Attachment 0012 - Past Performance Assessment.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W15P7T24R0021
About this file
This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity. It is intended to be completed by past performance points of contact to provide an assessment of an offeror's past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts. The questionnaire covers areas such as compliance with requirements, project management effectiveness, timeliness of performance, cost control, and customer satisfaction. The respondent is required to provide a rating (Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence) and rationale for each evaluation area. The completed questionnaire will be used in the evaluation of offers for RFP W15P7T-24-R-0021, which is for Command, Control & Communications Tactical (C3T) Post Deployment Software Support (PDSS) & Post Production Software Support (PPSS) services. The solicitation is for a single-award, IDIQ contract with a one-year base period and four 12-month option periods. An industry conference will be held on March 19, 2024, and proposals are due by a to-be-determined date.
View the file
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX D : Performance Assessment Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
(Insert Date)
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W15P7T-24-R-0021
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The Communications Electronics Command (CECOM) Software Engineering Center (SEC) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 541511. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the no later than TBD. Submit your completed questionnaire to Contract Specialist Chere Benson, chere.v.benson.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at christopher.m.winfield.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, Christopher Winfield Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
[Questionnaire should include questions to assess compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9.]
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Telephone Interview
Contractor: ____________________ Contract No.: ____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable): _________________________________
| POC: ________________________ | Title: ________________________ | |
| (Name) | (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) |
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail & Facsimile No.)
If conducting a telephone interview:
“Hello, I am ______________________. I am calling in reference to Contract ____________________ with a company called ________________________. My questions will pertain to the contractor’s record of past, which is defined as within the past three years, and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. A summary of this discussion may be sent to you for your records.
Please provide examples and/or explanations, and utilize the following ratings:
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
*Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. RECORD OF INTERVIEW (To be completed by PPT Member)
( ) Discussed recentness and relevance of information
| ( ) Read summary to person contacted | Date: ____________________ |
| ( ) Sent copy to person contacted | Date: ____________________ |
| ______________________________ | ________________________________ | |
| PPT Member Signature | Typed or Printed Name |
| ______________________________ | ________________________________ | |
| Telephone | Fax |
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Telephone Interview Summary Memorandum
(Insert Contracting Office)
MEMORANDUM FOR (insert Contractor name)
SUBJECT: Performance Assessment Telephone Interview Report
1. Enclosed is a summary of your telephone conversation, (insert date), with a member of a Past Performance Team at this Command.
2. Please review and verify the accuracy of this report and e-mail or fax it to my point of contact listed below by (insert date). If we do not receive your response by the date indicated above, we will consider the summary of the discussion official.
3. We would like to thank you in advance for your time and assistance regarding this acquisition. If you have any questions or comments, please contact: (Insert name, title, phone number, email address, fax number).
(Insert name)
CONTRACTING OFFICER
Encl
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .