S3630 reference-questionnaire-2025-12-29.pdf
PDF 182 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SFC Homes
- Solicitation number
- 40DHHS-S3630
- Issued by
- Washoe County, Nevada
About this file
This is a Reference Questionnaire form issued by the Nevada State Purchasing Division, Department of Administration, for solicitation number 40DHHS-S3630. The form is designed to collect client references for vendors and subcontractors participating in formal state solicitations for projects of similar size and scope. The questionnaire must be completed by current or former clients of the proposing vendor and submitted to the single point of contact, Denise Frohlich (Dfrohlich@dcfs.nv.gov), by 5:00 pm on January 20, 2026. The form includes instruction requirements that all questions be answered, with responses of "U/K" (Unknown) or "N/A" (Not Applicable) permitted where applicable. If additional space is needed, responses may be attached on supplemental pages. References are designated as confidential business information and will not be made public or returned to the proposing vendor to allow for candid client feedback.
The evaluation section contains thirteen rating items and two narrative items assessing vendor performance across multiple dimensions including knowledge and expertise, flexibility, quality of deliverables and products, staff interaction, schedule adherence, customer service responsiveness, billing accuracy, problem resolution capability, and business requirement flexibility. Ratings are scored on a scale of 1-10, with 0 representing poor or inadequate performance, 1-3 representing below average performance, 4-6 representing average performance, 7-9 representing above average performance, and 10 representing exceptional performance. Vendors and subcontractors must provide the client's contact information, including name, title, telephone, and email, along with the period of performance for the referenced project to facilitate potential follow-up inquiries by the State.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S3630 Enterprise SFC Floorplans.pdf | ||
| S3630 Enterprise SFC Insurance Schedule.pdf | ||
| 3630-site-visit-registration.pdf | ||
| 3630-request-for-proposals-2025-12-29.docx | DOCX document | |
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| Certification-regarding-lobbying~20.pdf | ||
| Terms-and-conditions-for-services~23.pdf | ||
| Terms-and-conditions-for-goods (2).pdf | ||
| Standard-form-contract~17.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3632 Additional Vendor Questions-DCFS Responses.docx | DOCX document | |
| S3630 Enterprise SFC SOW-Application.docx | DOCX document | |
| S3630 Enterprise SFC SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| S3630 Enterprise SFC Building Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3631 Additional Vendor Questions-DCFS Responses.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Revised 2024-10 Page 1 of 2
Reference questionnaire
Due Date
Solicitation number
Single point of contact name
Single point of contact email
Proposing vendor or subcontractor
Client providing the reference
Client contact name and title
Client telephone and email
Period of performance
1. CLIENT REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS
1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposing vendor or subcontractor above. Once you have completed the reference questionnaire, please submit to the single point of contact via email, with the solicitation number in the subject line, no later than the due date above.
1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach additional pages. If attaching additional pages, please place your company/organization name on each page and reference the appropriate RFP number.
1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) and not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333. In addition to the reference questionnaire, the State may contact references for further clarification.
1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3; Average performance: 4-6; Above average performance: 7-9; Exceptional performance: 10.
2. EVALUATION ITEMS
2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) https://purchasing.nv.gov/ https://nevadaepro.com/ https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec333
Page 2 of 2 Reference questionnaire
2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating:
2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating:
2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating:
2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating:
2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating:
2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating:
2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating:
2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating:
2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating:
2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating:
2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating:
2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating:
2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating)
2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating)
| 1. Client reference instructions |
| 1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposi... |
| 1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach add... |
| 1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) a... |
| 1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3;... |
| 2. Evaluation items |
| 2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) |
| 2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating: |
| 2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating: |
| 2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating: |
| 2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating: |
| 2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating: |
| 2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating: |
| 2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating: |
| 2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating: |
| 2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating: |
| 2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating: |
| 2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating: |
| 2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating: |
| 2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating) |
| 2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating) |
| text2: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 211: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| 14: |
| 15: |
| rating2: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 11: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| Solicitation-number: 40DHHS-S3630 |
| POC-name: Denise Frohlich |
| POC-email: Dfrohlich@dcfs.nv.gov |
| Proposing-vendor-or-subcontractor: |
| Client-providing-the-reference: |
| Client-contact-name-and-title: |
| Client-telephone-and-email: |
| Period-of-performance: |
| Due-date: 5:00 pm on 1/20/26 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .