Section_J_-_Section_L.4_Attachment_Past_Performance_Survey.pdf

PDF 64 KB Posted

Attached to
SOLICITATION TIRNO-16-R-00026 IEP 1. 5
Solicitation number
TIRNO-16-R-00026
Issued by

About this file

L.4 PP Survey

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0002_TIRNO16R00026.20161104.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002Attachment_B.2_IEP_Pricing_Sheet_11-4-2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30_TIRNO16R00026-Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_B.1_Pricing_Sheet_IEP1.20161026_unlocked.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TIRNO16R00026_IEP1.5_Question.Answers-20161026-V1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0001C.8_IRS_Application_Development_Third_Party_Coding_Standards-extract-20161020-V1.pdf PDF
TIRNO-16-R-00026.amend0001_FINAL-20161026-V5.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.C.12_INITIAL_TRANSITION_TASK_ORDER_PWS-20161020-V2.pdf PDF
Section_J-Section_Attachment_H.5__Award_Term_Plan_08-10-2016PR.doc.pdf PDF
Section_J-Section_C.8_IRS_Application_Development_TPCS-extract-20160916-V1.pdf PDF
Section_J-_Section_C.10_Attachment_IEP1.5_QASP_v2_20160807-V1.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_B.1_Bid_Pricing_Sheet_IEP1.5.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_J-Attachment_H.6_HSPD-12_PIV_MANUAL_AND_FORMS_.pdf PDF
Section_J_-_Attachments_B2_and_B.3.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_C.4_IEP_Capacity_Governance_072414-extract-20160620-2.pdf PDF
Section_J-AttachmentC.11_Sample_IEP_Standard_Operating_Procedures_Outline-20160909-V2.pdf PDF
Section_J-Section_C.2_Attachment_IEP_control_Document-91916.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_C.9_WCMS_Requirements_Matrix-20160930-V1.pdf PDF
TIRNO-16-R-00026_RFP_FINAL-10062016-V5.pdf PDF
Section_J-Section_H.1_Innovation_Decisions_Confirmation_3-4-2015-extract-20160620-3.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_H.4_Sample_list_ACA_Open_Enrollment_Activity_Attachment-20160916-1.pdf PDF
Section_J-Section_H.3_Attachment_ChM_Process_Description_V0_09_09_28_2012.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_H.7_NON-DISCLOSURE_INSTRUCTIONS_AND_FORM.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_L.6_and_L.7.pdf PDF
Section_J_-_Section_L.1_Attachment_-_THE_DEPARTMENT_OF_TREASURY_EARNED_VALUE_MANAGEMENT_GUIDE.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_C.6_IRS_ISA_MOU_template_20160912-V1.pdf PDF
Section_J-Section_L.5__Attachment_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Section_J_-_Section_F_Attachments_F.1_F.2_F.3_ _F.3.1.F.4rtf.pdf PDF
Section_J._Attachment_H.2_Sample_list_of_Filing_Season_Support.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_C.12_INITIAL_TRANSITION_TASK_ORDER_PWS.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_C.1_Current_State_of_the_Portals_and_Help_Desk_Environment_-_v2.9.pdf PDF
Section_J-Attachment_C.3_ES_IT_service_Catalog-9192016.pdf PDF
Section_J_-_Section_L.2_Attachment_EVMS_Intent_Guide.pdf PDF
Section_J_-_Section_L.3_Attachment_Past_Performance_Reference_Form.rtf RTF text file
Section_J-Section_C.5_Attachment_C.5_ISCP_Testing_Checklist_-_Blank.pdf PDF
IEP_1.5_Pre-solicitation_Notice8222016.pdf PDF
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TIRNO-16-R-00026 IEP 1.5 ATTACHMENT L.4

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the company listed below for the contract referenced below. Please complete the survey, scan, and email to bianca.betancourt@irs.gov and tara.scott@irs.gov. If you encounter problems with email, then mail to Bianca Betancourt, IRS-5000 Ellin Road, Bldg.C-7th FL (mailstop C7-430) by the closing date of the this solicitation.

Question Extremely Satisfied

Generally Satisfied

Barely Satisfied

Not Satisfied

Not Applicable Comments

Management Capabilities

Were you satisfied that the contractor established the organization in a timely manner during contract start-up?

How satisfied were you that the contractor committed adequate resources to this contract in a timely manner?

Were you satisfied that the program manager and other key personnel were qualified and used appropriately on this project?

Were you satisfied that the contractor delivered quality products (e.g., documents, software, systems) on time and within budget?

If the contractor used subcontractors, were you satisfied that they were selected and managed effectively?

Were you satisfied that the contractor raised program issues and was able to resolve them in a timely and effective manner?

Were you satisfied with how the contractor responded to unexpected changes in scope or requirements?

Were you satisfied with the contractor’s response to unexpected changes in staffing requirements?

Were you satisfied that the contractor understood and executed system security risk management?

Were you satisfied that the management tools and techniques used by the contractor (e.g., schedule, requirements tracking) provided adequate insight to the Government on the project’s status or progress?

If this project included a partnering agreement/initiative with this contractor, how satisfied were you with the contractor’s performance in helping to reach your organization’s business objectives?

If this project involved multiple organizations under the contractor’s leadership (teaming partners/subcontractors), how satisfied were you with the ability of the team to complete tasks effectively?

If this project involved multiple organizations under the contractor’s leadership (teaming partners/subcontractors), how satisfied were you with the definition of roles and responsibilities of each organization?

How satisfied were you with the contractor’s ability to estimate costs and schedule on both the initial tasks and on change orders?

How satisfied were you with the contractor’s efforts to control cost and schedule?

CONTRACT NUMBER COMPANY BEING RATED

mailto:bianca.betancourt@irs.gov

Satisfied

Generally Satisfied

Barely Satisfied

Not Satisfied

Not Applicable Comments

How satisfied were you with the timeliness and effectiveness of the contractor’s remedies for cost and schedule problems?

Overall, how satisfied were you with the relationship between you and this contractor?

Technical Capabilities

If this contract included managed hosting services (mid-tier, and mainframe), how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?

If this contract included electronic reporting via a dashboard, how satisfied were you with the results and if this function were integrated with another enterprise-level dashboard, how satisfactory was the result?

security services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?

If this contract included disaster recovery and/or backup and recovery services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?

data storage services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?

If this contract included help desk services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?

If this contract included performance monitoring and performance management, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?

Were you satisfied that the lead technical advisor and other specialized technical personnel were qualified and were used appropriately on this project to solve technical problems?

Were you satisfied that the contractor raised technical issues and was able to resolve them in a timely and effective manner?

contractor identified, analyzed, and managed the technical risks associated with this project?

If this contract included technology transfer either of skills or tools from the contractor to your organization, were you satisfied with the process for this transfer?

Question

Extremely

Generally

Barely

Not

Not Applicable

Comments

If this contract included migration from a legacy system to a modernized system integrated with other functions, how satisfied were you with the execution of that migration process?

If the contractor was responsible for integrating a system into an operational or legacy environment, how satisfied were you with the results?

contractor planned for and included technology insertion?

contractor implemented an efficient, effective, and consistent information security posture?

To what extent did the delivered product(s) satisfy the business need?

Were you satisfied with the technical performance and system integration?

Staffing and Retention

Did the contractor provide a fully qualified workforce to satisfy business needs by the required dates?

personnel turnover (direct and indirect) did not affect contract performance?

If recruitment problems were encountered, were you satisfied that the remedies were timely and effective?

Were you satisfied with the contractor’s responsiveness to the correction and removal of unsatisfactory personnel?

Overall Assessment

Satisfied

Generally Satisfied

Barely Satisfied

Not Satisfied

Not Applicable Comments

Customer Service Assurance Management

Performance Monitoring/Management

Site Design and Installation

Help Desk

Backup and Disaster Recovery

Data Services

Database Management

Web Application Development

Website Management

Security Services

Identity Management / Privacy

Information Security

Physical Security

Audit Services (Data and Systems)

Configuration Management

Capacity Planning

Quality Management/Control

Asset Management

Application and Infrastructure Integration and Testing

Change Management

Problem Management

Communications Management

Stakeholder Management

Risk Management

Program Management

Design and Engineering

Strategic Planning

Technology Innovation

Continual Service Improvement

Other: Specify

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .