Solicitation Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 99 KB Posted

Attached to
ATC Test Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W91CRB-21-R-0016
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for offerors responding to solicitation number W91CRB-21-R-0016. The solicitation is for test support services required by the US Army Aberdeen Test Center, including ammunition operations, compliance and program support, engineering and scientific support, facilities design and maintenance, test instrumentation operation, marine operations and maintenance, vehicle and equipment operations and maintenance, technical test support, and test range and facility operations support. Offerors are required to provide information on relevant past performance for evaluation. The questionnaire requests ratings and explanations for categories including compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction, and any other relevant information. Respondents include points of contact for the past efforts who are asked to provide ratings, comments, and identification information. Completed questionnaires must be returned to the contracting officer by January 7, 2021.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to ATC Test Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
ATSS RFP AMD_5 W91CRB-21-R-0016.pdf PDF
ATSS RFP AMD_4 W91CRB-21-R-0016.pdf PDF
ATSS RFP AMD_3 W91CRB-21-R-0016.pdf PDF
Solicitation Attachment 5 - LOE Spreadsheet 2020-12-18.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATSS RFP AMD_2 W91CRB-21-R-0016.pdf PDF
ATSS RFP AMD_1 W91CRB-21-R-0016.pdf PDF
Solicitation Attachment 2 - Contract References Form 2020-12-11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Attachment 5 - LOE Spreadsheet 2020-12-8.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Attachment 4 - OCI Certification.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4c1 - Local 2424 CBA Amendment - HEO Lead - Trans Op II.pdf PDF
Attachment 4a - WD 15-4266 Maryland.pdf PDF
Attachment 4c - Local 2424 Executed CBA.pdf PDF
Solicitation Attachment 2 - Contract References Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - Labor Category Qualification Requirements..pdf PDF
Attachment 4b - Local 186 Executed CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - DD Form 254.pdf PDF
Solicitation Attachment 5 - LOE Spreadsheet 2020-11-24.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Training Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - 2020 CBA Notice of Critical Status.pdf PDF
Exhibit C - CDRLs A001 - A025.pdf PDF
Solicitation Attachment 6 - Purchasing System Review Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit B - Contractor Furnished Equipment List.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - SBPCD and SBSP.pdf PDF
Solicitation Attachment 1 - Summary of Experience Form.docx DOCX document
ATSS RFP W91CRB-21-R-0016.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - GFP.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).docx DOCX document
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND – ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND ABERDEEN DIVISION D

4310 BOOTHBY HILL AVE ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005-3013

24 November 2020

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number (W91CRB-21-R-0016)

Dear Sir/Ma’am;

The US Army Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on services/efforts that are the same as or similar in scope and complexity to the portion(s) of the PWS that the prime offeror or applicable major subcontractor is proposing to perform. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the US Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Aberdeen Contracting Division, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 07 January 2021, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted to Esther Casari at esther.casari.civ@mail.mil and Erin Weber at erin.k.weber.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at 410-306-2790.

Sincerely, Erin K. Weber Contracting Officer

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:

Contract No.:

Subcontract No. (if applicable):

POC:

Title:

(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:

Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name: Title: Date:

Telephone Number: Address:

E- mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

☐Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Good
☐Acceptable
☐Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

☐Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Good
☐Acceptable
☐Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

☐Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Good
☐Acceptable
☐Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

☐Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Good
☐Acceptable
☐Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

☐Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Good
☐Acceptable
☐Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
☐Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization: Name:

Title: Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .