Attachment 17-HPSB Sustainability Checklist.pdf
PDF 171 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construct F‐35 Flight Simulator, Wisconsin Air National Guard Truax Field Air National Guard Base
- Solicitation number
- W50S9F-20-R-0001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document outlines a federal contract opportunity to construct an F-35 flight simulator facility. The project seeks to demolish an existing 4,646 square foot facility at Truax Field Air National Guard Base in Madison, Wisconsin and construct a new 19,000 square foot, four-ship F-35 simulator training facility. The solicitation will result in a single firm fixed-price construction contract awarded on best value. Interested offerors must register in SAM and proposals are due September 24, 2020. The contract duration is 565 days from notice to proceed. Products and services required include demolition, site work, construction, mechanical, electrical, and technology systems. Options and brand name products are also specified.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 123 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Air Force Sustainability Requirements Scoresheet HPSB COMPLIANCE (Updated Jan 2017) * required entry
General Information XGFG189001 Project ID (e.g. ABCD12345) ID0000000000000000 Real Property Unique ID (RPUID) B424 Facility Number F-35 Flight Simulator Building Name Other Installation Other City Other State Other CONUS
0 MAJCOM
BCE Construction Agent Pinnow, SMSgt Katherine AFCEC DM/CM (Last Name, First Name)
$14,000,000.00 PA
19,000 Building Size (SF) 2020 Program Year (FY####) Design Complete Project Phase 08/14/18 Design Started (MM/DD/YY)
01/28/19 BOD (MM/DD/YY)
USGBC GP Guiding Principles Compliance Certification Method
100% HPSB Compliant 14% Energy Efficiency Achieved (% below ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA
Standard 90.1-2013) 2017V1 Scoresheet version
Color Coding: See Instructions Tab for more detail Yes or N/A No Recommended not Required
90.1-2013 HPSB I: Employ Integrated Design Principles (UFC 1-200-02 para 2-2) Total Points 2 Possible Points 2
Yes HPSB I.1 Integrated Design 1
Yes HPSB I.2 Commissioning 1 HPSB II: Optimize Energy Performance (UFC 1-200-02 para 2-3) Total Points 5 Possible Points 5
Yes HPSB II.1 Energy Efficiency 1
Yes Reduce energy use 30% below ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1- 2013 or IECC, or if not - achieve maximum energy efficiency that is lifecycle cost effective
13.7% Insert percentage below ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2013 or IECC, in terms of energy use (e.g. 32)
550.3 Insert building energy intensity (kBtu/yr-sqft) calculated IAW 10 CFR
Yes Roof Attributes (Recommended) 1 Select roof types (Check below)
Energy Efficient Products 1 Yes
Yes HPSB II.2 On-site Renewable Energy 1
Yes Installed renewable energy elements or projects were not lifecycle cost effective
1 Renewable energy types (check below)
0.0 Insert generation capacity (kW)
0.0% Insert percentage of total building Yes HPSB II.3 On-site Renewable Energy - Solar Hot Water Heater System 1
Yes Installed solar hot water heater system or found installation not lifecycle cost effective
0.0 Insert generation capacity (MMBtu/yr)
0.0% Insert percentage of demand Yes HPSB II.4 Metering 1
Yes Electric Metering: Select N/A if no service
Yes Natural Gas Metering: Select N/A if no service
N/A Steam Metering: Select N/A if no service
Drop-Down Box
Federal Requirements
Complete
No Entry Required Custom Entry
Solar PV
Solar CP
Solar Thermal Electric
Geothermal
GSHP Wind
Hydro Waste to Energy
Renewables were not lifecycle cost effective
04/10/20 Date Project Registered (MM/DD/YY)
Date Project Certified (MM/DD/YY)
Cool roof
Green roof
Solar electric
Solar thermal
Solar Passive
4/13/2020 1
TR010309
Line
TR010309
Line
TR010309
Line
TR010309
Line
Air Force Sustainability Requirements Scoresheet HPSB COMPLIANCE (Updated Jan 2017) * required entry
HPSB III: Protect and Conserve Water (UFC 1-200-02 para 2-4) Total Points 6 Possible Points 6
Yes HPSB III.1 Indoor Water 1
Yes Indoor Water Metering 1
Yes HPSB III.2 Outdoor Water 1
N/A Outdoor Water Metering 1
N/A HPSB III.3 Alternative Water 1
Yes HPSB III.4 Stormwater Management (LID Documentation per UFC 3-210-10) 1
14000.0 Change in Impervious Area (SF)
$12,000,000.00 Pre-Award Cost Estimate ($)
Yes Project addressed EISA 438
0 EISA Technical Constraints
70.0%
Percent Increase in Stormwater Runoff for 95 Percentile Storm (%) -or- Percent Increase in Stormwater Runoff from continuous simulation model, published data, studies, or other established tools (Reference UFC 3-210-10 Figure 2-1 Implementation of EISA Section 438)
On-Site LID Features Locations
4 Integrated Management Practices Employed
Final LID Construction Cost ($)
Post Construction Analysis (Name of DOR) HPSB IV: Enhance Indoor Environmental Quality (UFC 1-200-02 para 2-5) Total Points 8 Possible Points 8
Yes HPSB IV.1 Thermal Comfort 1
Yes HPSB IV.2 Ventilation 1
Yes HPSB IV.3 Daylighting 1
Yes HPSB IV.4 1
Yes HPSB IV.5 Low Emitting Materials 1
Yes HPSB IV.6 Protect Indoor Air Quality during Construction 1
Yes HPSB IV.7 Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control 1
Yes HPSB IV.8 Occupant Health and Wellness 1 HPSB V: Reduce Environmental Impact of Materials (UFC 1-200-02 para 2-6) Total Points 5 Possible Points 5
Yes HPSB V.1 Recycled Content 1
Yes HPSB V.2 Biologically-based Products 1
Yes HPSB V.3 Ozone Depleting Substances 1
Yes HPSB V.4 Waste and Materials Management - Recycling 1
Yes HPSB V.5 Waste and Materials Management - Divert 60% from Disposal 1
Yes 60% or greater diverted
60.0% Insert percentage diverted from landfill HPSB VI: Address Climate Change Risk (UFC 1-200-02 para 2-7) Total Points 1 Possible Points 1
Yes HPSB VI.1 Address Climate Change Risk 1 Possible Points 27
27 Federal Requirements - Yes or N/A 0 Federal Requirements - No
100% Percentage of Federal Requirements Met
Moisture Control
Retaining stormwater impact receving water flow
Site too small to infiltrate significant volume
State or local restrict water harvesting
Shallow bedrock, contaminated soil, high ground water table, underground utilities
Non-potable water demand to small Structural, plumbing, and other mods not feasible
Soil infiltration capacity limited
State or local restrict use of green Other
Bio-Retention
Infiltration Trench
Soil Amendments
Dry Wells Inlet Pollution Removal Device
Permeable Pavement/Pavers
Filter Strips Grassed Swells
Rain Barrels/Cisterns
Tree Box Filters Vegetated Buffers Vegetated Roof
Other
4/13/2020 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .