SOW Attachment 3 - SOCAMES 6 Design Alert 1.pdf

PDF 124 KB Posted

Attached to
C1DA--EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Design- Jefferson Barracks (St. Louis) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C77621R0087
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Technology Acquisition Center Austin

About this file

This document provides details for a federal contract opportunity seeking architectural and engineering services. The Department of Veterans Affairs Technology Acquisition Center Austin is soliciting SF330 qualification packages from firms for the C1DA--EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Design- Jefferson Barracks project located at the St. Louis VA Medical Center. The project scope involves infrastructure upgrades to electrical systems, communications infrastructure, the data center, and physical security. The procurement is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. The anticipated award date for the A-E contract is June 30, 2021 with a 184-day period of performance for design completion. Firms must submit SF330 responses by May 4, 2021 to be considered.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to C1DA--EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Design- Jefferson Barracks (St. Louis), newest first.
File Type Posted
SOW Attachment 2 - VA OEHRM Site Infrastructure Requirements - 2.0.pdf PDF
SOW - Rvd - Supplement B - 05042021 - EHRM Infra JB.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 32 - NCO 15 Form 10-6298 AE Fee Proposal Submission Form.zip ZIP file
36C77621R0087_3.docx DOCX document
36C77621R0087_2.docx DOCX document
Attachment - PPQ.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 33 - VA Form 10-6238 Construction Cost Estimate (1).zip ZIP file
SOW Attachment 26 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 57.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 24 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 55.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 28 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 59.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 25 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 56.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 23 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 53T.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 17 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 24.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 19 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 51.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 30 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 60T.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 27 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 58.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 33 - VA Form 10-6238 Construction Cost Estimate.zip ZIP file
SOW Attachment 18 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 25.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 16 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 23.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 21 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 52.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 31 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 75.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 29 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 60.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 22 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 53.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 20 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 51T.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 12 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 2.pdf PDF
36C77621R0087.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 11 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 1_Part2.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 7 - VHA Directive 1013 Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines.pdf PDF
SOW - Supplement B - 03032021 - 657 21 701JB.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 11 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 1_Part2 02.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 10 - Jefferson Barracks Campus Map.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 4 - Sensitive Infrastructure Data Classification Memo.pdf PDF
SOW - Attachment 2 - VA OEHRM Site Infrastructure Req - 1.9.pdf PDF
SOW - Attachment 1 - VHA Required Div 01 Spec Sections.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 15 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 18.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 14 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 3T.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 13 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 3.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 9 - Jefferson Barracks - EHRM Building Plans_Part1.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 8 - VHA Directive 1061.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 6 - PG 18-15 AE Submission Reqts Vol C.doc DOC document
SOW Attachment 5 - EHRM Arch and Eng CPM Schedule Spec.docx DOCX document
Show all 41

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HEFP/10NA5G/29APR20

SOCAMES 6 Design Alert 1

Problem

During a recent construction activity of cable upgrades to an existing telecommunication room (TR) at an Initial Operating Capability (IOC) site, it was discovered during cable testing procedures that some of the cables being upgraded were greater in length to the end user device than standards allows.

Background

ANSI/TIA-568.D, “Balanced Twisted-Pair Telecommunications Cabling and Components” (Sep 2018) version of industry standards for telecommunication room fixed cabling installation, limits the total length of a network Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) cable segment to 100 meters. The 100 meters is broken down as 10 meters for patch cables and 90 meters for total fixed cabling. Cable length requires a three-dimensional assessment to ensure that the fixed cables being installed do not exceed the specified UTP cable segment of 90 meters of fixed cable length.

There are several scenarios that require an assessment to occur to ensure that a telecommunication rooms UTP cable segments do not exceed 90 meters.

Scenario 1: The installation of a new telecommunication room to serve an area.

Scenario 2: The relocation of an existing telecommunication room to serve an area.

Scenario 3: The installation of new cabling upgrades in a telecommunication room that will remain in place to serve an area.

Scenario 4: An existing telecommunication room that will not receive any cabling upgrades.

Solution

To ensure that an assessment is performed for each of the four telecommunication room scenarios listed above, our office in conjunction with the SD-DCIE team is providing a recommended three-dimensional estimation approach that can be shared with your respective facility leads and design team to verify all telecommunication rooms do not exceed the specified UTP cable segment of 90 meters.

Step 1: Ensure you have an accurate floor plan that depicts the locations of the telecommunication rooms serving the facility.

Step 2: Utilizing AutoCAD or rule, center on the location of the telecommunication room being assessed.

From the center of the room project out lines, 80 meters in length from that point, in the plan north, south, east and west respectively.

Step 3: At the end each of the 80 meters lines created, connect a line 45 degrees from that point out to the next end point creating a diamond.

Step 4: Validate that all areas served by that telecommunication room fall within the parameters of the diamond overlay.

HEFP/10NA5G/29APR20

Step 5: If the area served by that telecommunication room is within the diamond overlay then the distance, as provided by the estimation tool, is adequate for that telecommunication room.

Step 6: If the area served by that telecommunication room is outside the diamond overlay then the distance, as provided by the estimation tool, is inadequate for that telecommunication room and further investigation is required by electronically testing the cable lengths to see if they pass or physical measurement. Any UTP cabling that does not pass testing protocols and is too long will need to have further design considerations to remedy the distance issue.

Notes

Since it is necessary to account for vertical cable distance, installation of slack for bypassing obstructions, cable management, bend radii and other in-situ obstacles 80 meters is utilized instead of the 90 meters acceptable length. This is to provide a realistic estimation of coverage of the representative telecommunication room.

This estimation tool is a recommended approach to validate fixed cable lengths meet the standards.

Designers and installers remain responsible for ensuring actual cable distances do not exceed the limits in the standards.

Below is a diagram of an example demonstrating the use of the estimation tool.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .