RFP_34101-250701_Attachemnt_6_3_Cost_Proposal_final.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted

Attached to
TEMA Critical Incident Management System - UPDATED
Solicitation number
RFP 34101-250701
Issued by
Davidson County, Tennessee

About this file

This is a Cost Proposal file for the Tennessee Emergency Management Agency (TEMA) Request for Proposals for a Critical Incident Management System (CIMS). The RFP seeks a comprehensive cloud-based software solution to enhance emergency management capabilities across Tennessee, with primary deliverables including cloud-based software licensing, system configuration, integration with ESRI ArcGIS Online with bidirectional data synchronization (maximum 10-minute delay), implementation services, comprehensive training and knowledge transfer, and 24/7/365 technical support with defined service level agreements. The system must support a minimum of 300 concurrent users and 5,000 provisioned user accounts with surge capacity to 600 simultaneous users, achieve FedRAMP Moderate compliance and NIST 800-53 security controls, provide role-based access control with no-code/low-code administrative configuration capabilities, and include disaster recovery capabilities with a 4-hour Recovery Time Objective and 15-minute Recovery Point Objective. Sealed cost proposals were due July 7, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. central time, with a mandatory pre-response conference held May 22, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. CST via Microsoft Teams. The top three ranked proposers were scheduled to present orally on July 27-29, 2026, with a Notice of Intent to Award anticipated August 6, 2026, and contract effective date of September 15, 2026. The contract term is 60 months with potential renewal or extension options negotiable with the selected contractor.

The estimated maximum contract value is $800,000 for the full 60-month term, encompassing software licensing, implementation charges, annual SaaS subscription fees, base user licensing for up to 5,000 provisioned accounts and 300 simultaneous users, and unit pricing for additional users and accounts above baseline quantities. The proposed solution must be the vendor's primary commercial product purpose-built for emergency management or disaster response, commercially offered for at least three consecutive years prior to the RFP release date, and offered as a no-code/low-code platform. The contractor must maintain cyber liability insurance of at least $3 million per occurrence and comply with all FedRAMP and NIST security requirements throughout the contract term. No set-aside designations or restrictions limiting eligible respondent organizations based on disadvantaged enterprise status have been identified in the available documentation. Integration with ESRI ArcGIS Online is a mandatory existing technology requirement that the selected system must support through bidirectional feature service integration and automated synchronization capabilities.

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Cost Proposal

RFP 34101-250701 RFP ATTACHMENT 6.3.
COST PROPOSAL & SCORING GUIDE
NOTICE: THIS COST PROPOSAL MUST BE COMPLETED EXACTLY AS REQUIRED
COST PROPOSAL SCHEDULE— The Cost Proposal, detailed below, shall indicate the proposed price for providing goods or services as defined in the Scope of Services of the RFP Attachment 6.6., Pro Forma Contract, for the entire contract period. The Cost Proposal shall remain valid for at least 120 days subsequent to the date of the Cost Proposal opening and thereafter in accordance with any contract resulting from this RFP. All monetary amounts shall be in U.S. currency and limited to two (2) places to the right of the decimal point.
Please provide your Cost Proposal cost in the provided areas below, highlighted in GREEN.
NOTICE:The Evaluation Factor associated with each compensable unit is for evaluation purposes only. The evaluation factors do NOT and should NOT be construed as any type of volume guarantee or minimum purchase quantity. The evaluation factors shall NOT create rights, interests, or claims of entitlement in the Respondent.
Notwithstanding the cost items herein, pursuant to the second paragraph of the Pro Forma Contract, Section C.1. (refer to RFP Attachment 6.6.), “The State is under no obligation to request any goods or services from the Contractor in any specific dollar amounts or to request any goods or services at all from the Contractor during any period of this Contract.”
This Cost Proposal must be signed, in the space below, by an individual empowered to bind the Respondent to the provisions of this RFP and any contract awarded pursuant to this RFP. If the individual signing this Cost Proposal is not the President or Chief Executive Officer, the Respondent must attach evidence to the Cost Proposal showing the individual’s authority to legally bind the Respondent.
RESPONDENT SIGNATURE:
PRINTED NAME & TITLE:
DATE:
RESPONDENT LEGAL ENTITY NAME:
Goods or Services DescriptionAmountState Use ONLY
(per compensable increment)Proposed CostEvaluation FactorEvaluation Cost

(cost x factor)

System Implementation, including all implementation services necessary to deliver a production-ready CIMS in accordance with the Contract. Total to be paid based on the implementation milestones below.Total Implementation Cost:10.00
PhasePhase DescriptionPercentage of Total Implementation Cost
1Project Management Plan submitted within fifteen (15) business days after the Effective Date and approved by the State.
Reference Proforma section A.3.5(a)5%-
2System Architecture and Design Plan submitted within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date and approved by the State.
Reference Proforma section A.3.5(b)10%-
3Comprehensive Test Plan developed and submitted for State review and written approval prior to execution.
Reference Proforma section A.3.5(c) - (d)10%-
4Functional, system, integration, performance, and security testing completed in accordance with the approved Comprehensive Test Plan, including testing under simulated emergency and disaster response conditions. The Functional Test Results Report shall be delivered to the State for review prior to UAT.
Reference Proforma section A.3.5(c) - (f)15%-
5User Acceptance Testing completed with State participants; all critical defects resolved or otherwise accepted in writing by the State prior to production; and the Defect Tracking Log reflects the status and closure of identified defects as required by the Contract.
Reference Proforma section A.3.5(e), (g)-(h)25%-
Yearly Subscription Charges – The Contractor’s compensation shall be paid in advance in accordance with this Contract
Year 1 - SaaS Subscription (Includes Hosting, Maintenance & Support) after the State’s written acceptance that the Service is production-ready and available for production use.$ - 01$ - 0
Year 2 - SaaS Subscription (Includes Hosting, Maintenance & Support).$ - 01$ - 0
Year 3 - SaaS Subscription (Includes Hosting, Maintenance & Support).$ - 01$ - 0
Year 4 - SaaS Subscription (Includes Hosting, Maintenance & Support).$ - 01$ - 0
Year 5 - SaaS Subscription (Includes Hosting, Maintenance & Support).$ - 01$ - 0
User Licenses - The Contractor’s compensation shall be paid in advance in accordance with this Contract
Years 1 – 5 - Base User Licensing — Provisioned Accounts : Annual price for up to 5000 provisioned (named) user accounts.$ - 05$ - 0
Years 1 – 5 - Base User Licensing — Simultaneous Users: Annual price for up to 300 simultaneous (concurrent) users$ - 05$ - 0
Additional Provisioned Accounts / Expansion: Unit price per additional provisioned account above the base.$ - 01$ - 0
Additional Simultaneous Users / Expansion: Unit price per additional simultaneous user above the base.$ - 01$ - 0
EVALUATION COST AMOUNT (sum of evaluation costs above):0.00
The Solicitation Coordinator will use this sum and the formula below to calculate the Cost Proposal Score.

Numbers rounded to two (2) places to the right of the decimal point will be standard for calculations.

lowest evaluation cost amount from all proposalsx 30 (maximum section score)=
evaluation cost amount being evaluatedSCORE:
State Use – Solicitation Coordinator Signature, Printed Name & Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .