RFPAttD_ReferenceChecks~1.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-66000-00013333
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Reference Check Form for a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Oregon through OregonBuys, specifically for Bid #S-66000-00013333, which solicits proposals for Oblique Aerial Photography services designed to improve decision support capabilities along the Oregon Shore. The form is structured to collect detailed reference information from previous clients, allowing the procuring agency to verify the offeror's qualifications, project performance, customer service quality, and overall capability to meet the solicitation requirements.
The reference check form is comprehensive, requesting potential references to provide insights into the offeror's past performance across multiple dimensions, including service type, customer service quality, problem resolution methods, timeline adherence, cost management, and overall satisfaction. The document indicates that at least two references from current or former client firms are required, covering similar projects performed within the last five years. The agency reserves the right to use these references to validate qualifications, break tie scores, or obtain additional information about the prospective contractor's capabilities.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Offer Conference Oblique Imagery RFP-20251028_140129-Meeting Recording.mp4 | MP4 file | |
| RFPAttH_Minus_Tide_Window_Durations.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFPAttE_Cost_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ColumbiaRiverCombined_Shoreline_Shapefile.zip | ZIP file | |
| Intent to Award Notice~2.pdf | ||
| RFPAttA_Services_Contract~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ_S-10700-00013334.pdf | ||
| ShoreZone_Flight_pts_2011_kml.zip | ZIP file | |
| RFPAttB_DisclosureExemption~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| ShoreZone_Flight_pts_2011.zip | ZIP file | |
| RFPAttG_ResponsibilityInquiry~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFPAttF_CertDisadvantagedOutreach~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFPAttC_OfferorInformation~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| OR_CUSP_MHW_SZ_Shoreline_OCMP_2014.zip | ZIP file | |
| S-66000-00013333_RFP_Draft_final.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
OregonBuys Bid # S-66000-00013333 | Oblique Aerial Photography for Improved Decision Support on the Oregon Shore Attachment D
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
[Delete instructions in brackets: Provide at least 2 references from current or former client firms for similar projects performed for any clients within the last 5 years. References must verify the quality of previous, related Work.
Agency may check to determine if references provided support Offeror’s ability to comply with the requirements of this solicitation. Agency may use references to obtain additional information, break tie scores, or verify any information needed. Agency may contact any reference (submitted or not) to verify Offeror’s qualifications.]
| Offeror Name: | __________________________________________ |
| Reference Entity: | __________________________________________ |
| Reference Contact Name: | __________________________________________ |
| Contact Telephone Number: | __________________________________________ |
| Contact Email Address: | __________________________________________ |
Please respond to the following questions:
1. For what type of services did you engage Offeror?
Describe the services listed in response to question 1.
Describe Offeror’s customer service.
Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Offeror.
Describe Offeror’s methods for problem resolution.
How likely would you be to use Offeror’s services again?
With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the most satisfied?
With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the least satisfied?
How well did Offeror stay within the proposed timeline?
How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?
| Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 | Page 1 of 2 |
| DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016 | Page 2 of 2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .