Q A_003-_Part_2_(Sections_A_through_K)_for_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.pdf

PDF 188 KB Posted

Attached to
Part 3 of 3- Complete RFP (Sections A through M) for Mortar Weapon System: W15QKN-15-R-0017
Solicitation number
W15QKN15R0017
Issued by

About this file

Q A 003 Part 2 (Sections A through K)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_0002-_Latest_Drawing_Revisions-16JULY2015.docx DOCX document
QA_009-_Complete_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0001-_Mortar_Weapon_Systems_Parts.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0002-_Latest_Drawing_Revisions_with_correction.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0017_Scheduled_Government_Furnished_Property.PDF PDF
Attachment_0003-Pricing_Chart_for_the_Section_B_CLINs_W15QKN-15-R-0017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
QA_007-_Complete_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017_r1.docx DOCX document
QA_006-_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.docx DOCX document
QA_005-_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.docx DOCX document
QA_0004-_Part_3_(Sections_A_through_M)_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.docx DOCX document
Q A_002-_Part_2_(Sections_A_through_K)_for_RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.pdf PDF
CDRL_A021_SAR.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A010_Integrated_Program_Mgmt_Report_(IMPR).docx DOCX document
Attachment_0012-_Live-Fire_Acceptance_Testing_Requirements.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A011_Production_Status_Report.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A023_Opec_Plan.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A002_Status_of_GFP_Report.docx DOCX document
RFP_W15QKN-15-R-0017.pdf PDF
Attachment_0004_Non-Disclosure_Agreement_W15QKN-15-R-0017.doc DOC document
CDRL_A006_ECP.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A017_MSE.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0016-_Warranty_Repair_Source_Instructions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_A012_Integrated_Master_Schedule_(IMS).docx DOCX document
CDRL_A018_Certification_Data.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0002-_Latest_Drawing_Revisions.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0007_-_FORM_3002.pdf PDF
CDRL_A022_Post_Award_Conference_(PAC).docx DOCX document
Attachment_0010-_Hazardous_Component_Safety_Data_Statement_(HCSDS).pdf PDF
Attachment_0001-_Mortar_Weapon_Systems_Parts.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A004_Report _Production_or_delivery_Problem(s).docx DOCX document
Attachment_0008_-_CERTIFICATE_OF_DESTRUCTION.doc DOC document
CDRL_A007_NOR.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0014-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A019_Accident_Incident_Report.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A015__Product_Acceptance.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A001_QDR.doc DOC document
Attachment_0015-_Warranty_Tracking_Information.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0009_-_SF_LLL.pdf PDF
CDRL_A009_RFV.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0005_DD2345_Form.pdf PDF
CDRL_A008_SCN.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A013_QMS_Audits..docx DOCX document
Attachment_0013_-_Demilitarized_Items.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A024_Marking.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0006_AMSTA-AR_1350_Form.pdf PDF
CDRL_A003_Physical_Inventories_Report.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0011-_Live_Fire_Testing_Government_Furnished_Property_(GFP)_List.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A014__Rework_Procedures.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0003-Pricing_Chart_for_the_Section_B_CLINs_W15QKN-15-R-0017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_A005_Contractors_CM_Plan.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 73 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Answers_003:

Part 2 (Section A through K) of RFP: W15QKN-15-R-0017

(Mortar Weapon systems)

Question 1: We interpret Section A.4. on page 3 of the draft solicitation to mean that the deliverable end items, AND subassemblies, components (excluding COTS items), forgings, castings, and weldments used in the deliverable end items, must be manufactured in the United States. Please confirm.

RESPONSE: This procurement is full and open, and not restricted to the NTIB since Mortar Weapon Systems are not categorized as ammunition items; however the Buy American Act per FAR Subpart 25.1 restricts the purchase of supplies that are not domestic end products. The language stating that items must be manufactured in the United States in Section A.4 has been removed.

Question 2: Regarding Section B of the draft solicitation, will warranty CLINs be awarded simultaneously and at the same quantity as associated production CLINs?

RESPONSE: Each warranty item will have an associated warranty CLIN. Award of any warranty CLINS is optional to the USG and is subject to evaluation.

Question 3: Will the Government consider implementing a Spares initiative as part of the solicitation required CLINs to immediately address warranty claims, wherein legitimate warranty claims can back fill depleted spares over time?

RESPONSE: The USG does not intend on purchasing "warranty spares" for the contractor's warranty program. The USG has determined that it should be more cost effective to obtain a warranty than to procure additional “warranty spares” to meet the same requirement. At this time, the procurement of USG Spares is intended for ILS /system sustainment purposes only.

Question 4: Does H.1 allow the contractor the option to use non-MRTFB installations as long as test are conducted by designated Government employees?

RESPONSE: The contractor may solicit quotes from USG test facilities for their sub-contract test services/needs as determined necessary and appropriate by the contractor to meet his test requirements IAW the TDP and contract provisions. All requirements and services rendered by the sub-contractor (USG Test Center) would be consistent with sub-contract agreements between both parties.

If the contractor elects to use a non-MRTFB facility, the contractor does not need Government employees to conduct the test, but should comply with the Live-Fire Acceptance Testing Requirements, Attachment 0012.

Question 5: C.3.14: The warranty statement requires the contractor to "start the shipping process for the replacement item to the affected unit within seventy-two (72) hours" for the twelve warranty items listed in Table 1. Will the government provide historical warranty data for these items such as the yearly/quarterly frequency of the replacements for these items? Alternatively, will the government provide a recommended level of inventory requirement for these items given the uncertainty in being able to properly stock and price this solicitation requirement?

RESPONSE: USG does not have historical warranty data of warranty items listed in Table 1. Level of inventory requirements should be based on the contractor’s confidence level for the quality & integrity their delivered products and the predictive analysis for determining anticipated frequencies of warranty claims for the respective items to ensure that contract warranty obligations are achieved.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .