Questions and Responses 1.pdf
PDF 331 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mapping Services and Data Management
- Solicitation number
- RFP-14699
- Issued by
- Wakulla County, Clewiston City, Florida
About this file
This is a Questions and Responses document issued by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) addressing proposer inquiries regarding the GIS Mapping Services and Data Management contract opportunity (DOT-RFP-26-3007-CS). The FDOT clarified that all 12 personnel classifications must be included in proposals to be considered responsive, and that vendors should provide estimated staff hours for each position across Tasks A through D outlined in the scope of services. Key personnel are defined as those meeting RFP Section 8.2 requirements, while technical staff perform as-needed technical functions, with potential overlap between categories. The Department confirmed that on-site staffing is not a standard requirement but may be necessary for specific project needs, occasional team meetings, emergency event support, and periodic needs assessment meetings, with routine work acceptable remotely. Additionally, FDOT clarified that no Small Business Enterprise (SBE) is required, onsite billing rates are not applicable under this contract, and qualifications verifiable through state and federal databases will be validated by the Department, with staff resumes and prior experience sections addressing licenses, certifications, and project history.
The FDOT responses address procedural matters including guidance on proposal submission timelines, availability percentages for proposed staff, and incorporation of supplemental qualification requirements from the Scope of Services into proposal documents, with staff certificates attachable at proposal end without page count inclusion. The responses confirm that an addendum was issued to address deadline extension concerns and that question responses would be made available as soon as possible to allow proposers adequate time for proposal revisions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 40
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Florida Department of Transportation
RON DESANTIS
GOVERNOR
605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
JARED W. PERDUE, P.E.
SECRETARY
www.fdot.gov
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 1/20/2026 To: All Proposers RE: Questions and Answers 1 Proposal ID: DOT-RFP-26-3007-CS Description: GIS Mapping Services and Date Management
1. Could you please advise when responses to submitted questions will be made available?
Response: As soon as possible
2. Additionally, would FDOT consider extending the submission deadline to ensure adequate time for proposers to incorporate any changes to our proposal based on those answers?
Response: An addendum was issued to address.
3. The billing rates for onsite staff generally differ from those for personnel assigned to our facilities. The rates table provided in the Price Proposal Form does not reflect this distinction. Could you please advise on the preferred method for submitting the onsite rates?
Response: There are no provisions under this contract for onsite personnel.
4. Is the Vendor required to provide staff in all 12 personnel classifications to be considered for award?
Response: Yes, all 12 personnel classifications need to be provided to be considered responsive.
5. Section 2b of the Technical Proposal states, “The approximate percent of time to be devoted exclusively for this project and to the assigned tasks should also be indicated.” However, because Task Work Orders have not yet been defined, what guidance does FLDOT provide to help proposers estimate the percentage of time for the project? Also, should the percent of time be listed for each individual task outlined in the scope of services?
Response: The vendor should address in their proposal the percentage of time the proposed staff are available for use in this agreement.
6. In Section 4 of the Technical Proposal, could you please explain how proposers are expected to estimate staff hours when Task Work Orders have not been provided?
Response: Please provide estimated staffhours for each position on their team for each task and their associated subtasks defined in the scope (Tasks A – D).
7. The evaluation system assigns points for both Key Personnel Qualifications and Technical Personnel. Could you clarify how these two categories differ, and indicate where details about technical personnel, if they are distinct, should be placed within the proposal?
Response: Key personnel are those who meet the requirements in Section 8.2 of the RFP. Technical staff are those who will be utilized on an as-needed basis to perform technical functions and/or tasks required in the scope. There may be overlap between the two.
8. Section IX, Qualifications of Exhibit A Scope of Services, outlines additional requirements that must be addressed in the proposal. Given that Section 21, Proposal Format Instructions, stipulates adherence to the prescribed outline to avoid proposal rejection, where should these items be incorporated within the proposal document?
Response: The qualifications that can be verified through state and/or federal databases will be verified by the Department. Experience, licenses, certifications, and/or previous project experience should be addressed on staff resumes, and/or the prior relevant experience section of the technical plan. Copies of certificates for individual staff may be attached at the end of the proposal and will not be included in the page count.
9. Could you confirm whether an SBE is required for this project?
Response: An SBE is not required for this project.
10. There is mention of "Demonstrated ability of supplying staff for onsite services for a duration of 6 months or greater" in the RFP, can you clarify if the Department seeks staff to be present "onsite" for this engagement? Or if staff working remotely would be acceptable?
Response: On-site staffing is not a standard requirement; however, this language is included in the contract to allow for on-site presence should a specific project necessitate it. While routine work may be performed remotely, there will be instances where on-site participation is required, including occasional team meetings, emergency event support, and periodic needs assessment meetings for upcoming or potential projects.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .