0003_Full_FAT_plan_R1.docx
DOCX document 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Modular Fuel System Tank Rack Module
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-18-R-0096
About this file
Full FAT
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DETAILED TEST PLAN
FOR THE
FIRST ARTICLE TEST
OF THE
MODULAR FUEL SYSTEM TANK RACK MODULE
Date - TBD
DISCLAIMER STATEMENTS
The use of trade names or the name of a manufacturer or contractor in this document does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial hardware or software or services. This document may not be cited for purpose of advertisement.
Yuma Test Center will conduct this test in accordance with PdM PAWS’s requirements. It may not relate to the independent evaluator’s issues. Therefore, additional tests may be required to provide test data for evaluation issues.
DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION | 1 | |
| 1.1 | SYSTEM DESCRIPTION | 1 |
| 1.2 | SUMMARY | 1 |
| 1.3 | UNIQUE TEST PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS | 6 |
| SECTION 2. SUBTESTS | 7 | |
| 2.1 | INITIAL INSPECTION | 7 |
| 2.2 | PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS | 13 |
| 2.3 | RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY (R&M) | 17 |
| 2.4 | TRM PUMP PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION | 25 |
| 2.5 | SAFETY AND HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING (HFE) | 30 |
| 2.6 | ENVIRONMENTAL | 39 |
| 2.7 | TRANSPORTABILITY | 87 |
| 2.8 | LANE CHANGE | 95 |
| 2.9 | GRADEABILITY AND SIDE SLOPES | 100 |
| 2.10 | STRAIGHT LANE BRAKING | 103 |
| 2.11 | FINAL INSPECTION | 106 |
| SECTION 3. APPENDICES | A–1 | |
| A. | TEST CRITERIA | A–1 |
| B. | LISTS OF FREQUENCIES USED FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC TESTING | B-1 |
| C. | REFERENCES | C-1 |
| D. | ABBREVIATIONS | D-1 |
| E. | DISTRIBUTION LIST | E–1 |
ii
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
The following system description of the Modular Fuel System (MFS) Tank Rack Module (TRM) describes the intended use and capabilities to TRM:
The MFS TRM provides an intermodal fuel transport, storage, and distribution capability. It is compatible with the Palletized Load System (PLS) and Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT) - Load Handling System (LHS). The TRM can be deployed and recovered full, partially full, or empty, by organic LHS and PLS unit assets. Two TRMs can transport 5,000 gallons of fuel (2,500 gallons per TRM; one on the truck and one on the trailer) utilizing the PLS and HEMTT mission profile to provide direct delivery of bulk fuel to division and brigade forces, providing rapid fuel support when a Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP) deployment is impractical. One trailer-mounted TRM can also be pulled and used in tandem with the HEMTT tanker.
The TRM includes a 20-gallon per minute (gpm) (threshold)/50 gpm (objective) pumping assembly, a filter separator, a flow meter, HEMTT interfaces, a fuel spill control kit, a nozzle, and accessories including hoses, a ladder, and fittings. The TRM is capable of top and bottom fill and is transportable at any level of fuel. The TRM is capable of retail refueling and evacuating all but residual fuel from the hoses and other system components prior to teardown. The TRM is compatible with other US, military, and commercial fuel systems. The TRM meets International Organization of Standardization (ISO) container requirements to allow stacking of TRMs. It meets requirements of worldwide shipping by air, rail, marine, and highway, without changes in configuration or special considerations.
The TRMs are required to interface with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and allied nation petroleum storage and distribution systems. The TRM was designed to be in compliance with international petroleum industry standards for petroleum product distribution and delivery. The TRM was also designed to conform to NATO standards for demountable cargo beds (flatracks), allowing LHS type trucks from other countries to load, unload, and transport the TRM.
1.2 SUMMARY
a. PdM PAWS will provide four TRMs (the evaluated test items), one HEMTT LHS or PLS truck and one M1076 PLS trailers to help support the test. YTC will provide one PLS truck and one M1076 PLS trailer for back-up purposes, as well as facilities, instrumentation, and support personnel to support this test. The contractor will provide one Field Service Representative (FSR) to operate the MFS at the test site during each of the two 10-hour shifts for technical support.
a. On (date TBD), U.S. Army Yuma Proving Ground (YPG), Yuma Test Center (YTC), received a Test Directive, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Project No. (TBD), on the Automated Decision Support System (ADSS) from U.S. Army Evaluation Center (AEC) to conduct the First Article Test (FAT) of the TRM.
b. The test is scheduled to start in (date TBD)
(1) Testing will be performed on seven TRMs.
(2) Four TRMs will perform a combined total of 11,900 miles and 595 pumping hours of Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) testing. The TRMs will be subjected to operations over primary, secondary, trails, and cross-country courses. Three TRMs will be used for performance testing. Test data results will be used to determine the TRM’s compliance to Automotive Tank Purchase Description (ATPD) 2336E, Purchase Description MFS (Ref 1, App C)
(3) Due to environmental concerns, Durasoil will be used as a substitute for Jet Propellant (JP) 8 during various tests. TRMs testing with Durasoil will be cleaned and purged of all fuel contaminates using detergent and water. The TRM will be filled approximately halfway with water once a box of detergent is added, and will be subjected to run one lap on the Patton Level Trails (PLT) test course. The TRM will be flushed and drained at a YTC wash rack by gravity feed only; Durasoil and water will not be pumped by the TRM during any time of the test. The process will be repeated twice prior to having Durasoil added to the TRM.
(4) The TRMs will be carried by one PLS prime mover, one HEMTT-LHS, and two PLS trailers throughout the R&M test.
(5) Testing will be performed using the Test Operating Procedures (TOPs) and Military Standards (MIL-STDs) referenced in each subtest as a guideline.
(6) The contractor will provide one Field Service Representative (FSR) to operate the MFS at the test site during each of the two 10-hour shifts for technical support.
c. The overall objective of the test is to collect data that will determine the capability of the TRM to function properly over its Mission Profile (MP) and to determine if the TRM meets its R&M and performance requirements. Table 1.2–1 provides a summary of the specific test objectives.
Table 1.2–1. Test Objectives
| Subtest |
| Objective |
| 2.1 Initial Inspection |
| a. To inspect and verify the conditions and configuration of each TRM, and to correct any defects or shipping damage prior to test commencement. |
b. To perform a preliminary hazard and safety assessment to assure that the test items are equipped with the required safety features and that the vehicles are safe to operate prior to the start of test.
c. To record/document the major component serial numbers and other component part numbers for use during testing.
d. To inventory and install all BII.
e. To perform a functional test of the electric pump before the start of testing.
f. To install instrumentation required for testing.
| 2.2 Physical Characteristics |
| To determine the dimensional and physical characteristics of the TRM on its own, while empty and full. |
| 2.3 R&M |
| a. To determine the capability of the TRM to function properly over the MP without inhibiting operation. |
b. To determine whether the electric pump meets the MTBHEFF of 125 hours.
c. To determine if the TRM meets the R&M requirements.
| 2.4 TRM Pump Performance Verification |
| a. To determine the adequacy of the TRM to provide fuel to other vehicles and to be discharged on level ground. |
b. To evaluate the operation of the TRM on level ground and on a 5-degree slope.
| 2.5 Safety and HFE |
| a. To determine the effectiveness of the man-machine interface provided by the TRM. |
b. To determine if the design of the TRM, as well as the provided operating procedures, conforms to existing HFE standards.
c. To ensure that any safety hazards associated with the operation, maintenance, transportation, and storage of the TRM are eliminated or minimized to an acceptable level.
d. To ensure that safety and warning devices (guards, locking devices, alarms, warning lights, etc.) are adequate to provide the protection of their intended design.
e. To ensure that all safety guidance (including warnings, cautions, and procedures in publications and on the equipment) is adequate to minimize operational or maintenance hazards.
Table 1.2–1. Test Objectives (Continued)
| Subtest |
| Objective |
f. To determine whether the noise levels produced by the TRM meet ATPD 2336E criteria.
g. To gather data for a Recommendation for Safety Confirmation.
2.1 Environmental
| 2.6.1 Cold Temperature |
| a. To determine the capability of the TRM to be stored, manipulated, and operated in a cold temperature environment. |
b. To determine the capability of the TRM to be fueled during cold environment conditions.
c. To determine the capability of the TRM to start at -25°F three times within a 1-hour period, with a 15-minute interlude between starts, after a 5-minute run cycle is completed.
d. To determine the capability of the manual stop to discontinue the flow of fuel within 5 seconds after activation.
e. To determine the capability of the TRM to maintain their fuel payload uncontaminated while operating in a cold temperature environment.
f. To determine the capability of the TRM to dispense fuel, be torn down, and be placed in the stowed condition in a cold temperature environment.
g. To verify the TRM has not been damaged or has not suffered a degradation in system performance as a result of the cold temperature test.
| 2.6.2 Hot Temperature |
| a. To determine the capability of the TRM to be stored, manipulated, and operated in hot weather conditions (storage at 160°F and operation at 120°F). |
b. To determine the capability of the TRM to operate continuously under maximum operating load while in hot weather conditions.
c. To verify that the TRM has not been damaged or has not suffered a degradation in system performance as a result of the hot temperature test.
d. To determine the capability of the TRMs to allow for thermal expansion of their fluid payload without incurring any leaks or damage.
| 2.6.3 Humidity |
| a. To determine the capability of the TRM to be stored, manipulated, and operated in high RH conditions (95 percent of saturation). |
b. To verify the TRM has not been damaged or has not suffered a degradation in system performance as a result of the humidity test.
| 2.6.4 Blowing Rain |
| a. To determine the operational readiness and to identify the discrepancies with the TRM during and after exposure to a blowing rain environment. |
b. To verify that the TRM has not been damaged or has not suffered any degradation in system performance as a result of the blowing rain test.
| 2.6.5 Blowing Sand and Dust |
| To determine if the TRM system is capable of operation during or after exposure to blowing sand and dust, with no damage or degradation to the system. |
| 2.6.6 Altitude |
| a. To assess the operational survivability and identify the susceptibilities of the TRM during and after exposure to a low pressure environment. |
b. To verify that the TRM have not been damaged or suffered any degradation in system performance as a result of the Altitude subtest.
| 2.6.7 Solar Radiation |
| a. To assess the operational survivability and identify the susceptibilities of the TRM during and after exposure to a high temperature and a solar radiation (solar load) environment. |
b. To verify that the TRM has not been damaged or has suffered a degradation in system performance as a result of the solar radiation subtest.
| 2.6.8 Salt Fog |
| a. To assess the operational survivability and identify the susceptibilities of the TRM after exposure to a salt fog environment. This subtest demonstrates survivability of the TRM to contamination by salt deposits. |
b. To verify that the TRM have not been damaged or suffered any degradation in system performance as a result of the salt fog subtest.
| 2.6.9 Electromagnetic Interference |
| a. To perform an assessment of the ability of the TRM, to meet its operational performance requirements when subjected to prescribed Electromagnetic Environments (EMEs) and the effects produced by these EMEs. |
b. To assess the survivability of the TRM to defined EMEs.
c. To expand the Life-Cycle Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Survivability (LCES) program and its database for the TRM with data from TRM.
2.7 Transportability
| 2.7.1 Rail Impact |
| a. To determine if each TRM is capable of withstanding the rail transportation environment. |
b. To verify that each TRM, set in its rail transport configuration, does not sustain performance degradation as a result of the rail impact test (ref table 2.7.2.2–1). The configurations that will be tested are TRM on prime mover and securing the TRM using the ISO locks on a container on flat car (COFC) railcar.
| 2.7.2 Highway Transport |
| To determine the feasibility of transporting each TRM as comparable to an ISO container. |
| 2.7.3 Tip Test |
| a. To determine the capability of the TRM to be air-transportable without incurring any leakage or failure resulting in or causing an unsafe condition. |
b. To determine if leakage will occur when TRM is tipped to a 60-degree angle to the right and left sides, and in the forward and aft directions.
| 2.7.4 Structural Integrity Test |
| To determine the capability of the TRM to withstand the positive and suction pressures encountered during air transport without any leakage or failure resulting in or causing an unsafe condition. |
| 2.7.5 Thermal Expansion Test |
| To determine the ability of the TRM to allow for thermal expansion of the fluid, without overflowing beyond the confines of the assembly. |
| 2.8 NATO Lane Change |
| a. To determine the dynamic stability of the TRM during a lane change. |
b. To verify that the TRM has not been damaged or has suffered degradation in system performance as a result of the NATO Lane Change test.
| 2.9 Gradeability and Side Slopes |
| a. To determine the ability of the system, the prime mover with the TRM, to negotiate a 30-percent side slope and a 60-percent longitudinal grade. |
b. To determine the ability of the system, the prime mover, trailer, and two TRMs to negotiate a 30-percent longitudinal grade and a 30-percent side slope with prime mover and trailer only.
| 2.10 Straight Lane Braking |
| a. To determine the base line stopping distance of the PLS truck, HEMTT-LHS, and the TRM with various payloads, and whether they meet the criteria set forth in the performance specifications. |
b. To verify that the TRM will not be damaged or has suffered any degradation in system performance as a result of an emergency stop.
| 2.11 Final Inspection |
| To determine the condition of the TRMs after the completion of all testing and to prepare the test items for shipment to another location. |
| LEGEND: | ||
| ATPD | – | Automotive Tank Purchase Description |
| BII | – | Basic Issue Items |
| HEMTT | – | Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck |
| HFE | – | Human Factors Engineering |
| HSL | – | Helicopter Sling Lift |
| ISO | – | International Organization of Standardization |
| LHS | – | Load Handling System |
| MP | – | Mission Profile |
| MTBHEFF | – | Mean-time-between Hardware Essential Function Failure |
| NATO | – | North Atlantic Treaty Organization |
| PLS | – | Palletized Load System |
| RH | – | Relative Humidity |
| R&M | – | Reliability and Maintainability |
| SDDCTEA | – | Surface Deployment and Distribution Command Transportation Engineering Agency |
| TRM | – | Tank Rack Module |
d. Test data collected during test operations will be reported via Test Incident Reports (TIRs) prepared in accordance with (IAW) Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet (PAM) 731, Test and Evaluation (T&E) in Support of Systems Acquisition (Ref 2, App C), and the final report. Additionally, TIRs will be furnished on all problems, failures, significant observations, and performance test results noted throughout the test period. All failed components will be tagged and stored until instructions for the release of parts are provided by PdM PAWS. All documentation, photographs, and data will be available through the Versatile Information Systems Integrated Online (VISION) Digital Library System (VDLS) at https://vdls.atc.army.mil. Each photograph will be labeled with the date taken and a brief reference to the incident it records.
1.3 UNIQUE TEST PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
None.
SECTION 2. SUBTESTS
2.1 INITIAL INSPECTION
2.1.1 Objectives
a. To inspect and verify the conditions and configuration of each TRM and to correct any defects or shipping damage prior to test commencement
b. To perform a preliminary hazard and safety assessment to assure that the test items are equipped with the required safety features and that the vehicles are safe to operate prior to the start of test
c. To record/document the major component serial numbers and other component part numbers for use during testing
d. To inventory and install all Basic Issue Items (BII)
e. To perform a functional test of the electric pump before the start of testing
f. To install instrumentation required for testing
2.1.2 Criteria and Data Analysis
Combat and Automotive Systems Division (CASD) test personnel will analyze the TRM data gathered during this test, as presented in table 2.1.2–1.
Table 2.1.2–1. TRM Criteria and Data Analysis for Initial Inspection
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
| 9 – Equipment Box(es) |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. Each TRM is equipped with equipment storage boxes.
b. The storage boxes are compartmented, contain a lockable hasp, and have provisions for holding the lid in an open position.
c. The boxes provide enough space to organize and protect them from corrosion and other damage to all tools, accessories, publications, and any other BII supplied with each TRM (unless specified elsewhere).
d. The equipment boxes are accessible by personnel standing at ground level when each TRM is sitting on the ground.
Table 2.1.2–1. TRM Criteria and Data Analysis for Initial Inspection (Continued)
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
| 11 – Hose Storage |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. The TRM has lockable storage tubes capable of storing all non-collapsible hoses as specified in paragraph 3.5.7.1 of ATPD 2336E.
b. The TRM has storage tubes located where they can be accessible by personnel standing at ground level when the system is truck or trailer mounted.
c. The storage tubes have a permanently attached cover at both ends and prevent damage to the hoses.
| 29 – Line Strainer |
| If the piping system includes an inline strainer before the pump to prevent damage to the pump by debris, the strainer is corrosion resistant, and the strainer is accessible for inspection and cleaning at the operator level without special tools, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 30 – Hose |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. Two segments of 4-inch non-collapsible hose, 15 feet in length; one segment of 4-inch non-collapsible hose, 8 feet in length; and one segment of 4-inch non-collapsible hose, 6 feet in length, are supplied with each TRM.
b. Each of these four segments is equipped with one 4-inch male cam-lock fitting with a tethered cap on one end and one 4-inch female cam-lock fitting with a tethered plug on the other end.
c. All hoses used on or supplied with each TRM are IAW MIL-PRF-370H, Performance Specification: Hose and Hose Assemblies, Nonmetallic: Elastomeric, Liquid Fuel (Ref 3, App C).
d. All hose lengths specified herein are nominal lengths for the overall hose assembly.
| 31 – Army Adapters |
| If each TRM is provided with the adapters and reducers as specified in Paragraph 3.5.7.2.1.2 of ATPD 2336E to allow interfacing with existing Army bulk storage and distribution equipment (4-inch male to 3-inch female cam-lock reducer), the criterion will be considered met. |
| Criterion | |
| (App A, Item No.) | Remarks/Analysis |
Table 2.1.2–1. TRM Criteria and Data Analysis for Initial Inspection (Concluded)
| 55 – Lubricants |
| The criterion will be considered met if the lubricating oil requirements are satisfied using the following: |
a. MIL-PRF-2104, Lubricating Oil, Internal Combustion Engine, Combat/Tactical Service (Ref 4, App C); and MIL-PRF-46167, Lubricating Oil, Internal Combustion Engine, Arctic (Ref 5, App C).
b. The gear oil, if required, conforms to SAE J2360, Lubricating Oil, Gear Multipurpose (Metric) Military Use (Ref 6, App C), and the grease conforms to MIL-PRF-10924, Grease, Automotive and Artillery (Ref 7, App C).
c. A means of lubrication is provided for all TRM components requiring routine lubrication.
d. The lubrication fittings conform to SAE J534, Lubrication Fittings, and antifreeze, if required, conforms to A-A-52624, Antifreeze, Multi-engine Type (Ref 8, App C), Types I and II (Arctic).
| 81 – Manuals and Special Instructions |
| If the TRM requires field and sustainment maintenance manuals and other special instructions; and if manuals and other special instructions are included as part of the end-item when specified by the contract, scope of work, or Section 6.2 of ATPD 2336E, the criterion will be met. |
| 82 – BII |
| The criterion will be considered met if each TRM is provided with BII and stowage space for the BII. BII is defined as any support items that the operator of each TRM requires to put the system in operation, operate, or perform emergency and operator level repairs of each TRM. |
| 83 – Load and Packaging Plans and Instructions |
| If load, packaging plans, and instructions are provided for each of the TRM movement modes and configurations (see paragraph 3.6.1 of ATPD 2336E), and these plans and instructions provide for protection of the equipment from damage or reduction in operation capabilities, and comply with the design and safe operational limitations of the required aircraft, vehicles, trailers, and pallets, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 84 – Test Center Specific |
| The criterion will be considered met if the TRM is received without any major defects and in a fully functional condition. |
NOTE: Underlined portions of the criteria will not be addressed at YTC.
| LEGEND: | ||
| ATPD | – | Automotive Tank Purchase Description |
| BII | – | Basic Issue Items |
| IAW | – | In accordance with |
| MIL-PRF | – | Military Performance |
| NATO | – | North Atlantic Treaty Organization |
| SAE | – | Society of Automotive Engineers |
| TRM | – | Tank Rack Module |
2.1.3 Test Procedures and Data Required
a. Test personnel will utilize TOP 2-2-505, Inspection and Preliminary Operation of Vehicles (Ref 9, App C), as guidance upon receipt at the test site, while in the shipping configuration.
b. Test personnel will perform a limited visual, functional, and safety inspection to ensure that each TRM, LHS prime mover, and trailer is free of defects or obvious design deficiencies that will adversely affect their capabilities and performance, and that they are safe to test. Prior to proceeding, PdM PAWS will be notified of any discovered discrepancies.
c. Test personnel will weigh the TRM in its as-received state.
d. The contractor will provide training to all test personnel in the use and maintaining of all test items and necessary test support equipment, such as the TRMs. The contractor will provide sufficient training to allow test personnel to operate the items and perform scheduled maintenance without contractor support.
e. PdM PAWS will provide ISO and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emission certification for the test items prior to commencement of the test, in order to meet the criteria requirements.
f. Test personnel will perform an initial inspection as follows:
(1) Visually and functionally inspect the TRMs to determine operational status. Test personnel will perform a complete Preventive Maintenance Checks and Services (PMCS) IAW the operator’s Technical Manual (TM).
(2) Inventory and document nomenclature, model numbers, and serial numbers of the TRMs and supporting HEMTT-LHS, PLS prime mover, and trailer.
(3) Perform a general safety walk-around inspection on each TRM and support PLS prime mover and trailer, and record any noticeable safety issues.
(4) Fill the fuel tanks on each TRM with JP-8 fuel and check for leaks. Test personnel will document any discrepancies in TIRs and will repair these discrepancies, as necessary, before the start of R&M testing.
(5) Operate each TRM and conduct a function test to ensure each TRM is fully operational and functional before the start of R&M testing. Test personnel will document any discrepancies in TIRs and will repair these discrepancies, as necessary, before the start of R&M testing.
(6) Take samples of each lubricant and submit them to the YTC Petroleum Laboratory for analysis.
(7) Inventory and document all BII received with the TRMs. If the BII hoses or connectors do not have serial numbers, serial numbers will be assigned with permanent markings. All BII hoses will be identified with one end of each hose lettered “A” and the other end “B” in order to facilitate documentation of test incidents.
g. Automotive instrumentation personnel will install a Global Positioning System (GPS) recorder on the LHS prime mover. A meter to record operating hours and gallons pumped will be installed onto the TRMs.
h. Test personnel will document any modifications performed. PdM PAWS must approve all modifications prior to their implementation, and discuss any modifications to the extent of the information provided by the manufacturer.
i. Test personnel will monitor the test item for any pertinent safety, health, and Human Factors Engineering (HFE) characteristics throughout the test. Prior to test initiation, the Test Officer (TO), YTC Systems Safety Engineer (SSE), and YTC HFE specialist will review the material developer’s Safety Assessment Report (SAR) for its content and safety characteristics of the TRM, along with any provided safety documents. The TO, SSE, and HFE specialist will also review the test item configuration and its operation within the prescribed Operational Mode Summary (OMS)/MP as outlined in the R&M subtest of this test plan (ref para 2.3) for any hazards that can be mitigated prior to the start of test.
j. Throughout the test, all parts that are removed from the TRM due to failure or other reasons will be tagged (listing, as applicable, TRM number, part name, TIR number, and other identifying information) and stored at a secure location. These parts will be available to ship out for analysis at the Program Manager’s (PM’s) request at any time during the test; at the conclusion of test, the PM will provide approval prior to submitting any parts to Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office (DRMO). The TO will maintain a log book of all failed parts, to include all identifying and disposal information.
k. Test personnel will inspect the TRM for conformance to any remaining criteria in table 2.1.3–1. Specifications of a quantitative nature will be considered met if the applicable measurements are within the stated limits. If the measured value falls outside the criterion limit, a discussion of the degree of degradation, cause, consequence, and recommendation will be provided. For specifications of a qualitative nature, an objective assessment will be presented to support the determination of compliance or noncompliance.
l. Table 2.1.3–1 lists the data required.
Table 2.1.3–1. Data Required
Test item identification
Major component or assembly nomenclature, model numbers, and serial numbers
Inventory of all items shipped to YTC
Serial numbers of all BII hoses and hose connectors
System TM version utilized
Details of any equipment appearing to be damaged or worn
Photographs of any shipping damage to the test items and test support equipment
Shipping documentation
Table 2.1.3–1. Data Required (Concluded)
TIRs documenting any discrepancies during the initial inspection
Any defects/hazards that may cause injury or compromise/limit test item/support vehicle capability or performance
Empty weight (±50 pounds)
| LEGEND: | ||
| BII | – | Basic Issue Items |
| TIR | – | Test Incident Report |
| TM | – | Technical Manual |
| YTC | – | Yuma Test Center |
2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
2.2.1 Objective
To determine the dimensional and physical characteristics of the TRM on its own, while empty, and while full
2.2.2 Criteria and Data Analysis
CASD test personnel will analyze the TRM data gathered during this test, as presented in table 2.2.2–1.
Table 2.2.2–1. TRM Criteria and Data Analysis for Physical Characteristics
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
| 2 – ISO Compatibility |
| a. The TRM and the PRM shall conform dimensionally to the requirements of table 2 of ISO 668 (Ref 10, App C) as a 1CX 20-foot container. |
b. If, when stowed for transport, the TRMs, including all accessories, components, and add-on items, as applicable, fit within the ISO interface dimensions, the criterion will be considered met. The contractor must obtain ISO certification prior to Government AI&T.
| 3 – Forklift Compatibility |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. Each TRM and any loads to be handled by a forklift have forklift pockets for lifting; TRMs are empty prior to handling by a forklift.
b. Forklift pockets are shielded to prevent the TRM from accidental piercing by the forklift tines.
c. Each TRM and any loads to be handled by a forklift is capable of being entirely lifted and secured IAW MIL-STD-1366 onto the HEMTT-LHS truck, PLS truck, PLS trailer, and conventional flatbed trailers, by the following standard U.S. Army forklift: 10,000 Lb. ATLAS, IAW ATPD 2325 and the M10A.
d. The TRM components are within the physical envelope of the ISO frame to avoid contact with the forklift carriage.
| 7 – Weight |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. The maximum gross weight of the TRM, fully loaded with fuel and all associated components, does not exceed the loading, unloading, and lifting capabilities of the HEMTT LHS of 26,000 pounds.
b. The CG limit for the 26,000-pound flatrack for transport by the HEMTT 1120 is 110.3 inches from the front of the flatrack and 39.9 inches from the bottom of the flatrack.
| 10 – Capacity |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. The tank has a capacity of 2,500 gallons with a desired capacity of 3,000 gallons (plus 5-percent capacity providing for expansion of the fuel) of bulk petroleum as specified in paragraph 3.5.9 of ATPD 2336E.
b. The TRM contains secure storage for hoses and nozzles as specified in paragraphs 3.5.9.2 and 3.5.7.1 of ATPD 2336E, and other equipment necessary for maintenance and refueling operations.
Table 2.2.2–1. TRM Criteria and Data Analysis for Physical Characteristics (Continued)
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
| 14 – Cleaning |
| If provisions are provided to allow the TRM to drain to the maximum extent possible, while unassisted and when sitting level, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 15 – Manhole |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. The tank is equipped with a hinged manhole cover.
b. The manhole is designed so that no fuel spillage occurs when loading or unloading the TRM, with fuel at any level, from or to the LHS or PLS truck or trailer.
c. The manhole assembly meets the requirements of DOT 49 CFR 178.345-5 (Ref 11, App C).
d. The opening for the manhole is raised above the level of the top of the tank a minimum of 2 inches, to prevent debris from falling into the tank when opening the manhole.
e. The manhole is lockable with a hasp.
f. Access to the inside of the tank allows 5th percentile female to 95th percentile male soldier equipped, with proper safety equipment to ingress and egress the inside of the tank.
g. Soldier safety was considered when designing method of access.
| 16 – Fuel Level Gauges |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. Each TRM is equipped with a fuel level indicator, viewable by a soldier standing on the ground.
b. The level indicator is not of a sight-glass type, and is accurate within ±5 percent with the TRM sitting level.
c. Each TRM shall be provided with a fuel level gauge stick to physically measure the amount of fuel in the tank through the manhole.
d. A storage location is provided on the top of the TRM for the gauge stick.
| 17 – TRM Interconnection |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. The TRM is capable of being interconnected to another TRM, positioned 30 feet apart ,using non-collapsible hose, as specified in paragraph 3.5.7.1 in ATPD 2336E.
b. The TRM has the ability to interconnect, within the terrain features that might be encountered, to allow for filling and dispensing from more than one TRM at a time.
c. Each TRM has provisions that allow the MFS to add TRMs, up to the maximum number of TRMs as specified herein, once the MFS is set up and the suction manifold is full of fuel, without spilling fuel.
d. Provisions minimize pressure drop at the maximum extent.
| 20 – Pumping Assembly |
| If the pumping assembly includes an adequate number of hose(s) equipped with quick-disconnect fittings to allow refueling of vehicles and equipment positioned a minimum of 25 feet away from the TRM, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 22 – Piping System |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. The piping system is designed to prevent contact between the bulk fuel and other operating fluids.
NOTE: Underlined portions of the criteria will not be addressed at YTC.
Table 2.2.2–1. TRM Criteria and Data Analysis for Physical Characteristics (Concluded)
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
b. All discharge hoses and connections specified herein are equipped with sexless dry disconnect fittings with captive dust caps.
c. All ports are equipped with shutoff valves.
d. All ports are located within the TRM ISO structure and are not overlapped with the TRM ISO frame.
e. A shutoff valve is provided at all tank/piping system interfaces to allow flow stoppage from the TRM.
f. The piping system shall meet the requirements of DOT 49 CFR 178.345-11(d), as applicable.
NOTE: Retaining lanyards are not an acceptable solution to securely attach labels/tags to the valves.
| 25 – Vapor Recovery Pipe |
| If the TRMs are capable of capturing the vapors displaced from the tank during refueling operation and if the connection is a 4-inch camlock, the criterion will be met. |
| 26 – Bottom Fill and Discharge Ports |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. The TRM is provided with two bottom port(s) equipped with 4-inch female cam-lock fitting, IAW A-A-59326.
b. The 4-inch bottom discharge/suction ports are capable of providing gravity and forced discharge, recirculation of filtered fuel, and bottom loading from an external pumped source rated up to 400 gpm and shall be capable of transferring fuel from and to a HEMTT tanker without requiring the trailer to be unhooked and repositioned.
c. In addition, all TRMs are capable of being bottom loaded using a single point-refueling nozzle, IAW SAE AS-5877.
| 32 – TRM Reducer |
| If the TRM reducer is a 4-inch male to 3-inch female camlock reducer, the criterion will be met. |
| 39 – Electrical System |
| If all electrical systems are 24 Volts (nominal), the criterion will be considered met. |
| LEGEND: | ||
| AI&T | – | Acceptance Inspection and Test |
| ATPD | – | Automotive Tank Purchase Description |
| CFR | – | Code of Federal Regulations |
| CG | – | Center of Gravity |
| DOT | – | Department of Transportation |
| gpm | – | gallons per minute |
| HEMTT | – | Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck |
| IAW | – | In accordance with |
| ISO | – | International Organization of Standardization |
| LHS | – | Load Handling System |
| MFS | – | Modular Fuel System |
| PLS | – | Palletized Load System |
| PRM | – | Pump Pack Module |
| SAE | – | Society of Automotive Engineers |
| TRM | – | Tank Rack Module |
| YTC | – | Yuma Test Center |
2.2.3 Test Procedures and Data Required
a. The following will be used as general guidelines for this subtest: TOP 2-2-800, Wheeled Vehicle Center of Gravity (CG) (Ref 12, App C); TOP 2-2-801, Weight Distribution and Ground Pressure (Wheeled and Tracked Vehicles) (Ref 13, App C); and TOP 2-2-802, Stowage (Ref 14, App C).
b. This subtest will be performed to document the physical characteristics of the three performance TRMs in the following configurations: each on its own; and in combination with the PLS prime mover, PLS trailer, and HEMTT LHS.
c. Test personnel will weigh the three performance TRMs, both empty and full of fuel. When preparing to measure the full TRM, the capacity of the TRM will be determined by measuring the amount of fuel added with a calibrated flowmeter.
d. The CG of the three performance TRM will be determined, both empty and full of fuel. When determining the vertical CG when full of fuel, test personnel will determine the effective CG, which will be somewhat higher than the true CG due to movement of the fuel into the expansion space.
e. Test personnel will weigh each of the prime movers with a full TRM installed. The individual wheel and axle weights will be recorded with tires set at the highway pressure setting, full of fuel and all lubricants, and all crew personnel on-board. The weight of each Soldier, with individual equipment, will be considered as 349 pounds IAW MIL-STD-1366E (Ref 15, App C). Each TRM, PLS prime mover and trailer, will be loaded with surrogate payload. All crew personnel locations will be occupied, with additional weight added to account for the individual equipment stowed by the seat.
f. Basic physical dimensions of the TRM including, but is not limited to, overall length, height, width, and length of hose will be determined using standard measuring tools, as required. Additionally, the dimensions of the forklift access points will be analyzed and compared to the requirements as supplied by the PM’s office.
g. Table 2.2.3–1 lists the data required.
Table 2.2.3–1. Data Required
Date of test
TRM weight, empty and full of fuel
GCW (±50 pounds), including individual tire and axle loads, of all three load combinations
CG in three planes, at both empty and full of fuel (±1 inch)
Basic dimensions (length, width, and height) (±0.25 inch)
TIRs on any out-of-specification performance or discrepancies
Photographs of any discrepancies
General and characteristic photographs of the test item
Photographs of all stowed equipment
| LEGEND: | ||
| CG | – | Center of Gravity |
| GCW | – | Gross Combined Weight |
| TIR | – | Test Incident Report |
| TRM | – | Tank Rack Module |
2.3 RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY (R&M)
2.3.1 Objective
a. To determine the capability of the TRM to be transported over the MFS OMS/MP without inhibiting operation
b. To determine whether the electric pump meets the Mean-time-between Hardware Essential Function Failure (MTBHEFF) of 125 hours.
2.3.2 Criteria and Data Analysis
CASD test personnel will analyze the TRM data gathered during this test, as presented in table 2.3.2–1.
Table 2.3.2–1. TRM Criteria and Analysis for R&M
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
1 – HEMTT LHS/
PLS and PLS Trailer Compatibility The criterion will be considered met if:
a. The TRM is compatible with the HEMTT LHS, PLS, and PLS trailer.
b. A HEMTT LHS or PLS truck, each coupled with a PLS trailer, is capable of transporting two TRMs.
c. These two TRMs are transported in two configurations: two TRMs at any fuel level and one TRM at any fuel level over the terrain specified in the OMS/MP without limitations.
d. When transporting the TRM, the current level of HEMTT LHS, PLS truck, and PLS trailer mobility (IAW App A of ATPD 2336E) and stability are maintained regardless of the liquid level.
e. The TRM is capable of being loaded on and unloaded from the HEMTT LHS, PLS truck, and PLS trailer using only the HEMTT LHS and PLS LHS.
f. The TRM shall be able to couple with the M978 HEMTT tanker to form a 5,000-gallon distribution platform.
g. The TRM configuration shall allow operators to safely connect hoses and perform other steps necessary to bulk transfer fuel between the TRM and the HEMTT tanker when the TRM is towed by a HEMTT tanker.
h. The TRM shall be able to perform retail operations using the TRM as the source without disconnecting the HEMTT tanker from the PLS trailer.
I. The time to complete all required connects shall be 5 minutes or less.
| 4 – Operation |
| If the operator is capable of performing all TRM loading, unloading, and dispensing operations while the TRM is mounted on the PLS trailer, while on the PLS truck, and while the TRM is sitting on the ground flat and on slopes up to 5 degrees, the criterion will be considered met. |
NOTE: Underlined portions of the criteria will not be addressed at YTC.
Table 2.3.2–1. TRM Criteria and Analysis for R&M (Continued)
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
| 6 – Failsafe Structure |
| The criterion will be considered met if, during the normal course of R&M testing, the TRM does not have any failures due to the following: |
a. Failure of each TRM’s bail bar or loading bar does not result in a rupture of the tank.
b. The head of each TRM is protected from accidental puncture by the LHS hook when engaging the bail bar or loading bar.
c. Each TRM’s base and frame protects components of each TRM from damage caused by loading and unloading onto its prime mover, transport, and normal use, in the military environment.
d. Components mounted to the TRM base and frame are protected from accidental contact and damage by foreign objects on the ground.
| 18 – Structural Durability |
| a. If, throughout the range of fuel payloads, the TRM is capable of withstanding loading and unloading operations to and from the HEMTT LHS, PLS truck, and PLS trailer; and is capable of being transported as defined in this document without spilling fuel, developing leaks, or incurring damage, deformation, or degradation of the TRM or components, the criterion will be considered met. |
b. All external TRM dimensions shall be maintained within the allowable tolerances of ISO 668.
| 43 – Filtered Fuel Recirculation |
| If the TRM has the ability to recirculate fuel, and fuel filtered within the same storage tank or any other storage tank within the system, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 44– Fuel Evacuation |
| If the MFS is capable of evacuating all but residual fuel from the suction and discharge hoses and other system components prior to teardown; and if evacuation, teardown, and recovery does not require more than 1 hour and does not require material handling equipment, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 45 – Fuel Flow Rate Measurement |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. The TRM has a flow meter or totalizer to measure the quantity of fuel pumped in gallons.
b. All displays of the flow meters are sealed for protection from moisture and dust.
c. The TRM and components are not damaged by sudden flow rate surges or “gas slugs” pumped along with the liquid.
d. One meter display that allows the operator to reset before each dispensing operation is provided with a range from zero to a minimum of 9,999 gallons.
e. The TRM has provisions to prevent either air or vapor from entering the flow meter.
| 60 – Reliability |
| If the MTBHEFF is not less than 125 hours for the TRM, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 61 – Maintainability |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. All lubrication fittings are accessible without removal of major components.
b. The electrical fittings are waterproof, corrosion resistant, and resistant to disconnection due to vibration.
c. The engine oil is drainable without flowing onto other components.
d. The total MR (see paragraph 6.5.7 of ATPD 2336E) does not exceed 0.07 MMH/OH.
Table 2.3.2–1. TRM Criteria and Analysis for R&M (Concluded)
Criterion (App A, Item No.)
Remarks/Analysis
| 62 – Time to Repair |
| If the MedTTR does not exceed 1 hour and the MaxTTR for 90 percent of all EUMD does not exceed 1.5 hours, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 63 – Servicing, Operation, and Maintenance |
| The criterion will be considered met if: |
a. The MFS support concept use two-level organic maintenance, and conform to the requirements and guidance according to AR 750-1, DA PAM 750-35, and DA PAM 750-8.
b. All tools, special tools, and test equipment are designed and provided by the contractor as part of the TRM to assemble, disassemble, maintain, and repair by the designated TRM operators and maintainers, as required.
| 64 – Operator |
| If all tools, special tools, and test equipment required to perform operator level PMCS, which includes assemble, disassemble, adjust, maintain, diagnose, and repair or report the condition of the TRM during the required TRM service life are provided with the TRM, along with the required stowage space, the criterion will be considered met. |
| 80 – Corrosion During Service Life |
| The criterion will be met if: |
a. During the specified service life, surface corrosion is a maximum of 0.1 percent (ASTM D610, rust Grade 8) on inside or outside surface of any component.
b. There is no loss of original base metal thickness greater than 5 percent or 0.010 inch, whichever is less.
c. In no case, any area exhibits Stage 2 or greater corrosion (as defined in the U.S. Army Corrosion Rating System) during the specified service life.
d. There is no effect on form, fit, or function of any component due to corrosion, throughout the specified service life.
| LEGEND: | ||
| ATPD | – | Automotive Tank Purchase Description |
| EUMD | – | Essential Unscheduled Maintenance Demands |
| HEMTT | – | Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck |
| IAW | – | In accordance with |
| ISO | – | International Organization of Standardization |
| LHS | – | Load Handling System |
| MaxTTR | – | Maximum-time-to-repair |
| MedTTR | – | Median-time-to-repair |
| MFS | – | Modular Fuel System |
| MMH/OH | – | Maintenance Man-hours per Operating Hour |
| MP | – | Mission Profile |
| MR | – | Maintenance Ratio |
| MTBHEFF | – | Mean-time-between Hardware Essential Function Failure |
| PLS | – | Palletized Load System |
| PMCS | – | Preventive Maintenance Checks and Services |
| OMS | – | Operational Mode Summary |
| R&M | – | Reliability and Maintainability |
| TRM | – | Tank Rack Module |
| YTC | – | Yuma Test Center |
2.3.3 Test Procedures and Data Required
a. Four TRMs will perform a combined total of 11,900 miles and 595 pumping hours of R&M testing.
b. Each prime mover will be instrumented with the standard YTC automotive instrumentation package, which includes GPS, a heads-up display for speed, and a beacon light for visibility.
c. Each TRM will maintain the ratio of performing 2 pumping hours, with the tank rack located on the ground, for every 40 miles of transport over the terrain profile specified in the OMS/MP (20 percent primary, 50 percent secondary, 15 percent trails, and 15 percent cross-country). In addition, each TRM will perform 30 percent of the miles empty, 30 percent of the miles half full of fuel, and 40 percent of the miles full of fuel.
d. All miles will be accumulated utilizing PLS or HEMTT-LHS prime mover and trailer. Each TRM will perform 50 percent of the test miles with the PLS trailer, and the other 50 percent with the PLS or HEMTT-LHS prime mover.
e. Each TRM will perform pumping cycles according to the following scenario. The pump will perform a 2-hour pumping scenario, which consists of six cycles of 18 minutes of pumping at 35 gpm, followed by a 2-minute break. For the purposes of R&M testing, the number of cycles will not be recorded, only the total pumping time and gallons. Additionally, during R&M, pumping may be split between working shifts/days to conform to standard working hours, as needed.
f. Each TRMs will accumulate mileage for endurance operations on primary, secondary, trails, and cross-country terrain. A detailed mileage breakdown for each TRM during the R&M testing is shown in table 2.3.3–1.
Table 2.3.3–1. Detailed Mileage Breakdown for Each TRM
Type (percent)
| Course |
| Tank Fuel Level |
(percent of miles at that configuration)
| TRM Position |
| Mileage for Specific Payload Configuration* |
Primary (20 percent)
| Laguna High-speed Oval (20 percent), Paved Access |
| Full |
(40 percent)
| Prime Mover |
| 119 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 119 |
Half Full (30 percent)
| Prime Mover |
| 89 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 89 |
Empty
| Prime Mover |
| 89 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 89 |
Table 2.3.3–1. Detailed Mileage Breakdown for Each TRM
Type (percent)
| Course |
| Tank Fuel Level |
(percent of miles at that configuration)
| TRM Position |
| Mileage for Specific Payload Configuration* |
Secondary (50 percent) Kofa Level Gravel (26 percent), Patton Hilly Gravel (12 percent), Patton Level Gravel (12 percent), Gravel Access Full (40 percent)
| Prime Mover |
| 298 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 298 |
Half Full
| Prime Mover |
| 223 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 223 |
Empty
| Prime Mover |
| 223 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 224 |
Trails (15 percent) Laguna Hilly Trails (5 percent), Patton Level Trails (5 percent), Laguna Level Trails West (5 percent), Trails Access Full (40 percent)
| Prime Mover |
| 89 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 89 |
Half Full
| Prime Mover |
| 67 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 67 |
Empty
| Prime Mover |
| 67 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 67 |
Cross-country (15 percent) Desert March (15 percent) Full (40 percent)
| Prime Mover |
| 89 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 89 |
Half Full
| Prime Mover |
| 67 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 67 |
Empty
| Prime Mover |
| 67 |
| PLS Trailer |
| 67 |
| TOTAL |
| 2,975.00 |
*The mileage listed is that desired, however, variations will exist in the final mileage totals for each scenario. The total mileage listed is the minimum required to meet R&M standards.
| LEGEND: | ||
| PLS | – | Palletized Load System |
| R&M | – | Reliability and Maintainability |
| TRM | – | Tank Rack Module |
g. Throughout testing, the proper ratio between pumping hours and mobility operation miles will be maintained. This corresponds to approximately 2 hours of pumping for every 40 miles of mobility operations This ratio corresponds to approximately 149 hours of pumping per TRM.
h. Prior to daily operations, the TRMs and PLS prime mover and trailer will be inspected and serviced IAW the PMCS outlined in the applicable TM.
| i. Test course speeds will be established using data from previous jury ride procedures, as described in TOP 2-2-506, Endurance Testing of Tracked and Wheeled Vehicles (Ref 16, App C). |
| j. A M978 HEMTT Tanker will be provided by PdM PAWS to address the TRM and HEMTT Tanker interface criterion. The interface will be conducted usa the M978 technical manual as well as the guidance from the TRM technical manual. If the absence of procedures from the TRM technical manual, the TRM manufacturer and/or PdM PAWS will provide prodedures to verify the successful interface of the TRM unit with the HEMTT tanker. |
k. All discrepancies of the TRMs observed during testing will be recorded. A TIR will be written for each discrepancy IAW DA PAM 73-1. Preliminary scoring of the TIRs will be performed by YTC IAW the Failure Definition/Scoring Criteria (FD/SC) provided by PdM PAWS. The final scores will be determined during a scoring conference. All TIRs will be available through VDLS.
l. During the R&M subtest, all scheduled vehicle maintenance will be performed at the required intervals IAW the procedures outlined in the applicable TM. Any discrepancies with the TM procedures or required tools will be documented in a TIR.
m. Any safety issues related to the TRM during testing will be documented in a TIR.
n. For each maintenance action required, the total chargeable maintenance time, man-hours, and Level of Maintenance (LOM) will be recorded in the associated TIR.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.