Attachment 16 Addendum to 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 Amendment 0001.pdf

Amended 0001 9 Sep 2024

Attachment 16 – Addendum to 52.212-1 and 52.212-2

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Products and Services

1. The selection of a source for award will be accomplished by using a Subjective Trade Off Process, IAW FAR Part 15.101-1. See the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services for specific basis for award. The contract will be a Combination Type Award: Firm Fixed Price and Requirements.

2. All questions, concerns, or clarifications shall be addressed to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) listed below as the sole point of contact for this acquisition. All inquiries must be made in writing and submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist with a copy to the PCO. The SUBJECT LINE shall be “W90VN6- 24-R-A001, Question. . . ATTN: KO Anthony Mosley”. Offerors will receive a notice of receipt, but if they do not, it is their responsibility to follow-up electronically with the points of contact listed below:

Contract Specialist:

Name: Ms. Nancy Segarra

Email: nancy.segarra2.civ@army.mil

Contract Specialist

Name: SFC Dong Kim

Email: dong.h.kim49.mil@army.mil

Procuring Contracting Officer:

Name: Anthony Mosley, CPCM

Email: anthony.s.mosley.civ@army.mil

3. A site visit will be held at each location as follows:

a. Daegu Air Base (Main Gate)– 5 Aug 2024, 0800hrs

b. Gimhae Air Base (Main Gate) – 6 Aug 2024, 0800hrs

c. Gwangju Air Base (Main Gate) – 7 Aug 2024, 0800hrs

d. Cheongju Air Base (Main Gate) – 8 Aug 2024, 1200hrs

e. Suwon Air Base (Main Gate) – 9 Aug 2024, 0800hrs

All site visits will end no later than 1630hrs.

There will be a short briefing provided by either the PCO or Contracting Officer Representative (COR) followed by a tour of facilities. The purpose of the site visit is to allow Offerors to see the site and make notes of questions for submission to the mailto:nancy.segarra2.civ@army.mil mailto:dong.h.kim49.mil@army.mil mailto:anthony.s.mosley.civ@army.mil

Contracting Officer at a later date. Prospective Offerors are highly encouraged to attend the site visit. Remarks and explanations provided by Government representatives during the site visit shall not change the terms of the RFP. Any change to the RFP terms will be conveyed through an amendment to the RFP.

Failure to attend the site visit will not disqualify the Offeror; however, the Offeror acts at its own risk and will not be relieved from complying with the terms and conditions of any resultant contract by reason of such failure. In no event will a failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after award of a contract.

4. Offerors are limited to two (2) attendees per firm due to room space limitations.

Attendees must also notify TSgt Scott Haeseler at scott.haeseler@us.af.mil (COR) and Mr. Yi at chae_hui.yi.kr@us.af.mil, no later than 1200hrs 24 Jul 2024 if attending the site visit. Include in the Subject Line: “W90VN6-24-R-A001, Site Visit.”

Send the request in the following format to the POCs listed in this paragraph via email:

If no response is received, the conference may be cancelled. No other pre-proposal conference will be scheduled. Attendance is at the expense of the Offerors.

Attendees must arrive on time to be included in the site visit. The visit will start promptly at the times listed in para. 3 above and anyone arriving after that time will be denied admission. Be advised that each COB is a limited access installation, and people entering its gates are subject to entrance requirements and possible search.

Unless some form of Department of Defense identification is provided, all drivers must provide a valid photo driver’s license, current vehicle registration, proof of vehicle insurance and enter through the designated gate.

5. Comments and/or questions are prohibited to be asked during the site visit.

Offerors shall submit all comments and/or questions in writing to be answered at a later date. This will ensure all Offerors have the same opportunity to receive a correct and accurate answer. This also removes any risk of an incorrect answer being provided verbally without first verifying its accuracy. All comments and/or questions must be submitted via a SINGLE email per Offeror, preferably in a Microsoft Word document attached to the e-mail. Submit to the point of contact in paragraph 2 above no later than 1200hrs 14 Aug 2024.

