements.

Contractor Work Plan: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's approach for ensuring the timeliness and quality of performance will be in accordance with the standards in the PWS throughout the life of the contract. The CWP, shall describe your approach for ensuring performance is IAW the standards in the PWS throughout the life of the contract.

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum, requirements of the solicitation.

Factor 3, Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the submission of information substantiating the Offeror's past performance in complying with FAR 52.219-8, "Utilization of Small Business" to maximize opportunities for U.S. small business subcontractors.

The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of the Offeror's recent and relevant Past Performance, focusing on and targeting performance which is relevant to the effort as it directly relates to the work under the Army's Performance Work Statement for this Solicitation and as defined as "Relevant." The past performance data shall be evaluated based on the demonstration of a successful history of past contract performance as outlined under the Recency and Relevancy Assessment paragraphs below.

Subfactor 1 Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be substantially complete (80% or more) or must have been performed during the previous thirty-six (36) months from this Solicitation Closing Date. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

Subfactor 2 Relevancy Assessment: The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the services performed under those projects relate to this requirement for agricultural sanitation. For each recent past performance citation reviewed, the relevance of the work performed will be assessed.

Consideration will be given to criteria such as similarity, complexity, and diversity of tasks, type of effort, scope, value, and performance period. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance is a stronger predictor of future success and will have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. A relevancy determination of the Offeror's and major and critical subcontractor(s)' past performance will be made. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the Offeror or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. The past performance information provided in the response and obtained from other sources will be used to establish the degree of relevancy of past performance. The Past Performance Relevancy definitions below will be used when assessing recent, relevant contracts:

Table A-2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Adjectival Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum, requirements of the solicitation.

In addition to requesting past performance information, the Contractor Performance and Reporting System (CPARS) will be utilized.

The Government intends to award this procurement based on contractor's responsibility, technical acceptability, and determination of a fair market price that complies with the requirements in the solicitation.

(End of Addendum)

KO DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING, 1792 12TH STREET

FORT RILEY, KS 66442-0248

UNITED STATES

PHYLLIS SENN, EMAIL: PHYLLIS.M.SENN.CIV@ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: 520-944-7308

AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: