Section_J_-_Section_L.4_Attachment_Past_Performance_Survey.pdf
PDF 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SOLICITATION TIRNO-16-R-00026 IEP 1. 5
- Solicitation number
- TIRNO-16-R-00026
About this file
L.4 PP Survey
View the file
Other files
Show all 36
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TIRNO-16-R-00026 IEP 1.5 ATTACHMENT L.4
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the company listed below for the contract referenced below. Please complete the survey, scan, and email to bianca.betancourt@irs.gov and tara.scott@irs.gov. If you encounter problems with email, then mail to Bianca Betancourt, IRS-5000 Ellin Road, Bldg.C-7th FL (mailstop C7-430) by the closing date of the this solicitation.
Question Extremely Satisfied
Generally Satisfied
Barely Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Not Applicable Comments
Management Capabilities
Were you satisfied that the contractor established the organization in a timely manner during contract start-up?
How satisfied were you that the contractor committed adequate resources to this contract in a timely manner?
Were you satisfied that the program manager and other key personnel were qualified and used appropriately on this project?
Were you satisfied that the contractor delivered quality products (e.g., documents, software, systems) on time and within budget?
If the contractor used subcontractors, were you satisfied that they were selected and managed effectively?
Were you satisfied that the contractor raised program issues and was able to resolve them in a timely and effective manner?
Were you satisfied with how the contractor responded to unexpected changes in scope or requirements?
Were you satisfied with the contractor’s response to unexpected changes in staffing requirements?
Were you satisfied that the contractor understood and executed system security risk management?
Were you satisfied that the management tools and techniques used by the contractor (e.g., schedule, requirements tracking) provided adequate insight to the Government on the project’s status or progress?
If this project included a partnering agreement/initiative with this contractor, how satisfied were you with the contractor’s performance in helping to reach your organization’s business objectives?
If this project involved multiple organizations under the contractor’s leadership (teaming partners/subcontractors), how satisfied were you with the ability of the team to complete tasks effectively?
If this project involved multiple organizations under the contractor’s leadership (teaming partners/subcontractors), how satisfied were you with the definition of roles and responsibilities of each organization?
How satisfied were you with the contractor’s ability to estimate costs and schedule on both the initial tasks and on change orders?
How satisfied were you with the contractor’s efforts to control cost and schedule?
CONTRACT NUMBER COMPANY BEING RATED
mailto:bianca.betancourt@irs.gov
Satisfied
Generally Satisfied
Barely Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Not Applicable Comments
How satisfied were you with the timeliness and effectiveness of the contractor’s remedies for cost and schedule problems?
Overall, how satisfied were you with the relationship between you and this contractor?
Technical Capabilities
If this contract included managed hosting services (mid-tier, and mainframe), how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?
If this contract included electronic reporting via a dashboard, how satisfied were you with the results and if this function were integrated with another enterprise-level dashboard, how satisfactory was the result?
security services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?
If this contract included disaster recovery and/or backup and recovery services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?
data storage services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?
If this contract included help desk services, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?
If this contract included performance monitoring and performance management, how satisfied were you with the performance of these services?
Were you satisfied that the lead technical advisor and other specialized technical personnel were qualified and were used appropriately on this project to solve technical problems?
Were you satisfied that the contractor raised technical issues and was able to resolve them in a timely and effective manner?
contractor identified, analyzed, and managed the technical risks associated with this project?
If this contract included technology transfer either of skills or tools from the contractor to your organization, were you satisfied with the process for this transfer?
Question
Extremely
Generally
Barely
Not
Not Applicable
Comments
If this contract included migration from a legacy system to a modernized system integrated with other functions, how satisfied were you with the execution of that migration process?
If the contractor was responsible for integrating a system into an operational or legacy environment, how satisfied were you with the results?
contractor planned for and included technology insertion?
contractor implemented an efficient, effective, and consistent information security posture?
To what extent did the delivered product(s) satisfy the business need?
Were you satisfied with the technical performance and system integration?
Staffing and Retention
Did the contractor provide a fully qualified workforce to satisfy business needs by the required dates?
personnel turnover (direct and indirect) did not affect contract performance?
If recruitment problems were encountered, were you satisfied that the remedies were timely and effective?
Were you satisfied with the contractor’s responsiveness to the correction and removal of unsatisfactory personnel?
Overall Assessment
Satisfied
Generally Satisfied
Barely Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Not Applicable Comments
Customer Service Assurance Management
Performance Monitoring/Management
Site Design and Installation
Help Desk
Backup and Disaster Recovery
Data Services
Database Management
Web Application Development
Website Management
Security Services
Identity Management / Privacy
Information Security
Physical Security
Audit Services (Data and Systems)
Configuration Management
Capacity Planning
Quality Management/Control
Asset Management
Application and Infrastructure Integration and Testing
Change Management
Problem Management
Communications Management
Stakeholder Management
Risk Management
Program Management
Design and Engineering
Strategic Planning
Technology Innovation
Continual Service Improvement
Other: Specify
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .