Sect_J_EXHC_BLISS_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 171 KB Posted

Attached to
test
Solicitation number
SAQMMA-12-R-0130
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
15)__EXH_F__BLISS_Pricing_Tables_04-05-2013.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
8)_ExhA.1_Atch_3E_PD-_Badge_Office_Technician_A003_4-5-13.pdf PDF
15)__EXH_F__BLISS_Pricing_Tables_04-05-2013.pdf PDF
4)_EXH_A_TORs_A003_(FINAL)_4-5-13.pdf PDF
3)_BLISS_Consolidated_RFP_A003_(track_changes)_4-5-13.pdf PDF
13)_EXH_A1Atch12_Fuel_SOO_(FINAL)_4-5-13.pdf PDF
12)_EXH_A1_Atch11_PMO_SOO_A003_(FINAL)_4-5-13.pdf PDF
5)_EXH_A1_TOR_SOOs_A003_(FINAL)_4-5-13.pdf PDF
5)_EXH_A1_TOR_SOOs_A003_(track_changes)_4-5-13.pdf PDF
BLiSS_Responses_3-29-13.pdf PDF
BLiSS_Responses_3-27-2013.pdf PDF
BLISS_Questions_Responses_03252013.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Questions_3202013_(2).pdf PDF
SF30_A002_Cont_Page.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHA1_Atch3D_RSOEquip_Rev2.pdf PDF
SF30_SAQMMA12R0130A002.pdf PDF
1EXHIBIT_A_Task_Order_Requests_(A002).pdf PDF
BLISS_Consolidated_RFP_A002_B-M.pdf PDF
Sect_J_ExhA1_Atch_4_FIRE_PROTECTION_A002_031213.pdf PDF
ExhA.1_PD-_Badge_Office_Supervisor_-_Baghdad_-BLISS.pdf PDF
2EXH_A1_TOR_SOO_A001_Mar_3_(conformed).pdf PDF
2EXH_A1_TOR_SOO_A001_Mar_3_(track_changes)_(2).pdf PDF
20_EXH_F__BLISS_Pricing_Tables_A001_Mar_3_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ExhA1_Atch_12_Amendment_1_Fuel_SOO.pdf PDF
SF30_SAQMMA12R0130-A001.pdf PDF
ExhA1_Atch_8_Amendment_1_Warehouse_Operations.pdf PDF
RFP_Questions_2-25-2013.pdf PDF
DRAFT_RFP_Questions_Feb202013.pdf PDF
Local_Labor_Law.doc DOC document
Sect_J_EXHA1_Atch3E_labor_by_site.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sec_J_EXH_A_Task_Order_Requests.pdf PDF
BLISS_RFP_Sections_B-M_02_01_2013.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHA1_Attch12_Fuel_SOO.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHA1_Atch3D_RSOEquip.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sect_J_EXHA1_Atch5B_PropTEs.pdf PDF
Sect_J_ExhA1_Atch3A_RDISS_ORC.pdf PDF
BLISS_COVER_SF-33_SAQMMA12R0130.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHA1_Atch4_Iraq_Fire_Protection.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHA1_Atch10_BLISS_Rqt_Matrix_013013.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sect_J_EXH_A1_Atch1_Food_SOO.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHD_DD254.SAQMMA12R0130pdf.pdf PDF
Sect_J_EXHA1_Attch11_PMO_SOO.pdf PDF
Sec_J_Exh_A.1_Task_Order_SOOs_.pdf PDF
draft_BLISS_RFP_12_28_2012_DS.docx DOCX document
draft_BLISS_RFP_12_05_2012.pdf PDF
Questions_for_FedBizOps_Nov_20_2012.pdf PDF
Questions_9-6-12.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_Presentation_for_Release_to_Public.pdf PDF
draft_BLISS_RFP_Nov16.pdf PDF
SITE_SURVEY_ANNOUNCEMENT.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION J

EXHIBIT C – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your immediate attention is requested no later than , please email the completed survey form directly to Laws2@state.gov or mail to:

U.S. Department of State

Office of Acquisition Management (A/LM/AQM)

Attn: Stephen Law

P.O. Box 9115 Rosslyn Station

Arlington VA 22219

You have been identified as a contact for___________ (insert name of Offeror). Using the rating table, please provide concise comments and ratings regarding your overall assessment of the Offeror’s performance on the contract identified below.

Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance. Handwritten responses are sufficient.

Indicate, based on the codes below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL CODE

EXCELLENT (E) Indicates that the contractor’s performance within the area of evaluation clearly exceeds contractual requirements.

GOOD (G) Indicates no problems exist in the area of evaluation or has only minor problems for which solutions are in hand.

MARGINAL (M) Indicates the area of evaluation contains an existing problem for which there is doubt whether the identified solution is adequate but the problem appears to be within the contractor’s ability to solve.

UNACCEPTABLE (U) Indicates a serious problem exists in the evaluation area which may be outside the contractor’s ability to solve. The contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery in not likely.

NEUTRAL (N) Performance did not include such efforts or performance was not observed.

Please circle a letter corresponding to your rating or ‘N’ if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.

FOR ANY RATING BELOW SATISFACTORY, A CLARIFICATION AND EXPLANATION IS

REQUESTED. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.

You are urged to add to your knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

Return the completed questionnaire to the requestor in a sealed envelope with the responder’s signature over the seal or direct to email address listed below.

If you have any questions, please contact Stephen Law: Laws2@state.gov mailto:Laws2@state.gov

PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor Name/Division:

B. Contract Number:

C. Contract Effort or Program Title:

D. Contract Type:

E. Estimated Amount/Annual Volume of Service:

F. Period of Performance:

G. Brief Description of contract effort or task:

MANAGEMENT ABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS

1. The contractor provided experienced executives, including project manager and supervisors and replacements with the technical and administrative qualifications required to meet the contract requirements.

E G M U N

2. The contractor’s delegation of authority to project manager and supervisors met contract requirements.

3. The contractor provided adequate resources (personnel/equipment) in each specialty necessary to fulfill contractual requirements.

4. The contractor provided effective emergency response actions and corrective actions to cover incidents such as: disruption of utilities, accidents, material shortages, safety, security, and hazardous materials handling incidents.

QUALITY

1. Contractor provided effective Quality/ Inspection procedures and personnel to meet contract requirements.

2. When deficiencies were reported, the contractor took effective corrective actions pursuant to their Quality Control procedures.

3. Contractor completed projects and subsequent corrective actions, including punch-list items, in a timely manner.

4. Overall quality of the services provided under the contract E G M U N

COST/PRICE

1. The contractor provided accurate and timely proposals for changes.

2. The contractor implemented cost control measures and tracking that resulted in transparent, accurate, and timely cost reporting, if applicable.

GENERAL

1. Compliance with contract terms and conditions. E G M U N

2. Willingness to cooperate with and assist the customer in routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties.

3. Business integrity and business conduct. E G M U N

4. Given the opportunity, would your organization enter into another contractual relationship with this contractor in the future?

Yes No

COMMENTS

NOTE: Additional comments are appreciated:

RESPONSE INFORMATION

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. This information will be kept confidential.

Name of Evaluator

Phone Number

Email Address

Date Questionnaire Completed:

Source of Information/Documentation utilized to rate Performance Level

May we contact you to discuss/validate ? Yes or No (circle one)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .