The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Program: Afghanistan National Maintenance Strategy Solicitation #: W56HZV-15-R-0139 Attachment: 0015
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL MAINTENANCE STRATEGY
W56HZV-15-R-0139
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL MAINTENANCE STRATEGY
1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:
This information, when filled in, shall be treated as Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104-3 and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government Source Selection Team. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward it electronically to.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SOLICITATION:
This service contracting effort procures training and mentoring and Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) to the Afghan National Defense Security Forces (ANDSF). The ANDSF consists of the Afghanistan National Army (ANA) in the Ministry of Defense (MoD) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) in the Ministry of Interior (MoI). The ANA and ANP operate independently of each other with separate facilities, maintenance locations, and operating procedures. Training and mentoring of the ANDSF will be at the management and maintainer levels in maintenance, supply chain management and warehouse supply support. To augment ANDSF Operational Readiness, CLS will be provided, which includes maintenance, supply chain management and parts support for vehicles and ground equipment. Further, the contractor shall provide necessary security and basic life support services for its personnel during performance of this effort as United States (U.S.) and Coalition forces draw down. These services support United States Governments strategic objectives in transitioning the war effort to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA).
Background: Currently, the ANDSF does not effectively manage accountability of its vehicles and ground equipment, nor does it have the necessary training and experience required to effectively and independently maintain and sustain its vehicles and ground equipment. Therefore, the ANDSF relies heavily on contractor and Coalition support to manage its maintenance, sustainment and supply systems. The planned effort provides targeted training at the management and maintainer levels to establish an ANDSF organic maintenance, sustainment, and supply capability. The services procured under this contract supplement and develop the ANSDF organic logistics support throughout the country to prevent an irreversible degradation in the operational capability of the ANDSF and reduce the risk of complete operational failure due to unavailability of vehicles and equipment. Development of this capability is critical to the Coalition exit strategy from Afghanistan.
3. INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR CONTRACT AND YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE ROLE:
a. Contractor:
b. Contract Number:
c. Contract Type (Firm Fixed Price; Cost Reimbursement; Training &Mentoring):
d. Original Contract Value:
e. Current (final) Contract Value:
| f. Was this contract competitively awarded? | Yes |_| | No |_| |
| g. Was this a follow-on contract? | Yes |_| | No |_| |
h. Period of Performance:
i. Place of Performance:
j. Your Title (e.g. Procurement Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative, etc) and period of involvement with the contract:
Title Period of Involvement
4. QUESTIONS:
4.1 Technical Performance
4.1.1. To what extent did the service provider satisfy requirements to provide training and mentoring on maintenance?
Please check one answer.
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
Comments:
4.1.1. To what extent did the service provider satisfy requirements to provide training and mentoring on supply chain management?
Please check one answer.
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.1.1. To what extent did the service provider satisfy requirements to provide training and mentoring on warehouse support?
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.1.2. To what extent did the service provider satisfy requirements to provide Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) maintenance for vehicles and ground equipment?
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.1.2. To what extent did the service provider satisfy requirements to provide Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) supply chain management for vehicles and ground equipment?
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.1.2. To what extent did the service provider satisfy requirements to provide Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) warehouse support for vehicles and ground equipment?
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.1.3. To what extent did the service provider perform a service contract in United States Central Command (CENTCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR) that required simultaneous deployment and management of at least 50 individuals over a period of performance of at least one year? For this solicitation, 'management' includes utilization of Synchronized Pre-deployment & Operational Tracker (SPOT), Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS), Central Verification System (CVS), Letter of Authorization (LOAs), Army Knowledge Online (AKO) and Conus Replacement Center (CRC) in the planning and deployment of personnel. Please indicate the ‘management tools’ utilized in the contract:
|_| SPOT |_| JPAS |_| CVS |_| AKO |_| CRC
Please check one answer.
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.2 Schedule Performance
1. To what extent did the service provider meet required performance schedules on an overall basis?
Please check one answer.
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
4.3 Cost Performance
1. To what extent did the contractor stay within cost estimates?
Please check one answer.
| |_| |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user of customer’s benefits of a significant magnitude. The contractual performance as accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| |_| |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| |_| |
| Too Soon to Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating. |
| |_| |
| Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract |
| UNCLASSIFIED |
| DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited |
| UNCLASSIFIED |
| DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited |
