SOW Attachment 15 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 18.pdf
PDF 12 MB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Design- Jefferson Barracks (St. Louis) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C77621R0087
About this file
This pre-solicitation notice seeks standard form 330 qualification packages from architecture and engineering firms for design services. Firms must have experience with network infrastructure installation, IT room renovations, data centers, electrical and HVAC upgrades, and physical security. The Department of Veterans Affairs will award a firm-fixed-price design contract for a project upgrading facilities at the St. Louis VA Medical Center to allow for a new electronic health record system. The project includes various building infrastructure improvements. The period of performance for design completion is 184 calendar days, with construction period services as optional items. Responses are due by May 4, 2021. A two-phase evaluation process will initially assess SF-330 qualifications, then invite three firms to provide written responses for final selection and negotiations. The award is reserved for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 – Saint Louis, MO 63101 ph 314-436-9492 – fx 314-436-9733
RSH-STL.com
2018 ASBESTOS & LEAD REINSPECTION
at
BUILDING 18
VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS
1 JEFFERSON BARRACKS DR.
ST. LOUIS, MO. 63125
PREPARED FOR
St. Louis V. A. Medical Center
1 Jefferson Barracks Dr.
St. Louis, MO. 63125
RIVERFRONT PROJECT NO. SH1476
June 4, 2019
ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND
SAFETY CONSULTANTS
General Industrial Hygiene Exposure Assessment and Risk Management
Indoor Air Quality Investigations
Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Inspection and Risk Management
Hazard Communication Programs
Hazardous Noise & Hearing Conservation Programs
OSHA Compliance Program Development
Phase I & II ESA— Due Diligence
Brownfields Redevelopment
Environmental Risk Assessment
Underground Storage Tank Management
Subsurface Investigation/Remediation
Remediation Oversight
CERCLA / RCRA
and more…
1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 – Saint Louis, MO 63101 ph 314-436-9492 – fx 314-436-9733 RSH-STL.com
Jne 4, 2019
RIVERFRONT PROJECT NO. SH1476
Mr. Michael Beitenman St. Louis VAMC – John Cochran Division Project Engineer 915 North Grand Ave St. Louis, MO 63106
RE: 2018 Asbestos/Lead Re-Inspection and Management Plan; Building 18
Dear Mr. Beitenman:
Riverfront Safety & Health (Riverfront) is pleased to present the following summary of findings from the asbestos/lead re-inspection and assessment performed from June 2018 through June 2019.
Sincerely, Riverfront Safety & Health, LC
Justin R. Rhyneer, CIH
2018 Asbestos/Lead Inspection Report St. Louis Jefferson Barracks VAMC – Bldg. 18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION
0.0 Definitions
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Scope of Work
3.0 Management Plan Recommendations
4.0 Limitations
5.0 Asbestos Containing Material Homogenous Material/Area Summary Tables and Drawings (w/sample locations; HMA locations; ACM color coding)
6.0 ACM Condition & Removal Priority Table with Abatement Cost Estimates
7.0 Master Bulk Sample Summary Tables
8.0 Asbestos Inspection Photo Log
9.0 Asbestos Inspection Laboratory Reports
10.0 Professional Certifications
11.0 Periodic Surveillance Forms
12.0 Management Plan Updates
13.0 Response Actions
14.0 Training Documents
15.0 Annual Notification Letters
16.0 Limited Lead Survey Summary Tables
17.0 Previous Inspection Reports
This 2018 Asbestos/Lead Re-inspection report was provided by:
CONTRACTOR:
Riverfront Safety & Health, LC 1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 St. Louis, MO 63101
(314) 436-9492 (Office)
(314) 436-9733 (Fax)
ASBESTOS/LEAD INSPECTORS:
Zachary Haselhorst MO Asbestos Certification No. 7118111618MOIR16667
MO Lead Certification No. 160229-300004899
ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT PLANNER:
Justin Rhyneer, CIH MO Certification No. 7011092718MOMPR8065
Accreditation Agencies: Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Asbestos) and Missouri Department of Public Health (Lead)
SECTION 0
DEFINITIONS
Section 0.0 DEFINITIONS
0.1 AHERA refers to the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. Asbestos regulations for schools issued in 1987.
0.2 Asbestos shall mean chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, actinolite asbestos and any of these minerals that have been chemically treated and/or altered. This definition includes all “Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials
(PACM)”.
0.3 Asbestos Containing Building Material (ACBM) means any building material containing more than 1% asbestos.
0.4 Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) means any material containing more than 1% asbestos.
0.5 Asbestos Abatement refers to the procedures to control fiber release from asbestos-containing materials, typically during removal. Includes removal, encapsulation, enclosure, demolition and renovation activities related to asbestos.
0.6 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) refers to one certified in the general practice of industrial hygiene by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene. An industrial hygienist Certified in Comprehensive Practice by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene.
0.7 Disturbance refers to activities that disrupt the matrix of ACM or PACM, crumble or pulverize ACM or PACM, or generate visible debris from ACM or PACM. Disturbance includes cutting away small amounts of ACM or PACM, no greater than the amount that can be contained in one standard sized glove bag or waste bag in order to access a building component.
0.8 Dry shall mean having no apparent wetness through visual or tactile means in the opinion of the Owner’s Representative.
0.9 Encapsulant refers to a material that surrounds or embeds asbestos fibers in an adhesive matrix and prevents the release of fibers.
0.10 Encapsulation refers to treating ACM with an encapsulant.
0.11 Friable Asbestos shall mean any asbestos containing material that can be crumbled or pulverized by hand.
0.12 Homogenous Material Area (HMA) refers to any distinct building material (carpet; floor tile; pipe insulation; stucco; etc.) that has been identified/observed in a given area (Building; Floor; Room), and has been included in this assessment effort.
0.13 HVAC refers to Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems.
0.14 Industrial hygienist (IH) refers to a professional qualified by education, training, and experience to anticipate, recognize, evaluate and develop controls for occupational health hazards.
0.15 Intact refers to when an ACM has not crumbled, been pulverized, or otherwise deteriorated so that the asbestos is no longer likely to be bound with its matrix.
0.16 Lead Based Paint refers to paint exhibiting a lead content equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, as defined by The U.S. EPA.
0.17 Management Planner refers to a person who has successfully completed the training requirements for an asbestos management planner as required by 40 CFR 763 Appendix C, Part I.
0.18 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) refers to EPA's rule to control emissions of asbestos to the environment.
0.19 OSHA shall refer to The Occupational Safety & Health Administration – A regulatory agency charged with enforcing the lawful protection of workers.
0.20 Owner refers to any person or entity who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the facility being demolished or renovated or any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the demolition or renovation operation, or both.
0.21 Owner’s Representative shall be the person or firm responsible for giving directions to
Contractor and measure Contractor’s performance.
0.22 Polarized light microscopy (PLM) – Refers to light microscopy using dispersion staining techniques and refractive indices to identify and quantify the type(s) of asbestos present in a bulk sample.
0.23 Presumed ACM (PACM) refers to thermal system insulation, surfacing, and flooring material installed in buildings prior to 1981.
0.24 Project designer refers to a person who has successfully completed the training requirements for an asbestos abatement project designer as required by 40 CFR 763 Appendix C, Part I.
0.25 Regulated ACM (RACM) refers to friable ACM; Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable; Category I no friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or; Category II no friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of the demolition or renovation operation.
0.26 Removal refers to all operations where ACM, PACM and/or RACM is taken out or stripped from structures or substrates, including demolition operations.
0.27 Renovation refers to altering a facility or one or more facility components in any way, including the stripping or removal of asbestos from a facility component which does not involve demolition activity.
0.28 Surfacing ACM refers to a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos that is sprayed, troweled on or otherwise applied to surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing and other purposes.
0.29 TEM refers to Transmission Electron Microscopy, which is the laboratory analysis method prescribed by EPA (AHERA) for the analysis of bulk samples from non-organically bound resilient flooring materials, such as vinyl floor tiles, due to its ability to detect and measure asbestos fibers that are too small to be observed using standard PLM analysis methods.
0.30 Thermal System Insulation (TSI) refers to a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos and applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other structural components to prevent heat loss or gain.
0.31 VA Representative refers to The VA official responsible for on-going project work, which is typically the VA Project Engineer.
0.32 Visible emissions refers to any emissions, which are visually detectable without the aid of instruments, coming from the disturbance, removal or renovation of ACM/PACM/RACM or ACM waste material.
0.33 Wet, Wetted or Adequately Wetted shall mean moistened with a wetting agent (amended water) such that the liquid is able to thoroughly penetrate ACM and exhibits no signs or potential for visible emissions.
SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Veterans Administration, and more specifically The St. Louis VA Medical Center Engineering Department, through the VISN 15 Contracting Office (Contract No. 36C25518C0113), retained Riverfront Safety & Health, LC (RSH) to conduct an asbestos-containing material (ACM) and limited lead based paint (LBP) survey in accordance with the VA contract specifications, as well as to recommend asbestos management procedures and cost estimates for the VA John Cochran Medical Center (VAMC) in St. Louis, MO.
Full size drawings that indicate the locations of bulk samples, homogenous materials and ACM have also been prepared as part of this project. All results, recommendations, cost estimates and drawings have been provided within this written package (1 set for each building), as well as in electronic format (3 x CD sets for each building).
This campus wide survey, which included the collection of over 2600 asbestos bulk samples and over 13,000 lead samples from all surveyed buildings at the Jefferson Barracks VAMC Campus, and was conducted from December 2018 through July 2019. The lead project asbestos and lead inspector was Mr. Zachary Haselhorst, with Asbestos Management Plan support from Mr. Justin Rhyneer, CIH, both accredited through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources as licensed asbestos inspectors. Certifications of additional field inspection team personnel can be found within Section 10 of this report.
The quality control review for this survey was conducted by Mr. Justin Rhyneer, CIH, who is licensed by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources as a licensed Asbestos Building Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner and is also an accredited lead inspector/risk assessor.
All asbestos bulk samples have been collected and analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 600/ R-93/116, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining techniques.
All lead bulk samples were collected using a Heuresis X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) machine (Model Pb200i; SN1920; Co-57 5mCi source; Reference Date 6/1/18), which was calibrated at the beginning and end of each shift using NIST standards.
Primary laboratory analysis has been provided by EMSL Laboratories (EMSL), Inc., which participates in the NIST-NVLAP (National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program No.
200742-0) and is an AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association) accredited laboratory (Lab No. 102636).
Secondary quality control split sample analysis has been performed for quality control purposes by Batta Laboratories (NVLAP 101032-0; AIHA 100448).
SECTION 2.0
SCOPE OF WORK
Section 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Riverfront conducted an ACM & LBP Assessment, in accordance with applicable requirements of The Scope of Work, as outlined within VA Contract Number 36C25518C0113, including Amendments 1, 2 & 3. Riverfront was responsible for implementing all technical and logistical requirements of this task, including those specified in The Scope of Work. All work was performed by qualified and licensed individuals.
1.0 TARGET BUILDINGS
a. Jefferson Barracks VAMC Campus Scope Buildings/Structures: 1, 1T, 2, 3, 3T, 18, 23, 24, 25, 35, 49, 51, 51T, 52, 53, 53T, 55, 56, 56G, 57, 58, 59, 60, 60T, 75, 83, 84, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 93, 99
b. John Cochran VAMC Campus Scope Buildings: 1, 1T, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6A, 7, 7A, 8, 8A, 8B, 11, 14, 16
2.0 FIELD INSPECTION STRATEGY
a. Asbestos Survey
i. The inspection performed as part of this survey complies with the requirements set forth within the EPA-AHERA regulatory guidance documents pertaining to the inspection of buildings for the presence, quantity and condition of ACM of all accessible spaces for in scope buildings.
ii. Ultimate objective was to show current conditions by:
1. Study/assess/verify 2008 Altec inspection report for each building as work progresses through each campus
2. Reconcile 2008 report with subsequent construction projects that included ACM removal:
a. Reference VHA NRM project list and review scope documents and record documents as needed to assess impacts to ACM inspection scope (no ACM scope = presume same as previous)
b. Reference historical project records to assess impacts to inspection scope (no ACM scope = presume same as previous)
3. Perform additional bulk sampling as needed to close data gaps within 2008 report and/or subsequent remediation work, as follows:
a. No change in material = no sampling; assess condition only
b. Omitted SACM (Suspect Asbestos Containing Material) = collect minimum of 3 samples
c. New SACM = collect minimum of 3 samples
d. Collection of additional bulk samples was made such that damage to existing suspect materials, which is unavoidable for asbestos bulk sampling efforts, is reasonably inconspicuous (i.e. behind doors; under equipment; etc.).
4. Each facility (i.e. building; space; etc. included in scope of work by contract) was inspected by an individual licensed through the State of Missouri as an asbestos inspector holding a current license for such.
5. For each facility, the inspector performed the following tasks:
a. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed and assessed the condition of all friable known, suspected or assumed ACBM.
b. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed and assessed suspect material considered non-friable ACBM.
c. Collected bulk samples of any building materials suspected as being ACBM, whether friable or non-friable, to determine asbestos content and regulatory status.
d. Recorded above information on field inspection forms for each facility.
6. A Management Planner reviewed the above information and performed the following required functions:
a. Reviewed each Management Plan for compliance with AHERA and verified that the plan reflects current conditions.
b. Reviewed the results of each inspection and assessment, per facility.
c. Recommended in writing, the appropriate response actions.
d. Signed and dated the review documents, included the accreditation number of inspectors and planners, and submitted a copy to the Designated Person.
7. The following information was submitted to the Designated Person under AHERA, for inclusion in the Management Plan for each facility and, optionally, at a central location.
8. The date(s) of the inspection, the name and signature of the person making the inspection, state of accreditation, his or her accreditation number, and any changes in the condition of known or assumed
ACBM.
9. If sample were collected, the exact locations where samples were collected during the inspection, a description of the manner used to choose sampling locations, the name and signature of each accredited inspector collecting the samples, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.
10. Any assessments or reassessments made of ACBM, the name and signature of the accredited inspector making the assessments, state of accreditation and his or her accreditation number.
b. Limited Lead Paint Survey
i. XRF sampling efforts were limited to following surfaces for each room/space
(hallways & other common spaces to be treated as a single room) encountered in buildings throughout both campuses:
1. Door jamb/frame x 1
2. 4 main walls (north; south; east; west) x 1 each
a. Shooting outermost walls for 4 main wall shots
b. One additional wall shot collected if secondary painted wall material noted for confirmation purposes (i.e. shoot plaster walls above drop ceiling where accessible)
3. Hard ceilings x 1 (acoustical drop ceilings excluded)
a. Shoot lowest level exposed hard ceiling
b. If concealed by acoustical drop, remove tile for access to painted hard ceiling surface for sample collection
4. Suspect wall fixtures/materials (i.e. ceramic tile) x 1 each per room
(maximum)
ii. All XRF sample data points reported, including results showing lead levels above 0 but below the standard limit of 1.0 mg/cm2 for Lead Based Paint as defined by EPA. Paint layers containing lead below LBP limit may be actionable for future OSHA compliance purposes.
c. ICRA Considerations
i. Inspection Team completed ICRA forms and submitted for VA consideration prior to field activities within each building.
ii. VA ICRA Team identified “special” or “High Risk” areas for consideration in the planning/phasing/scheduling of field inspection activities, as delineated within maps provided by VA.
iii. Above ceiling inspections were carried out in a manner reflective of risk ranking as assigned and approved on ICRA worksheet, as follows:
1. HEPA cart (i.e. pre-manufactured cart with HEPA filtered air machines) required in all High-Risk areas
2. HEPA cart use will be limited by reasonable access restrictions (desks;
small doorways; etc.); lack of access in High Risk areas will be assessed conservatively and with worst case assumptions made accordingly
3. HEPA cart use may be dismissed if only displacing one ceiling tile at a time in Non-High-Risk areas
SECTION 3.0
MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
Section 3.0 MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The following general notes are for all facilities inspected during the Asbestos Re-inspection.
1) Removal Priorities were developed for each homogenous material area (HMA) identified as being an ACM, or PACM.
2) The Removal Priorities are an indicator of priorities for future repair work or abatement work to be scheduled as financial budgets allow. Please see the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0 for further detail.
3) Records for custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff who have received two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 14.0.
4) Any new custodial, janitorial, or maintenance staff that have the potential to come in contact with ACM are required to attend a two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 14.0.
5) The Designated Person is required to inform workers and building occupants at least once a year about the Management Plan. This includes information about inspections, response actions, and post-response action activities that are planned or in progress. Provide a copy of the notification to each facility and include a copy in the Management Plan under Section 15.0.
6) Maintenance areas (boiler rooms, janitor closets, etc.) are required to have warning labels where ACM are located. Warning labels should be installed in these areas as needed, and in a prominent location.
7) Review the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0 for maintenance actions that may be required and to establish priorities and budgets for future repair and abatement work.
8) Periodic “Surveillance Inspections” are required every six (6) months. This inspection should indicate the condition of the material and provide recommendations for repair or potential removal. Consistency of inspection is desired and, therefore, should be performed by the same team of individual(s) for all facilities. It is recommended that the inspection team rotate facility responsibilities regularly to allow for a less biased assessment and improve overall quality control of this effort. The surveillance inspections should be performed by an accredited inspector. Records of Surveillance Inspections should be filed within the facility Management Plan under Section 11.0.
9) Re-inspections (i.e. the scope of work executed during this project) are required every three
(3) years. Updated information should be added to the Management Plan as needed under Section 12.0.
10) The existing Management Plan (original) is amended by this Three-Year Re-inspection assessment.
11) An accredited “Supervisor” should be on staff or available on a contract basis per AHERA guidelines to support execution of the Management Plan, with training and licensure filed within Section 14.0 of the Plan.
12) ACBM must only be removed by licensed and accredited contractors in the State of Missouri. Response actions related to abatement activity should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 13.0. Removal of limited amounts (i.e. less than one glovebag) of asbestos is within the scope of the Management Plan by the accredited Supervisor and/or trained individuals (i.e. Operations and Maintenance 24-hour trained).
13) Notification should be provided to “outside contractors” about ACM within each facility when their work could bring them into direct contact with said ACM. This should include such trades/services as telephone, electrical, plumbing, air conditioning and other construction trades. A form should be created for this purpose and filed within the Management Plan for regular use and access.
14) New building construction and portable buildings added to the facilities are required to be inspected and sampled for ACM. Please note that many ACM products can still be purchased and used in the construction industry to this day, with very few legal restrictions otherwise, and their absence should not be assumed. In lieu of this, a letter from the architect, engineer or manufacturer can be obtained that states “no ACM were specified or used in the facility during its construction”. A copy of this letter is to be filed within the Management Plan for each facility under Section 12.0. This letter will negate the requirement for sampling.
15) Abatement costs have been developed for each homogenous material area for each facility as part of this Management Plan and can be found within the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0. The estimated abatement cost is for budget purposes only. The costs are based on the area of material and estimated abatement costs for this material, as per current (2018) industry standard unit rates. The cost is for abatement only and does not include abatement design, additional inspections needed for inaccessible locations, air monitoring or project oversight costs.
SECTION 4.0
LIMITATIONS
Section 4.0 LIMITATIONS
The following limitations apply to this inspection and assessment effort and report:
1) Due to limitations on the ability to penetrate the roofing systems matrix for each building (i.e. risk of voiding existing roofing system warranties paid for by the VA), no roofing matrix samples have been collected to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos containing materials. It should be noted that even recently installed roofing systems can be found to contain ACM, particularly within the flashing materials, as they are currently legally available in the commercial market and should be presumed to have been used unless the architect/engineer responsible for its installation can provide a letter stating otherwise (see Section 3.0). As such, all facility roofing systems are presumed to contain an asbestos containing material until sampled and proven otherwise and should be handled as such by VA Medical Center maintenance and/or custodial workers as well as outside contractors.
2) Inspection efforts taken during this assessment did NOT include making ceiling and/or wall penetrations into wall/ceiling cavities suspected to have contained ACM, particularly TSI systems, which are commonly found hidden within wall cavities and utility chases. Often, it is not possible to gain visual confirmation of the presence of TSI systems, however, the prevalence of surrounding systems and overall building trends strongly suggest them present. In the absence of visual confirmation, building systems suspected as having ACM TSI on water and/or steam lines have been assumed to be present behind inaccessible barriers until proven otherwise. For example, if a given building exhibits ACM TSI joint fittings on water lines in exposed locations (i.e. hallways), then those same lines feeding into inaccessible wall cavities near bathrooms or shower areas will also be assumed to contain ACM TSI joint fittings. These observations, and associated sampling results, are outlined within the attached report. However, it should also be noted that newer building finishes are often presumed by contractors/maintenance staff as having hidden wall cavity locations that would not be considered as “suspect”, and thus presumed as presenting no asbestos risks, which is a risky presumption. As such, wall cavities that have not otherwise been identified as containing ACM-TSI should be penetrated with caution, and preferably preceded with assessment by a licensed asbestos inspector using destructive means, should future renovation projects call for such demolition activities.
3) Inspection and sampling of flooring systems has been limited to those observations and sampling efforts afforded by “spot” checks performed in a representative number of locations in order to determine the type and extent of suspect building materials and any obvious trends associated with those systems. For example, if a given room flooring system consists of carpet over one or more layers of floor tile, only a single access point would have been made (typically in the least visible corner of the room) to observe and sample suspect materials. As such, there exists the possibility of unidentified suspect building materials present in concealed, inaccessible locations in other areas of the same room, hall or floor space, and that those materials could be found to be an ACM upon discovery and proper testing.
Similarly, if inspectors observed evidence of suspect materials within a given homogenous area, such as second floor tile layers and/or flooring adhesives, then those hidden materials were presumed present throughout the remaining homogenous area based on visible observations of the top flooring layers. As such, there exists the possibility of this inspection identifying an area as having a hidden layer of ACM floor tile and/or mastic which, upon demolition, would reveal a much smaller area of impact.
4) Due to limitations on the ability to collect sufficient suspect adhesive materials typically found beneath ceramic systems (particularly in restrooms and other areas designed for exposure to water), and to do so without significantly damaging the finished ceramic tile surface, samples of ceramic tile mastic/adhesive materials were not collected to confirm or deny the presence of ACM. Adhesives/mastics used for bathroom/kitchen/shower areas commonly contain ACM, are currently available in the commercial market and should be presumed to have been used unless the architect/engineer responsible for its installation can provide a letter stating otherwise (see Section 3.0). As such, all ceramic tile systems should be assumed to be underlain by an ACM adhesive/mastic until inspected and/or sampled and proven otherwise and should be handled as such by VA maintenance and/or custodial workers as well as outside contractors.
5) Inspection and sampling efforts during this assessment did not include the necessary destructive sampling techniques to sufficiently collect samples of fire rated doors as well as heat shields located in the perimeter steam convector units. Sampling of these materials would have caused a great deal of damage that would have not been able to be repaired. All fire rated doors and heat shields behind the steam convector units throughout the hospital shall be considered to contain asbestos unless sampled proving otherwise.
6) Suspect caulking/glazing materials observed on exterior window systems were safely assessed at ground level only with the assumption that window units at higher elevations are homogenous and carry the same designation with respect to asbestos containing materials.
7) Fixed objects, such as cabinets, lab hoods, etc. often conceal additional layers of older flooring that are not otherwise visible for observation and/or sampling during inspection, but are then uncovered during construction activities.
8) Building systems in constant operation which are critical to the building’s occupation are not capable of being inspected. For example, the interior spaces of an HVAC Air Handler Unit would be considered inaccessible for proper inspection due to safety risks by inspectors.
9) Inspection maps provided with this report indicate specific rooms/spaces in which access for visual inspection was not made possible during the 2018 inspection effort.
In such cases, previous conditions for ACM (as per 2008 Altec survey) was presumed unchanged and reported as such.
St. Louis Jefferson Barracks VAMC Bldg. 18
Section 5.0 MAP GUIDE
A. Title
a. Level
i. Indicates the floor or level of the hospital
ii. Crawlspace, Basement, First, Second, etc.
b. Floor/Miscellaneous/Surfacing/TSI HMA
i. Map representing specific categories of building materials
B. Legends
a. Asbestos Containing Materials HMA Guide
i. HMA’s representing building materials tested positive for asbestos
1. Each building material observed was given a different letter or number to represent that specific material
2. Letters (in boxes) were adopted from the 2008 reinspection to represent either ACM and/or Non-ACM HMAs
3. Numbers (in boxes) reflect ACM and Non-ACM HMA’s discovered during both the 2008 and the 2018 re-inspections.
ii. The location of the positive HMA’s will be indicated on the map using a hatching (highlight) with the specific HMA letter or number in or near the area where it is located which corresponds to the ACM HMA legend.
iii. Positive HMA’s will have a quantity that represents the estimated amount of that particular HMA throughout the entire floor/map area
1. Thermal system insulation will have quantities per functional space where TSI was observed in the thermal system insulation summary table
2. TSI conditions are to be presumed as “Good” unless otherwise noted on TSI maps/drawings as “D” corresponding to damaged conditions or “SD”, which corresponds to significantly damaged conditions.
iv. Assumed or presumed HMA’s are materials that could not be sampled or accessed for inspection but are nonetheless assumed to be asbestos containing until proven otherwise based on historical knowledge base at facility.
v. Asbestos containing pipe insulation (TSI) should be assumed in all chases and wet walls. Perimeter chases are shown with a red hatching (highlight) to reflect known historical trends of ACM TSI risers being left in place during even major renovations and are assumed present throughout unless proven otherwise.
b. Non- Asbestos General HMA Guide
i. HMA materials that were observed, sampled and tested negative for asbestos are represented within this legend/list of materials. Map users are to interpret items listed and described therein as a comprehensive list of materials observed on that floor/area that are known or believed to be a Non-ACM component.
c. Sample Locations
i. Each sample taken was numbered and represented on the map
ii. Red sample numbers indicate the sample number taken from that specific area tested positive for asbestos
iii. Blue sample numbers indicate the sample number taken from that specific area tested negative for asbestos
C. Inaccessible Areas
a. Often indicated with the term No Access or N/A
b. Re-inspection team assumed that the same materials noted as existing in that particular space from the 2008 inspection are presumed to remain now.
c. Various reasons contributed to no access
i. Could not utilize key
1. Police or engineering team could not enter as well
ii. HEPA Cart
1. Size limitations (cart couldn’t be moved into room)
iii. Inpatient Rooms (occupied by patients)
iv. Plaster ceilings or 1’x1’ ceiling tiles with no hatch for access
v. Could not interrupt important hospital functions
1. Emergency Room Area
2. SPD…(etc)
D. General Recommended Procedures for Updating Maps After Abatement
a. Remove highlight and HMA notation from the room abatement took place
b. Subtract quantity from the total in the legend and cost table
c. If TSI (pipe insulation) was removed, subtract the total quantity from the TSI
Summary Table and Cost Estimating Table as well.
d. When all ACM has been removed from the floor, remove HMA from legend, HMA Summary Table and Condition and Removal Priority Table.
SECTION 5.0
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL HOMOGENOUS MATERIAL AREA
(HMA) SUMMARY TABLES AND DRAWINGS
This section provides a quick table reference to all ACM Homogenous Material Areas (HMAs) found during the 2018 inspection, as well as a complete set of corresponding drawings with the exact location of bulk samples and ACM HMAs found during 2018 inspection.
HMA Summary Table Jefferson Barracks Campus Bldg. 18
JEFFERSON BARRACKS CAMPUS BUILDING 18
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
2018 CAMPUS-WIDE ACM INSPECTION
ACM HOMOGENOUS AREAS SUMMARY TABLE
Building 18
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
Crawlspace
52: Contaminated crawlspace soil
None None None
Basement
A1: 12x12 floor tile – white w/ black mastic B1: 12x12 floor tile – tan w/ black mastic 25: Black mastic under 12x12 floor tile
– white w/ white and gray specs
None 6: ACM pipe insulation and mudded fittings
18: Fire door (PACM) 19: Steam convector units
(PACM)
28: Interior door caulk - gray
B1: 12x12 floor tile – tan w/ black mastic C1: 12x12 floor tile – gray w/ black
18: Fire door (PACM) 19: Steam convector units
B1: 12x12 floor tile – tan w/ black
18: Fire door (PACM) 19: Steam convector units
B1: 12x12 floor tile – tan w/ black
None None
18: Fire door (PACM) 19: Steam convector units
HMA Summary Table Jefferson Barracks Campus Bldg. 18
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous
Materials
Exterior
None 4: Tan exterior surfacing material None None
Section 5.0 MAP GUIDE
A. Title
a. Level
i. Indicates the floor or level of the hospital
ii. Crawlspace, Basement, First, Second, etc.
b. Floor/Miscellaneous/Surfacing/TSI HMA
i. Map representing specific categories of building materials
B. Legends
a. Asbestos Containing Materials HMA Guide
i. HMA’s representing building materials tested positive for asbestos
1. Each building material observed was given a different letter or number to represent that specific material
2. Letters (in boxes) were adopted from the 2008 reinspection to represent either ACM and/or Non-ACM HMAs
3. Numbers (in boxes) reflect ACM and Non-ACM HMA’s discovered during both the 2008 and the 2018 re-inspections.
ii. The location of the positive HMA’s will be indicated on the map using a hatching (highlight) with the specific HMA letter or number in or near the area where it is located which corresponds to the ACM HMA legend.
iii. Positive HMA’s will have a quantity that represents the estimated amount of that particular HMA throughout the entire floor/map area
1. Thermal system insulation will have quantities per functional space where TSI was observed in the thermal system insulation summary table
2. TSI conditions are to be presumed as “Good” unless otherwise noted on TSI maps/drawings as “D” corresponding to damaged conditions or “SD”, which corresponds to significantly damaged conditions.
iv. Assumed or presumed HMA’s are materials that could not be sampled or accessed for inspection but are nonetheless assumed to be asbestos containing until proven otherwise based on historical knowledge base at facility.
v. Asbestos containing pipe insulation (TSI) should be assumed in all chases and wet walls. Perimeter chases are shown with a red hatching (highlight) to reflect known historical trends of ACM TSI risers being left in place during even major renovations and are assumed present throughout unless proven otherwise.
b. Non- Asbestos General HMA Guide
i. HMA materials that were observed, sampled and tested negative for asbestos are represented within this legend/list of materials. Map users are to interpret items listed and described therein as a comprehensive list of materials observed on that floor/area that are known or believed to be a Non-ACM component.
c. Sample Locations
i. Each sample taken was numbered and represented on the map
ii. Red sample numbers indicate the sample number taken from that specific area tested positive for asbestos
iii. Blue sample numbers indicate the sample number taken from that specific area tested negative for asbestos
C. Inaccessible Areas
a. Often indicated with the term No Access or N/A
b. Re-inspection team assumed that the same materials noted as existing in that particular space from the 2008 inspection are presumed to remain now.
c. Various reasons contributed to no access
i. Could not utilize key
1. Police or engineering team could not enter as well
ii. HEPA Cart
1. Size limitations (cart couldn’t be moved into room)
iii. Inpatient Rooms (occupied by patients)
iv. Plaster ceilings or 1’x1’ ceiling tiles with no hatch for access
v. Could not interrupt important hospital functions
1. Emergency Room Area
2. SPD…(etc)
D. General Recommended Procedures for Updating Maps After Abatement
a. Remove highlight and HMA notation from the room abatement took place
b. Subtract quantity from the total in the legend and cost table
c. If TSI (pipe insulation) was removed, subtract the total quantity from the TSI
Summary Table and Cost Estimating Table as well.
d. When all ACM has been removed from the floor, remove HMA from legend, HMA Summary Table and Condition and Removal Priority Table.
Basement Asbestos Location Maps
Date
Project No.
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
48 Metal jacket 51 Crawlspace soil (no debris detected)
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
CRAWLSPACE - TSI LOCATION
LEGEND
TSI LOCATION - CRAWLSPACE
JB-18-CS-TSI
J.RHYNEER
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UCRAWLSPACE PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text Z002
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
HMA GUIDE
A1 12"x12" floor tile - white w/ black mastic - 10 ft2
B1 12"x12" floor tile - tan w/ black mastic - 2000 ft2
25 Black mastic under negative 12"x12" floor tile - gray w/ white/gray specs - 1125 ft²
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
3 Concrete 4 Ceramic Tile 7 Terrazzo 20 12"x12" floor tile - Lt Brown w/ Brown and White Specs
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - FLOORING HMA
LEGEND
FLOOR HMA - BASEMENT
JB-18-B-Floor
J.RHYNEER
B1
B1 B1
B1
B1
B1
A1
A 12"x12" floor tile - white B 12"x12" floor tile - tan
25 25
AutoCAD SHX Text Z001
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text S002
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H003
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H001
AutoCAD SHX Text H002
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBASEMENT PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
HMA GUIDE
18 Fire door - 2 units 19 Steam convector unit (heat shields presumed) - throughout 28 Interior pliable door caulk - 60 ft
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
4 Ceramic Tile 8 Cork Ceiling 9 Flange Gasket 10 2'x2' ceiling tile- Pinhole Henpeck-White 11 2'x2' ceiling tile- Pinhole Larger Henpeck- Off White 12 Plaster 13 White Seam Tape 14 Gray Seam Sealant 15 Drywall/Joint Compound 16 Red Fireproof Caulk 17 Vibration Joint Cloth- Green Canvas 22 4" Covebase- Brown 23 2'x4' ceiling tile- Pinhole Henpeck- White 24 2'x4' ceiling tile- Pinhole Larger Henpeck- Off White 26 4" Covebase- Beige 27 6" Covebase- Beige
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - MISCELLANEOUS
HMA LEGEND
MISCELLANEOUS HMA - BASEMENT
JB-18-B-misc
J.RHYNEER
AutoCAD SHX Text Z001
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text S002
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H003
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H001
AutoCAD SHX Text H002
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBASEMENT PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
HMA GUIDE
4 Tan exterior surfacing material (beneath EIFS layer) - 6192 ft
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - SURFACING HMA
LEGEND
SURFACING HMA - BASEMENT
JB-18-B-surfacing
J.RHYNEER
AutoCAD SHX Text Z001
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text S002
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H003
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H001
AutoCAD SHX Text H002
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBASEMENT PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A
ASBESTOS CONTAINING TSI
GUIDE
6 ACM pipe insulation and mudded fittings - 856 ft, 180 fittings
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - TSI LOCATION
LEGEND
TSI LOCATION - BASEMENT
JB-18-B-TSI
J.RHYNEER
DSD
All asbestos pipe insulation is presumed to be in Good condition unless noted as Damaged (D) or Significantly Damaged (SD)
Unknown amounts of asbestos pipe insulation may be present in all wet walls, pipe chases, perimeter steam chases, inside plaster walls, and above plaster ceilings.
AutoCAD SHX Text Z001
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text S002
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H003
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H001
AutoCAD SHX Text H002
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBASEMENT PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - SAMPLE
LOCATION LEGEND
SAMPLE LOCATION - BASEMENT
JB-18-B-sample
J.RHYNEER
6 41 33
36 37 38
24 27 32 35 45
AutoCAD SHX Text Z001
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text S002
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H003
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H001
AutoCAD SHX Text H002
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBASEMENT PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
ST. LOUIS V.A. MEDICAL CENTER
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
2018 REINSPECTION
THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION (TSI) SUMMARY TABLE
Building 18 - Basement
Room # Description Qty S/LF Fittin gss TH/DI
B001-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 12 lf 0 4.00 B001-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 5 4.00
B003-18-JB cardboard wrap pipe lagging 95 lf 0 2.00 B003-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 95 lf 0 4.00 B003-18-JB mudded joint fittings on cardboard lag 0 ea 12 2.00 B003-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 30 4.00
B004-18-JB cardboard wrap pipe lagging 1 lf 0 4.00
B005-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 40 lf 0 4.00 B005-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 20 4.00
B007-18-JB cardboard wrap pipe lagging 32 lf 0 2.00 B007-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 48 lf 0 4.00 B007-18-JB mudded joint fittings on cardboard lag 0 ea 17 2.00 B007-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 19 4.00
B008-18-JB cardboard wrap pipe lagging 66 lf 0 4.00 B008-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 100 lf 0 4.00 B008-18-JB mudded joint fittings on cardboard lag 0 ea 9 4.00 B008-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 21 4.00
B010-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 86 lf 0 4.00 B010-18-JB mudded joint fittings on cardboard lag 0 ea 10 4.00 B010-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 25 4.00
B011-18-JB cardboard wrap pipe lagging 65 lf 0 2.00 B011-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 110 lf 0 4.00 B011-18-JB mudded joint fittings on cardboard lag 0 ea 20 2.00 B011-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 33 4.00
B012-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 96 lf 0 4.00
H003-18-JB cardboard wrap pipe lagging 4 lf 0 4.00 H003-18-JB magnesia pipe lagging 10 lf 0 4.00 H003-18-JB mudded joint fittings on cardboard lag 0 ea 1 4.00 H003-18-JB mudded joint fittings on mag pipe lagging 0 ea 3 4.00
Presumed ACM in inaccessible perimeter steam chases 1024 lf
TOTALS 1884 225
First Floor Asbestos Location Maps
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
EIGHTEEN
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM Ve te ra ns Ad m in is tra tio n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A on e-ei gh t i nc h on e fo ot on e-qu ar te r i nc h on e fo ot th re e-ei gh ts in ch o ne fo ot th re e-qu ar te rs in ch o ne fo ot on e in ch o ne fo ot on e an d on e-ha lf in ch es o ne fo ot th re e in ch es o ne fo ot on e ha lf in ch o ne fo ot
F E
D C
B A
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
HMA GUIDE
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
2-01-19
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
3 Concrete 4 Ceramic Tile 6 Carpet 30 16"x16" floor tile - Cream w/ Gray Accent 31 16"x16" floor tile - Tan/White and Navy spec
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
FIRST FLOOR - FLOORING
HMA LEGEND
FLOOR HMA - FIRST FLOOR
JB-18-1-Floor
J.RHYNEER
A1 12"x12" floor tile - white w/ black mastic - 4050 ft2
B1 12"x12" floor tile - tan w/ black mastic - 225 ft2
C1 12"x12" floor tile - gray w/ black mastic - 2025 ft²
A1
A1
A1
B1 no access no access no access
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UFIRST FLOOR PLAN
AutoCAD SHX Text
%%UBLDG. 18
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text S101
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text H101
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCAD SHX Text
AutoCA…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .