Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) Responsive Strategic Sourcing for Services (RS3)
Solicitation number
W15P7T-15-R-0008
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity notice for knowledge-based professional engineering support services. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a contractor bidding on the engineering support services contract and will be used to evaluate the contractor's record of past and current performance. The federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for the Responsive Strategic Sourcing for Services multiple award IDIQ contract to provide C4ISR-related engineering, logistics, acquisition, and education support to various Department of Defense and federal agencies. Services will be performed both domestically and internationally. The total ceiling for the contract is $37.4 billion over five years with an optional five year extension. The draft solicitation and additional documents can be found on FedBizOpps. Proposals are due in late March 2015 with an anticipated award date of July 29, 2015.

Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A02_-_Solicitation_Phase_2_QA_6_20170927.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CHS-5_Responses_to_Industry_Questions_dated_15_Sept_2017_(Industry_Responses_to_Post).docx DOCX document
A02_-_Solicitation_-_Phase_2_QA_5_20170907.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RS3_Phase_2_Update_08092017.docx DOCX document
A02_-_Solicitation_Phase_2_QA_4.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A02_-_Solicitation_Phase_2_QA_3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A02_-_Solicitation_-_W15P7T-15-R-0008_AMD_0011.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation Phase 2_QA 2 20170607.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 5.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 4.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation Phase 2_QA 20170602.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 3.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008_EXH_A.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 10.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 9.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 0011 Conformed.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 8.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008_ATT_2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 1.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 6.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008_ATT_1_AMD_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 0011.pdf PDF
A02 - Solicitation - W15P7T-15-R-0008 AMD 2.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Q A_7.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_Q A_6.docx DOCX document
Amendment_6.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I.

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): N/A Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date: 06 May 2015 Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .