Answered QAs Anchorage Harbor Dredging Preproposal Conference.doc

DOC document 84 KB Posted

Attached to
RECOVERY - 2009 -2011 Transitional and Maintenance Dredging at the Port of Anchorage
Solicitation number
W911KB-09-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Questions and Answers from Pre-Proposal Conference

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W911KB-09-R-0001 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
W911KB-09-R-0001-0003.pdf PDF
3D-2009 Anch Bndy Model .pdf PDF
REGISTER.pdf PDF
QUESITONS AND ANSWERS.doc DOC document
W911KB-09-R-0001-0002 ANCH.pdf PDF
Trial Dredging Report Port of Anchorage Harbor Deeping.pdf PDF
Trial Dredging Report Port of Anchorage Harbor Deeping.pdf PDF
W911KB-09-R-0001 A00001.pdf PDF
FONSI.pdf PDF
Port of Anchorage- ANCEXP09.pdf PDF
Geotechnical Findings Report Anchorage Harbor Deepening June 2008.pdf PDF
C-103 sheet 4 of 6 newwork 2010 Model —
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 4 —
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 1 —
C-501 sheet 6 of 6 newwork 2010 Details Model —
C-102 sheet 3 of 6 newwork 2010 Model —
Trial Dredging Report Port of Anchorage Harbor Deeping.pdf PDF
Geotechnical Findings Report Anchorage Harbor Deepening June 2008.pdf PDF
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 3 —
C-101 sheet 2 of 6 newwork 2010 Model —
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 2 —
C-104 sheet 5 of 6 newwork 2010 Model —
FONSI.pdf PDF
SPECS PORT OF ANCHORAGE DREDGING.pdf PDF
G-001 sheet 1 of 6 newwork 2010 Cover Model —
W911KB-09-R-0001 PORT OF ANCHORAGE DREDGING.pdf PDF
Port of Anchorage Drawings.pdf PDF
Port of Anchorage Dredging Specifications.pdf PDF
2009-2011 Transitional Dredging Port of Anchorage Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 2 —
sheet 4 of 4 newwork 2010 DETAILS Model —
ANCHORAGE dtl-site North1 nad83 sheet 3 of 5 Model —
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 3 —
sheet 2 of 4 newwork 2010 Model —
Agenda W911KB-09-R-0001 Anchorage Harbor Dredging 2009-2011.pdf PDF
ANCHORAGE dtl-site South1 nad83 sheet 2 o f 5 Model —
ANCHORAGE dtl-site DETAILS sheet 5 of 5 rev2 Model —
ANCHORAGE dtl-site South2 nad83 sheet 1 of 5 Model —
sheet 3 of 4 newwork 2010 Model —
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 1 —
POA_Pre-Dredge 16 may 08 EXHIBITS 1-4 Sheet 4 —
ANCHORAGE dtl-site North2 nad83 sheet 4 of 5 Model —
W911KB-09-R-0001 Proposal Documents Anchorage Harbor Dredging 2009-2011.pdf PDF
ANCHORAGE Cover 08-09 Model —
sheet 1 of 4 newwork 2010 Model —
Synopsis ANCH.doc DOC document
W911KB-09-R-0001 Drawings.pdf PDF
Geotechnical Findings Report Anchorage Harbor Deepening June 2008.pdf PDF
_Compiled Solicitation Packet.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 51 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W911KB-09-R-0001

2009-2011 Transitional and Maintenance Dredging

Port of Anchorage, Alaska

Pre-Proposal Meeting Attendance List

NAME
REPRESENTNG
PHONE NUMBER
EMAIL ADDRESS
Robb Swenson
General Construction
360-779-3200
robb.swenson@kiewit.com
April Hiller
Value Management Strategies
760-741-5518
april@vms-inc.com
George Hunter
Value Management Strategies
916-224-9812
george@vms-inc.com
Jayme Neubigging
Manson Construction
206-762-0850
jneubigging@mansonconstruction.com
Bill Hussin
Manson Construction
206-762-0850
bhussin@mansonconstruction.com
Leonard Juhnke
Manson Construction
206-762-0850
ljuhnke@mansonconstruction.com
Andrea Elconin
Corps of Engineers
907-753-5680
andrea.b.elconin@usace.army.mil
Greg Carpenter
Corps of Engineers
907-753-7684
gregory.w.carpenter@usace.army.mil
Stuart Greydanus
Port of Anchorage
907-343-6202
greydanussb@muni.org
Allen Churchill
Corps of Engineers
907-753-2753
e.allen.churchill@usace.army.mil
Brett F. Flint
ICRC
907-264-8931
bflint@icrcsolutions.com
Jim Campbell
J.E. McAmis
503-791-2765
Bill Dutra
Dutra Group
415-258-6875
bdutra@dutragroup.com
Harry Stewart
Dutra Group
415-258-1588
hstewart@dutragroup.com
Ken Eisses
Corps of Engineers
907-753-2742
kenneth.j.eisses@usace.army.mil
Lyn Dokoozian
ICRC
907-264-8938
ldokoozian@icrcsolutions.com
Kim Kuk
Corps of Engineers
907-753-2755
kim.b.kuk@usace.army.mil
Cody McCrary
Terrasond
907-745-7215
cmccrary@terrasond.com
Karl Woods
Terrasond
907-745-7215
kwoods@terrasond.com
JC Krause
Dutra Group
415-254-4443
jkrause@dutragroup.com
Christine Dale
Corps of Engineers Contracting
907-75-5618
christine.a.dale@usace.army.mil
Kim Tripp
Corps of Engineers Contracting
907-753-2549
kimberly.tripp@usace.army.mil
R. David Williams
Corps of Engineers Contracting
907-753-5571
r.david.williams@usace.army.mil
Merlin Peterson
Corps of Engineers EN-HH
07-753-2671
merlin.d.peterson@usace.army.mil
Al Arruda
Corps of Engineers EN-CE
907-753-5679
albert.arruda@usace.army.mil
Anne Fore
Corps of Engineers EN-CE
907-753-5574
anne.d.fore@usace.army.mil
Cory Hughes
Hughes & Assoc.
907-373-6999
hughes.survey@ak.net
Ze Jong
Corps of Engineers
907-753-2503
ze.f.jong@usace.army.mil
Scott M. Olson
Corps of Engineers
907-753-2884
scott.m.olson@usace.army.mil
Mark Reid
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
630-574-3488
mlreid@gldd.com
Will Wallgren
Dutra Group
415-250-6561
wwallgren@dutragroup.com

Questions and Answers from Pre-Proposal Conference

Question 1: Specify the preferred version of AutoCad (ie ACAD2004, Civil 3D, etc…)

Answer: The latest version of AutoCAD

Question 2: Paragraph 3.2.6 states that Independent Hydro Surveyor shall be a Registered Professional Land Surveyor or a certified (ACSM) Hydrographic Surveyor. This potentially excludes a registered PLS (no stamp/seal for drawings/surveys.) ACSM CHS is a nationwide certification (no such thing as “valid in the State of Alaska”) also there is not a “registered” or “licensed” professional ACSM certification. An individual meets minimum requirements to practice discipline. Referred paragraphs: 3.2.7, 3.2.7.2.1 and 3.2.7.2.3 of Sec 10 19 40.00 29 do not exist!

Answer: The survey specification has been revised to require a PLS and certified hydrographer as follows:

“The independent hydrographic surveyor shall be a Professional Land Surveyor (PLS) valid in the State of Alaska, and have current hydrographic certification from the American Congress for Surveying and Mapping (ACSM). The surveyor shall document at least 3 years of experience in hydrographic surveying of navigable channels.”

Question 3: Can there be a separate CLIN for obstructions/boulders?

Answer: Yes, the Proposal Schedule has been changed to include a CLIN for boulders and obstruction that are greater than 8 feet but less than 16 feet in any dimension. A sub-CLIN has also been added to address the pillbox discovered a few years ago.

Question 4: How would payment for obstructions/boulders be computed? Can there be a separation for size to reflect additional effort involved?

Answer: See response to above question. Anything larger than the size range provided in the above answer will be handled under the differing site conditions clause.

Question 5: Can the payment for removal of boulders be done on an hourly rate?

Answer: No, payment will be an “Each” unit price.

Question 6: Is blasting allowed for large boulders? If not, any other means for easier removal, for example chemicals or pneumatic hammer?

Answer: Blasting will not be allowed due to the listing of Cook Inlet beluga whales as an endangered species. The Offeror will be required to address removal techniques as part of their “Understanding of the Requirement” section in the proposal package..

Question 7: Can large boulders be towed or buried?

Answer: Yes, but keep in mind that a large portion of the project area will eventually be dredged to a Maximum Pay Line of -49 feet MLLW. Any burial of boulders would have to be accomplished so that they would not require re-removal during this deepening phase.

Question 8: For boulder removal there are no diver requirements in the specs.

Answer: True, use of divers in Cook Inlet may be to risky.

Question 9: Can drawings reflect where known large boulders and pill boxes are located?

Answer: Yes, one of the existing contract drawings already shows the location of known obstructions and the pillbox.

Question 10: Can the contract be separated, one for virgin soil removal and one for maintenance dredging?

Answer: No, right now that is not be in the Government’s best interest because of the additional contract preparation, execution, and administration costs..

Question 11: Would it be acceptable for South End Dredging be accomplished in a two year period of time?

Answer: Yes, the Proposal schedule has been revised to allow an additional optional CLIN to cover dredging of the South Extension virgin materials.

Question 12: If for reasons beyond contractor control, how will the bid be illustrated in the schedule if work cannot be completed until the following year?

Answer: The Proposal Schedule allows 2 years to complete the Barge Berths area, North Extension and South Extension virgin materials. Alternate proposal schedules will also be accepted.

Question 13: Can contract be set up by task and not by year?

Answer: No, leaving out the year references would make the contract unbiddable because there are very specific dates that some of the work must be completed. Additionally, the annual allocation of funding affects whether or not the optional work in the outyears can be awarded.

Question 14: Is there a date when this work must be completed in order for the new cranes to be delivered? Is there a date when this work must be completed in order to meet a deadline for the Port to commence everyday operation?

Answer: Yes, the new cranes for the North Extension are scheduled to arrive in August 2010. Enough dredging in front of the North extension will need to be completed by then so the ship bringing the new cranes can dock at the north extension. Similar milestones exist for the South Extension so that the POL areascan be relocated.

Question 15: Please specify if multi-beam or single beam survey is required in the specs.

Answer: Section 01 19 40.00 29 of the specifications has been revised to specifies that all surveys shall be multi-beam

Question 16: What are the requirements of the surveyors in the specs? Please include number of surveys in specifications. for bidding by surveyors.

Answer: The requirements of the surveyor are contained in Section 01 19 00.00 29, paragraph 3.2 of the specifications. The number of surveys shall be provided in an Offeror’s proposal for source selection.

Question 17: Please specify how many surveys are required.

Answer: The number of surveys shall be provided in an Offeror’s proposal for source selection.

Question 18: Will you specify the type of equipment used for maintenance dredging?

Answer: No. In order for this contract to be a performance based contract and also to maximize competition, we will not specify the type of equipment to be used.

Question 19: What is a composite survey? Is that the only means you are using for computing the amount of virgin material dredged?

Answer: “Composite” is a method for calculating survey quantities in the AutoCAD software. The composite method is preferred as opposed to average-end-area.

Question 20: After the virgin dredging, will shoaling be considered maintenance dredging or part of the virgin dredging? When will the shoaling be dredged?

Answer: All shoaling will be maintenance dredging. As currently written, maintenance dredging will be required for the North Extension, Barge Berths, and existing project (or portion thereof) in 2010 and 2011. Maintenance dredging for the South Extension will be required in 2011.

Question 21: Can surveys be done on smaller areas as virgin dredging is completed to accurately reflect effort of dredging by contractor?

Answer: Yes. A new type of survey to address this called “Acceptance Surveys” and has been added to Section 01 19 00.00 29 of the specifications.

Question 22: How many acceptance areas are there?

Answer: The frequency and number of Acceptance Surveys will be up to the successful Offeror to decide. In general, it will be in the Contractor’s best interests to survey fairly frequently in order to prevent virgin material dredged apparent from being reduced by the amount of shoaling in the dredged areas.

Question 23: How will the Cutter Head be paid by, barge count or survey?

Answer: If a cutter head is used, it will be paid by surveys.

Question 24: What other work is being done in the dredging area that will have to be coordinated with or worked around?

Answer: The new dock construction will be taking place within portions of the existing dredging area. A construction setback distance will be established and shown on the contract drawings followed by a 5 foot offset from the new dock face once completed. Periodic progress meetings throughout the contract period will be held with the Port, the dock contractor, you, and Corps representatives to coordinate work schedules in and around the new dock construction.

Question 25: On the drawings a box cut is shown, can that be modified to reflect a side slope?

Answer: No, box cuts are specified for all areas. Any material sloughing into the dredging prism after the acceptance surveys will be considered shoal material and removed during maintenance phases.

Question 26: How does the presence of the wall affect dredging?

Answer: The contract drawing specify a 5 foot offset from any structure. During construction of the new dock, there will be a 65 foot offset requirement until it is completed. It will be up to the Offeror to determine which type of equipment to use for dredging and protection of structures.

QUESTION 27: What type of rock classifications do the boulders fall under?

ANSWER: The Corps has not core sampled any of the boulders to know their specific classifications.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .