SPE600-16-R-0513-0008.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

WHIDBEY ISLAND, WA

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60016R0513

X

2016 AUG 03

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, X is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

USA

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

07/05/2017

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

The solicitation is hereby amended to incorporate the following:

1. Section B, B-0001, B34.01 Services to Be Furnished and Prices is update to change the period of performance for this contract to begin January 1, 2018.

2. “Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation should be prepared in accordance with the ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 provision, and will be evaluated by a board of one or more Government personnel. The Source Selection Authority shall make a final selection based on each offeror’s ability to satisfy the requirements of the solicitation.

Basis for Award. The Government will award a firm fixed price contracts (NAS Whidbey Island) resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer(s) conform to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. Formal source selection procedures will be used for this procurement. As such this is a best value acquisition, employing a Tradeoff Process in which award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror, in accordance with FAR 15.101-1.

There are four evaluations factors for this acquisition: Factor 1 –Technical/Management (Sub-Factor #1:

Operations, Sub-Factor #2: Maintenance, Sub-Factor #3: Personnel/Training, Sub-Factor #4:

Safety/Environmental), Factor 2 – Past Performance, Factor 3 – Socioeconomic Proposal, and Factor 4 – Price.

The Technical/Management factor is significantly more important than Past Performance. Past performance is equal in importance to the Socioeconomic Proposal. Socioeconomic Proposal and Past Performance are more important than price. When combined, the non-price factors (Technical/Management, Past Performance, and Socioeconomic Proposal) are significantly more important than Price.

Each proposal will be evaluated for compliance with solicitation terms and conditions, the Performance Work Statement, FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014), and applicable DLA Energy Contract Provisions, established evaluation criteria and standards, as well as evaluation of any exceptions/deviations in accordance with DLA ENERGY M-0003 M72 – EVALUATION OF OFFERS (EXCEPTIONS/DEVIATIONS) (DLA ENERGY APR 1997) to determine if the offered exceptions/deviations are acceptable or material enough to make the offer completely or partially unacceptable.

Factor 1: Technical/Management The Government will evaluate each offeror’s technical/management proposal based upon the offeror’s understanding of and capability to accomplish the work as stated in the solicitation. The technical/management evaluation will include an evaluation of risk. The offeror must demonstrate in its proposal a complete understanding of the Performance Work Statement provided in the solicitation.

The Technical/Management factor will be rated Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Unacceptable. The four subfactors, which are of equal importance will be rated Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Unacceptable. The subfactors will be evaluated separately and then combined to come up with an overall Technical/Management factor rating.

a. Technical Rating Definitions IAW the DOD Source Selection Guide, Section 3.1.2.2 Methodology 2:

Combined Technical/Risk Rating:

Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

b. The subfactors are as follows:

Subfactor 1: Operations - Technical, managerial, and operational details of supporting normal and contingency operations, accounting, and fuel quality assurance/surveillance on multiple fuel systems capable of meeting all of DLA Energy’s service requirements.

Subfactor 2: Maintenance - Technical, managerial, and operational details of planning and conducting preventive and recurring maintenance and identifying and resolving corrective maintenance items and repairs.

Subfactor 3: Personnel/Training - Technical, managerial, and operational details to ensure contractor personnel have requisite skills and associated training to accomplish all government requirements.

Subfactor 4: Safety/Environmental – Technical, managerial, and operational details of planning and conducting operations in compliance with environmental laws and regulations and safety policies and procedures.

Overall technical/management evaluation ratings will be Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Unacceptable.

Note: Any offeror who receives a rating of Unacceptable or Marginal in this factor or any subfactor after final proposal revisions will not be eligible for award.

Any proposal that does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. The proposal is unawardable.

Factor 2: Past Performance.

The Government shall review the offeror's recent and relevant past performance and determine its quality and usefulness as it applies to this procurement. Additionally, the Government may use other data available to its evaluators, including but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), and the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, past and present customers and their employees, other subcontractors, and any others who may have useful and relevant information.

The past performance will be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. A record or poor performance may be considered an indication that the offeror has failed to conform to contract requirements and/or to standards of good workmanship, adhere to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance, provide reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and/or display a business-like concern for the interests of the customer.

Evaluation for Joint Ventures and Teaming Arrangements will be performed by evaluating the past performance of each partner in accordance with the procedures outlined above. The ratings for each partner will be combined and the Joint Venture or Teaming Arrangement will receive one rating.

Offerors are instructed to submit three Past Performance Questionnaires that may include the performance still in progress; however, it should have a minimum of one year of performance history and no more than three years old from the closing date of this solicitation. The past performance evaluation shall consider whether the offeror’s relevant present/past performance effort involved similar magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The evaluation shall also evaluate the offeror’s past performance to determine how well the offeror performed on those efforts.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability, “Unknown” shall be considered Acceptable. A record of acceptable past performance will not result in a favorable assessment of an otherwise unacceptable proposal. As a Joint Venture, each partner’s experience and past performance may be evaluated and weighted against their respective roles identified in the Joint Venture agreement. This evaluation may be combined for a final past performance rating.

Note: A proposal receiving a rating of Unacceptable in this factor after final proposal revisions will be ineligible for award.

Factor 3: Socioeconomic/Subcontracting Proposal:

Small Business offerors will be evaluated on their submitted Socioeconomic/Subcontracting Proposal goals In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c)(1) and contract provision M-0001 M7 Socioeconomic Evaluation. For other than small businesses, offerors will be evaluated on their submitted Socioeconomic Proposal and its accurate reflection on Attachment 5 DLA Energy SMALL BUSINESS Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 19.704. Upon consideration of the offeror’s proposed subcontracting to Small Business, HUBZone Small Businesses, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses, Small Disadvantaged Businesses, and Women-Owned Small Businesses, and Historically Black Colleges and Universities or Minority Institutions and the offeror’s degree of commitment to implementing proposed opportunities, the Government will assign a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable based on the overall percentage goal of subcontracting dollars to the aforementioned groups and the complexity level, variety of participation, and specifically identifying firms that will perform the subcontracted work. Small businesses submitting a Socioeconomic/Subcontracting Proposal will be assigned a rating of Acceptable.

Note: A proposal receiving a rating of Unacceptable in this factor after final proposal revisions will be ineligible for award.

Factor 4: Price A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract will result from this solicitation. The Government will perform evaluation of the offered prices in accordance with the terms of the solicitation. Prices will always be evaluated for reasonableness.

The total price offered for CLIN 0001 will be multiplied by 48. The total price offered for CLIN 0002 (Option) will be multiplied by 60.

Option (Extension Provision) price: In accordance with FAR 52.217-8 – Option to Extend Services, the Government has the unilateral right to extend any resulting contract upon the same terms and conditions for a total of no more than six months. To account for the option period(s) possible under 52.217-8 (maximum of six months), the Government will evaluate the option to extend by adding six months of the Offeror’s performance period price to the Offeror’s total price. In accordance with FAR 52.217-9 Option to Extend the term of the contract the Government may extend the term of this contract by written notice to the Contractor within 30 days provided that the Government gives the Contractor a preliminary written notice of its intent to extend at least 60 days before the contract expires. The preliminary notice does not commit the Government to an extension. If the Government exercises this option, the extended contract shall be considered to include this option clause.

The sum of the aforementioned products will be the offeror’s evaluated price. This price will then be used for comparison to all offerors evaluated prices.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a price realism analysis to determine whether the offeror understands the requirements and to determine the firm’s responsibility IAW FAR 15.404-1(b)(2) – Proposal Analysis Techniques.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the prices are significantly unbalanced.

The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest evaluated offer.

Competitive Range:

The Government reserves the right to limit the number of offers included in the competitive range for the purposes of efficiency in accordance with FAR 15.306(c)(2).”

3. The following PWS Section C-2.0 Performance Requirements paragraphs are revised to read:

C-3.1 Vehicles and Equipment: The Contractor shall provide aviation, ground, utility vehicles, and equipment in necessary quantities to meet the aircraft and ground refueling/defueling workload requirements, including surge demands. All vehicles and equipment shall meet the performance requirements of NAVAIR 80T-109, Aircraft Refueling NATOPS Manual, National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 407, Standards for Aircraft Fuel Servicing, NAVFAC P-300, Management of Transportation Equipment, Department of Transportation (DOT) 406, and other Federal, State, and local policies/laws as applicable. These vehicles and equipment are commercially available trucks, tractors, and cargo tanks modified to meet specific military demands and maximum deliverable quantities of product to an airfield/flightline environment. The NAVAIR 80T-109, Aircraft Refueling NATOPS Manual will take precedence over other regulations unless otherwise dictated. The Contractor shall provide all necessary tools, instruments, devices, parts, required to operate and maintain vehicles and equipment. The vehicles provided at contract start shall not be replaced or removed from the base/station without written notification to and documented approval by the Contracting Officer.

C-3.1.5 Company Logo: Aviation, ground, utility vehicles and equipment doors shall be marked with a permanently affixed company name or logo. Stenciled or spray painted logos or magnetic placards shall not be used.

C-3.1.6 Spill Remediation Kits: All Contractor aviation, ground, and utility vehicles shall be equipped with a spill clean-up/remediation kit that is protected from the elements but readily available to the vehicle operator under CLIN 0001 at no additional cost to the Government. Sufficient spares shall be provided so that in vehicle kits can be maintained at a 100 per cent level.

4. The PWS Section C-2.0 Performance Requirements paragraph 2.5 is removed.

5. Attachment:

a) PWS

6. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

RFx: 4001852452

Attachments

List of Attachments

Description File Name ATTACH.Whidbey Island RPF PWS Revised 30 June 2017

SECTION A -

PLANNING &

SOLICITAION (Tabs 1-