Attach D Performance Matrix
18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA09R0212
Text of this file
ATTACHMENT D – PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Explanation of Columns
| Outcomes |
| Area within the overall Task/Delivery Order where the Government describes what it wants to accomplish as the end result of this Task/Delivery Order |
| Requirement |
| Requirements represent organizational needs |
| Standard |
| Standard represents the performance baseline against which the Contractor will be measured |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| The percentage of maximum allowable error or variation from the standard |
| Performance Incentive Measurement Interval |
| The frequency with which the incentive adjustments will be exercised |
| Monitoring Source |
| The source, or data collection methodology, the organization will use to measure contractor performance |
| Incentive/Disincentive |
| The methodology used to reward good performance or punish poor performance |
| Calculation |
| The formula used to quantify contractor performance |
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (continued)
| Outcome |
| Requirement |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Performance Incentive Measurement Interval |
| Monitoring Source |
| Incentive/ |
Disincentive Calculation
Deliverables that are in full to request data and/or plan; meet Task Order requirements and have no material quality issues.
Deliverables are high quality and complete (e.g., Weekly Activity Report, Monthly Progress Reports, Task Proposal and Test Plan, As-Built Drawings)
Deliverables are written clearly and concisely, providing DoS stakeholders a clear understanding of all deliverables.
Final documentation must be in Microsoft Suite: Word 2003 and Excel 2003 or current DoS version.
Final documentation must be spell checked, grammar checked, and accepted by the Government.
Not more than 5% failure in meeting quality requirements and standards; Minimal COR intervention required.
Measured monthly by deliverable; Non-monetary Performance Incentive calculated on an annual basis.
DoS 100% inspection of all deliverables by COR and/or GTM.
Positive incentive = Acceptable or higher Annual Past Performance Report
Negative incentive = a Less Than Acceptable Past Performance Report will be issued when the Contractor has more than 5% failure in meeting quality requirements and standards during an annual period.
Performance = number of high quality and complete deliverables received during the annual calculation period/number of deliverables
For example:
Acceptable Performance = 95% or greater delivery of high quality and complete deliverables
Less Than Acceptable Performance = Less than 95% delivery of high quality and complete deliverables
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (continued)
| Outcome |
| Requirement |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Performance Incentive Measurement Interval |
| Monitoring Source |
| Incentive/ |
Calculation
Deliverables that meet or exceed the delivery dates specified by the PWS, delivery/task order and/or COR (if applicable).
Deliverable delivery dates are met or exceeded.
100% of delivery dates specified by the PWS, delivery/task order and/or COR (if applicable) are met, or exceeded.
Not more than 2% of the deliverables submitted on an annual basis are late; Minimal COR intervention required.
Measured monthly by deliverable; Non-monetary Performance Incentive calculated at the end of a delivery/task order or on an annual basis, whichever performance period is less.
DoS 100% inspection of all deliverables by COR and/or GTM.
Negative incentive = a Less Than Acceptable Past Performance Report will be issued when the Contractor has more than 2% of its deliverables late during an annual period.
Performance = number of deliverables identified in the Task/Delivery Order (delivered on-time divided by the number of deliverables required by the Task/Delivery Order, expressed as a percentage.
Acceptable Performance = 98% or greater delivery of on-time deliverables
Less Than Acceptable Performance = Less than 98% delivery of on-time deliverables
For example:
Deliverables delivered on-time = 6 Deliverables required by the Task Order = 7
Performance = 6/7 or .857 x 100 = 85.7% of the deliverables met the delivery dates specified in the project plan.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (continued)
| Outcome |
| Requirement |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Performance Incentive Measurement Interval |
| Monitoring Source |
| Incentive/ |
Calculation
Installation features or components described in the acceptance test plan perform and require no-retest.
Installation features and components perform in accordance with the plan.
100% of installation features and components perform in accordance with the Acceptance Test Plan and Testing.
No deviation from the standard.
Measured per event.
DoS 100% inspection of all work by COR and/or GTM.
Positive incentive = None Negative incentive = 10% reduction of invoiced services for the individual task/delivery order.
Go – Installation Features and Components perform IAW the plan. Full payment will be applied.
No-Go – Installation Features and Components do not perform IAW the plan. In these cases, the negative incentive will be applied after completion of work.
Financial records are error-free
All IMPAC Purchases are accurate and complete
No unauthorized charges are contained in the credit card statement
100% of all IMPAC Purchases are accurate and complete
No deviation from the standard.
Measured per quarterly cycle.
DoS 100% inspection of all statements by COR and/or GTM.
Negative incentive = a Less Than Acceptable Past Performance Report will be issued when the Contractor submits one or more defective credit card statements during any annual period.
Performance = number of error-free credit card statement received during the annual calculation period/number of credit card statements
For example:
Acceptable Performance = 100% error-free submissions
Less Than Acceptable Performance = Less than 100% error-free submissions.
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SAQMMA09R0212_A006.pdf | ||
| saqmma09R0212_A005.pdf | ||
| SAQMMA09R0212_A004.pdf | ||
| Cable-Conduit SAQMMA09R0212_20090615_amended.pdf | ||
| SAQMMA09R0212_A003.pdf | ||
| SAQMMA09R0212_A002.pdf | ||
| amendment_001.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers_Cabling_20090529.pdf | ||
| SAQMMA09R0212 A001.pdf | ||
| Attach G | — | |
| Attach B Attachment B Domestic Design and HST Standards 2008.pdf | ||
| Attachment L Wage Determinations.pdf | ||
| Attach H Locationsdocx.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach M DD254.pdf | ||
| Attach A | — | |
| Attach C | — | |
| SAQMMA09R0212_20090514_final.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Cover | — | |
| Attach I Cable QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach K Offer Schedule Pricing.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach F | — | |
| Attach E | — | |
| Attach J Non-Disclosure_Cable Recompete.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .