Exhibits B and C - Past Peformance Reference Questionnaire (Word Copy).docx
DOCX document 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Renovate Comm (Bldg. 27) & Security Forces (Bldg. 26) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W50S8J-20-R-0002
About this file
This document contains a past performance reference questionnaire and instructions for a federal solicitation to repair communications and security forces at two buildings on an Army National Guard base in New York. The solicitation requests proposals to renovate one building for communications and another for security forces. Interested offerors must provide references from previous similar government or commercial contracts using the questionnaire, which the references return directly to the contracting office. The solicitation also describes a mandatory combined pre-proposal site visit and conference to be held on April 10, 2020, with attendance limited to two representatives per company due to COVID-19 precautions. Offerors must register by April 8 to attend. The work is to be awarded by the Department of the Army New York Army National Guard.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 10 14 00.20 Interior Signage.pdf | ||
| Amendnment 02.pdf | ||
| 14 21 16 Wheel Chair Lift.pdf | ||
| 1160647 NYANG Stratton-Repair CF-SF B26-27_SIGNAGE.pdf | ||
| Amendment Report 001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 08 41 13 Aluminum-Framed Entrances and Storefronts.pdf | ||
| 08 33 23 Overhead Coiling Doors.pdf | ||
| B26 Existing Roof As Built.pdf | ||
| 20-R-0002-0001.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Fact Sheet.pdf | ||
| B26_27 Pre-proposal Conference Slides.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| B26 and 27 - Complete Specs.pdf | ||
| B26 and 27 - Drawings.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A- Technical Evaluation - Subfactor 1 Worksheet (Word Copy).docx | DOCX document | |
| W50S8J-20-R-0002.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation W50S8J-20-R-0002
FY20 TITLE OF PROJECT: REPAIR COMMUNICATIONS AND SECURITY FORCES B26 & B27
EXHIBIT B
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions to Offeror for sending Reference Questionnaire Forms:
Prepare and submit to the owners of the projects listed in your Exhibit A “Technical Evaluation – Subfactor 1 Worksheet”, a Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (Exhibit C). For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer. For commercial references, send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. Offerors should follow-up and encourage references to return completed questionnaires in a timely manner. If you have multiple references at one location (i.e. at a military base), send one cover letter and questionnaires for each contract for which you need a reference. Your questionnaire package should contain the following:
· Cover Letter (See SAMPLE on the next page)
· Respondent Info Rating Sheets (Exhibit C) (the following 4 pages). Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes.
· Suggested – Pre-addressed stamped envelope.
OFFEROR SHOULD PLACE THEIR NAME ON TOP OF EACH QUESTIONNAIRE PAGE In accordance with SECTION 00120 – PROPOSAL EVALUATIONS AND BASIS FOR AWARD, completed questionnaires should be sent directly to the Contracting Office (Email Preferred).
OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES
SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER AND PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Your Company Letterhead
Date:
To:
We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm will be submitting a proposal under a project advertised by the NY Air National Guard. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the government evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Only one response from each office is required. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306(e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each firm is required.
Please return your completed questionnaire to the following address (email preferred):
109th MSG/MSC Att: SMSgt Nicholas Bastiani 1 Air National Guard Road Scotia, NY 12302 nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil
This documentation must arrive NOT LATER THAN 1200PM EST, 04 May 2020, so that it can be evaluated with our proposal.
If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the Contracting Officer, SMSgt Nicholas Bastiani, via email (preferred) at: nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil or alternatively by telephone at 518-344-2513. Thank you for your assistance.
Signature and Title
National Guard PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Exhibit C)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number: Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
| 4. Project Description: | |||
| Complexity of Work | High | Med | Routine |
Please provide a brief description of the scope of work involved:
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name: Title:
Phone Number: Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: THE NATIONAL GUARD REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY TO SMSgt Nicholas Bastiani at nicholas.b.bastiani.mil@mail.mil. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
(U) Unsatisfactory
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of Workmanship | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
b) Adequacy of the Contractor's Quality Control
E VG S M U N
| c) Identification/ correction of deficient work in a timely manner | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| d) Suggested solutions and displayed initiative to implement solutions | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| e) Use of Specified Materials | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| f) Adequacy of Submittals | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| g) Adequacy of “As-Builts” | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Met established progress schedule. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Timely submission of updated and revised progress schedules | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| c) Resolved delays in an expeditious manner | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| d) Identification/ correction of deficient work in a timely manner | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| e) Provided submittals in a timely manner | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| f) Completed all contract work prior to requesting final inspection | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| g) Timely completion of punch-list items | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| h) Timely submission of close-out documents (i.e. “as-builts”, “red-lines”) | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| i) Provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
3. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS:
| a) Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the ability to meet contract requirements | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Hired experienced subcontractors | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| c) Paid subcontractors/ suppliers in a timely manner | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| d) Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attend meetings (as applicable), and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| e) Overall customer satisfaction and willingness to foster a spirit of partnership with the owner | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
4. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS
| a) Adequacy of implementation of safety plan | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Overall acceptable safety throughout project | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
5. COMPLANCE WITH FEDERAL LAWS/REGULATIONS
| a) Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to Construction Wage Rate Requirements | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| b) Timely submission of certified payrolls | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| c) Payrolls were correct and complete | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| d) Contractor was in compliance with Drug Free Work Place Requirements | |
| Yes | No |
e) Contractor was in compliance with Executive Order 16393 – Planning for Federal Sustainability in the Next Decade
Yes No N/A
6. COMPLIANCE WITH UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS
a) Contractor was in compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (if “No”, please explain)
Yes No N/A
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or unforeseen situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) | |
| Yes | No |
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .