Amendment 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

K

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16 April 2010

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

DEFENSE ENERGY SUPPORT CENTER

SP0600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

CODE

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 3830

FT. BELVOIR, VA 22060-6222

BUYER/SYMBOL: RONALD MOORE

PHONE (703) 767-9518 P.P. 8.2

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code)

X

9a. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SP0600-10-R-0808

9b. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30 MARCH 2010

10a. MODIFICATION OF ONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10b. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ ] is extended [ X ] is not extended .

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __1__ copies of the amendment;(b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A. I2.05 CHANGES-FIXED PRICE (AUG 87)

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF: FAR 43.01 OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ x ] is required to sign this document and return ____1__ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See following pages.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C.DATE

SIGNED

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SP0600-10-R-0808

Amendment 0002

PURPOSE: This amendment is issued to incorporate the following change to subject Request for Proposal:

a. Solicitation Provision M.2.1, Order of Importance for Evaluating Factors and Sub-factors, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Before a best-value decision can be made, Offerors must comply with the basic economic test of 10 USC § 2688. If more than one proposal meets the basic economic test, such proposals will then be evaluated using the following factors and sub-factors:

Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Risk are of equal importance.

Socioeconomic Plan is somewhat less important than Technical Capability, Past Performance and Risk. When combined, Technical Capability, Past Performance, Risk, and Socioeconomic Plan are significantly more important than Price. Technical Capability and Risk will be evaluated at the sub-factor level. Under Technical Capability, all sub-factors are of equal importance;

however a less than acceptable rating for any sub-factor will result in a less than acceptable rating for the overall Technical Capability factor. Under Risk, all sub-factors are of equal importance; however, a negative rating in any sub-factor may result in a negative rating for the overall Risk factor.

b. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.