Amendnment 02.pdf

VBDZ162001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to answ er questions, incorporate changes and further define the SubCLINS for this RFP. See summary of changes for complete details,

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 50

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-May-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W50S8J20R0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Apr-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-May-2020

CODE

USPFO NY 109 MISSION SUPPORT CONTRACTING

1 AIR NATIONAL GUARD RD

SCOTIA NY 12302-9572

W50S8J 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W50S8J20R0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Non personal services: Provide all plant, labor, material, transportation, tools, equipment, permits, insurance and supervision necessary to Renovate Security Forces (Bldg 26) and Communication (Bldg 27) in accordance with specifications and drawings dated July 12, 2018.

To:

Non personal services: Provide all plant, labor, material, transportation, tools, equipment, permits, insurance and supervision necessary to Renovate Security Forces (Bldg 26) and Communication (Bldg 27) in accordance with specifications and drawings dated July 12, 2018. This dollar amount will be the sum of the 0001 Sub-CLINS listed under this section. (Substructure + Shell + Interiors, etc)

SUBCLIN 0001AA

Slab on Grade, Patching, Substructure and Superstructure Demo (concrete demo, metal stairway and landing removal, etc), SUBCLIN 0001AB

Superstructure, Interior stair construction, Structural Framing, Lifts/Ramps, Exterior Closure (Exterior walls, Roofing and Roofing Demo)

SUBCLIN 0001AC

Interior Construction, GWB and CMU partitions, Ballistic partitions, Interior Windows, Interior Personnel Doors, Interior Specialties (Cubicles, compartments, toilet partitions, toilet accessories, Signs, Casework, Wall finishes, Glazed partitions and Storefronts, Flooring, Carpeting, Ceiling Finishes, Painting and Staining, and other Interior Construction and Demo.

SUBCLIN 0001AD

Self-Explanatory

SUBCLIN 0001AE

Self-Explanatory

SUBCLIN 0001AF

Water Supply for fire protection equipment and piping, Sprinklers

SUBCLIN 0001AG

Electric power and lighting, Lighting and Branch Wiring, Fire alarm systems, Electrical Systems Demo

SUBCLIN 0001AH

Includes pathways, terminal boxes & pull strings only

Pathways, terminal boxes and pull strings only, Telephone systems (cable trays, outlet boxes, wall plates, relocated data racks), television systems (EMT, Outlet boxes)

SUBCLIN 0001AJ

Pathways and pull strings only

Equipment racks, patch panels, conduit with pull strings, junctions boxes, steel channel, 4 channel, EMT, USR Feeder)

SUBCLIN 0001AK

Includes pavements, utilities and demolition and abatement.

Includes pavements, utilities, seeding and demolition and abatement.

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD SF 1442 and SF 1442 BACK

SECTION 00010 - PRICING SCHEDULE, NOTES

SECTION 00100 - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00110 – PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION 00120 – PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND BASIS FOR AWARD

SECTION 00600 – REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION 00800 – Wage Determination

SECTION 01000 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1 – SPECIFICATIONS dated 12 July 2018 (890 Pages) ATTACHMENT 2 – DRAWINGS dated 12 July 2018 (87 Pages) ATTACHMENT 3 – 08 33 23 Overhead Coiling Doors (11 Pages) ATTACHMENT 4 – 08 41 13 Aluminum Framed Entrances and Storefronts (13 Pages) ATTACHMENT 5 – 10 14 00.20 Interior Signage (5 Pages) ATTACHMENT 6 – 14 21 16 Wheel Chair Lift (5 Pages) ATTACHMENT 7 - 1160647 NYANG Stratton-Repair CF-SF B26-27_SIGNAGE (3 Pages) ATTACHMENT 8 – Amendment Report 001 (1 Page) ATTACHMENT 9 – B26 Existing Roof As-Built (1 Page)

EXHIBIT A- Technical Evaluation Subfactor 1 – Experience Worksheet EXHIBIT B- Past Performance Questionnaire Instructions EXHIBIT C- Past Performance Reference Questionnaire

SECTION 00010 NOTES

NOTES

1. Instructions for the preparation of proposals are located in Sections 00100, 00110 and 00120.

2. Offeror’s attention is invited to the insurance requirement contained in this solicitation (FAR Clause 52.228-5 Insurance – Work on a Government Installation). Certification of the required coverage for the prime contractor shall be furnished prior to beginning work on this contract, and the Contracting Officer may request evidence of the required insurance at any time during the life the contract.

3. Reference DFARS Provision 252.236-7008, Contract Prices – Bidding Schedules. The term “Bidding Schedule” shall also be construed to mean “Offer Schedule” or “Schedule”. The terms “bid” and “offer”, and “bidder” and “offeror” shall be construed as having the same meaning in this solicitation and resulting contract.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

SECTION 00100

Section 00100 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1. SCOPE

1.1. You are invited to submit a proposal in response to our Request for Proposal W50S8J-20-R-0002 for Project No. VBDZ162001, Repair Security Forces (Bldg. 26) and Communication (Bldg. 27) at Stratton ANGB. As a result of this solicitation, the Government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors and subfactors in the solicitation.

1.2. This solicitation is set-aside 100% for small businesses.

2. NOTICE OF PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

2.1. A pre-proposal conference will be conducted on 10 April 2020 at 0900 for the purposes of briefing on the proposal requirements and answering questions regarding this solicitation. This conference will be held at Bldg. 25 (Civil Engineering) on Stratton Air National Guard Base, Scotia, NY. Interested Contractors are highly encouraged to attend the pre-proposal conference. The site visit will be held following the conference.

2.2. Due to security conditions, all offerors must register to attend this conference and site visit. Email the following information for all attendees to nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil.

Visitor’s Name Last Four Digits of Social Security No.

Driver’s License No., State Issued and Expiration Date Date of Birth Citizenship

2.3. This information must be provided in advance, not later than 08 April 2020, in order to ensure access to the military base and conference site and ensure adequate seating for the conference attendees. Even if you have access to the base you must register to ensure adequate seating. The furnishing of the above information is voluntary; however, your failure to furnish all or part of the requested information may result in the Government’s denial of your access to the pre-proposal conference. This information will be provided to the Base Security Forces who will authorize your entrance to the site.

2.4. Visitors will be escorted by a Government employee from the Installation’s Main Entry Gate to Pre- Proposal Conference location. You will be required to present the following information upon arrival: (1) Vehicle Registration, (2) Valid Driver’s License, (3) Proof of Insurance for Vehicle, and/or (4) Safety Inspection and Car Rental agreement if applicable. Any of the above information furnished by you is protected under the Privacy Act and shall not be released unless permitted by law and/or you have consented to such.

2.5. Information provided at this conference or site visit shall not qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation and specifications. Terms of the solicitation and specifications remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of solicitation amendments shall apply.

2.6. A record of the conference shall be made and furnished to all prospective offerors via posting to Contract Opportunities website on-line at https://beta.sam.gov. The record will include minutes of the meeting, including questions (on a non-attribution basis) and answers.

3. FORMAL COMMUNICATION, OFFEROR EXPLANATIONS

3.1. Submit all questions via email to the contracting office at the address shown below. Do NOT contact the A-E or Engineering personnel directly. Doing so will only delay the response to your question.

Subject Line: Reference No. W50S8J-20-R-0002 Email: nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil and wanda.d.yarbor.mil@mail.mil

INQUIRIES SHALL BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:

Date of Proposal Inquiry:

From: ______________________________

Company Name: ___________________________

Phone Number: ____________________________

Email address: _____________________________

Proposal Inquiry: Be specific as to part of solicitation you are questioning.

3.2. Any explanation desired by an offeror regarding the meaning or interpretation of the solicitation, or proposals, drawings, specifications, etc. must be requested in writing and with sufficient time allowed for a reply to reach offerors before the submission of their offer.

3.3. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to address questions received after the fifth day prior to solicitation closing with those offers deemed compliant and/or in the competitive range after closing. All questions and requests for information (RFI) must be received NOT LATER THAN the fifth working day prior to closing and will be posted not later than two working days prior to closing. OFFERORS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED

TO SUBMIT QUESTIONS EARLY IN THIS PROCESS.

3.4. Any interpretations made will be in the form of an amendment of the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., and will be furnished to all prospective offerors via posting to Contract Opportunities website on-line at https://beta.sam.gov.

3.4.1. Receipt by the offeror must be acknowledged in the space provided on the SF 1442 or by returning a signed copy of the amendment by the time set for receipt of proposals. Explanations or instructions given in a form other than an amendment to the solicitation shall not be binding. Questions (on a non-attribution basis) and answers shall be furnished to all prospective offerors via the web site.

3.4.2. For security reasons, all technical and engineering data related to this solicitation will be distributed using the Contract Opportunities website on-line at https://beta.sam.gov. Contract Opportunities is a web-based dissemination tool designed to safeguard acquisition-related information for all Federal agencies. Plans and specifications are locked on the Contract Opportunities website and require Contractors to request explicit access from the Contracting Officer OR export controlled access through DLA. See the instructions on the Contract Opportunities website regarding registration as Interested bidders/offerors. Contractors must register with the Contract Opportunities website before accessing the system. (Please note the registration for access to the secure site takes approximately 15 business days, so plan accordingly.)

3.4.2.2. Interested offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM). To register go to:

www.sam.gov. You will need your DUNS number to register. Instructions for registering are on the web page.

4. AMENDMENTS PRIOR TO DATE SET FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

4.1. The right is reserved, as the interest of the Government may require, to revise or amend, the specifications or drawings or both prior to and/or after the date set for receipt of proposals as necessary. Such amendments, if any, will be announced by an amendment or amendments to this Request for Proposal. All information relating to this RFP, including pertinent changes/amendments and information prior to the date set for receipt of proposals will be posted at Contract Opportunities website on-line at https://beta.sam.gov.

4.2. Offerors are strongly cautioned to check this site frequently and to “refresh” their web page to ensure they have the lasted information.

5. HAND CARRIED PROPOSALS/INVITATIONS

5.1. THIS SECTION HAS BEEN REMOVED! Due to COVID 19, the requirement for hard copies of proposal documents has been deleted. Offerors shall submit all proposal documents electronically via the Department of Defense Secure Access File Exchange (DOD SAFE) website. See Section 00110, Proposal Preparation Instructions for complete details on how to submit a proposal.

6. WAGE DETERMINATION

6.1. The Construction Wage Rate Requirements formerly known as Davis Bacon Wage Rates are applicable to this project. Current prevailing wage determination(s) at time of issuance of solicitation are General Decision NY20200002 dated 04/10/2020 for Schenectady County, New York.

In the event the current prevailing Wage Determination is changed by the Department of Labor prior to the closing date of the solicitation, the most current wage determination is in effect. Should the wage rate change after closing, but prior to award, the updated Wage Determination will be incorporated by amendment and issued to all offerors that have not been eliminated from the competition. If applicable, these offerors/contractors will be given a reasonable opportunity to provide revised proposals solely to amend proposals due to Wage Determination changes.

If the wage determination modification does not change any affected wage rates, then the provisions of FAR 22.404- 5(c)(4) will apply.

6.2. Applicable wage rates can be found at https://beta.sam.gov/search?index=wd

7. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This RFP does not commit the Government to pay costs incurred in preparation and submission of initial and subsequent proposals or for other costs incurred prior to award of a formal contract.

8. REMOVAL OF SECTIONS AT TIME OF AWARD

Sections 00100, 00110, 00120, 00600 and all exhibits will be physically removed as a result of an award, but will be deemed to be incorporated by reference in that award.

9. DISPOSITION OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSALS

In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. The Government will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals. No destruction certificate will be provided.

10. INFORMATION REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF UTILITY SERVICES

It has been determined that all reasonable amounts of water and electricity, where/if physically available, used in connection with this project will be furnished to contractor without cost. The offerors will take this into consideration when computing its offer. (FAR Clause 52.236-14, Availability and Use of Utility Services)

11. BID BONDS

An Electronic copy of the Bid bond is required with submission of the proposal. The bid bond is due on the date as stated on the SF1442 block 13. The bid bond must be on a SF24 form. Rejection of a bid bond shall be in accordance with FAR 28.101-4 Noncompliance with bid guarantee requirements.

NOTE: In accordance with DARS Tracking Number: 2020-O0016, Electronic Signature are now accepable on bid bonds and corporate seals are no longer required. The bid bond must be submitted electronically along with the proposal documents via the DOD SAFE website.

12. EXCEPTIONS

If the offeror takes exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify each such exception and include a complete explanation of why the exception was taken and what benefit accrues to the Government. All exceptions to the solicitation requirements (Sections 00010 through 00800) and supporting rationale shall be included in an addendum to the proposal and clearly labeled "Exceptions". An addendum is only required if the offeror takes exception to any requirement in the solicitation. (The Addendum does not have a page limitation, but shall only include information relevant to exceptions taken to the solicitation requirements.) The Government will assume an offeror takes no exceptions to any solicitation requirement if the offeror does not submit an Addendum identifying exceptions. Offerors are advised that solicitation requirements are not necessarily negotiable and such exceptions may render an offeror's proposal unacceptable and ineligible for award.

13. CLAUSES

13.1. Clauses and provisions from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and supplements thereto are incorporated in this document by reference and in full text. Those incorporated by reference have the same force and effect as if they were given in full text.

13.2. Clauses and provisions in this document may not appear in consecutive order.

14. BRAND NAME REQUIREMENTS

N/A

End of Section 00100

SECTION 00110

Section 00110

1. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposal data. They are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals. Carefully review this section prior to commencing proposal preparation. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged in accordance with Section 00100, FAR Provision 52.215-1, Instruction to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition.

1.2. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal, at the time of proposal submission, may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and eliminated from consideration for award.

2. PROPOSAL CONTENT

2.1. Prospective offerors shall submit the following volumes in two separate packages:

2.1.1. Submit Volume 1, Price proposal, pro forma documents, electronically via the DOD SAFE website (see paragraph 2.4.7 for instructions.)

Volume 2, Part 1 – Technical Capability Proposal, electronically via the DOD SAFE website (see paragraph 2.4.7 for instructions.)

Subfactor 1 – Experience (submission of Technical Evaluation – Subfactor 1 Worksheet (Exhibit A); 1 worksheet per project, limit 4 pages per worksheet)

Subfactor 2- Construction Schedule and Commissioning Approach timeline (schedule – no page limit; narrative – no more than 5 pages)

Volume 2, Part 2 – Past/Present Performance Information

Exhibit C – Past Performance Questionnaire - should provide questionnaire responses to the Contracting Officer not later than the closing date.

2.3. After compiling all required information, submit electronically via the DOD SAFE website (see paragraph

2.4.7 for instructions.)

2.4. PROPOSAL FORMAT

2.4.1. Purpose: These instructions prescribe the format of proposals, and describe the approach for the development and presentation of the proposed data. The proposal shall include all of the information requested in the specific instructions. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation.

2.4.2. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

2.4.3. Offerors are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the evaluation committee to fully ascertain each offeror’s capability to perform all of the requirements contemplated by this solicitation. All commitments made in the proposal may become a part of the resultant contract. The data submitted with each proposal should be complete and concise, but not overly elaborate. Excessive reliance on promotional brochures is discouraged.

2.4.4. Written proposals shall be prepared on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper (charts may be landscaped but must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper) and shall be in a legible font size (10 min.). All pages of each proposal shall be appropriately numbered, and identified with the RFP number. For ease of reference, consecutive page numbering with tabs is required. Type size for graphics, charts, diagrams and tables shall be of an appropriate font and size for the application, and must be clearly readable without magnification assistance to the normal eye. Text lines will be no less than single-space. To the maximum extent practicable, proposal submission shall be double sided. Where page limits exist a page is defined as one single side of a page. Double sided pages count as 2 pages. Unless otherwise stated, tabs, indexes and dividers do not count in the page count.

2.4.5. Binding: This section is no longer applicable.

2.4.6. Indexing: Each volume will contain a “Table of Contents” for that volume. The “Table of Contents” will identify major areas, paragraphs and subparagraphs by number and title, as well as by page number and volume locations. Tab indexing will be used to identify Sections as appropriate.

2.4.7. Electronic Copy: Due to the COVID19 Pandemic, hard copies of proposal document (either hand carried or mailed) will not be accepted. Instead, Offeror’s shall submit all proposal documents via the Department of Defense (DOD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) website located at https://safe.apps.mil/

In order to submit documents, offeror’s must request a “Drop-Off Code” from the 109th Base Contracting Office. In order to request a code, offeror’s should email nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil AND wanda.d.yarbor.mil@mail.mil AND christina.e.shorkey.mil@mail.mil and state in the email that you are requesting a drop off code to submit a proposal for solicitation W50S8J-20-R-0002. Codes are valid for 14 days from the date of receipt, therefore offerors are advised to request their code well before the offer due date. The 109th Contracting Office will not be responsible for late proposals caused by offerors waiting until the last minute to request a drop off code.

Electronic copies shall be submitted in Microsoft Word format or Adobe Acrobat. (“Read Only” files are acceptable).

Offerors are encouraged to visit and familiarize themselves with the DOD SAFE website early in the process in order to avoid technical difficulties submitting proposal documents prior to the offer due date.

2.4.10. The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in his/her proposal, including that provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected.

2.5. PROPOSAL VOLUME CONTENTS: Each offeror’s proposal shall be submitted as set forth below and all information shall be confined to the appropriate part to facilitate independent evaluation. Proposals, which do not include the requested minimum information, may be eliminated from further consideration for award.

2.5.1. VOLUME 1, PRICE/COST INFORMATION AND PRO FORMA DOCUMENTS

2.5.1.1. Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for Government's analysis and evaluation of price/cost for the project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation. The Government is not, and does not intend on, requesting certified cost or pricing data. Offerors may be required during the evaluation process to provide sufficient price/cost information that will enable the Government to perform a meaningful evaluation.

2.5.1.2. Provide an introductory page to include Cage Code, DUNS Number, Tax Identification Number (TIN), points of contact, authorized negotiators, contact phone, and email addresses. Also, include your business socioeconomic status, e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, HUBZone small business, etc.

2.5.1.3. Offer and Section 00010 – Complete in its entirety the “Offeror” portion of the Standard Form (SF) 1442.

An official having the authority to contractually bind your company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with FAR

4.102. One copy of the SF 1442 is required to have an original signature.

2.5.1.4. Section 00010 – Insert the price/cost associated with the project in the line items. All line items (CLINs) must be priced to be considered.

2.5.1.5. Representations and Certifications- Section 00600- insert the required certifications and representations and return only those shown in section 00600. Return the entire Section 00600 with your proposal. All other required representations and certifications are to be completed on line in the System for Award Management (SAM) www.sam.gov.

2.5.1.6. All potential offerors are required to register in the System for Award Management. See FAR Provision 52.204-7 System for Award Management.

2.5.1.8. Joint Venture Requirements - Parties wishing to propose as a joint venture must submit, with the Pro Forma documents, an executed copy of the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement shall be executed in accordance with FAR 4.102(d). Each joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its Board of Directors has approved its participation in the joint venture or by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity. Offerors are reminded that to obtain an award the awardee, to include a joint venture, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database.

Applicable to set-aside solicitations: Joint Ventures must meet applicable size standards (See FAR Subpart 19.1).

Submit with the proposal any size determination for the Joint Venture entity received from the Small Business Administration. A Joint Venture where-in one party is not a small business may be referred to the Small Business Administration ( IAW FAR 19.302 (b)) to determine eligibility. All questions regarding Joint Ventures must be directed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and not the Contracting Officer.

2.5.2. VOLUME 2, PART 1, OFFEROR TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROPOSAL

2.5.2.1. Volume 2 Part 1 is comprised of two (2) subfactors: Subfactor 1 Experience & Subfactor 2 Construction Schedule

2.5.2.1.1. The Government acknowledges that the technical proposal will involve discussion of the same projects/contracts discussed in the Past Performance volume. While Past Performance examines how an offeror performed in the past, so as to determine the probability of success on future projects, this subfactor examines the offeror’s experience with complex multidiscipline project management and execution and how the offeror demonstrates an understanding of the contract’s requirements taking this experience into consideration. The Government intends to use Exhibit A Part 1 information in the evaluation of experience for Subfactor 1. A reiteration of the information provided in Exhibit A is neither required nor desired. Offeror should reference this information by providing a short summation of their relevant experience to meet the submission requirements of this subfactor.

2.5.2.2. Subfactor 1 - Experience: The Experience Proposal is limited to 12 pages (four (4) pages per relevant project; three (3) projects maximum), exclusive of table of contents, tabs, and dividers. Pages in excess of the limit will not be evaluated. The elements in subfactor 1 are of equal importance.

2.5.2.2.1. Demonstrate offeror’s technical experience in performing the three (3) most relevant projects which in the offerors opinion are similar to this project in terms of scope, size and complexity considering the major components of this requirement which the Government has identified as follows:

• KEY POINT #1: HVAC Removal and Installation

• KEY POINT #2: Minor Interior Demolition and Structural Work

• KEY POINT #3: Plumbing

• KEY POINT #4: Electrical

• KEY POINT #5: Carpentry, Drywall, Trim, Painting, Tile, and Other Finish Work

• KEY POINT #6: ADA Compliant Bathroom, Stairwell and Other Access Renovation

• KEY POINT #7: Fire Sprinkler System and/or Dry Chem System Installation

• KEY POINT #8: Roof (Specifically EPDM) Repairs

If the identified project did not include experience with a particular Key Point, so state. While the Government understands each identified project may not include experience with every Key Point, offerors are cautioned that projects submitted for review which contain relevant experience with more (or all) of the Key Points listed may be evaluated more favorably than projects that contain less (or none) of the Key Points.

2.5.2.3. Subfactor 2 - Construction Schedule: The evaluation will focus on the offeror’s ability to properly allocate resources and schedule construction as well as concurrent activities based on a sound understanding of the current project requirements. The Schedule itself is not subject to page limits; however any provided narrative to the schedule submission is limited to 5 pages, excluding tabs, and indexes.

2.5.2.3.1. The offeror shall provide a schedule using a Gantt chart that shows a complete project schedule considering a Notice to Proceed date of 03 August 2020 to include all construction activities as well as concurrent activities, and outline the critical path activities that will show successful execution of the construction project within the period of performance requirements per FAR 52.211-10. Also, include a narrative discussing the scheduling processes and resource allocation that ensure completion and control of schedule progress from beginning to the end of the project.

2.5.3. VOLUME 2, PART 2 OFFEROR PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

2.5.3.1. Volume 2 Part 2 is obtained for the purpose of evaluating Past/Present Performance. Past/Present Performance includes current/on-going performance that is complete to 70% or greater. The Government is requesting past performance information on a maximum of three (3) projects, which shall be the same three (3) projects, which the offeror submits for evaluation under Technical Evaluation Subfactor 1, “Experience” (Exhibit A). Offeror’s are cautioned that while a contractor with no relevant experience shall be evaluated as “Neutral” for Past/Present Performance, the Technical Evaluation, Subfactor 1 is a separate and distinct evaluation and lack of relevant experience may result in an “Unacceptable” Technical and/or overall rating.

Volume 2 includes the offeror’s Past Performance Reference Questionnaire, Exhibits B & C; Offerors are cautioned to completely read all information contained in Exhibit B. Exhibit B is for the offeror’s information/ use only and is not required to be returned with the offeror’s proposal.

2.5.3.2. Offerors shall use the National Guard Past Performance Quesionnaire, Exhibit C, to obtain references from past and present clients.

2.5.3.3. Past/Present Performance, which includes current on-going (present) performance that is complete to 70% or greater will be evaluated using the evaluation criteria set forth in Section 00120 of the solicitation. If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies, joint venture or formal teaming agreement, for the purpose of this RFP, each company shall complete Exhibit As and obtain Exhibit C references. The Government may contact these references and may consider this information as well as information obtained from any other sources when evaluating the offeror's past/present performance.

2.5.3.4. Offerors shall be advised that the information provided in the Subfactor 1 – Experience Proposal (Exhibit A) documents will be considered by the Government in determining a relevancy rating for each project provided.

Additionally, the Government will consider the similarity of construction methods employed, scope, complexity, cost magnitude, location and client type of each project submitted in comparison to this project’s plans and specifications.

2.5.3.5. Offerors should consider the currency and relevancy of the past/present performance information to be considered, the performance must have been completed during the past five (5) years. The period begins five (5) years prior to the solicitation release date and includes current performance. Performance that is more current may have greater impact than older performance.

2.5.3.6. Offerors are encouraged to include with their proposal information any problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror's correction actions.

2.5.3.7. Past Performance References – REQUIRED – A “Final” Performance Evaluation (Construction) (also referred to as CCASS Evaluation) issued for a project may be included in lieu of sending out reference package for the project. OR Offerors shall prepare and submit to prior client(s) of all the projects listed on your Exhibit A submission a Reference Package (Exhibit C) (Detailed instructions are included in Exhibit B Package). This includes correspondence explaining the requirement to obtain an independent evaluation of prior contract performance, and the Past Performance Questionnaire for use in evaluating Past Performance. Inform references that completed Performance Questionnaire should be returned to the Contracting Officer via email at:

nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil and wanda.d.yarbor.mil@mail.mil to arrive later than the closing date for receipt of proposals. Offeror must not review the Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission. They are to be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the Contracting Officer. Offeror's should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner.

2.5.3.8. Offerors are advised that the Government may use all data provided by the offeror in this volume (including Volume 2 Part 1, Technical) and data obtained from any other sources, to include, but not limited to, data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program/Project Managers, Contracting Officers or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror. The Government reserves the rights to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing current accurate and complete past/present performance information rests with the offeror.

END OF SECTION 00110

SECTION 00120

SECTION 00120 PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND BASIS FOR AWARD

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. This solicitation is for a Firm Fixed Price Contract. The Government intends to award a single contract to a qualified Small Business Offeror deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose proposal conforms to all the RFP's requirements and is judged to represent the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation scheme set out in this solicitation. The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e. best value) proposal that is determined to be the most be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Technical, Price, and Past Performance. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Source Selection Authority will integrate the evaluation of Past/Present Performance, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation. In terms of the relative importance of the factors, the Technical factor is approximately equal to the Present/ Past Performance and when combined however, the non-cost factors are more important than the Price Factor. The firm that represents the best value to the Government will be selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.1 Source Selection Processes and Techniques.

1.2. To arrive at a Best Value decision this acquisition will utilize the FAR Part 15.101-1 tradeoff process unless the lowest priced offeror (with a price deemed reasonable and realistic) is also deemed to be the highest rated in terms of non-price evaluation criteria. If the lowest priced offeror is also the highest rated in terms of non-Price Factors, no tradeoff is necessary. Further, there is no tradeoff necessary between any offer that is lower priced and higher rated in terms of non-Price Factors with respect to any other offers that are higher priced and lower rated for the non-Price Factors. While the Government and the Source Selection Authority will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire evaluation process.

1.3. The source selection process will be conducted in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.3, Source Selection procedures. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria listed in “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the RFP requirements may raise serious questions regarding an offeror’s technical ability, past performance and/or pricing and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation. A proposal that merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal that is orderly and sufficiently documented will be easy for the Government to understand and will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

1.4. The Contracting Officer will begin the evaluation process by conducting a proposal compliance review for all timely-received proposals for determination of basic proposal adequacy prior to providing the proposals to the evaluators. Failure to provide a complete proposal may result in the proposal being removed from further consideration for award. Failure to address any factor Technical, Past Performance and Price or any technical subfactor shall be grounds for elimination from evaluation and consideration for award.

1.5. Offerors must ensure that no pricing information is displayed in Volume 2, Technical and Past Performance Proposal.

1.6. Although the assessment of Past Performance as a specific evaluation factor is separate and distinct from the Determination of Responsibility required by FAR Part 9, Past Performance information obtained herein will be used during the Government’s responsibility determination. The Government also reserves the right to obtain additional information solely for the purpose of making a responsibility determination from all offerors after receipt of proposals. Requests for responsibility information do not constitute discussions.

1.8. ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (if applicable e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

2. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

2.1. The evaluation factors are (1) Technical, (2) Past/Present Performance and (3) Price. To arrive at a Best Value decision, the Source Selection Authority will integrate the evaluation of Past/Present Performance, Technical and Price as set out in the solicitation. In terms of the relative importance of the factors, the Technical factor is approximately equal to the Present/ Past Performance and when combined however, the non-cost factors are more important than the Price Factor. The firm that represents the best value to the Government will be selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.1 Source Selection Processes and Techniques.

2.1.1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed task and technical requirements within the required schedule.

2.2. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR RATINGS:

2.2.1. The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal. This is a combined rating that includes risk associated with the technical approach in a single rating. Ratings will be assigned at the subfactor level as well as an overall factor level rating. Based on evaluation results, the Government will assign a technical rating for each of the two (2) subfactors as well as the overall technical proposal. The subfactors will be rated in descending order of importance with Subfactor 1, Experience being the most important. An offer which fails to provide information in any of the specified areas may be deemed incomplete, and eliminated from the competition and ineligible for further consideration for award.

Color Rating

Adjectival Rating

Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

2.2.3. Subfactor 1 Experience Proposal: The elements in subfactor 1 are of equal importance.

2.2.3.1. Using the information in Technical Proposal, and the projects/contracts discussed and listed in the Exhibit A’s the Government will evaluate the extent of related experience, and determine to what degree the offeror has the experience managing complex multi-disciplined construction project comparable to the work requirements of this solicitation. Accordingly, higher ratings can be achieved by offerors whose projects more closely resemble the scope, size, and complexity of this solicitation’s requirements.

2.2.3.2. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the contract requirements, and determine to what degree the projects the offeror has identified are similar in size, scope and complexity based on the Key Points the Government has identified. Offerors are not required to address all eight (8) Key Points, although projects submitted for review which contain relevant experience with more (or all) of the Key Points listed will be evaluated more favorably than projects that contain less (or none) of the Key Points. For a Key Point narrative to be considered adequate, the offeror must address the Key Point in a manner that gives the Government confidence that the offeror understands the current requirement and has managed projects which are similar in size, scope and complexity. A highly rated proposal will include a narrative for each Key Point (Exhibit A), describing how the work which was successfully performed on a previous project is similar in size, scope and complexity to the work which is required on the current project.

2.2.3.3. Offerors are instructed to submit project information on the three (3) most relevant contracts performed by the prime contractor, which in the offerors opinion are most similar to the current project in size, scope and complexity based on the following Key Points (Note: Key Points are not listed in order of importance; in other words, each Key Point is of equal importance in relation to the others):

KEY POINT #1: HVAC Removal and Installation

KEY POINT #2: Minor Interior Demolition and Structural Work

KEY POINT #3: Plumbing

KEY POINT #4: Electrical

KEY POINT #5: Carpentry, Drywall, Trim, Painting, Tile, and Other Finish Work

KEY POINT #6: ADA Compliant Bathroom, Stairwell and Other Access Renovation

KEY POINT #7: Fire Sprinkler System and/or Dry Chem System Installation

KEY POINT #8: Roof (Specifically EPDM) Repairs

Offerors shall note that the same contracts which are submitted for this evaluation criteria shall be evaluated under the Past Performance evaluation factor, as well.

2.2.4. Subfactor 2. Construction Schedule. The Schedule itself is not subject to page limits. The offeror shall provide a schedule using a Gantt chart that shows a complete project schedule considering a Notice to Proceed date of 03 August 2020 (Estimated). The schedule should demonstrate an offerors understanding of the requirements.

The Construction Schedule is an integrated and networked multi-layered schedule of program/project tasks. It identifies project events, accomplishment, and criteria and the expected dates of each. These dates are based on the calendar dates provided as the starting point and the logical flow of dates provided by calculating the addition of duration of all tasks using typical schedule networking tools. Each major task will be directly traceable to the requirements of the project. The NTP date for the schedule is for the purpose of evaluation only.

2.3. PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

2.3.1. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the Plans and Specifications. The Past/Present Performance evaluation will consist of a “relevancy” rating and a “confidence” rating. Although there are subfactors listed below, the “confidence” ratings will be at the factor level only. Stated differently, the subfactors will be considered, but they will not receive individual confidence ratings. The Past/Present Performance evaluation will consider such things as an offeror's business practices, customer relationship, ability to successfully perform as proposed, and other considerations as described in Past/Present Performance Sub-factors, elements and other considerations. Past/Present Performance includes current/on-going (present) performance complete to 70% percent.

Projects currently in progress for the National Guard will also be considered regardless of percentage complete. In assessing performance confidence, the evaluator may: (1) evaluate present and past performance information through the use of questionnaires completed by the offeror's references; (2) use data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other…