SOW Attachment 26 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 57.pdf

1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 – Saint Louis, MO 63101 ph 314-436-9492 – fx 314-436-9733

RSH-STL.com

2018 ASBESTOS & LEAD REINSPECTION

at

BUILDING 57

VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS

1 JEFFERSON BARRACKS DR.

ST. LOUIS, MO. 63125

PREPARED FOR

St. Louis V. A. Medical Center

1 Jefferson Barracks Dr.

St. Louis, MO. 63125

RIVERFRONT PROJECT NO. SH1476

July 17, 2019

ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND

SAFETY CONSULTANTS

General Industrial Hygiene Exposure Assessment and Risk Management

Indoor Air Quality Investigations

Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Inspection and Risk Management

Hazard Communication Programs

Hazardous Noise & Hearing Conservation Programs

OSHA Compliance Program Development

Phase I & II ESA— Due Diligence

Brownfields Redevelopment

Environmental Risk Assessment

Underground Storage Tank Management

Subsurface Investigation/Remediation

Remediation Oversight

CERCLA / RCRA

and more…

1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 – Saint Louis, MO 63101 ph 314-436-9492 – fx 314-436-9733 RSH-STL.com

July 17, 2019

RIVERFRONT PROJECT NO. SH1476

Mr. Michael Beitenman St. Louis VAMC – John Cochran Division Project Engineer 915 North Grand Ave St. Louis, MO 63106

RE: 2018 Asbestos/Lead Re-Inspection and Management Plan; Building 57

Dear Mr. Beitenman:

Riverfront Safety & Health (Riverfront) is pleased to present the following summary of findings from the asbestos/lead re-inspection and assessment performed from June 2018 through July 2019.

Sincerely, Riverfront Safety & Health, LC

Justin R. Rhyneer, CIH

2018 Asbestos/Lead Inspection Report St. Louis Jefferson Barracks VAMC – Bldg. 57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION DESCRIPTION

0.0 Definitions

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Scope of Work

3.0 Management Plan Recommendations

4.0 Limitations

5.0 Asbestos Containing Material Homogenous Material/Area Summary Tables and Drawings (w/sample locations; HMA locations; ACM color coding)

6.0 ACM Condition & Removal Priority Table with Abatement Cost Estimates

7.0 Master Bulk Sample Summary Tables

8.0 Asbestos Inspection Photo Log

9.0 Asbestos Inspection Laboratory Reports

10.0 Professional Certifications

11.0 Periodic Surveillance Forms

12.0 Management Plan Updates

13.0 Response Actions

14.0 Training Documents

15.0 Annual Notification Letters

16.0 Limited Lead Survey Summary Tables

17.0 Previous Inspection Reports

This 2018 Asbestos/Lead Re-inspection report was provided by:

CONTRACTOR:

Riverfront Safety & Health, LC 1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 St. Louis, MO 63101

(314) 436-9492 (Office)

(314) 436-9733 (Fax)

ASBESTOS/LEAD INSPECTORS:

Zachary Haselhorst MO Asbestos Certification No. 7118111618MOIR16667

MO Lead Certification No. 160229-300004899

ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT PLANNER:

Justin Rhyneer, CIH MO Certification No. 7011092718MOMPR8065

Accreditation Agencies: Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Asbestos) and Missouri Department of Public Health (Lead)

SECTION 0

DEFINITIONS

Section 0.0 DEFINITIONS

0.1 AHERA refers to the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. Asbestos regulations for schools issued in 1987.

0.2 Asbestos shall mean chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, actinolite asbestos and any of these minerals that have been chemically treated and/or altered. This definition includes all “Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials

(PACM)”.

0.3 Asbestos Containing Building Material (ACBM) means any building material containing more than 1% asbestos.

0.4 Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) means any material containing more than 1% asbestos.

0.5 Asbestos Abatement refers to the procedures to control fiber release from asbestos-containing materials, typically during removal. Includes removal, encapsulation, enclosure, demolition and renovation activities related to asbestos.

0.6 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) refers to one certified in the general practice of industrial hygiene by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene. An industrial hygienist Certified in Comprehensive Practice by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene.

0.7 Disturbance refers to activities that disrupt the matrix of ACM or PACM, crumble or pulverize ACM or PACM, or generate visible debris from ACM or PACM. Disturbance includes cutting away small amounts of ACM or PACM, no greater than the amount that can be contained in one standard sized glove bag or waste bag in order to access a building component.

0.8 Dry shall mean having no apparent wetness through visual or tactile means in the opinion of the Owner’s Representative.

0.9 Encapsulant refers to a material that surrounds or embeds asbestos fibers in an adhesive matrix and prevents the release of fibers.

0.10 Encapsulation refers to treating ACM with an encapsulant.

0.11 Friable Asbestos shall mean any asbestos containing material that can be crumbled or pulverized by hand.

0.12 Homogenous Material Area (HMA) refers to any distinct building material (carpet; floor tile; pipe insulation; stucco; etc.) that has been identified/observed in a given area (Building; Floor; Room), and has been included in this assessment effort.

0.13 HVAC refers to Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems.

0.14 Industrial hygienist (IH) refers to a professional qualified by education, training, and experience to anticipate, recognize, evaluate and develop controls for occupational health hazards.

0.15 Intact refers to when an ACM has not crumbled, been pulverized, or otherwise deteriorated so that the asbestos is no longer likely to be bound with its matrix.

0.16 Lead Based Paint refers to paint exhibiting a lead content equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, as defined by The U.S. EPA.

0.17 Management Planner refers to a person who has successfully completed the training requirements for an asbestos management planner as required by 40 CFR 763 Appendix C, Part I.

0.18 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) refers to EPA's rule to control emissions of asbestos to the environment.

0.19 OSHA shall refer to The Occupational Safety & Health Administration – A regulatory agency charged with enforcing the lawful protection of workers.

0.20 Owner refers to any person or entity who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the facility being demolished or renovated or any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the demolition or renovation operation, or both.

0.21 Owner’s Representative shall be the person or firm responsible for giving directions to

Contractor and measure Contractor’s performance.

0.22 Polarized light microscopy (PLM) – Refers to light microscopy using dispersion staining techniques and refractive indices to identify and quantify the type(s) of asbestos present in a bulk sample.

0.23 Presumed ACM (PACM) refers to thermal system insulation, surfacing, and flooring material installed in buildings prior to 1981.

0.24 Project designer refers to a person who has successfully completed the training requirements for an asbestos abatement project designer as required by 40 CFR 763 Appendix C, Part I.

0.25 Regulated ACM (RACM) refers to friable ACM; Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable; Category I no friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or; Category II no friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of the demolition or renovation operation.

0.26 Removal refers to all operations where ACM, PACM and/or RACM is taken out or stripped from structures or substrates, including demolition operations.

0.27 Renovation refers to altering a facility or one or more facility components in any way, including the stripping or removal of asbestos from a facility component which does not involve demolition activity.

0.28 Surfacing ACM refers to a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos that is sprayed, troweled on or otherwise applied to surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing and other purposes.

0.29 TEM refers to Transmission Electron Microscopy, which is the laboratory analysis method prescribed by EPA (AHERA) for the analysis of bulk samples from non-organically bound resilient flooring materials, such as vinyl floor tiles, due to its ability to detect and measure asbestos fibers that are too small to be observed using standard PLM analysis methods.

0.30 Thermal System Insulation (TSI) refers to a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos and applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other structural components to prevent heat loss or gain.

0.31 VA Representative refers to The VA official responsible for on-going project work, which is typically the VA Project Engineer.

0.32 Visible emissions refers to any emissions, which are visually detectable without the aid of instruments, coming from the disturbance, removal or renovation of ACM/PACM/RACM or ACM waste material.

0.33 Wet, Wetted or Adequately Wetted shall mean moistened with a wetting agent (amended water) such that the liquid is able to thoroughly penetrate ACM and exhibits no signs or potential for visible emissions.

SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION

Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Veterans Administration, and more specifically The St. Louis VA Medical Center Engineering Department, through the VISN 15 Contracting Office (Contract No. 36C25518C0113), retained Riverfront Safety & Health, LC (RSH) to conduct an asbestos-containing material (ACM) and limited lead based paint (LBP) survey in accordance with the VA contract specifications, as well as to recommend asbestos management procedures and cost estimates for the VA John Cochran Medical Center (VAMC) in St. Louis, MO.

Full size drawings that indicate the locations of bulk samples, homogenous materials and ACM have also been prepared as part of this project. All results, recommendations, cost estimates and drawings have been provided within this written package (1 set for each building), as well as in electronic format (3 x CD sets for each building).

This campus wide survey, which included the collection of over 2600 asbestos bulk samples and over 13,000 lead samples from all surveyed buildings at the Jefferson Barracks VAMC Campus, and was conducted from December 2018 through July 2019. The lead project asbestos and lead inspector was Mr. Zachary Haselhorst, with Asbestos Management Plan support from Mr. Justin Rhyneer, CIH, both accredited through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources as licensed asbestos inspectors. Certifications of additional field inspection team personnel can be found within Section 10 of this report.

The quality control review for this survey was conducted by Mr. Justin Rhyneer, CIH, who is licensed by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources as a licensed Asbestos Building Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner and is also an accredited lead inspector/risk assessor.

All asbestos bulk samples have been collected and analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 600/ R-93/116, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining techniques.

All lead bulk samples were collected using a Heuresis X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) machine (Model Pb200i; SN1920; Co-57 5mCi source; Reference Date 6/1/18), which was calibrated at the beginning and end of each shift using NIST standards.

Primary laboratory analysis has been provided by EMSL Laboratories (EMSL), Inc., which participates in the NIST-NVLAP (National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program No.

200742-0) and is an AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association) accredited laboratory (Lab No. 102636).

Secondary quality control split sample analysis has been performed for quality control purposes by Batta Laboratories (NVLAP 101032-0; AIHA 100448).

SECTION 2.0

SCOPE OF WORK

Section 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Riverfront conducted an ACM & LBP Assessment, in accordance with applicable requirements of The Scope of Work, as outlined within VA Contract Number 36C25518C0113, including Amendments 1, 2 & 3. Riverfront was responsible for implementing all technical and logistical requirements of this task, including those specified in The Scope of Work. All work was performed by qualified and licensed individuals.

1.0 TARGET BUILDINGS

a. Jefferson Barracks VAMC Campus Scope Buildings/Structures: 1, 1T, 2, 3, 3T, 18, 23, 24, 25, 35, 49, 51, 51T, 52, 53, 53T, 55, 56, 56G, 57, 58, 59, 60, 60T, 75, 83, 84, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 93, 99

b. John Cochran VAMC Campus Scope Buildings: 1, 1T, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6A, 7, 7A, 8, 8A, 8B, 11, 14, 16

2.0 FIELD INSPECTION STRATEGY

a. Asbestos Survey

i. The inspection performed as part of this survey complies with the requirements set forth within the EPA-AHERA regulatory guidance documents pertaining to the inspection of buildings for the presence, quantity and condition of ACM of all accessible spaces for in scope buildings.

ii. Ultimate objective was to show current conditions by:

1. Study/assess/verify 2008 Altec inspection report for each building as work progresses through each campus

2. Reconcile 2008 report with subsequent construction projects that included ACM removal:

a. Reference VHA NRM project list and review scope documents and record documents as needed to assess impacts to ACM inspection scope (no ACM scope = presume same as previous)

b. Reference historical project records to assess impacts to inspection scope (no ACM scope = presume same as previous)

3. Perform additional bulk sampling as needed to close data gaps within 2008 report and/or subsequent remediation work, as follows:

a. No change in material = no sampling; assess condition only

b. Omitted SACM (Suspect Asbestos Containing Material) = collect minimum of 3 samples

c. New SACM = collect minimum of 3 samples

d. Collection of additional bulk samples was made such that damage to existing suspect materials, which is unavoidable for asbestos bulk sampling efforts, is reasonably inconspicuous (i.e. behind doors; under equipment; etc.).

4. Each facility (i.e. building; space; etc. included in scope of work by contract) was inspected by an individual licensed through the State of Missouri as an asbestos inspector holding a current license for such.

5. For each facility, the inspector performed the following tasks:

a. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed and assessed the condition of all friable known, suspected or assumed ACBM.

b. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed and assessed suspect material considered non-friable ACBM.

c. Collected bulk samples of any building materials suspected as being ACBM, whether friable or non-friable, to determine asbestos content and regulatory status.

d. Recorded above information on field inspection forms for each facility.

6. A Management Planner reviewed the above information and performed the following required functions:

a. Reviewed each Management Plan for compliance with AHERA and verified that the plan reflects current conditions.

b. Reviewed the results of each inspection and assessment, per facility.

c. Recommended in writing, the appropriate response actions.

d. Signed and dated the review documents, included the accreditation number of inspectors and planners, and submitted a copy to the Designated Person.

7. The following information was submitted to the Designated Person under AHERA, for inclusion in the Management Plan for each facility and, optionally, at a central location.

8. The date(s) of the inspection, the name and signature of the person making the inspection, state of accreditation, his or her accreditation number, and any changes in the condition of known or assumed

ACBM.

9. If sample were collected, the exact locations where samples were collected during the inspection, a description of the manner used to choose sampling locations, the name and signature of each accredited inspector collecting the samples, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.

10. Any assessments or reassessments made of ACBM, the name and signature of the accredited inspector making the assessments, state of accreditation and his or her accreditation number.

b. Limited Lead Paint Survey

i. XRF sampling efforts were limited to following surfaces for each room/space

(hallways & other common spaces to be treated as a single room) encountered in buildings throughout both campuses:

1. Door jamb/frame x 1

2. 4 main walls (north; south; east; west) x 1 each

a. Shooting outermost walls for 4 main wall shots

b. One additional wall shot collected if secondary painted wall material noted for confirmation purposes (i.e. shoot plaster walls above drop ceiling where accessible)

3. Hard ceilings x 1 (acoustical drop ceilings excluded)

a. Shoot lowest level exposed hard ceiling

b. If concealed by acoustical drop, remove tile for access to painted hard ceiling surface for sample collection

4. Suspect wall fixtures/materials (i.e. ceramic tile) x 1 each per room

(maximum)

ii. All XRF sample data points reported, including results showing lead levels above 0 but below the standard limit of 1.0 mg/cm2 for Lead Based Paint as defined by EPA. Paint layers containing lead below LBP limit may be actionable for future OSHA compliance purposes.

c. ICRA Considerations

i. Inspection Team completed ICRA forms and submitted for VA consideration prior to field activities within each building.

ii. VA ICRA Team identified “special” or “High Risk” areas for consideration in the planning/phasing/scheduling of field inspection activities, as delineated within maps provided by VA.

iii. Above ceiling inspections were carried out in a manner reflective of risk ranking as assigned and approved on ICRA worksheet, as follows:

1. HEPA cart (i.e. pre-manufactured cart with HEPA filtered air machines) required in all High-Risk areas

2. HEPA cart use will be limited by reasonable access restrictions (desks;

small doorways; etc.); lack of access in High Risk areas will be assessed conservatively and with worst case assumptions made accordingly

3. HEPA cart use may be dismissed if only displacing one ceiling tile at a time in Non-High-Risk areas

SECTION 3.0

MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

Section 3.0 MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

The following general notes are for all facilities inspected during the Asbestos Re-inspection.

1) Removal Priorities were developed for each homogenous material area (HMA) identified as being an ACM, or PACM.

2) The Removal Priorities are an indicator of priorities for future repair work or abatement work to be scheduled as financial budgets allow. Please see the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0 for further detail.

3) Records for custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff who have received two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 14.0.

4) Any new custodial, janitorial, or maintenance staff that have the potential to come in contact with ACM are required to attend a two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 14.0.

5) The Designated Person is required to inform workers and building occupants at least once a year about the Management Plan. This includes information about inspections, response actions, and post-response action activities that are planned or in progress. Provide a copy of the notification to each facility and include a copy in the Management Plan under Section 15.0.

6) Maintenance areas (boiler rooms, janitor closets, etc.) are required to have warning labels where ACM are located. Warning labels should be installed in these areas as needed, and in a prominent location.

7) Review the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0 for maintenance actions that may be required and to establish priorities and budgets for future repair and abatement work.

8) Periodic “Surveillance Inspections” are required every six (6) months. This inspection should indicate the condition of the material and provide recommendations for repair or potential removal. Consistency of inspection is desired and, therefore, should be performed by the same team of individual(s) for all facilities. It is recommended that the inspection team rotate facility responsibilities regularly to allow for a less biased assessment and improve overall quality control of this effort. The surveillance inspections should be performed by an accredited inspector. Records of Surveillance Inspections should be filed within the facility Management Plan under Section 11.0.

9) Re-inspections (i.e. the scope of work executed during this project) are required every three

(3) years. Updated information should be added to the Management Plan as needed under Section 12.0.

10) The existing Management Plan (original) is amended by this Three-Year Re-inspection assessment.

11) An accredited “Supervisor” should be on staff or available on a contract basis per AHERA guidelines to support execution of the Management Plan, with training and licensure filed within Section 14.0 of the Plan.

12) ACBM must only be removed by licensed and accredited contractors in the State of Missouri. Response actions related to abatement activity should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 13.0. Removal of limited amounts (i.e. less than one glovebag) of asbestos is within the scope of the Management Plan by the accredited Supervisor and/or trained individuals (i.e. Operations and Maintenance 24-hour trained).

13) Notification should be provided to “outside contractors” about ACM within each facility when their work could bring them into direct contact with said ACM. This should include such trades/services as telephone, electrical, plumbing, air conditioning and other construction trades. A form should be created for this purpose and filed within the Management Plan for regular use and access.

14) New building construction and portable buildings added to the facilities are required to be inspected and sampled for ACM. Please note that many ACM products can still be purchased and used in the construction industry to this day, with very few legal restrictions otherwise, and their absence should not be assumed. In lieu of this, a letter from the architect, engineer or manufacturer can be obtained that states “no ACM were specified or used in the facility during its construction”. A copy of this letter is to be filed within the Management Plan for each facility under Section 12.0. This letter will negate the requirement for sampling.

15) Abatement costs have been developed for each homogenous material area for each facility as part of this Management Plan and can be found within the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0. The estimated abatement cost is for budget purposes only. The costs are based on the area of material and estimated abatement costs for this material, as per current (2018) industry standard unit rates. The cost is for abatement only and does not include abatement design, additional inspections needed for inaccessible locations, air monitoring or project oversight costs.

SECTION 4.0

LIMITATIONS

Section 4.0 LIMITATIONS

The following limitations apply to this inspection and assessment effort and report:

1) Due to limitations on the ability to penetrate the roofing systems matrix for each building (i.e. risk of voiding existing roofing system warranties paid for by the VA), no roofing matrix samples have been collected to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos containing materials. It should be noted that even recently installed roofing systems can be found to contain ACM, particularly within the flashing materials, as they are currently legally available in the commercial market and should be presumed to have been used unless the architect/engineer responsible for its installation can provide a letter stating otherwise (see Section 3.0). As such, all facility roofing systems are presumed to contain an asbestos containing material until sampled and proven otherwise and should be handled as such by VA Medical Center maintenance and/or custodial workers as well as outside contractors.

2) Inspection efforts taken during this assessment did NOT include making ceiling and/or wall penetrations into wall/ceiling cavities suspected to have contained ACM, particularly TSI systems, which are commonly found hidden within wall cavities and utility chases. Often, it is not possible to gain visual confirmation of the presence of TSI systems, however, the prevalence of surrounding systems and overall building trends strongly suggest them present. In the absence of visual confirmation, building systems suspected as having ACM TSI on water and/or steam lines have been assumed to be present behind inaccessible barriers until proven otherwise. For example, if a given building exhibits ACM TSI joint fittings on water lines in exposed locations (i.e. hallways), then those same lines feeding into inaccessible wall cavities near bathrooms or shower areas will also be assumed to contain ACM TSI joint fittings. These observations, and associated sampling results, are outlined within the attached report. However, it should also be noted that newer building finishes are often presumed by contractors/maintenance staff as having hidden wall cavity locations that would not be considered as “suspect”, and thus presumed as presenting no asbestos risks, which is a risky presumption. As such, wall cavities that have not otherwise been identified as containing ACM-TSI should be penetrated with caution, and preferably preceded with assessment by a licensed asbestos inspector using destructive means, should future renovation projects call for such demolition activities.

3) Inspection and sampling of flooring systems has been limited to those observations and sampling efforts afforded by “spot” checks performed in a representative number of locations in order to determine the type and extent of suspect building materials and any obvious trends associated with those systems. For example, if a given room flooring system consists of carpet over one or more layers of floor tile, only a single access point would have been made (typically in the least visible corner of the room) to observe and sample suspect materials. As such, there exists the possibility of unidentified suspect building materials present in concealed, inaccessible locations in other areas of the same room, hall or floor space, and that those materials could be found to be an ACM upon discovery and proper testing.

Similarly, if inspectors observed evidence of suspect materials within a given homogenous area, such as second floor tile layers and/or flooring adhesives, then those hidden materials were presumed present throughout the remaining homogenous area based on visible observations of the top flooring layers. As such, there exists the possibility of this inspection identifying an area as having a hidden layer of ACM floor tile and/or mastic which, upon demolition, would reveal a much smaller area of impact.

4) Due to limitations on the ability to collect sufficient suspect adhesive materials typically found beneath ceramic systems (particularly in restrooms and other areas designed for exposure to water), and to do so without significantly damaging the finished ceramic tile surface, samples of ceramic tile mastic/adhesive materials were not collected to confirm or deny the presence of ACM. Adhesives/mastics used for bathroom/kitchen/shower areas commonly contain ACM, are currently available in the commercial market and should be presumed to have been used unless the architect/engineer responsible for its installation can provide a letter stating otherwise (see Section 3.0). As such, all ceramic tile systems should be assumed to be underlain by an ACM adhesive/mastic until inspected and/or sampled and proven otherwise and should be handled as such by VA maintenance and/or custodial workers as well as outside contractors.

5) Inspection and sampling efforts during this assessment did not include the necessary destructive sampling techniques to sufficiently collect samples of fire rated doors as well as heat shields located in the perimeter steam convector units. Sampling of these materials would have caused a great deal of damage that would have not been able to be repaired. All fire rated doors and heat shields behind the steam convector units throughout the hospital shall be considered to contain asbestos unless sampled proving otherwise.

6) Suspect caulking/glazing materials observed on exterior window systems were safely assessed at ground level only with the assumption that window units at higher elevations are homogenous and carry the same designation with respect to asbestos containing materials.

7) Fixed objects, such as cabinets, lab hoods, etc. often conceal additional layers of older flooring that are not otherwise visible for observation and/or sampling during inspection, but are then uncovered during construction activities.

8) Building systems in constant operation which are critical to the building’s occupation are not capable of being inspected. For example, the interior spaces of an HVAC Air Handler Unit would be considered inaccessible for proper inspection due to safety risks by inspectors.

9) Inspection maps provided with this report indicate specific rooms/spaces in which access for visual inspection was not made possible during the 2018 inspection effort.

In such cases, previous conditions for ACM (as per 2008 Altec survey) was presumed unchanged and reported as such.

SECTION 5.0

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL HOMOGENOUS MATERIAL AREA

(HMA) SUMMARY TABLES

This section provides a quick table reference to all ACM Homogenous Material Areas (HMAs) found during the 2018 inspection

2018 HMA Summary Table VA-Jefferson Barracks Medical Facility Building 57

VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS CAMPUS BLDG 57

ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

2018 CAMPUS-WIDE ACM INSPECTION

ACM HOMOGENOUS AREAS SUMMARY TABLE

Building 57 Floor Flooring materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous

Materials

1 None None None 14: Fire door (PACM) 38: Flange gasket (PACM)

Exterior None None None None

SECTION 6.0

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL CONDITION & REMOVAL

PRIORITY TABLE

WITH

ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATES

This section provides a table with the current condition, potential for disturbance, and removal priority for each ACM HMA.

Condition and Removal Priority Table

PLAN REMOVAL PRIORITY ASSESSMENT CHARTS

Qualitative (Descriptive) Rankings for Current Condition of ACM Qualitative Ranking Example Descriptions of Current Condition

Good (G) Surfacing material has no visible damage; covering on TSI is intact; miscellaneous materials are intact; no visible debris.

Damaged (D) Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive visible damage; covering on TSI is cut or torn, exposing small but not extensive amounts of insulation; miscellaneous materials have moderate but not extensive damage; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible debris

Significantly Damaged (SD) Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on TSI is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damaged; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile is extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.

Note: Damage is considered “extensive” when the total area of distributed damage exceeds 10%, or 25% localized damage.

Qualitative Rankings for Potential for Disturbance of ACM Level of Potential Disturbance Frequency of Potential

Contact (accessibility) Influence of Vibration Potential for Air Erosion or

Water Damage

HIGH (H)

(potential for significant damage) High Any Value Any Value

Any Value High Any Value Any Value Any Value High

MODERATE (M)

(potential for damage)

Moderate Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate

LOW (L) Low Low Low Note: Overall rating determined by assigning disturbance probabilities under all 3 categories then adopting highest individual score for each material.

Qualitative Rankings and Numerical Ratings for Removal Priority of ACM Hazard Rank/

Removal Priority ACBM Condition ACBM Disturbance

Potential Recommended Response Actions

1 Significantly Damaged

Any Evacuate or isolate area immediately. Remove ACBM immediately. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

2 Damaged High Evacuate or isolate area immediately. Remove, enclose, encapsulate or repair ACBM to correct immediately. Reduce potential for disturbance of remaining materials. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

3 Damaged Moderate Remove, enclose, encapsulate, or repair to correct damage as soon as feasible.

O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

4 Damaged Low Remove, enclose, encapsulate, or repair to correct damage as needed to facilitate future projects. Take steps to reduce potential for disturbance. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

5 Good High Take steps to reduce potential for disturbance. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

6 Good Moderate O&M Required for all friable ACBM.

7 Good Low O&M Required for all friable ACBM, but measures need not be as extensive as

Category 6.

VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS CAMPUS

2018 ASBESTOS INSPECTION

CONDITION AND REMOVAL PRIORITY TABLE FOR

BUILDING 57

Homogeneous

Area No.

Bldg

Floor

Material Description

Friable Yes/No

Accessibility

Yes/No Restricted

Current Condition

Potential for Disturbance

Removal Priority

Rating Based On Rating Based On

Building 57 – 1st Floor

HMA-14 57 1 Fire door (PACM) No Yes G Intact L Renovation 7

HMA-38 57 1 Flange gasket (PACM) No Yes G Intact L Maintenance 7

Building 57 – Exterior

No ACM Detected

2018 Asbestos Summary and Cost Table

2018 BUILDING 57 ACM SUMMARY AND COST TABLE

HMA NUMBER

AND ACM

DESCRIPTION

FRIABLE? CONDITION EST.

QNTY.

UNIT COST COST TO REMOVE

14 - Fire door

(PACM)

CAT-2

non-friable Good 6 units $750/ea $4,500

38 - Flange gasket

(PACM)

CAT-2

non-friable Good TBD $500/ea TBD. Requires NESHAP

Inspection

SECTION 7.0

MASTER BULK SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLES

This table provides a listing of all asbestos bulk samples taken during the 2018 inspection.

2018 Asbestos Bulk Sample Table

2018 ACM INSPECTION REPORT

VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS ST. LOUIS CAMPUS

SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES TAKEN TO DATE

2018 Riverfront Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Sample No. HMA Number and Material Description Floor Room Category Asbestos Content

1 15: Seam sealant - gray 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

2 15: Seam sealant - gray 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

3 7: Red fireproof caulk 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

4 7: Red fireproof caulk 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

5 26: White paint on fiberglass 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

6 26: White paint on fiberglass 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

7 26: White paint on fiberglass 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

8 5: 6" cove base - gray 1 1B-132 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

9 5: 6" cove base - gray 1 1B-142 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

10 5: 6" cove base - gray 1 1A-05C CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

11 17: Door window caulk - black 1 1B-138D CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

12 17: Door window caulk - black 1 1A-05C CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

13 17: Door window caulk - black 1 1A-108 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

Building 57

2018 Riverfront Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Sample No. HMA Number and Material Description Floor Room Category Asbestos Content

14 10: Garage door cushion 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

15 10: Garage door cushion 1 1A-105 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

16 10: Garage door cushion 1 1A-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

17 8: Penetration caulk - white 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

18 8: Penetration caulk - white 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

19 8: Penetration caulk - white 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

20 7: Red fireproof caulk 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

21 9: Penetration caulk - gray 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

22 9: Penetration caulk - gray 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

23 9: Penetration caulk - gray 1 Hallway CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

24 23: Expansion caulk - red 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

25 23: Expansion caulk - red 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

26 23: Expansion caulk - red 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

27 24: Sink soundproofing - gray 1 1A-105B CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

28 24: Sink soundproofing - gray 1 1A-105B CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

29 24: Sink soundproofing - gray 1 1A-105B CAT 1 Non-Friable

Building 57

2018 Riverfront Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Sample No. HMA Number and Material Description Floor Room Category Asbestos Content

30 11: Drywall and joint compound 1 1A-110 Friable None Detected

31 11: Drywall and joint compound 1 1A-110 Friable None Detected

32 11: Drywall and joint compound 1 1A-110 Friable None Detected

33 11: Drywall and joint compound 1 1A-110 Friable None Detected

34 11: Drywall and joint compound 1 1A-110 Friable None Detected

35 11: Drywall and joint compound 1 1A-110 Friable None Detected

36 12: Pipe dope 1 1B-138D CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

37 12: Pipe dope 1 1A-110 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

38 12: Pipe dope 1 1A-108 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

39 15: Seam sealant - gray 1 1A-110 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

40 22: Expansion joint cloth - black 1 1A-110 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

41 13: 2'x4' ceiling tile - white 1 1B-133 Friable None Detected

42 13: 2'x4' ceiling tile - white 1 1B-133 Friable None Detected

43 13: 2'x4' ceiling tile - white 1 1B-133 Friable None Detected

44 28: 16"x16" floor tile - rubber, gray striped 1 1B-128 Friable None Detected

45 28: 16"x16" floor tile - rubber, gray striped 1 1B-128 Friable None Detected

Building 57

2018 Riverfront Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Sample No. HMA Number and Material Description Floor Room Category Asbestos Content

46 28: 16"x16" floor tile - rubber, gray striped 1 1B-128 Friable None Detected

47 20: Garage door cushion - black 1 1C-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

48 20: Garage door cushion - black 1 1C-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

49 20: Garage door cushion - black 1 1C-104 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

50 6: Gray concrete caulking 1 1A-108 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

51 6: Gray concrete caulking 1 1B-127 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

52 6: Gray concrete caulking 1 1A-105 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

53 19: White caulking on fire box 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

54 19: White caulking on fire box 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

55 19: White caulking on fire box 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

56 18: Door caulk - brown 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

57 18: Door caulk - brown 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

58 18: Door caulk - brown 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

59 16: Window caulking - black 1 1A-109 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

60 16: Window caulking - black 1 1B-138 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

61 16: Window caulking -black 1 Near

C106 CAT 1 Non-Friable

(FT/M)

None Detected

Building 57

2018 Riverfront Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Sample No. HMA Number and Material Description Floor Room Category Asbestos Content

62 25: CMU block caulking - white 1 1B-138 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

63 25: CMU block caulking - white 1 1B-138 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

64 25: CMU block caulking - white 1 1B-138 CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

65 32: Exterior tan brick caulk Exterior S door CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

66 33: Gray door caulk Exterior S door CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

67 34: Exterior window caulk -black Exterior S windows CAT 1 Non-Friable

(FT/M) None Detected

68 34: Exterior window caulk -black Exterior S windows CAT 1 Non-Friable

(FT/M) None Detected

69 35: Exterior sprinkler caulk Exterior S windows CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

70 35: Exterior sprinkler caulk Exterior S windows CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

71 35: Exterior sprinkler caulk Exterior S windows CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

72 32: Exterior tan brick caulk Exterior W wall CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

73 33: Gray door caulk Exterior W door CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

74 34: Exterior window caulk -black Exterior W windows CAT 1 Non-Friable

(FT/M) None Detected

75 32: Exterior tan brick caulk Exterior E windows CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

76 33: Gray door caulk Exterior E door CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

77 36: Concrete expansion caulk Exterior N parking CAT 1 Non-Friable

Building 57

2018 Riverfront Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Sample No. HMA Number and Material Description Floor Room Category Asbestos Content

78 36: Concrete expansion caulk Exterior N parking CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

79 36: Concrete expansion caulk Exterior N parking CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

80 37: Freight cushion - black Exterior N dock CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

81 37: Freight cushion - black Exterior N dock CAT 1 Non-Friable (FT/M) None Detected

82 37: Freight cushion - black Exterior N dock CAT 1 Non-Friable

SECTION 8.0

ASBESTOS INSPECTION PHOTO LOG

This section provides photographs of all HMAs identified during the 2018 inspection effort, which should be referenced to visually confirm the identity of any suspect material in question versus this report.

PROJECT NAME: VA JC & JB LEAD AND ASB SURVEYS RSH PROJECT NO. SH1476

PROJECT SITE: JEFFERSON BARRACKS

PROJECT LOCATION: BUILDING 57

SECTION 9.0

ASBESTOS INSPECTION LABORATORY REPORTS

This section provides all laboratory analytical reports pertaining to the specific building assessed during the 2018 inspection effort.

Asbestos Detected

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

NoSeam Sealant, Gray None Detected0220319-001 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-1 Carbonates Quartz Binder/Filler

100%

NoSeam Sealant, Gray None Detected0220319-002 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-2 Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoFireproof Caulk, Red None Detected0220319-003 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-3

<1%

Carbonates

99%

Cellulose FiberNoFireproof Caulk, Red None Detected0220319-004 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-4

<1%

Carbonates

Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass

NoLAYER 1 Wrap, White/ Silver

None Detected0220319-005 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-5

5% 3%

Aluminum Carbonates Gypsum

92%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 2 Paint, White/ Off White

None Detected 2%

Carbonates

98%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass

NoLAYER 1 Wrap, White/ Silver

None Detected0220319-006 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-6

5% 3%

Aluminum Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 2 Paint, White/ Off White

None Detected 2%

Carbonates

NoLAYER 1 Wrap, White/ Off White

None Detected0220319-007 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-7 Carbonates

NoLAYER 2 Paint, White/ Off White

None Detected

Carbonates

Cove Base, Gray

None Detected0220319-008 BLDG FLOOR 1-1B-

132SH1476-JB57-

1-1B-132-M-8 Carbonates

Mastic, White/ Yellow

None Detected

Carbonates

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

NoLAYER 1 Cove Base, Gray

None Detected0220319-009 BLDG FLOOR 1-1B-

142SH1476-JB57-

1-1B-142-M-9 Carbonates

Mastic, White/ Yellow

None Detected

Carbonates

Cove Base, Gray

None Detected0220319-010 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

05CSH1476-JB57-

1-1A-05C-M-10 Carbonates

Mastic, White/ Yellow

None Detected

Carbonates

NoCaulking, Black None Detected0220319-011 BLDG FLOOR 1-1B-

138DSH1476-JB57-

1-1B-138D-M-

Cellulose FiberNoCaulking, Black None Detected0220319-012 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

05CSH1476-JB57-

1-1A-05C-M-12

<1%

Carbonates Gypsum

NoCaulking, Black None Detected0220319-013 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

108SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-108-M-13 Carbonates

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Fibrous GlassNoCushion, Gray None Detected0220319-014 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-14

8%

Carbonates

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 1 Cushion, Gray

None Detected0220319-015 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

105SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-105-M-15

8%

Carbonates

Cushion, Gray

None Detected

Carbonates

Fibrous GlassNoCushion, Black None Detected0220319-016 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

104SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-104-M-16

5%

Carbonates

95%

NoPenetration Caulk, White/ Off White

None Detected0220319-017 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-17 Carbonates Gypsum

Cellulose FiberNoPenetration Caulk, White/ Off White

None Detected0220319-018 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-18

<1%

Carbonates

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoPenetration Caulk, White/ Off White

None Detected0220319-019 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-19

<1%

Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoFireproof Caulk, Red None Detected0220319-020 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-20

<1%

Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoPenetration Caulk, Gray None Detected0220319-021 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-21

<1%

Carbonates

NoPenetration Caulk, Gray None Detected0220319-022 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-22 Carbonates

NoPenetration Caulk, Gray None Detected0220319-023 BLDG FLOOR 1-

HALLWAYSH1476-JB57-

1-HLWY-M-23 Carbonates

NoExpansion Caulk, Red None Detected0220319-024 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

109SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-109-M-24 Carbonates

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoExpansion Caulk, Red None Detected0220319-025 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

109SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-109-M-25

<1%

Carbonates

NoExpansion Caulk, Red None Detected0220319-026 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

109SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-109-M-26 Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoSink Soundproofing, Gray None Detected0220319-027 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

105BSH1476-JB57-

1-1A-105B-M-

<1%

Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoSink Soundproofing, Gray None Detected0220319-028 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

105BSH1476-JB57-

1-1A-105B-M-

1%

Cellulose FiberNoSink Soundproofing, Gray None Detected0220319-029 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

105BSH1476-JB57-

1-1A-105B-M-

1%

Fibrous Glass

NoDrywall/ Joint Compound, Off White/ Brown Note: No Joint Compound Present

None Detected0220319-030 BLDG FLOOR 1-1A-

110SH1476-JB57-

1-1A-110-S-30

10% 2%

Gypsum Mica

88%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0220319

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 1139 OLIVE ST. STE 300

ST LOUIS MO 63101

RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH

Date Received: 05/20/2019

05/25/2019Date Analyzed:

SH1476Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 05/15/2019

BLDG 57

EPA Method: Project Name: SH1476 JEFFERSON BARRACKS BLDG 57

Submitted By: JUSTIN RHYNEERAddress:

Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

05/28/2019Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass

NoDrywall/ Joint Compound, Off White/ Brown Note: No Joint Compound Present

None…