PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation - Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) contract for the FDA Forensic Chemistry Center Project
Solicitation number
47PF0020R0057S
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance reference questionnaire for evaluation of contractors on previous federal contracts. It requests information on budget, schedule, staffing, administration, safety, project management, and overall performance for a reference project. The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for a Construction Manager as Constructor contract for the FDA Forensic Chemistry Center Project. The General Services Administration intends to award a guaranteed maximum price contract to modernize outdated systems and expand laboratory spaces to meet the FDA's long-term requirements. Responses are due as outlined in the solicitation document attachments. The proposed project location is in Cincinnati, Ohio.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EpsteinCombinedPart-4.pdf PDF
EpsteinCombinedPart-3Part-2.pdf PDF
EpsteinCombined Part 1.pdf PDF
EpsteinCombinedPart-2Part-1.pdf PDF
EpsteinCombinedPart-3Part-1.pdf PDF
EpsteinCombinedPart-2Part-2.pdf PDF
Appendix A.pdf PDF
Appendix H.pdf PDF
Appendix B.pdf PDF
Amendment 02_47PF0020R0057S.pdf PDF
Drawings Amendment 02.pdf PDF
Appendix J.pdf PDF
Appendix I.pdf PDF
Appendix E.pdf PDF
Concept Design Report.pdf PDF
Appendix F.pdf PDF
Pre Alteration Assessment Survey.pdf PDF
Appendix D.pdf PDF
Appendix C.pdf PDF
Amendment 01_RFP 47PF0020R0057S.pdf PDF
02_08_60_Lead_Mitigation.doc DOC document
Wage Determnation.pdf PDF
R5_Asbestos_Pre-Alteration_Assessment_Guidance.pdf PDF
Appendix-F_GPC_Checklist.pdf PDF
GSA 013200 Construction Progress Documentation FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
FDA CMc Solicitation_SOW.pdf PDF
Appendix-E_LEED-CI_Scorecard.pdf PDF
GSA 016000 Product Requirements FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
GSA 015930 Security Regulations FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
GSA 014025 Quality Control Testing for Air Barriers FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
GSA 011400 Work Restrictions FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
Appendix-D_InteriorDesign_Concepts.pdf PDF
SSL_TLS_Implementation_Guide_10-17-2016.docx DOCX document
GSA 019113 Commissioning FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
Appendix-H_ProjectLocation_FIRM_Map.pdf PDF
GSA_ACM_Notification_Form.pdf PDF
FDA-FCC_ConceptNarrative.pdf PDF
GSA 014100 Structural Testing Laboratory Services FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
GSA 013000 Electronic Project Management FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
Appendix-A_MeetingMinutes.pdf PDF
GSA 014000 Quality Assurance_Control FY15 Update Oct 1_2014.docx DOCX document
GSA 018111 Sustainable Design Requirements FY15 Update Oct. 1 2014.docx DOCX document
Appendix-C-DepartmentalDrawings.pdf PDF
FDA CMa and CXa SOW.pdf PDF
Peck DID Drawings.pdf PDF
GSA Smart Buildings Program Guide_v11.pdf PDF
SF24.pdf PDF
FDA Equipment_Responsibility_ Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
GSA 013220 Photographic Documentation FY15 Update Oct. 1, 2014.docx DOCX document
GSA 015950 Safety_Health FY15 Update Oct 1_2014.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 95 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR: _____________________________

Reference Information Name:

Company/Agency:

Telephone Number:

Title:

Contract Number:

Location of Contract Performance:

Start Date:

Completion Date:

Project Cost:

Type of Contract:

Square Footage:

1. Please provide a brief description of the project and if services included laboratories and/or office renovations.

Comments:

BUDGET

2. Did the contractor complete the project within the original contract budget? If not, what was the reason for the difference in actual costs for the project?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A

Comments:

SCHEDULE

3. Did the contractor cause any delays to the original project schedule? If so, what was the reason for delays?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

STAFFING

4. Did the contractor staff the job adequately? Were key personnel adequately qualified for their positions?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

ADMINISTRATION

5. How responsive and responsible was the contractor in administrative areas? (e.g. submitting reports, documenting progress/problems, filing correspondence, tracking changes, responding to Requests for Information (RFI’s), processing payments, etc.)

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

SAFETY

6. Did the contractor address safety issues? (Developed a good safety plan, followed it, enforced it with subcontractors, posted OSHA information, etc.)

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

7. Did the prime contractor manage the subcontractors effectively? (Coordinate work, update them on changes, pay promptly, address work if performance was poor, etc.) How well did the contractor demonstrate sensitivity to client/tenant concerns (coordination issues, debris, noise, fumes, inconveniences, disruptions within the occupied spaces, etc.)?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

PERFORMANCE

8. Overall, how would you rate the contractor’s performance? How would you describe the quality of work? If you had a chance, would you hire the contractor again? Why or why not?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

Would you like to make any additional comments, positive or negative, concerning the Offeror’s past performance on your contract(s)?

SAFETY

9. Did the contractor address safety issues? (Developed a good safety plan, followed it, enforced it with subcontractors, posted OSHA information, etc.)

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

10. Did the prime contractor manage the subcontractors effectively? (Coordinate work, update them on changes, pay promptly, address work if performance was poor, etc.) How well did the contractor demonstrate sensitivity to client/tenant concerns (coordination issues, debris, noise, fumes, inconveniences, disruptions within the occupied spaces, etc.)?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

PERFORMANCE

11. Overall, how would you rate the contractor’s performance? How would you describe the quality of work? If you had a chance, would you hire the contractor again? Why or why not?

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:

Would you like to make any additional comments, positive or negative, concerning the Offeror’s past performance on your contract(s)?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .