Questions_and_Comments_Document_-_SWC_242.pdf

PDF 238 KB Posted

Attached to
SWC 242 Ground Maintenance Equipment/UTVs/ATVs
Solicitation number
Event 32110-13514
Issued by
Anderson County, Tennessee

About this file

This document is an Invitation to Bid (ITB) for SWC 242 Ground Maintenance/UTVs/ATVs issued by the State of Tennessee Department of General Services, Central Procurement Office. The ITB amends and clarifies responses to questions and comments related to the specifications, evaluation model, general requirements, and terms and conditions. Key details include: Bidders are allowed to bid on multiple brands that meet the specifications, but OEMs are excluded from this opportunity. The evaluation will consider the offered discount in addition to conformity with specifications and bid compliance. Pricing is required to be firm for 365 days, with quarterly catalog price updates. The contract will award one dealer per brand per territory, and residential grade equipment is not permitted - all items must be commercial grade.

Regarding pricing, the MSRP should only include the item cost without freight or setup charges. Labor rates are also required to be quoted on an hourly basis for repairs. The evaluation model has been simplified for Category 7 Motorized Hand Tools, requiring only brand and discount information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_A_-_Purchasing_Regions_and_counties_of_TN.pdf PDF
ITB_Amendment_1_SWC_242.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Comments_Document_-_SWC_242.pdf PDF
SWC_242_Ground_Maintenance_Equipment_UTVs_ATVs.pdf PDF
SWC242_General_Specs.pdf PDF
ITB_Amendment_2_SWC_242.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_Equipment_Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_-_SWC_242_Eval_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TCs_32110-13456-13514.pdf PDF
ITB_Amendment_1_SWC_242.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Purchasing_Regions_and_counties_of_TN.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Comments_Document_-_SWC_242.pdf PDF
SWC_242_Ground_Maintenance_Equipment_UTVs_ATVs.pdf PDF
TCs_32110-13456-13514.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_-_SWC_242_Eval_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SWC242_General_Specs.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_Equipment_Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_-_SWC_242_Eval_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SWC_242_Ground_Maintenance_Equipment_UTVs_ATVs.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_Equipment_Specifications.pdf PDF
SWC242_General_Specs.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Comments_Document_-_SWC_242.pdf PDF
ITB_Amendment_1_SWC_242.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Purchasing_Regions_and_counties_of_TN.pdf PDF
TCs_32110-13456-13514.pdf PDF
SWC242_General_Specs.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_-_SWC_242_Eval_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SWC_242_Ground_Maintenance_Equipment_UTVs_ATVs.pdf PDF
TCs_32110-13456-13514.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Purchasing_Regions_and_counties_of_TN.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_Equipment_Specifications.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ITB # 32110-13456-13514 – Questions & Comments

STATE OF TENNESSEE

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, CENTRAL PROCUREMENT OFFICE

INVITATION TO BID # 32110-13456-13514

FOR SWC 242 Ground Maintenance/UTVs/ATVs

DATE: 11/5/2024

ITB # 32110-13456-13514 IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. State responses to questions and comments in the table below amend and clarify this ITB.

Any restatement of ITB text in the Question/Comment column shall NOT be construed as a change in the actual wording of the ITB document.

Comments, Questions and Answers ITB Section Question/Comment Answer

1. Specifications Attachment B/Evaluation Model

For Category 9, there is a model that is now obsolete, the New Holland T4 Series. Do I bid on that obsolete item, or do I bid on its replacement model the New Holland Workmaster Series?

If an item listed in Columns A and B of the Evaluation Model is found to be obsolete, please select “Equivalent Item” from the drop-down menu in Column G and list the replacement item in Columns H and I.

2. Evaluation model

How should bidding multiple brands within the same specification be handled?

Bidding for multiple brands in the same category is allowed. All of the categories listed in the evaluation model have two to four lines where brands can be entered. Brands that meet specifications should be listed in Columns, G, H, and I of the Evaluation Model. If you are bidding on more brands in a given category than there are available lines, then please submit a second, third, fourth, etc. evaluation model as needed.

3. General Specifications

As an OEM, would our bid be rejected because we’re not a local dealer? Is assigning a dedicated dealer for each territory an option? If assigned dealers are allowed, could we specify that the purchase orders can be made out to the local dealer?

OEMs are excluded from this bidding opportunity. You also cannot assign a dealer for each territory (region). If a dealer that you are associated with would like to bid, they can do so.

4. Evaluation Model/Terms

When submitting bid pricing, are we allowed to quote freight and setup as separate line

Freight and set-up costs are not allowed to be charged to the State.

The MSRP given should be the price and Conditions items or does that cost have to be rolled into the MSRP catalog price?

of the of the item only without extra charges being rolled into it. Please refer to the Terms and Conditions Section 3.16. which states:

Respondent's prices shall include delivery of all items F.O.B. destination or as otherwise specified by the State.

5. Specifications Attachment B/Evaluation Model

The single award says it will award one dealer per brand per territory. Is the intent to only award one brand per category or can there be multiple brands awarded for each category?

Multiple brands have historically been made available on contract for each category. All brands will be considered if they meet the specifications provided.

6. Evaluation Model

Can a category/specification be added for PTO driven or tractor-pulled equipment as well as remote control equipment?

The State has opted not to include these items as categories to this contract at this time. This is subject to change in the future should it be determined that the inclusion of these items is in the best interest of the State.

7. Evaluation Model

Is the evaluation going to be based on the Discount or

MSRP?

The discount offered plays a factor in this evaluation as well as the dealer’s ability to perform, conformity with specifications, and compliance with bid factors. The evaluation is not based on MSRP.

8. Terms and Conditions/ Evaluation Model

Is the State asking for firm pricing for more than 365 days since the bid is taking place in November 2024?

The firm price period on this contract has been set as 365 days for labor rates only. The intervals for catalog price updates will be quarterly starting on day one of the contract.

9. Terms and Conditions

In the previous iteration of the contract, the contract was amended to allow quarterly price updates. Will this still be in place, or will price updates happen at a different frequency?

Please see the answer to question #8.

10. General Specifications

Are residential grade equipment items allowed on this contract?

No, all items being offered and sold to the State must be of commercial grade. Please see general specifications section 1.3 for more information.

11. Evaluation Model

On the evaluation model labor tab, what exactly is the labor quote for? Is it for Oil Changes, etc.?

The labor is an hourly rate for all labor repairs provided at the dealer’s facility. Oil changes would be an example of one type of repair.

12. Evaluation Model

On the Bid Sheet it asks for Manufacturer Name, Manufacturer Model and MSRP. With the inclusion of MSRP on the Bid sheet does that mean quote each vehicle for the Model Lineup for Polaris Rangers—in this case approximately 56 different vehicles meet these specifications?

We are looking for a quote for one vehicle only that meets the specifications. If the make and model number are an exact match to what the State has listed in Columns A and B, then you would select “Exact Match” in Column G. If it is a similar item to what the State has listed in Columns A and B, then you would select “Equivalent Item” in Column G and then list the make and model of that item in Columns H and I.

Please note if awarded a brand in a region, you are expected to make all models available to the State in that given region with that awarded brand.

13. Evaluation Model

For Category 7 many of the lines have been blacked out. Is there a reason for this?

For Category 7 (Motorized Hand Tools), we are looking for the brand and blanket discount only. The MSRP calculations, and specific models have been removed.

2. Summary of Changes. Changes made as a result of the Question and Comment Period are as follows:

Language regarding catalog updates has been added to the General Specifications. This includes sections 2.4, 2.4.1, and 2.4.2.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .