SOW Attachment 28 _ Hazmat Information _ Jefferson Barracks _ Building 59.pdf
PDF 17 MB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Design- Jefferson Barracks (St. Louis) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C77621R0087
About this file
This pre-solicitation notice seeks standard form 330 qualification packages from architecture and engineering firms for the design of electrical and IT infrastructure upgrades at the Jefferson Barracks campus of the St. Louis VA Medical Center. Responses are due by May 4, 2021. The project is set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and has an estimated value of $20 million. Firms will submit SF-330 statements of qualifications for evaluation based on professional qualifications, specialized experience, capacity, past performance, locality, and experience with construction period services. The highest rated firms will be invited to provide written responses on their proposed management approach, strategies for addressing project challenges, and expectations for collaboration with the VA. The contract award is anticipated by June 30, 2021 for design completion within 184 calendar days of notice to proceed. Construction period services will be optional contract line items.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 – Saint Louis, MO 63101 ph 314-436-9492 – fx 314-436-9733
RSH-STL.com
2018 ASBESTOS & LEAD REINSPECTION
at
BUILDING 59
VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS
1 JEFFERSON BARRACKS DR.
ST. LOUIS, MO. 63125
PREPARED FOR
St. Louis V. A. Medical Center
1 Jefferson Barracks Dr.
St. Louis, MO. 63125
RIVERFRONT PROJECT NO. SH1476
July 11, 2019
ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH AND
SAFETY CONSULTANTS
General Industrial Hygiene Exposure Assessment and Risk Management
Indoor Air Quality Investigations
Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Inspection and Risk Management
Hazard Communication Programs
Hazardous Noise & Hearing Conservation Programs
OSHA Compliance Program Development
Phase I & II ESA— Due Diligence
Brownfields Redevelopment
Environmental Risk Assessment
Underground Storage Tank Management
Subsurface Investigation/Remediation
Remediation Oversight
CERCLA / RCRA
and more…
1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 – Saint Louis, MO 63101 ph 314-436-9492 – fx 314-436-9733 RSH-STL.com
July 11, 2019
RIVERFRONT PROJECT NO. SH1476
Mr. Michael Beitenman St. Louis VAMC – John Cochran Division Project Engineer 915 North Grand Ave St. Louis, MO 63106
RE: 2018 Asbestos/Lead Re-Inspection and Management Plan; Building 59
Dear Mr. Beitenman:
Riverfront Safety & Health (Riverfront) is pleased to present the following summary of findings from the asbestos/lead re-inspection and assessment performed from June 2018 through July 2019.
Sincerely, Riverfront Safety & Health, LC
Justin R. Rhyneer, CIH
2018 Asbestos/Lead Inspection Report St. Louis Jefferson Barracks VAMC – Bldg. 59
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION
0.0 Definitions
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Scope of Work
3.0 Management Plan Recommendations
4.0 Limitations
5.0 Asbestos Containing Material Homogenous Material/Area Summary Tables and Drawings (w/sample locations; HMA locations; ACM color coding)
6.0 ACM Condition & Removal Priority Table with Abatement Cost Estimates
7.0 Master Bulk Sample Summary Tables
8.0 Asbestos Inspection Photo Log
9.0 Asbestos Inspection Laboratory Reports
10.0 Professional Certifications
11.0 Periodic Surveillance Forms
12.0 Management Plan Updates
13.0 Response Actions
14.0 Training Documents
15.0 Annual Notification Letters
16.0 Limited Lead Survey Summary Tables
17.0 Previous Inspection Reports
This 2018 Asbestos/Lead Re-inspection report was provided by:
CONTRACTOR:
Riverfront Safety & Health, LC 1139 Olive Street, Suite 300 St. Louis, MO 63101
(314) 436-9492 (Office)
(314) 436-9733 (Fax)
ASBESTOS/LEAD INSPECTORS:
Zachary Haselhorst MO Asbestos Certification No. 7118111618MOIR16667
MO Lead Certification No. 160229-300004899
ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT PLANNER:
Justin Rhyneer, CIH MO Certification No. 7011092718MOMPR8065
Accreditation Agencies: Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Asbestos) and Missouri Department of Public Health (Lead)
SECTION 0
DEFINITIONS
Section 0.0 DEFINITIONS
0.1 AHERA refers to the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. Asbestos regulations for schools issued in 1987.
0.2 Asbestos shall mean chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, actinolite asbestos and any of these minerals that have been chemically treated and/or altered. This definition includes all “Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials
(PACM)”.
0.3 Asbestos Containing Building Material (ACBM) means any building material containing more than 1% asbestos.
0.4 Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) means any material containing more than 1% asbestos.
0.5 Asbestos Abatement refers to the procedures to control fiber release from asbestos-containing materials, typically during removal. Includes removal, encapsulation, enclosure, demolition and renovation activities related to asbestos.
0.6 Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) refers to one certified in the general practice of industrial hygiene by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene. An industrial hygienist Certified in Comprehensive Practice by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene.
0.7 Disturbance refers to activities that disrupt the matrix of ACM or PACM, crumble or pulverize ACM or PACM, or generate visible debris from ACM or PACM. Disturbance includes cutting away small amounts of ACM or PACM, no greater than the amount that can be contained in one standard sized glove bag or waste bag in order to access a building component.
0.8 Dry shall mean having no apparent wetness through visual or tactile means in the opinion of the Owner’s Representative.
0.9 Encapsulant refers to a material that surrounds or embeds asbestos fibers in an adhesive matrix and prevents the release of fibers.
0.10 Encapsulation refers to treating ACM with an encapsulant.
0.11 Friable Asbestos shall mean any asbestos containing material that can be crumbled or pulverized by hand.
0.12 Homogenous Material Area (HMA) refers to any distinct building material (carpet; floor tile; pipe insulation; stucco; etc.) that has been identified/observed in a given area (Building; Floor; Room), and has been included in this assessment effort.
0.13 HVAC refers to Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems.
0.14 Industrial hygienist (IH) refers to a professional qualified by education, training, and experience to anticipate, recognize, evaluate and develop controls for occupational health hazards.
0.15 Intact refers to when an ACM has not crumbled, been pulverized, or otherwise deteriorated so that the asbestos is no longer likely to be bound with its matrix.
0.16 Lead Based Paint refers to paint exhibiting a lead content equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2, as defined by The U.S. EPA.
0.17 Management Planner refers to a person who has successfully completed the training requirements for an asbestos management planner as required by 40 CFR 763 Appendix C, Part I.
0.18 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) refers to EPA's rule to control emissions of asbestos to the environment.
0.19 OSHA shall refer to The Occupational Safety & Health Administration – A regulatory agency charged with enforcing the lawful protection of workers.
0.20 Owner refers to any person or entity who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the facility being demolished or renovated or any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises the demolition or renovation operation, or both.
0.21 Owner’s Representative shall be the person or firm responsible for giving directions to
Contractor and measure Contractor’s performance.
0.22 Polarized light microscopy (PLM) – Refers to light microscopy using dispersion staining techniques and refractive indices to identify and quantify the type(s) of asbestos present in a bulk sample.
0.23 Presumed ACM (PACM) refers to thermal system insulation, surfacing, and flooring material installed in buildings prior to 1981.
0.24 Project designer refers to a person who has successfully completed the training requirements for an asbestos abatement project designer as required by 40 CFR 763 Appendix C, Part I.
0.25 Regulated ACM (RACM) refers to friable ACM; Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable; Category I no friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or; Category II no friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of the demolition or renovation operation.
0.26 Removal refers to all operations where ACM, PACM and/or RACM is taken out or stripped from structures or substrates, including demolition operations.
0.27 Renovation refers to altering a facility or one or more facility components in any way, including the stripping or removal of asbestos from a facility component which does not involve demolition activity.
0.28 Surfacing ACM refers to a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos that is sprayed, troweled on or otherwise applied to surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing and other purposes.
0.29 TEM refers to Transmission Electron Microscopy, which is the laboratory analysis method prescribed by EPA (AHERA) for the analysis of bulk samples from non-organically bound resilient flooring materials, such as vinyl floor tiles, due to its ability to detect and measure asbestos fibers that are too small to be observed using standard PLM analysis methods.
0.30 Thermal System Insulation (TSI) refers to a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos and applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other structural components to prevent heat loss or gain.
0.31 VA Representative refers to The VA official responsible for on-going project work, which is typically the VA Project Engineer.
0.32 Visible emissions refers to any emissions, which are visually detectable without the aid of instruments, coming from the disturbance, removal or renovation of ACM/PACM/RACM or ACM waste material.
0.33 Wet, Wetted or Adequately Wetted shall mean moistened with a wetting agent (amended water) such that the liquid is able to thoroughly penetrate ACM and exhibits no signs or potential for visible emissions.
SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Veterans Administration, and more specifically The St. Louis VA Medical Center Engineering Department, through the VISN 15 Contracting Office (Contract No. 36C25518C0113), retained Riverfront Safety & Health, LC (RSH) to conduct an asbestos-containing material (ACM) and limited lead based paint (LBP) survey in accordance with the VA contract specifications, as well as to recommend asbestos management procedures and cost estimates for the VA John Cochran Medical Center (VAMC) in St. Louis, MO.
Full size drawings that indicate the locations of bulk samples, homogenous materials and ACM have also been prepared as part of this project. All results, recommendations, cost estimates and drawings have been provided within this written package (1 set for each building), as well as in electronic format (3 x CD sets for each building).
This campus wide survey, which included the collection of over 2600 asbestos bulk samples and over 13,000 lead samples from all surveyed buildings at the Jefferson Barracks VAMC Campus, and was conducted from December 2018 through July 2019. The lead project asbestos and lead inspector was Mr. Zachary Haselhorst, with Asbestos Management Plan support from Mr. Justin Rhyneer, CIH, both accredited through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources as licensed asbestos inspectors. Certifications of additional field inspection team personnel can be found within Section 10 of this report.
The quality control review for this survey was conducted by Mr. Justin Rhyneer, CIH, who is licensed by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources as a licensed Asbestos Building Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner and is also an accredited lead inspector/risk assessor.
All asbestos bulk samples have been collected and analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 600/ R-93/116, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining techniques.
All lead bulk samples were collected using a Heuresis X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) machine (Model Pb200i; SN1920; Co-57 5mCi source; Reference Date 6/1/18), which was calibrated at the beginning and end of each shift using NIST standards.
Primary laboratory analysis has been provided by EMSL Laboratories (EMSL), Inc., which participates in the NIST-NVLAP (National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program No.
200742-0) and is an AIHA (American Industrial Hygiene Association) accredited laboratory (Lab No. 102636).
Secondary quality control split sample analysis has been performed for quality control purposes by Batta Laboratories (NVLAP 101032-0; AIHA 100448).
SECTION 2.0
SCOPE OF WORK
Section 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Riverfront conducted an ACM & LBP Assessment, in accordance with applicable requirements of The Scope of Work, as outlined within VA Contract Number 36C25518C0113, including Amendments 1, 2 & 3. Riverfront was responsible for implementing all technical and logistical requirements of this task, including those specified in The Scope of Work. All work was performed by qualified and licensed individuals.
1.0 TARGET BUILDINGS
a. Jefferson Barracks VAMC Campus Scope Buildings/Structures: 1, 1T, 2, 3, 3T, 18, 23, 24, 25, 35, 49, 51, 51T, 52, 53, 53T, 55, 56, 56G, 57, 58, 59, 60, 60T, 75, 83, 84, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 93, 99
b. John Cochran VAMC Campus Scope Buildings: 1, 1T, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6A, 7, 7A, 8, 8A, 8B, 11, 14, 16
2.0 FIELD INSPECTION STRATEGY
a. Asbestos Survey
i. The inspection performed as part of this survey complies with the requirements set forth within the EPA-AHERA regulatory guidance documents pertaining to the inspection of buildings for the presence, quantity and condition of ACM of all accessible spaces for in scope buildings.
ii. Ultimate objective was to show current conditions by:
1. Study/assess/verify 2008 Altec inspection report for each building as work progresses through each campus
2. Reconcile 2008 report with subsequent construction projects that included ACM removal:
a. Reference VHA NRM project list and review scope documents and record documents as needed to assess impacts to ACM inspection scope (no ACM scope = presume same as previous)
b. Reference historical project records to assess impacts to inspection scope (no ACM scope = presume same as previous)
3. Perform additional bulk sampling as needed to close data gaps within 2008 report and/or subsequent remediation work, as follows:
a. No change in material = no sampling; assess condition only
b. Omitted SACM (Suspect Asbestos Containing Material) = collect minimum of 3 samples
c. New SACM = collect minimum of 3 samples
d. Collection of additional bulk samples was made such that damage to existing suspect materials, which is unavoidable for asbestos bulk sampling efforts, is reasonably inconspicuous (i.e. behind doors; under equipment; etc.).
4. Each facility (i.e. building; space; etc. included in scope of work by contract) was inspected by an individual licensed through the State of Missouri as an asbestos inspector holding a current license for such.
5. For each facility, the inspector performed the following tasks:
a. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed and assessed the condition of all friable known, suspected or assumed ACBM.
b. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed and assessed suspect material considered non-friable ACBM.
c. Collected bulk samples of any building materials suspected as being ACBM, whether friable or non-friable, to determine asbestos content and regulatory status.
d. Recorded above information on field inspection forms for each facility.
6. A Management Planner reviewed the above information and performed the following required functions:
a. Reviewed each Management Plan for compliance with AHERA and verified that the plan reflects current conditions.
b. Reviewed the results of each inspection and assessment, per facility.
c. Recommended in writing, the appropriate response actions.
d. Signed and dated the review documents, included the accreditation number of inspectors and planners, and submitted a copy to the Designated Person.
7. The following information was submitted to the Designated Person under AHERA, for inclusion in the Management Plan for each facility and, optionally, at a central location.
8. The date(s) of the inspection, the name and signature of the person making the inspection, state of accreditation, his or her accreditation number, and any changes in the condition of known or assumed
ACBM.
9. If sample were collected, the exact locations where samples were collected during the inspection, a description of the manner used to choose sampling locations, the name and signature of each accredited inspector collecting the samples, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.
10. Any assessments or reassessments made of ACBM, the name and signature of the accredited inspector making the assessments, state of accreditation and his or her accreditation number.
b. Limited Lead Paint Survey
i. XRF sampling efforts were limited to following surfaces for each room/space
(hallways & other common spaces to be treated as a single room) encountered in buildings throughout both campuses:
1. Door jamb/frame x 1
2. 4 main walls (north; south; east; west) x 1 each
a. Shooting outermost walls for 4 main wall shots
b. One additional wall shot collected if secondary painted wall material noted for confirmation purposes (i.e. shoot plaster walls above drop ceiling where accessible)
3. Hard ceilings x 1 (acoustical drop ceilings excluded)
a. Shoot lowest level exposed hard ceiling
b. If concealed by acoustical drop, remove tile for access to painted hard ceiling surface for sample collection
4. Suspect wall fixtures/materials (i.e. ceramic tile) x 1 each per room
(maximum)
ii. All XRF sample data points reported, including results showing lead levels above 0 but below the standard limit of 1.0 mg/cm2 for Lead Based Paint as defined by EPA. Paint layers containing lead below LBP limit may be actionable for future OSHA compliance purposes.
c. ICRA Considerations
i. Inspection Team completed ICRA forms and submitted for VA consideration prior to field activities within each building.
ii. VA ICRA Team identified “special” or “High Risk” areas for consideration in the planning/phasing/scheduling of field inspection activities, as delineated within maps provided by VA.
iii. Above ceiling inspections were carried out in a manner reflective of risk ranking as assigned and approved on ICRA worksheet, as follows:
1. HEPA cart (i.e. pre-manufactured cart with HEPA filtered air machines) required in all High-Risk areas
2. HEPA cart use will be limited by reasonable access restrictions (desks;
small doorways; etc.); lack of access in High Risk areas will be assessed conservatively and with worst case assumptions made accordingly
3. HEPA cart use may be dismissed if only displacing one ceiling tile at a time in Non-High-Risk areas
SECTION 3.0
MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
Section 3.0 MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The following general notes are for all facilities inspected during the Asbestos Re-inspection.
1) Removal Priorities were developed for each homogenous material area (HMA) identified as being an ACM, or PACM.
2) The Removal Priorities are an indicator of priorities for future repair work or abatement work to be scheduled as financial budgets allow. Please see the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0 for further detail.
3) Records for custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff who have received two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 14.0.
4) Any new custodial, janitorial, or maintenance staff that have the potential to come in contact with ACM are required to attend a two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 14.0.
5) The Designated Person is required to inform workers and building occupants at least once a year about the Management Plan. This includes information about inspections, response actions, and post-response action activities that are planned or in progress. Provide a copy of the notification to each facility and include a copy in the Management Plan under Section 15.0.
6) Maintenance areas (boiler rooms, janitor closets, etc.) are required to have warning labels where ACM are located. Warning labels should be installed in these areas as needed, and in a prominent location.
7) Review the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0 for maintenance actions that may be required and to establish priorities and budgets for future repair and abatement work.
8) Periodic “Surveillance Inspections” are required every six (6) months. This inspection should indicate the condition of the material and provide recommendations for repair or potential removal. Consistency of inspection is desired and, therefore, should be performed by the same team of individual(s) for all facilities. It is recommended that the inspection team rotate facility responsibilities regularly to allow for a less biased assessment and improve overall quality control of this effort. The surveillance inspections should be performed by an accredited inspector. Records of Surveillance Inspections should be filed within the facility Management Plan under Section 11.0.
9) Re-inspections (i.e. the scope of work executed during this project) are required every three
(3) years. Updated information should be added to the Management Plan as needed under Section 12.0.
10) The existing Management Plan (original) is amended by this Three-Year Re-inspection assessment.
11) An accredited “Supervisor” should be on staff or available on a contract basis per AHERA guidelines to support execution of the Management Plan, with training and licensure filed within Section 14.0 of the Plan.
12) ACBM must only be removed by licensed and accredited contractors in the State of Missouri. Response actions related to abatement activity should be filed in the Management Plan under Section 13.0. Removal of limited amounts (i.e. less than one glovebag) of asbestos is within the scope of the Management Plan by the accredited Supervisor and/or trained individuals (i.e. Operations and Maintenance 24-hour trained).
13) Notification should be provided to “outside contractors” about ACM within each facility when their work could bring them into direct contact with said ACM. This should include such trades/services as telephone, electrical, plumbing, air conditioning and other construction trades. A form should be created for this purpose and filed within the Management Plan for regular use and access.
14) New building construction and portable buildings added to the facilities are required to be inspected and sampled for ACM. Please note that many ACM products can still be purchased and used in the construction industry to this day, with very few legal restrictions otherwise, and their absence should not be assumed. In lieu of this, a letter from the architect, engineer or manufacturer can be obtained that states “no ACM were specified or used in the facility during its construction”. A copy of this letter is to be filed within the Management Plan for each facility under Section 12.0. This letter will negate the requirement for sampling.
15) Abatement costs have been developed for each homogenous material area for each facility as part of this Management Plan and can be found within the 2018 Re-inspection Condition and Removal Priority Table in Section 6.0. The estimated abatement cost is for budget purposes only. The costs are based on the area of material and estimated abatement costs for this material, as per current (2018) industry standard unit rates. The cost is for abatement only and does not include abatement design, additional inspections needed for inaccessible locations, air monitoring or project oversight costs.
SECTION 4.0
LIMITATIONS
Section 4.0 LIMITATIONS
The following limitations apply to this inspection and assessment effort and report:
1) Due to limitations on the ability to penetrate the roofing systems matrix for each building (i.e. risk of voiding existing roofing system warranties paid for by the VA), no roofing matrix samples have been collected to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos containing materials. It should be noted that even recently installed roofing systems can be found to contain ACM, particularly within the flashing materials, as they are currently legally available in the commercial market and should be presumed to have been used unless the architect/engineer responsible for its installation can provide a letter stating otherwise (see Section 3.0). As such, all facility roofing systems are presumed to contain an asbestos containing material until sampled and proven otherwise and should be handled as such by VA Medical Center maintenance and/or custodial workers as well as outside contractors.
2) Inspection efforts taken during this assessment did NOT include making ceiling and/or wall penetrations into wall/ceiling cavities suspected to have contained ACM, particularly TSI systems, which are commonly found hidden within wall cavities and utility chases. Often, it is not possible to gain visual confirmation of the presence of TSI systems, however, the prevalence of surrounding systems and overall building trends strongly suggest them present. In the absence of visual confirmation, building systems suspected as having ACM TSI on water and/or steam lines have been assumed to be present behind inaccessible barriers until proven otherwise. For example, if a given building exhibits ACM TSI joint fittings on water lines in exposed locations (i.e. hallways), then those same lines feeding into inaccessible wall cavities near bathrooms or shower areas will also be assumed to contain ACM TSI joint fittings. These observations, and associated sampling results, are outlined within the attached report. However, it should also be noted that newer building finishes are often presumed by contractors/maintenance staff as having hidden wall cavity locations that would not be considered as “suspect”, and thus presumed as presenting no asbestos risks, which is a risky presumption. As such, wall cavities that have not otherwise been identified as containing ACM-TSI should be penetrated with caution, and preferably preceded with assessment by a licensed asbestos inspector using destructive means, should future renovation projects call for such demolition activities.
3) Inspection and sampling of flooring systems has been limited to those observations and sampling efforts afforded by “spot” checks performed in a representative number of locations in order to determine the type and extent of suspect building materials and any obvious trends associated with those systems. For example, if a given room flooring system consists of carpet over one or more layers of floor tile, only a single access point would have been made (typically in the least visible corner of the room) to observe and sample suspect materials. As such, there exists the possibility of unidentified suspect building materials present in concealed, inaccessible locations in other areas of the same room, hall or floor space, and that those materials could be found to be an ACM upon discovery and proper testing.
Similarly, if inspectors observed evidence of suspect materials within a given homogenous area, such as second floor tile layers and/or flooring adhesives, then those hidden materials were presumed present throughout the remaining homogenous area based on visible observations of the top flooring layers. As such, there exists the possibility of this inspection identifying an area as having a hidden layer of ACM floor tile and/or mastic which, upon demolition, would reveal a much smaller area of impact.
4) Due to limitations on the ability to collect sufficient suspect adhesive materials typically found beneath ceramic systems (particularly in restrooms and other areas designed for exposure to water), and to do so without significantly damaging the finished ceramic tile surface, samples of ceramic tile mastic/adhesive materials were not collected to confirm or deny the presence of ACM. Adhesives/mastics used for bathroom/kitchen/shower areas commonly contain ACM, are currently available in the commercial market and should be presumed to have been used unless the architect/engineer responsible for its installation can provide a letter stating otherwise (see Section 3.0). As such, all ceramic tile systems should be assumed to be underlain by an ACM adhesive/mastic until inspected and/or sampled and proven otherwise and should be handled as such by VA maintenance and/or custodial workers as well as outside contractors.
5) Inspection and sampling efforts during this assessment did not include the necessary destructive sampling techniques to sufficiently collect samples of fire rated doors as well as heat shields located in the perimeter steam convector units. Sampling of these materials would have caused a great deal of damage that would have not been able to be repaired. All fire rated doors and heat shields behind the steam convector units throughout the hospital shall be considered to contain asbestos unless sampled proving otherwise.
6) Suspect caulking/glazing materials observed on exterior window systems were safely assessed at ground level only with the assumption that window units at higher elevations are homogenous and carry the same designation with respect to asbestos containing materials.
7) Fixed objects, such as cabinets, lab hoods, etc. often conceal additional layers of older flooring that are not otherwise visible for observation and/or sampling during inspection, but are then uncovered during construction activities.
8) Building systems in constant operation which are critical to the building’s occupation are not capable of being inspected. For example, the interior spaces of an HVAC Air Handler Unit would be considered inaccessible for proper inspection due to safety risks by inspectors.
9) Inspection maps provided with this report indicate specific rooms/spaces in which access for visual inspection was not made possible during the 2018 inspection effort.
In such cases, previous conditions for ACM (as per 2008 Altec survey) was presumed unchanged and reported as such.
SECTION 5.0
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL HOMOGENOUS MATERIAL AREA
(HMA) SUMMARY TABLES AND DRAWINGS
This section provides a quick table reference to all ACM Homogenous Material Areas (HMAs) found during the 2018 inspection, as well as a complete set of corresponding drawings with the exact location of bulk samples and ACM HMAs found during 2018 inspection.
2018 HMA Summary Table VA-Jefferson Barracks Medical Facility Building 59
VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS CAMPUS BLDG 59
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
2018 CAMPUS-WIDE ACM INSPECTION
ACM HOMOGENOUS AREAS SUMMARY TABLE
Building 59 Floor Flooring materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous
Materials
Basement None None None None
1 None None None 19: Fire door (PACM)
2 None None None 19: Fire door (PACM)
Exterior
None
None None None
Basement Asbestos Location Maps
STAIRS
STAIRS
GROUND FLOOR.
11'-4" TO CEILING.
UPPER TIER
4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
9'-2" TO CEILING.
LOWER TIER
4' BELOW GROUND LEVEL.
14' TO CEILING.
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 00
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
Date
Project No.
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n c h o n e f o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a d e h a l f i n c h e s o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-9-2019
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - FLOORING HMA
LEGEND
FLOOR HMA - BASEMENT
JB-59-B-Floor
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
1 Concrete
Date
Project No.
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a e h a l f i n c h e o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-9-2019
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
1 Concrete
28 Dark gray duct seam sealant
29 Silver silicone caulk
30 Pipe dope
31 Interior concrete expansion caulk - around support pillars
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - MISCELLANEOUS HMA
LEGEND
MISCELLANEOUS HMA - BASEMENT
JB-59-B-misc
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
STAIRS
STAIRS
GROUND FLOOR.
11'-4" TO CEILING.
UPPER TIER
4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
9'-2" TO CEILING.
LOWER TIER
4' BELOW GROUND LEVEL.
14' TO CEILING.
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 00
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a e h a l f i n c h e o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-9-2019
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - SURFACING HMA
LEGEND
SURFACING HMA - BASEMENT
JB-59-B-surfacing
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
STAIRS
STAIRS
GROUND FLOOR.
11'-4" TO CEILING.
UPPER TIER
4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
9'-2" TO CEILING.
LOWER TIER
4' BELOW GROUND LEVEL.
14' TO CEILING.
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a e h a l f i n c h e o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX ACM amount and condition
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-9-2019
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - TSI LOCATION
LEGEND
TSI LOCATION - BASEMENT
JB-59-B-TSI
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
All ACM pipe insulation is presumed to be in Good condition unless noted as Damaged (D) or Severely Damaged (SD)
Unknown amounts of ACM pipe insulation may be present in all inaccessible areas including pipe chases and above plaster ceilings
STAIRS
STAIRS
GROUND FLOOR.
11'-4" TO CEILING.
UPPER TIER
4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
9'-2" TO CEILING.
LOWER TIER
4' BELOW GROUND LEVEL.
14' TO CEILING.
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n c e f o o t o n e q u a r t e r i n c e f o o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n c e f o o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n c e f o o t o n e i n c e f o o t o n e a n d o n e h a l f i n c h e e f o o t t h r e e i n c h e e f o o t o n e h a l f i n c e f o o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-9-2019
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
BASEMENT - SAMPLE LOCATION
LEGEND
SAMPLE LOCATION - BASEMENT
JB-59-B-sample
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
STAIRS
STAIRS
GROUND FLOOR.
11'-4" TO CEILING.
UPPER TIER
4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL.
9'-2" TO CEILING.
LOWER TIER
4' BELOW GROUND LEVEL.
14' TO CEILING.
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 00
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
First Floor Asbestos Location Maps
F E
C
F E
C
F E
C
O
O
F.E.C
HW
HW
BO
T E
L E
FOYER
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 01
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
STAIRS
Date
Project No.
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a e h a l f i n c h e o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-11-2019
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
1 Concrete
13 Yellow mastic under carpet
14 Carpet
21 16"x16" tan & brown ceramic floor tile
22 Wood planks floor
26 12"x12" tan w/ brown ,white specs floor tile
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
FIRST FLOOR - FLOORING HMA
LEGEND
FLOOR HMA - FIRST FLOOR
JB-59-1-Floor
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a e h a l f i n c h e o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-11-2019
NON-ASBESTOS GENERAL HMA GUIDE
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
FIRST FLOOR - MISCELLANEOUS
HMA LEGEND
MISCELLANEOUS HMA - FIRST FLOOR
JB-59-1-misc
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
1 Concrete
2 Exterior black expansion concrete caulk
3 Exterior dark white pillar caulk
4 Exterior white door frame caulk
5 Exterior white door window glaze
6 Exterior bright white facia caulk
7 Exterior white pillar to brick caulk
8 Red brick
9 Exterior copper & cloth water proofing barrier
10 Exterior brown frame caulk
11 Exterior black tar water proofing
12 Dry wall/ joint compound
15 2"x2" white ceramic tile
16 4"x4" white ceramic tile
17 Brown fixture caulk
18 Interior white window frame caulk
20 Interior white penetration coulk - crown
23 white fixture caulk
24 White penetration caulk on metal frame
27 4" tan cove base
28 Dark gray duct seam sealant
29 Silver silacone caulk
30 Pipe dope
31 Interior concrete expansion caulk - around support pillars
32 Gray sink sound proofing
F E
C
F E
C
F E
C
O
O
F.E.C
HW
HW
BO
T E
L E
FOYER
STAIRS
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 01
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
19 Fire door (PACM) - 8 units
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL
GUIDE
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n c e f o o t o n e q u a r t e r i n c e f o o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n c e f o o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n c e f o o t o n e i n c e f o o t o n e a n d o n e h a l f i n c h e e f o o t t h r e e i n c h e e f o o t o n e h a l f i n c e f o o t
F E
D C
B A XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-11-2019
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
FIRST FLOOR - SURFACING HMA
LEGEND
SURFACING HMA - FIRST FLOOR
JB-59-1-surfacing
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
F E
C
F E
C
F E
C
O
O
F.E.C
HW
HW
BO
T E
L E
FOYER
STAIRS
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 01
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n o t o n e q u a r t e r i n o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n o t o n e i n o t o n e a e h a l f i n c h e o t t h r e e i n c h e o t o n e h a l f i n o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-11-2019
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
FIRST FLOOR - TSI LOCATION
LEGEND
TSI LOCATION - FIRST FLOOR
JB-59-1-TSI
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
All ACM pipe insulation is presumed to be in Good condition unless noted as Damaged (D) or Severely Damaged (SD)
Unknown amounts of ACM pipe insulation may be present in all inaccessible areas including pipe chases and above plaster ceilings
F E
C
F E
C
F E
C
O
O
F.E.C
HW
HW
BO
T E
L E
FOYER
STAIRS
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 01
DRAWING NO.
Project Title
Building Number
Location
Drawn
Checked
Drawing Title
V.A.M.C. ST. LOUIS, MO.
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT &
AREA LOCATION PROGRAM
V e t e r a n s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983-400-285
DateRevisions
VA FORM 08-6231, FEB. 1983
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
F E
D C
B A o n e e i g h t i n c e f o o t o n e q u a r t e r i n c e f o o t t h r e e e i g h t s i n c e f o o t t h r e e q u a r t e r s i n c e f o o t o n e i n c e f o o t o n e a n d o n e h a l f i n c h e e f o o t t h r e e i n c h e e f o o t o n e h a l f i n c e f o o t
F E
D C
B A
XX HMA Numbers
XX Sample Numbers
C.DEY
VA-JB 2018 Asbestos and Lead Reinspection
SH1476
7-11-2019
Riverfront Safety & Health 1139 Olive St. Suite 300
St. Louis, MO. 63101
FFIRST FLOOR - SAMPLE
LOCATION LEGEND
SAMPLE LOCATION - FIRST FLOOR
JB-59-1-sample
J.RHYNEER
Fifty-Nine
F E
C
F E
C
F E
C
O
O
F.E.C
HW
HW
BO
T E
L E
FOYER
STAIRS
BUILDING 59 - LEVEL: 01
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
1 2 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24
SECTION 6.0
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL CONDITION & REMOVAL
PRIORITY TABLE
WITH
ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATES
This section provides a table with the current condition, potential for disturbance, and removal priority for each ACM HMA.
Condition and Removal Priority Table
MANAGEMENT PLAN REMOVAL PRIORITY ASSESSMENT CHARTS
Qualitative (Descriptive) Rankings for Current Condition of ACM Qualitative Ranking Example Descriptions of Current Condition
Good (G) Surfacing material has no visible damage; covering on TSI is intact; miscellaneous materials are intact; no visible debris.
Damaged (D) Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive visible damage; covering on TSI is cut or torn, exposing small but not extensive amounts of insulation; miscellaneous materials have moderate but not extensive damage; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible debris
Significantly Damaged (SD) Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on TSI is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damaged; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile is extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.
Note: Damage is considered “extensive” when the total area of distributed damage exceeds 10%, or 25% localized damage.
Qualitative Rankings for Potential for Disturbance of ACM Level of Potential Disturbance Frequency of Potential
Contact (accessibility) Influence of Vibration Potential for Air Erosion or
Water Damage
HIGH (H)
(potential for significant damage) High Any Value Any Value
Any Value High Any Value Any Value Any Value High
MODERATE (M)
(potential for damage)
Moderate Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate or Low Moderate
LOW (L) Low Low Low Note: Overall rating determined by assigning disturbance probabilities under all 3 categories then adopting highest individual score for each material.
Qualitative Rankings and Numerical Ratings for Removal Priority of ACM Hazard Rank/
Removal Priority ACBM Condition ACBM Disturbance
Potential Recommended Response Actions
1 Significantly Damaged
Any Evacuate or isolate area immediately. Remove ACBM immediately. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.
2 Damaged High Evacuate or isolate area immediately. Remove, enclose, encapsulate or repair ACBM to correct immediately. Reduce potential for disturbance of remaining materials. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.
3 Damaged Moderate Remove, enclose, encapsulate, or repair to correct damage as soon as feasible.
O&M Required for all friable ACBM.
4 Damaged Low Remove, enclose, encapsulate, or repair to correct damage as needed to facilitate future projects. Take steps to reduce potential for disturbance. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.
5 Good High Take steps to reduce potential for disturbance. O&M Required for all friable ACBM.
6 Good Moderate O&M Required for all friable ACBM.
7 Good Low O&M Required for all friable ACBM, but measures need not be as extensive as
Category 6.
VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS CAMPUS
2018 ASBESTOS INSPECTION
CONDITION AND REMOVAL PRIORITY TABLE FOR
BUILDING 59
Homogeneous
Area No.
Bldg
Floor
Material Description
Friable Yes/No
Accessibility
Yes/No Restricted
Current Condition
Potential for Disturbance
Removal Priority
Rating Based On Rating Based On
Building 59 – Basement
No ACM Detected
Building 24 – 1st Floor
HMA-19 59 1 Fire door (PACM) No Yes G Intact L Renovation 7
Building 24 – 2nd Floor
HMA-19 59 2 Fire door (PACM) No Yes G Intact L Renovation 7
Building 24 – Exterior
No ACM Detected
2018 Asbestos Summary and Cost Table
2018 BUILDING 59 MISCELLANOUS ACM SUMMARY
HMA NUMBER
AND ACM
DESCRIPTION
FRIABLE? CONDITION EST.
QNTY.
UNIT COST COST TO REMOVE
19 - Fire door (PACM) No Good 13 $750/ea $9,750
SECTION 7.0
MASTER BULK SAMPLE SUMMARY TABLES
This table provides a listing of all asbestos bulk samples taken during the 2018 inspection.
2018 Asbestos Bulk Sample Table
2018 ACM INSPECTION REPORT
VA JEFFERSON BARRACKS ST. LOUIS CAMPUS
BUILDING 59
SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES TAKEN TO DATE
2018 Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary
Sample No.
HMA Number and Material
Description
Room
Category
Asbestos Content
1 4: Exterior white door frame caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
2 4: Exterior white door frame caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
3 4: Exterior white door frame caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
4 10: Exterior brown frame caulk Ext East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
5 10: Exterior brown frame caulk Ext East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
6 10: Exterior brown frame caulk Ext East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
7 9: Exterior copper & cloth water proofing barrier Ext East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
8 9: Exterior copper & cloth water proofing barrier Ext East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
9 9: Exterior copper & cloth water proofing barrier Ext East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
10 7: Exterior white pillar to brick caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
11 7: Exterior white pillar to brick caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
12 7: Exterior white pillar to brick caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
13 6: Exterior bright white facia caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
14 6: Exterior bright white facia caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
15 6: Exterior bright white facia caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
16 5: Exterior white door window glaze Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
17 5: Exterior white door window glaze Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
18 5: Exterior white door window glaze Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
19 3: Exterior dark white pillar caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
20 3: Exterior dark white pillar caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
21 3: Exterior dark white pillar caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
22 2: Exterior black expansion concrete caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
23 2: Exterior black expansion concrete caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
24 2: Exterior black expansion concrete caulk Ext Entrance CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
25 11: Exterior black tar water proofing Ext North CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
26 11: Exterior black tar water proofing Ext North CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
27 11: Exterior black tar water proofing Ext North CAT 2 Non-Friable
28 13: Yellow mastic under carpet 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
29 12: Dry wall/ joint compound 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
30 12: Dry wall/ joint compound 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
31 17: Brown fixture caulk 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
32 17: Brown fixture caulk 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
33 17: Brown fixture caulk 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
34 18: Interior white window frame caulk 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
35 18: Interior white window frame caulk 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
36 18: Interior white window frame caulk 1 107 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
37 20: Interior white penetration caulk - crown 2 208 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
38 23: white fixture caulk 2 201 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
39 24: White penetration caulk on metal frame 2 West CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
40 20: Interior white penetration caulk - crown 2 Near 203 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
41 13: Yellow mastic under carpet 2 204 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
42 24: White penetration caulk on metal frame 2 East CAT 2 Non-Friable
43 23: white fixture caulk 1 106 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
44 13: Yellow mastic under carpet 1 106 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
45 20: Interior white penetration caulk - crown 1 106 CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
46 Void Void Void Void Void
47 12: Dry wall/ joint compound 1 106 Friable None detected
48 12: Dry wall/ joint compound 1 106 Friable None detected
49 12: Dry wall/ joint compound 1 101 Friable None detected
50 12: Dry wall/ joint compound 1 101 Friable None detected
51 23: white fixture caulk 1 102 CAT 2 Non-Friable (transite)
None detected
52 24: White penetration caulk on metal frame 1 East CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
53 28: Dark gray duct seam sealant B Basement CAT 2 Non-Friable
(transite) None detected
54 28: Dark gray duct seam sealant B Basement CAT 2 Non-Friable
(t…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .