W911KB18R0040_AM_4.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

EIE390, School Age Facility, Eielson AFB AK

The purpose of this amendment if to replace Section 00 22 20 in it's entirety.

See continuation page.

YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF STANDARD FORM 1442.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Oct-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB18R0040

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Oct-2018

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911KB-18-R-0040

AM#04

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections.

NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers.

PHASE 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNICAL PROVISIONS

SECTION 00 22 20- Phase 2 Design-Build Selection Procedures and Bases of Award

REPLACED IN ITS ENTIRETY

c. The following sections are deleted

d. The following documents are added

e. The following revisions are incorporated

f. Other

CAD Files provided via Amrdec

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

Section 00 22 20 W911KB-18-R-0040

EIE390

Section 00 22 20 Page 1

SECTION 00 22 20

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS AND

ELEMENTS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL

5.2. TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 – BUILDING FUNCTIONAL, AESTHETICS AND SPACE

5.3. TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS

5.4. TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 – SITE DESIGN

5.5. TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

6.1 VOLUME 2 - PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

6.2 TAB A – FACTOR 2 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM

SCHEDULE)

6.3 TAB B – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1. GENERAL

7.2. DISCUSSIONS (IF NECESSARY)

PHASE TWO – SECTION 00 22 20 ATTACHMENTS

6 – FORMAT FOR TABLE OF FACILITIES

7 – FORMAT FOR TABLE OF SPACES

Section 00 22 20 Page 2

1.0 OVERVIEW

The most highly qualified offerors selected in Phase 1 are invited to submit a Phase 2 proposal, as indicated below.

The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria described herein, using the evaluation rating systems outlined in the Phase 1 Design-Build selection procedures. Price information will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and for material unbalancing, as described herein. The Phase 2 evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15 and will utilize the Tradeoff Process described in FAR 15.101-1.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible Phase 2 Offeror whose proposal the

Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than the price, however, the Contract award may not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 00 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Contracting Officer/Source

Selection Authority will compare proposals to determine which proposal represents the best value. Proposals will not be ranked. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers.

The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR

15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that

Offeror.

2.1. As part of the evaluation, the Government will evaluate betterments in proposals relative to the minimum standards in the RFP to determine if they offer additional value to the Government. In addition, innovations in proposals will be evaluated to determine if creative ideas of the Offeror are a better value to the Government compared to the minimum criteria.

2.2 Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint.

Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.0 STIPEND FOR UNSUCCESSFUL PHASE 2 OFFERORS

3.1. A stipends is not currently authorized for this acquisition.

Section 00 22 20 Page 3

4.0 PHASE 2 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS

AND ELEMENTS

(VOLUME 1 – DESIGN TECHNICAL)

Factor/Sub

Factor

Location

Description

Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 DESIGN TECHNICAL Most Important Factor

Subfactor 1

Vol. 1 TAB A

Building Functional and Aesthetics Equally Important to Subfactor 2 (slightly more important than Subfactor 3)

Subfactor 2

Vol. 1 TAB B Quality of Building Systems and

Materials Equally Important to Subfactor 1 (slightly more important than Subfactor 3)

Subfactor 3

Vol. 1 TAB C

Site Design 2nd Most Important Subfactor (slightly less important than Subfactors 1 and 2)

Subfactor 4

Vol. 1 TAB D Proposed Contract Duration and

Summary Schedule 3rd Most Important Subfactor (slightly less important than Subfactor 3)

N/A

Vol. 1 TAB E Air Force MILCON Sustainability

Worksheet

Not Rated

(VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA IMFORMATION)

Factor/Sub

Factor

Location

Description

Relative Importance

FACTOR 2

Vol. 2 TAB A PRICE (Standard Form 1442 and

Proposal Schedule) 2nd Most Important Factor (significantly less important than Factor 1)

N/A Vol. 2 TAB B Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – DESIGN - TECHNICAL

5.1. GENERAL: The design-technical factor consists of conceptual level presentation drawings, technical approach narratives and information regarding material and system quality. It must clearly define the proposed scope and quality levels that the design-build team is offering to the Government in enough detail for the Government and the Offeror to mutually understand whether or not the proposal meets or exceeds the minimum Solicitation requirements. The use of BIM to prepare or submit proposals is NOT required. Fully developed drawings, details or specifications are not required or desired. Unless specifically stated herein, the Government will not be performing a detailed engineering analysis or design review at the proposal stage. The intent during the

Section 00 22 20 Page 4 proposal submission and review process is not to require detailed design effort or to perform a detailed design engineering review but to focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems If the Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise does not meet the contract requirements, the Government will inform the proposer in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm. But the Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final amended

RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in Clause 52.236-5000, “Design Build Order Of Precedence.” The

Offeror shall identify what it considers to be Betterments in its proposal for Factor 1 (See Section 00 73 00.00 29, SCR-DB051 “Proposed Betterments”). Betterments included in the technical submission must also be included in the base price under Factor 4. Do not describe in the narratives or show in the drawings any betterments that are not included in the base price. The final design must comply with the RFP requirements except that accepted betterments become the new contract minimum requirements. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

5.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB A –SUBFACTOR 1 - BUILDING FUNCTIONAL, AESTHETICS AND SPACE

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1. Presentation Drawings: Limit presentation drawings to no more than twenty-five (25) drawings to include the following:

(a) Exterior Elevation(s) of the primary elevation(s) of the facility clearly noting proposed materials and colors.

(b) At least two (2) renderings: showing a perspective from a location northeast and southwest of the facility with enough realistic detail to aid in the evaluation of the exterior building aesthetics, as described in paragraph 5.2.2.2 (a), below. Renderings shall include a slightly overhead view of the entire building to encompass elevations and the roof configuration of the building (Reference Section

01 33 16.00 29). Renderings should be at least 11" x 17" in order to show a detailed perspective view of the building.

(c) At least one building section demonstrating typical exterior wall sections, typical exterior construction materials, finished floor elevations, and ceiling heights.

NOTE: The Government will use this information to evaluate functional and aesthetic considerations, such as floor to ceiling heights and may use it to help evaluate exterior aesthetics and appearance. The

Government may also use this information in conjunction with the submission information under the subfactor: QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS below, to evaluate quality of wall finishes as well as to look at how the proposer has considered air barrier.

(d) Schematic floor plan for the School Age Facility. T h e floor plan shall show furnishings, equipment, and other specifically identified items.

Section 00 22 20 Page 5

(e) Offerors shall include one presentation drawing showing entire/overall floor plan of the facility on one sheet.

5.2.1.2. Color Board

Provide a color board including primary interior and exterior finish materials. Format shall be in accordance with

Section 01 33 16.00 29, Attachment A, Structural Interior Design Requirements.

5.2.1.3. Technical Approach Narrative

Provide technical approach narrative defining the elements of the proposal. This narrative shall be no longer than five (5) typewritten pages. The page limit does not include the space and facility tables.

(a) Building Functional Arrangement. Describe the spaces provided for the facility, and how the planning and design of the spaces accommodates children and staff conditions and the operation of the facility.

Preface the narrative with a design concept narrative, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal.

(b) Building Aesthetics. Describe the architectural themes of the various facilities and spaces which demonstrate how the proposal achieves the results desired by the Statement of Work. Narrative should address how the selection of materials and colors enhances the exterior and interior aesthetics of the facility and improves the conditions for the children and staff who will utilize the facility. This narrative is not intended to be a material listing, but to explain/reflect how the selections were made and how they address the requirements.

(c) Minimum Space and Facility Size. Provide a tabulation of the net square footage for rooms, zones, or other areas, the total gross square footage for the facility, and the total gross square footage for the facility to clearly demonstrate compliance with the project requirements. See the sample spreadsheets in Attachments 6 and 7 at the end of this section.

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria:

The following three elements are equal in importance (not rated separately).

5.2.2.1. Building Functional Arrangement: This element considers the overall functional layout (Floor Plan) and interaction of the spaces in the facility as well. This element considers the planning and design of the spaces with respect to children and staff working conditions and the operation of the facility.

The following criteria will be considered in the evaluation of the functional arrangement of the various facilities:

(a) How well the floor plan responds to the Functional Relationship requirements described in the

Statement of Work.

(b) How well the floor plan and space arrangement facilitate work flow and access necessary to successfully operate this facility in accordance with its mission.

Section 00 22 20 Page 6

(c) Do the facilities provide acceptable life safety and fire safety measures?

(d) Do the proposed plans demonstrate compliance with the mandatory requirements for circulation, furnishings, equipment, and other specifically identified items in the Statement of Work?

5.2.2.2. Building Aesthetics: This element considers the overall “appeal” of the facility and the desire that both the interior and exterior of the facilities present a professional, attractive appearance. The following two areas will be considered under this element and are equal in consideration (not separately rated):

(a) Exterior Considerations:

To the extent possible within the government identified contract cost limitation (CCL), the proposal must comply with the look and feel of the Installation architectural theme identified in the Request for Proposal. The first priority in order of importance is how well the proposal provides comparable building mass, size, height, and configuration in comparison with the architectural theme expressed in Section 01 10 00. The second priority in order of importance is how well the proposal provides compatible exterior skin appearance based upon façade, architectural character (period or style), exterior detailing, matching the architectural theme expressed in the Solicitation.

□ Proposals shall be evaluated on mass, size, height, and configuration in comparison with the architectural theme expressed in the Solicitation, design of facades, roof lines, delineation of entrances, proportions of fenestration in relation to elevations, shade and shadow effects, materials, textures, architectural character (period or style), exterior color schemes.

□ How compatible is the proposed design with the installation architectural theme expressed in the

RFP? If not an exact "copy" of the theme, how well does it harmonize or blend with the expressed theme?

□ How well does the proposal provide comparable building mass, size, height, and configuration in comparison with the architectural theme expressed in the Solicitation?

□ Is the buildings scale and proportion complimentary of the adjacent structures?

□ Is the building an attractive addition to the Installation?

□ How well does the building harmonize with its environment, including surrounding facilities?

(b) Interior Considerations:

□ Are the proposed colors and material finishes conducive to the working environment of the facility?

□ How well does the size of each room meet the concept in the RFP?

□ Has “support item” placement been considered and addressed in the proposal to enhance the environment? For example: placement of supply/exhaust devices, placement of electrical panels, and placement of exhaust fans, etc.

5.2.2.3. Minimum Space and Facility Size: The proposal must include all the mandatory spaces in response to the requirements set forth in Section 01 10 00, Statement of Work. For this element, proposals will be evaluated on compliance with these requirements. Individual areas may slightly exceed the requirements, so long as building function is not compromised elsewhere and as long as the overall square footage is not greater than that as described in Section 01 10 00, as authorized by Congress.

5.3. VOLUME 1- TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 - QUALITY OF BUILDING SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS

Section 00 22 20 Page 7

5.3.1. General. As part of this Subfactor, the Government has identified certain items as desirable features or preferable items. Desirable features are identified below in the evaluation criteria. Preferable items are listed in order of priority. These items, along with any Offeror-identified betterment, will be given additional consideration during the evaluation process, provided that they are included in the proposed base price and are within the contract cost limitation (CCL) identified in the Solicitation.

Preferable Item:

□ Open cubicles instead of lockers

□ Clerestory windows

5.3.2. Submission Requirements:

5.3.2.1. Presentation Drawings

There are no specific drawings requirements for this Subfactor. However, the Offeror has the option of providing concept level drawing information for specific materials and/or systems which the Offeror feels are necessary to describe the proposed systems or materials in the drawings provided under Tab A.

5.3.2.2. Technical Approach Narrative:

Provide technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed.

Maximum total length for the narrative shall be ten (10) typewritten pages.

(a) Architectural Finishes: Describe how the materials selected provide for a suitable environment for the expected population of the facility. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on durability and maintenance of the finishes proposed. Provide duration of roof system warranty.

(b) Structural Systems: Describe design loads and structural member and wall framing deflection limits used for design. Describe the building's gravity system and lateral system. Describe exterior wall systems and building foundation. Describe how partitions and curtain walls are to be isolated from structural deflections. Discuss measures used to limit cracking in veneer, walls and slabs-on-grade.

Discuss measures used to prevent slabs-on-grade from delaminating.

(c) Mechanical Systems: Describe how the mechanical systems selected provide for a highly efficient environmental control system including information about provisions for indoor air quality maintenance. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

(d) Plumbing Systems: Describe how the plumbing systems selected provide for a highly efficient domestic hot water system and an efficient piping system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Narrative

Section 00 22 20 Page 8 should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

(e) Electrical Systems: Describe how the electrical power and lighting systems, telephone and data systems selected provide for a highly efficient electrical system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

(f) Fire Protection Systems: Describe the fire suppression, detection and alarm system with associated site and equipment needs. Discuss basic life safety and building code implications. Discuss how the systems provide value to the Government and address the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Narrative should discuss maintenance considerations, and how the proposed systems will interface with existing and future facilities.

5.3.2.3 Proposed Material Identifications:

In the proposed material identification submission, the Offeror shall include only major materials in each of the areas shown below (there is no need to include materials such as fasteners, adhesives, wire, etc.). Provide this information in tabular form supported by catalog information. Table should include manufacturer’s name, model number if known or at least model series, length of warranty, size/capacity (where available), efficiency (where applicable), country of origin and any other notes or information selected by the Offeror. Catalog cuts shall be organized and tabbed in accordance with the disciplines listed below and each section shall contain a table of contents identifying the products included. On catalog cut sheets that show more than one product, clearly identify the specific product proposed for this project. Provide only one hard copy of catalog cut sheets with original proposal. Provide CD-ROM with catalog cut sheets for each copy of proposal. Information on CD shall be bookmarked.

The Government will evaluate and consider materials and equipment proposed by brand name and model series or number as a quality standard. Unless substitution of a manufacturer, brand name or model is otherwise specifically prohibited in the contract, if the successful Offeror desires to substitute manufacturers, brand names or models after award, the substituted product must meet the contract requirements and be approved by the designer of record and the Government as equal in function, performance, quality and salient features to that initially proposed. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements. See below under

Evaluation Criteria for more explanation.

(a) Architectural Finishes

□ Interior Walls

□ Floors

□ Ceilings

□ Exterior Walls

□ Any Special Features

□ Hardware systems (not individual hardware sets)

□ Door systems/types (not individual doors)

Section 00 22 20 Page 9

□ Window systems/types (not individual windows)

□ Roofing Systems

□ Insulation Systems

(b) Mechanical Systems

□ Central Heating/Cooling Equipment

□ Pumps

□ Air Handling Equipment

□ HVAC System Control Equipment

□ Energy Conservation Features

□ Kitchen Ventilation Equipment

(c) Plumbing Systems

□ Fixtures

□ Domestic Hot Water Generator

(d) Electrical Systems

□ Lighting Fixtures

□ Fire Alarm, DDC and Mass Notification Systems

□ Data, Telephone, PA and Other Special Systems as identified in the SOW

(e) Kitchen Equipment

□ Cooking Equipment

□ Refrigerators and Freezers

□ Dishwashing Equipment

□ Furnishings

5.3.2.4 Quality Improvements:

Provide a list of quality improvements that are above the minimum stated in the performance specifications. Develop the following table, or similar, to identify desirable features (see 5.3.3.2), preferable items (see 5.3.1) and other

Offeror identified betterments (mark appropriate column). Desirable features, preferable items and offeror identified betterments shall be included in the following table only if included in the base price.

Preferred

Item Desirable

Feature Contractor

Betterment Concise description of improved quality Location of catalog information (page number)

Arch.

Finishes

Etc.

5.3.3. Evaluation Criteria:

5.3.3.1. General: It is the Air Force's objective that these buildings will have a 50 year useful life. The design and construction should provide an appropriate level of quality to ensure the continued use of the facility over that time period with the application of reasonable preventive maintenance and repairs that would be industry-acceptable

Section 00 22 20 Page to a major civilian sector project OWNER. The facility design should consider that the Air Force may repurpose the use of the facility over the 50 year life. The Air Force's intent is to install products and materials of good quality that meet industry standard average life that corresponds with the period of performance expected before a major renovation or repurpose. The design should be flexible and adaptable to possible future uses different than the current to the extent practical while still meeting the operational and functional requirements defined within.

Flexibility is achieved through design of more flexible structural load-bearing wall and column system arrangements.

The site infrastructure will have at least a 50-year life expectancy with industry-accepted maintenance and repair cycles. Develop the project site for efficiency and to convey a sense of unity or connectivity with the adjacent buildings and with the Installation as a whole. Building useful life is defined by the length of service of the structural systems; concrete, masonry, steel, and wood in any combination. These structural systems last a lifetime when properly constructed and maintained. The building systems; electrical, mechanical, interior finishes etc. vary in useful life based on quality of the products and materials. Generally speaking these systems will last an average of

20-30 years. Historically the Air Force has often performed a major renovation or changed the use of the facility once in the first 25 years. Within that overriding theme the Government will evaluate the Offeror selected systems and components proposed in terms of extended warranties provided, maintenance considerations (frequency, estimated cost, access, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability (withstand troop usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (HVAC, lighting, power). The minimum acceptable level of quality for finishes and materials for these buildings are those materials suitable for the expected population and usage. Residential or similar grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in these buildings, unless otherwise specifically allowed in Section 01 10 00. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guaranty that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements or that they are the appropriate size or application for the design which will be developed after award. The intent during the proposal submission and review process is not to require detailed design effort or to perform a detailed design engineering review but to focus on the proposed quality levels of materials and systems. If the Government evaluators have actual knowledge or strong suspicion that a proposed product or solution is inappropriately sized, being used in the wrong application or otherwise won’t meet the contract requirements, the Government will inform the proposer in the event that discussions are conducted with the firm. But the Government is not asking for design analyses in the proposal and is not obligated to perform an engineering design review at this stage. After award, in the event of conflict between the contractor’s accepted proposal and the requirements in the final, amended RFP, the order of precedence is indicated in Clause 52.236-5000, “Design-Build Order Of Precedence.”

5.3.3.2. The Government encourages the Offeror to place emphasis on those design features which optimize and emphasize functional/operational requirements; interior/exterior finishes and systems; and life cycle/ energy efficiency. The Offeror may choose the most economical “Type of Construction” allowed by the Building Code for this occupancy/project and put the money into durable finishes and efficient systems. The features that the

Government has identified below as desirable features, the items that the Government has identified in paragraph as preferable and Offeror-identified betterments may be given additional consideration during the evaluation process provided they are included within contract cost limitation identified in the Solicitation and the offeror’s proposed base contract price. The order of importance for proposed betterments for rating purposes is as follows:

desirable features, preferable items and other Offeror identified betterments. The Government will identify those

Offeror identified betterments that are not desired, or are otherwise objectionable or unacceptable, if discussions are conducted with that Offeror. Unsubstantiated claims or narrative information will not be given evaluation credit during the evaluations. The following elements (not rated separately) will be considered in the evaluation of the building systems and materials of the various facilities:

(a) Architectural Finishes, Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include finishes, components and systems which provide usable spaces for the intended purposes. Proposals will receive additional consideration for materials and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features: solid wood cabinetry; solid surface counter tops; ceramic tile; increased R-values for roof and walls; extended non-pro-rated, no-leak roof warranty; high efficiency windows and doors;

welded door frames in heavy use/shop/storage areas.

(b) Structural Components and Systems: All proposals must be compliant with the structural requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Type I or type II construction as defined in the

International Building Code is considered more desirable than Type V construction.

(c) Mechanical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic environmental control function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, reduce energy consumption, sustainability, maintainability (cyclical maintenance, access, equipment placement), and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

(d) Plumbing Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability

(stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features: lifetime domestic hot water storage tank warranty; high efficiency equipment;

easy/local availability of replacement/repair parts; zoned/valved sub-systems to allow repair without building shutdown.

(e) Electrical Components and Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability

(stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

Desirable features: all copper conductors.

(f) Fire Protection Systems: Acceptable proposals include components and systems that provide the basic suppression, detection, alarm, and life safety functions necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems that improve life safety, , include extended warranties, improved maintainability, and longer life expectancies.

(g) Interoperability: Fire Alarm, Telephone, Mass Notification System and UMCS must be integrated into the new facilities which require connection and interface with existing installation-wide systems and must be accommodated in the proposed project.

5.4. VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 – SITE DESIGN

Layout of site improvements as shown in the RFP is conceptual. Offerors are expected and encouraged to exercise ingenuity and innovativeness to propose a site design which meets the requirements of the RFP while taking into account the existing site features and potential obstacles, including utilities. There is no intent or expectation that the site improvements must be laid out exactly as shown in the conceptual drawings. If the offeror identifies an existing utility that needs to be relocated to provide sufficient clearance for proposed site improvements, the offeror shall identify the specific utility feature(s) that needs to be relocated.

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

5.4.1.1. Presentation Drawings: Limit presentation drawings to no more than five (5) drawings to include the following:

□ Schematic/Conceptual Site Plans(s) for the School Age Facility showing improvements for drainage, buildings, paving, walks, parking, landscaping, utilities and communications infrastructure.

Indicate all building setbacks and separations, which must meet antiterrorism design requirements.

Delineate vehicle circulation and pedestrian access to allow evaluation of the integration of this new development into the existing surrounding infrastructure.

5.4.1.2. Technical Approach Narrative:

Provide a technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposed site design. Begin the narrative with a preface concerning the design concepts, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal. It is the responsibility of the offeror to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed. Narrative shall not exceed five (5) pages.

(a) Geotechnical Considerations

□ Soil compaction method

(b) Grading

□ Drainage patterns

□ Stormwater on site retention considerations

(c) Landscaping

□ Plant Material Selection

□ Site Lighting Considerations

(d) Pedestrian Circulation

□ Development of Circulation Patterns

□ Way Finding Between Facilities

□ Separation from Vehicular Circulation

(e) Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection

□ Compliance with the Statement of Work Requirements.

5.4.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.4.2.1. This Subfactor considers the overall layout of the site and the various specialties which define a workable, pleasing environment for the airmen. The proposed site development plan must incorporate all the specific requirements from the Statement of Work as well as comply with all statutory and regulatory requirements outlined therein. All site related Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (ATFP) considerations must be included and/or addressed in the proposal.

Elements (1) through (4) below are of equal importance and are not separately rated.

(1) Geotechnical Considerations: Acceptable proposals include sound method of soil compaction and address liquefaction and other geotechnical issues. Proposal will be evaluated on measures planned to protect existing buildings and utilities as well as measures to repair damage caused by compaction.

(2) Grading and Landscaping: Acceptable proposals include reasonable amounts of cut/fill and regrading as necessary to ensure proper drainage and positive drainage away from the facility. Landscaping provided must meet the minimums required by the Statement of Work. Proposals which include innovative solutions to storm water management, landscaping to enhance the surrounding environment, or other similar improvements beyond the basic requirements will receive additional consideration during the proposal evaluation process.

(3) Pedestrian Circulation: Acceptable proposals address and include all the specific requirements of the Statement of Work.

The following items will be considered with respect to pedestrian and vehicle circulation and storage. These are not sub-factors.

Pedestrian Considerations:

□ Are all facility entrances/exits served by a paved sidewalk system?

□ Does the proposed sidewalk system provide direct, convenient access to all facilities?

(4) ATFP Considerations: This element verifies the proposal’s inclusion/compliance with the site related (setbacks, etc.) ATFP constraints included in the Statement of Work. The proposal must be compliant with the ATFP requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Acceptable proposals are compliant with all ATFP requirements. Acceptance of the successful proposal does not constitute acceptance of design that does not conform to ATFP requirements. The final design must comply with the ATFP requirements.

5.5. VOLUME 1 - TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND

SUMMARY SCHEDULE

5.5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.5.1.1 Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall propose the contract duration where indicated in the

Proposal Schedule and in the narrative provided under this Tab. Proposed contract duration shall not exceed the maximum contract duration specified in FAR 52.211-10.

5.5.1.2 Summary Schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab D.

This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32

01.00 10: Project Schedule. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. For proposal purposes, utilize a Notice to Proceed date of 04 April 2019. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of offeror’s proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features but limit narrative information to no more than three (3) pages total:

(1) Narrative:

(a) Provide the proposed contract duration.

(b) Provide a narrative, describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, based on the Offeror’s plan for fast tracking. Describe all design and construction to be “fast-tracked” (See section 01

33 16.00 29: Design After Award). If long lead item equipment must be ordered prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule.

Complete the following matrix summarizing the proposed design package review schedule (not included in schedule narrative page limit).

1.

Submittal Package Name

(e.g. Site / Utilities) Stage (Interim, Final, Design Complete) Submittal

Date Review

Start Date Review

End Date Review Conference

Date (if applicable)

(c) Provide a narrative describing how contractor plans on coordinating design efforts with adjacent

EIE405 Utilidor project. Describe the coordination, accommodations, scheduling, and procedures that will be employed to avoid conflicts and facilitate construction interfaces where required. Describe impacts and risks to schedule if EIE405 does not provide utility connection points at a time most convenient for contractor and what measures will be taken to mitigate risks to schedule and project costs.

(2) Summary Schedule:

(a) Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the interim and final design submittals for each package and the proper handling of the review comments for each design package (See section 01 33 16.00 29). For each submittal package noted in 5.5.1.2(1)(b) above, show date submitted to

Government, Government review period and Review Conference on summary schedule.

(b) Show anticipated/preferred periods for installation of permanent water, sewer, steam/condensate, and electrical utility line taps/connection points by EIE405.

(c) Show the overall construction phase for the facility, for the site work, and for utilities. Show fast track starts for design packages but it isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of the facility, site work and utilities.

(d) Show commissioning activities.

(e) Show turnover of the facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspections.

(f) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

5.5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.5.2.1 Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror’s proposed contract duration will become the contractually binding completion period and will replace the duration stated in FAR 52.211-10 upon contract award. The

Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the offeror under this Tab and in the Proposal

Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration stated in FAR 52.211-10. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. A proposed contract duration matching the maximum allowed contract duration is “acceptable.” A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum allowed duration will receive additional rating consideration, provided it is realistic and deemed to be achievable.

The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment.

5.5.2.2 Summary Schedule: In addition to the proposed contract duration, the Government will evaluate the summary schedule for integrated design and construction. The length of the schedule must match the Offeror’s proposed contract duration. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it offers no advantage to the

Government because it is non-binding, only representing a preliminary planned schedule. A schedule shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required contract completion period. Therefore, the Government believes that there is no valid need to shorten the schedule less than the full proposed contract duration. The

Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting (see section 01 10 00), long lead items, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating design submittals, reviews and incorporating review comments, the Offeror's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. The Government will evaluate the design packaging plan for logic, reasonableness, how it facilitates meeting the proposed contract duration and how it facilitates the Government’s ability to timely perform its design reviews. The packaging plan should minimize risk to the Contractor and to the

Government for tear-out and coordination for reviews. For example, is the footing and foundation plan based on adequate design for building loads; etc.? A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

6.1 VOLUME 2 - PRICE & PRO FORMA INFORMATION

6.2 VOLUME 2 – TAB A – FACTOR 2 – PRICE (STANDARED FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE

ITEM SCHEDULE)

6.2.1 Submission Requirements:

Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the CLIN Schedule, containing proposed line item and total pricing, as well as the proposed contract duration. See instructions in Section 00 21 00, “Instructions to

Offerors.”

6.2.1.2 HUBZONE CONTRACTORS: This RFP includes Contract Clause 52.219-4 regarding a 10% price evaluation preference for HUBZone small business concerns. HUBZone small business concerns electing to waive the evaluation preference shall submit a copy of clause 52.219-4 indicating such. HUBZone small business concerns not waiving the evaluation preference shall submit a copy of their SBA certification letter under this tab.

6.2.1.3 Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals, the Government will request a Phase 2 price breakdown of the Contract Line items in a sealed envelope marked “Phase 2 Price

Breakdown Information”, in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three working days after the proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial Phase 2 proposal and, if requested, for any revised proposals.

This information is not an opportunity for an Offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

6.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

6.1.2.1 Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

6.1.2.2 If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

6.1.2.3 Award may not be made for project cost for design and construction exceeding the contract cost limitation described herein.

6.2 VOLUME 2 – TAB B – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

6.2.1 Submission Requirements:

6.2.1.1 Submit this information for the Contracting Officer’s determination of Offeror responsibility, which includes, but is not limited to the following:

(a) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value thereof, and name of the organization under which the work is being performed. Include names and telephone numbers of personnel within each organization who are familiar with the prospective contractor’s performance.

(b) A certified statement listing; (1) each contract awarded within the preceding three month period exceeding $1,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract; and (2) each contract awarded within the preceding three year period not already physically completed and exceeding $5,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract. If the prospective contractor is a joint venture, each joint venture member will be required to submit the above defined certification

(c) Competed Representations and Certifications included by full text in Section 00 45 00.