6. At the site visit, all attendees will be escorted by 607th MMS personnel at all times. Attendees will provide their own vehicles for the site visit. There will be no cameras, audio recordings, or videotaping or other recordings allowed, except that done by the Government. Cellular phones with cameras are allowed, but no pictures are permitted to be taken.

Na me DOB Address Ra nk/Title Cell phone Pla te Number Model Color 성명 생년월일 주소 업체명 연락처 차량번호 차종 색상

Full Na me YYYYMMDD Home a ddress (For US, unit na me) SSgt/CIV 010-1234-5678

PLEASE COMPLETE THE INFORMATION IN KOREAN AND ENGLISH.

Visitor informa tion Vehicle informa tion

7. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a. Each volume shall be submitted electronically and clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

b. Each paragraph should be single spaced and shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscape mode.

c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volume Title Digital Copies Maximum Pages

I Technical (Technical Phase I and Technical Phase II)

2 – one copy must be redacted of all company identification to include identifying logos.

II Past Performance 1 25

III Cost/Price 1 No page limit

IV Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents, and Certifications / Representations

1 No page limit

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated.

Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

8. PROPOSAL FILES

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled.

Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word.

MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5”

Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging. All of the proposal files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled proposal zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2007.

c. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I – Technical. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 – Technical Phase I (Acceptable/Unacceptable). The Offeror will provide information to substantiate the following:

• Subfactor #1- Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses – All licenses must be current and issued by the ROK government.

1. General Works (Civil) (종합공사 (토목공사업))

2. General Works (Architecture) (종합공사 (건축공사업))

3. Specialized Work for Electrical (전기 공사업)

Or in lieu of licenses 1, 2 and 3 above the prime contractor may submit:

General works (Civil & Architecture) (종합공사 (토목건축공사업)) and

Electrical Systems Repair (전기 공사업)

4. Mechanical Systems Repair (기계설비 공사업)

5. Fire Protection Systems Management (소방시설 관리업)

Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses and Prior Experience – Proposals will not be considered technically acceptable if the proposal attempts to meet this requirement through the licenses and experience of Subfactors, Joint Ventures or other type of partnerships

• Subfactor #2 – Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience

The Offeror will be evaluated on providing and demonstrating evidence of recent experience (calendar years beginning Jan 2018 – 2024,) either in the commercial sector or for government contracts, in facility maintenance including electrical, mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services for the same or similar services. Experience in the areas of mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services may be provided by subcontractors. The proposal submission must show evidence of at least three (3) years for experience within the past seven (7) years (calendar years beginning Jan 2018 – 2024). The Offeror shall provide evidence of prior experience in the following format:

- Title of the contract/Project

- A detail description of work completed

- Length of contract/Project (year/month/date – year/month/date)

- Value of contract/project in KW for annual sales total amount

- Complete name, phone number, and E-mail address of point of contact at Client Organization (Company) partnerships

(2) Section 2 – Technical Phase II – Technical and Management

(SubjectiveTrade Off). The offeror will provide information to substantiate the following:

• Subfactor #1- Technical Approach - The offeror shall provide a Technical Approach that demonstrates how the Contractor will complete all tasks contained in PWS. The offeror must show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements, specifically facility maintenance including electrical, mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services for the same or similar services. The Offeror shall provide staffing plan that clearly demonstrates how they will perform repair and maintenance of buildings and clearly identifies the labor mix and quantities by task, identifies the replacement strategy, backup policy, retention policy to ensure mitigation of turbulence caused by vacancies and leaves of absence to the execution of this requirement to include the proposed Key Personnel and Non-Key Personnel, both full time and part time staff, detailing roles, experience, license, and responsibilities of each position supporting the maintenance and repair of facilities at each designated location. The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement of capability to perform.

• Subfactor #2 – Quality Control Plan (QCP) - The Offeror shall provide a QCP that demonstrates the Offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the Offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call responses, and take corrective action to prevent re-occurrences. As part of the QCP, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP. The life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP.

Subfactor #3 – Property Management Plan (PMP) - The offeror shall provide a detailed explanation of how the offeror plans to meet the Government Furnished Property requirements as stated in the PWS and IAW FAR 52.245-1 (b)(1)-(4) to include:

• A detailed description of the offeror’s Property Management System

(PMS)

• The PMS description includes:

o PMS purpose o Applicable laws, regulations, instructions, etc.

o Company assets, subcontractor assets, and customer assets (e.g.

Government Property)

• Addresses the ten (10) outcomes of Government Property IAW FAR

52.245-1(f), (Acquisition, receiving, records, physical inventories, sub-contractor control, reports, and relief of responsibility, utilization, maintenance, and property closeout).

• Standards that the offeror intends to use in the management of Government Property (i.e. voluntary consensus standards, industry leading practices)

• How offeror plans to meet the Unique Identifying Device (IUID) requirements

• How contractor plans to meet all required reporting requirements

• Ensures all requirements of the Government Furnished Property requirements listed in PWS are addressed and IAW FAR 52.245-1 (b)(1)-(4).

(ii) VOLUME II – Past Performance. This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages plus five pages for each major subcontractor, excluding Past Performance Questionnaire Forms. Offerors shall submit Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 – Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format.

(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

(b) Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring

Contracting Officer’s name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

(c) Government’s technical representative/Contracting Officer’s

Representative and current email address, telephone, and fax numbers.

(d) Government contract administration activity and the

Administrative Contracting Officer’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone, and fax number.

(e) Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award

Monitor’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone, and fax numbers.

(f) Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.

(g) Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost

Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).

(h) Awarded price/cost.

(i) Final or projected final price/cost.

(j) Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.

(k) Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(2) Section 2 – Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this

RFP.

(a) For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

(b) For all contracts, the offeror shall provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate (CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the offeror’s delivered product.

(3) Section 3 – Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than (insert percentage) % of the total proposed cost/price. This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors

(4) Section 4 – New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its offices and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

(5) Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1, Contract Descriptions, where the past performance record cannot be obtained via the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS,) Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and/or the Supplier

Performance Risk System (SPRS), a Past Performance Questionnaire must be completed and submitted. The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to (insert email address). The offeror shall e-mail to the Contracting Officer a list of all the POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number;

Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

(6) Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POCs in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.

(iii) VOLUME III – Offer Breakdown. The offeror shall provide complete price proposal to include:

- Complete Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs (CLINs/SubCLINs) of the

RFP for the Phase-in Period, Base Period, and four (4) options. Any escalation in additional option year pricing shall be identified. The offeror should provide a cost breakdown per CLIN which is consistent with the offeror staffing plan and labor mix.

- Complete Attachment 12 Technical Exhibit II ELINs for Maintenance and Repair and Attachment 13 Technical Exhibit III Labor Categories/Rates for M&R.

- FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services: As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding a six-month equivalent of the Offeror’s final option period prices to the Offeror’s total price. Offerors are required only to price the base and four (4) options. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential one-half year extension of services period.

- The offeror shall submit all pricing information in Korean Won (KRW), rounding all unit prices to the nearest whole KRW, eliminating the use of any decimal points.

General Instructions. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.402 and 15.403-1, certified cost or pricing data are not required based on the fact that adequate competition is expected for this procurement. Information other than certified cost or pricing data may be provided in contractor format providing that sufficient information is made available. Information submitted shall be prepared following the instruction in FAR 15.403-5. If after receipt of proposals the Contracting Officer determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions at FAR 15.403-1 apply, the Offeror may be required to submit cost or pricing data. Additionally, in the event that adequate competition is not obtained, the Contracting Officer may incorporate FAR 52.215-20 entitled, “Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data,” into the solicitation and request a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. There are no page limitations for this volume. Proposal information included in this volume which is not directly related to Cost will be disregarded.

(iv) VOLUME IV – SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS

AND CERTIFICATIONS/REPRESENTATIONS

Certifications and Representations – Each offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections indicated below using the file (without modification to the file) provided with the RFP. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the SF 1449 and all certifications requiring original signature. An Acrobat PDF file shall be created to capture the signatures for submission.

- Complete Standard Forn 1449 and Standard Form 30 (if any amendment is issued)

- Complete 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Products and Commercial Services

- Complete Attachment 14 Contractor’s Tax Exemption Declaration Complete provision FAR 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment: The Offeror shall check mark in checkbox on the representation whether the Offeror WILL or WILL NOT provide the covered telecommunications equipment or services and DOES or DOES NOT use covered telecommunications equipment. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph of this section if the Offeror responds “WILL” or "DOES" in paragraph of this section. (If both Provisions have been in SAM (https://www.sam.gov)already, you are not required to check mark).

Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be addressed separately from that submitted in VOLUME IV –

SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS

/REPRESENTATIONS.

ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD OF ROK MND CONTRACTS

(a) This solicitation is conducted under the LCS program and will result in a contract between the Government of the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the contractor. ROK will directly pay the contractor. No appropriated funds of the United States (US) shall be obligated for payment due under a contract resulting from this solicitation.

(b) In accordance with the International Agreement between the US and ROK, titled “Implementation Arrangement for the Special Measures Agreement” (hereinafter “International Agreement”), signed by the parties in 2019:

The parties hereby agree that all LCS work must be accomplished in the ROK or its territorial waters and that all equipment and supplies that are to be acquired with ROK Government funds shall be manufactured in the ROK, and all LCS service work shall be carried out by Korean contractor(s), the Korea Railroad Corporation, or the ROK military.

The term ‘Korean contractor” in implementing the LCS program in Section V, Paragraph 3 (of the 2019 SMA IA) is defined as follows:

1. An entity, that, including its parent, is a domestic corporation under the Korean Corporation Tax Act and whose domestic status is recorded in the Certified Copy of Register or its successor document. A parent is defined as an entity that holds more than 50/100 of the total issued and outstanding shares in another company, as reflected in the Stock Change Certificate; or

2. An individual who has Korean nationality.

(c) In order to establish eligibility for a LCS contract, the offeror shall submit the documents listed below with their proposal prior to the closing date/time established in the solicitation. The contracting officer will determine the offeror’s eligibility status as a Korean contractor solely on the basis of these documents.

(1) Prime Contractor Registration: The offeror shall submit its Certified Copy of Register

(등기부 등본 (유효사항)), as certified and submitted to the ROK Supreme Court

(대법원). In order to qualify as a Korean Contractor, the fourth block of the offeror's

Certified Copy of Register [등기부 등본 (유효사항)] must state an address that is physically located in the Republic of Korea.

(2) Prime Contractor Stock Change Certification: The offeror shall submit its most recent

Stock Change Certificate (주식 변동 상황 명세서), as certified and submitted to the

ROK Local Tax Office (국세청). The prime contractor’s Stock Change Certificate (주식

변동 상황 명세서) will be evaluated to determine if the prime contractor has a Parent (as defined in the International Agreement extract above).

(3) If the Prime Contractor has a Parent, the offeror shall submit the Parent’s Certified

Copy of Register (등기부등본 (유효사항)) as certified and submitted to the ROK

Supreme Court (대법원). In order for the Prime Contractor to qualify as a Korean

Contractor, the fourth block of the offeror’s Parent’s Certified Copy of Register (등기부

등본 (유효사항)) must state an address that is physically located in the Republic of

Korea.

(4) To validate if an individual is “Korean nationality”, the following documents shall be submitted:

• Business Registration (사업자 등록증)

• Basic Certificate (기본 증명서)

• Certificate of Business Fact (사업사실증명서)

(Issued by National Tax Service showing partnership/owners, shares, and date when the business was jointly owned)

(d) To summarize the requirements stated above:

(1) An offeror that does not have a “Parent” will submit 2 documents to establish that the offeror is a Korean Contractor: 1) Offeror's Certified Copy of Register, and 2) Offeror's Stock Change Certificate.

(2) An offeror that does have a “Parent” will submit 3 documents to establish that the offeror is a Korean Contractor: 1) Offeror's Certified Copy of Register, 2) Offeror's Stock Change Certificate, and 3) Parent's Certified Copy of Register.

(3) An Offeror that does not have Stock Change Certificate will submit: 1) Business Registration, 2) Basic Certificate, and 3) Certificate of Business Fact.

NOTICE TO OFFERORS

All sources may submit a proposal as applicable. However, the Republic of Korea (ROK)-United States (U.S.) Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), precludes the U.S.

Government from granting Invited Contractor or Technical Representative Status to any offeror, for this requirement. All sources submitting a proposal, as applicable, including U.S. sources, must already have, or obtain the requisite business licenses directly from the ROK Government, and conduct business in accordance with all applicable ROK laws, including but not limited to, rules and policies regarding labor, taxation, and immigration. Any contractor not already doing business in Korea, must submit adequate verification in its initial proposal - that it has the requisite business licenses directly from the ROK Government to perform the contract and the capacity to conduct business in accordance with all applicable ROK laws, including but not limited to, rules and policies regarding labor, taxation, and immigration. If an initial proposal does not fully demonstrate this authorization and capacity, it will not be further considered for award.

Whether an offeror demonstrates this authorization and capacity shall be determined by the Contracting Officer. “All offerors interested in competing for this requirement are required to submit their price proposal in (KW) only. A proposal submitted in currency other than Korean Won will not be considered for award.”

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Services

(1) In accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 15, the award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the RFP# W90VN6-24-R-A001 evaluation factors: Prime Contractor’s Business Registration and License, Prime

Contractor’s Prior Experience, Technical and Management, Past Performance, and Price/Cost.

(2) In accordance with FAR 15.101-1, Trade-Off process, an award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror. However, the Government will not pay a substantially higher amount for a minimal increase in capability.

(3) The offeror must get an Acceptable rating for the Factor/Subfactors under Technical Phase I to be considered for subjective trade off under the Technical Phase II Factor/Subfactors. Technical Phase 1 factors and subfactors will be rated as Acceptable/Unacceptable only (The unsuccessful letter including debriefing instruction will be sent to the Offerors who rated as “Unacceptable” under Technical Phase I).

(4) To be considered, for award, the offeror must get at least an Acceptable rating in all factors and subfactors in Technical Phase II.

(5) The relative importance of each evaluation factor is listed in the table below:

FACTOR DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

2 Technical Phase II - Technical and Management

Most Important All subfactors under Technical Phase II are of equal importance.

3 Past Performance Less important than Factor 2, but more important than Factor 4.

4 Price Least Important. Each Factor 2 and 3 are more important that Factor 4.

Factors 2 and 3, when combined, are significantly more important than Factor

(6) Volume IV – Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations will only be evaluated as responsive/non-responsive.

Any required documentation that is missing, incomplete or incorrectly completed may be deemed non-responsive and will not be further considered for award.

(7) Discussions: In accordance with FAR 15.306(d), discussion sessions with each Offeror may be held. Should discussions take place, all Offerors in the competitive range may be allowed to submit Final Proposal Revisions. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions.

FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below. The Government reserves the right to make award based upon the Cost/Price factor in the event that the Technical, and Past Performance evaluation results of all the offerors’ proposals are substantially the same.

Factor 1: The Technical Phase I Factor will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis and is further divided into the following subfactors:

a. Subfactor 1 – Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses.

b. Subfactor 2 – Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience

Factor 2: The Technical Phase II – Technical and Management Factor is further divided into the following subfactors:

a. Subfactor 1 – Technical Approach

b. Subfactor 2 – Quality Control Plan (QCP)

c. Subfactor 3 – Property Management Plan (PMP)

Factor 3: Past Performance: Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine relevancy and confidence assessment.

Factor 4: Cost/Price: The resulting award will be a Requirements Contract with Firm- Fixed Price CLINs. Prices will be analyzed and evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price.

EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals shall be evaluated by the Source Selection Team (SST).

1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the

RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable.

The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule.

2. The Technical factors are divided into the following subfactors:

Factor 1: The Technical Phase I Factor will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis as follows:

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

and is further divided into the following subfactors:

a. Subfactor 1 – Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses. Any offeror that cannot provide evidence of having current licenses listed below will receive an Unacceptable rating and will not be further considered for award.

1. General Works (Civil) (종합공사 (토목공사업))

2. General Works (Architecture) (종합공사 (건축공사업))

3. Specialized Work for Electrical (전기 공사업)

Or in lieu of licenses 1, 2 and 3 above the prime contractor may submit:

General works (Civil & Architecture) (종합공사 (토목건축공사업)) and

Electrical Systems Repair (전기 공사업)

4. Mechanical Systems Repair (기계설비 공사업)

5. Fire Protection Systems Management (소방시설 관리업) partnerships.

b. Subfactor 2 – Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience

The Offeror will be evaluated on providing and demonstrating evidence of recent experience (calendar years beginning Jan 2018 – 2024,) either in the commercial sector or for government contracts, in facility maintenance including electrical, mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services for the same or similar services. Experience in the areas of mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services may be provided by subcontractors. The proposal submission must show evidence of at least three (3) years for experience within the past seven (7) years (calendar years beginning Jan 2018 – 2024). Any offeror that does not provide evidence of such experience will receive an Unacceptable rating and will not be further considered for award.

Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses and Prior Experience – Proposals will not be considered technically acceptable if the proposal attempts to meet this requirement through the licenses and experience of Subfactors, Joint Ventures or other type of partnerships.

Factor 2: The Technical Phase II – Technical and Management Factor (Subjective Trade-Off)

Technical Approach and Related Risk will be evaluated as shown on Table 1 below. This methodology considers risk, in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, certainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

Strength. An aspect of an Offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the Offeror is indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Technical Phase II Subfactors:

a. Subfactor 1 – Technical Approach: The offeror shall provide a Technical

Approach that demonstrates how the Contractor will complete all tasks contained in PWS. The offeror must show their understanding and capability in accomplishing all requirements, specifically facility maintenance including electrical, mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services for the same or similar services. The Offeror shall provide staffing plan that clearly demonstrates how they will perform repair and maintenance of buildings and clearly identifies the labor mix and quantities by task, identifies the replacement strategy, backup policy, retention policy to ensure mitigation of turbulence caused by vacancies and leaves of absence to the execution of this requirement to include the proposed Key Personnel and Non-Key Personnel, both full time and part time staff, detailing roles, experience, license, and responsibilities of each position supporting the maintenance and repair of facilities at each designated location. The Offerors are cautioned that “mirroring/copying” the technical requirements of the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement of capability to perform.

b. Subfactor 2 – Quality Control Plan (QCP): The Offeror shall provide a

QCP that demonstrates the Offeror’s approach to conducting comprehensive quality control. The plan shall clearly describe the Offeror’s quality control methods and practices such as standardized procedures to monitor performance, identify discrepancies, service call responses, and take corrective action to prevent re- occurrences. As part of the QCP, the Offeror shall identify what items the Offeror will inspect under its comprehensive QC for each task listed in the PRS table. The QCP shall be used throughout the life of this contract and shall

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is not awardable.

be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the QCP. The life of this contract and shall be updated by the Contractor when the changes affect the

QCP.

c. Subfactor 3 – Property Management Plan (PMP): The offeror shall provide a detailed explanation of how the offeror plans to meet the Government Furnished Property requirements as stated in the PWS and IAW FAR 52.245-1 (b)(1)-(4) to include:

• A detailed description of the offeror’s Property Management System

(PMS)

• The PMS description includes:

o PMS purpose o Applicable laws, regulations, instructions, etc.

o Company assets, subcontractor assets, and customer assets (e.g.

Government Property)

• Addresses the ten (10) outcomes of Government Property IAW FAR 52.245-1(f), (Acquisition, receiving, records, physical inventories, sub-contractor control, reports, and relief of responsibility, utilization, maintenance, and property closeout).

• Standards that the offeror intends to use in the management of Government Property (i.e. voluntary consensus standards, industry leading practices)

• How offeror plans to meet the Unique Identifying Device (IUID) requirements

• How contractor plans to meet all required reporting requirements

• Ensures all requirements of the Government Furnished Property requirements listed in PWS are addressed and IAW FAR 52.245-1 (b)(1)-(4).

Each Subfactor listed for Factor 2 Technical Phase II, Technical and Management are of equal importance.

Evaluation of the offeror’s proposal shall address each Technical Phase II subfactor as it applies to the Performance Work Statement (PWS). A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the “Evaluation Approach” of this section. During evaluation of each proposal, the Government will assign each Technical subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings.

3. Past Performance Factor. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS.

The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered. Relevant contracts are defined as contracts that demonstrate the Offeror has provided evidence of experience in facility maintenance including electrical, mechanical (structural, plumbing, HVAC), real property management, and environmental protection services for the same or similar services.

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information). All three aspects must be considered for each of the contracts or requirements evaluated.

Recency: The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance.

Recency is generally expressed as a period of no less than seven (7) years are considered recent, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information.

Relevance: The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

Relevancy is not separately rated; however, the following criteria (see below table) will be used to establish what is relevant which shall include similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming. Relevant service is same or similar to the tasks in this Performance Work Statement.

Table 2 - Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(i) QUALITY ASSESSMENT: The third aspect assesses the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

e. Performance Confidence Assessment: Utilize the Performance Confidence Assessment (see Table 3 below) to select the most appropriate confidence level for each Offeror. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.

TABLE 3 - Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the facto of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

4. Cost/Price Factor.

1. Price will not be scored or rated. All CLINs and banding prices proposed (including the Pricing Matrix) will be evaluated for Price Reasonableness and Balance. Unbalanced pricing will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404- 1(g), as applicable, to assess potential performance risk which could result in unreasonably high prices. Price reasonableness will be evaluated in accordance with the proposal analysis techniques described in FAR 15.404-1(b). Through this technique the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable, and balanced.

2. Options the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding a six-month equivalent of the Offeror's price for the last Option Period. The Offeror will not propose a price for the six-month period.

The extension of services clause will be exercised only if necessary, utilizing the negotiated rates of the preceding period.

3. Total Evaluated Price (TEP): The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) shall be used for evaluation of price reasonableness and for the purpose of determining best value for award. The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be the sum of the Base Period and each Option Period, including the phase-in period and the option to extend services as described in paragraph 2.3.2 of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

4. Evaluation of the option(s) shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

5. Balanced Pricing. The government will evaluate all CLINs for balanced pricing to include sub-CLIN pricing contained in the Pricing Schedule. Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items (including Base and Option Periods) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the lack of balance poses a significant risk to the Government.

6. Completeness/Accuracy. The Offeror’s proposal shall comply with the Price volume instructions in the solicitation.

7. Reasonableness. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

SOLICITATION CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX

For Prospective Offerors: If this matrix conflicts with any other requirement, direction, or provision of this solicitation, the other reference shall take precedence over this matrix.

Additionally, to the extent this matrix discloses details as to the extent or manner by which the Government intends to evaluate offeror’s proposals for award, FAR 52.212-2 and its addendum references in the matrix are for information purposes only, and the Government shall be obligated to evaluate proposals solely in conformance with the provisions of FAR 52.212-2 and its addendum of the solicitation.

TECHNICAL

52.212-1 52.212-2 PWS Attachment

Technical Phase I

Subfactor #1- Prime Contractor’s Business Licenses

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable The proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

1. General works (Civil)

2. General works (Architecture)

3. Specialized Work for Electrical or General works (Civil & Architecture) and Electrical Systems Repair

N/A

Subfactor #2 – Prime Contractor’s Prior Experience

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal…