Past Performance - Basewide Custodial.docx

DOCX document 49 KB Posted

Attached to
Base-wide Custodial - Fort Novosel
Solicitation number
W9124G24Custodial
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire that will be used to evaluate past performance for federal contract opportunities. It contains a set of questions and rating definitions that the Point of Contact will use to provide an assessment of the contractor's performance across several areas, including compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost control, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire requests the contractor's company information, as well as the contact information for the evaluating Point of Contact. The completed questionnaire is to be returned to the specified Contracting Officer within the stated timeframe.

The related federal contract opportunity is for base-wide custodial services at Fort Novosel, AL, solicited by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis. This is a solicitation for the provision of custodial services, and offerors are instructed to carefully review all attached documents.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W9124G24R0005 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
Clarifying Question and Answer Sheet (25 June 2024).pdf PDF
TE-12 Installation Map(s) Fort Novosel REVISED 6-25-2024.docx DOCX document
W9124G24R0005 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
Clarifying Question and Answer Sheet (21 June 2024).pdf PDF
W9124G24R0005 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
SAM.gov - SCA Wage Determination 2015-4631 Rev 26.pdf PDF
Question and Answer Sheet (11 June 2024).pdf PDF
W9124G24R0005 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
TE-3 Enterprise Municipal Custodial Services (Tasks and Frequency) Performance Standards - REVISED 6-4-2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-11.1+Facility+Data FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-6 (Schedule C - Bldgs. 101, 5700) - Revised_03June24.pdf PDF
TE-13 ESTIMATED NIN MAX OCCUPANCY.pdf PDF
Question and Answer Sheet 7 June 2024.pdf PDF
W9124G24R0005 Amendment.pdf PDF
Custodial Site Visit Attendance Roster.pdf PDF
TE-11 Facility Data LOCKED REVISED 4 June 2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-9 (Schedule F - Post Office).pdf PDF
TE-2 Deliverable Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-5 (Schedule B - ALL OTHERS).pdf PDF
TE-8 (Schedule E - Air Force).pdf PDF
W9124G24R0005.pdf PDF
TE-3 Enterprise Municipal Custodial Services (Tasks and Frequency) Performance Standards - FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-6 (Schedule C - Bldgs. 101, 5700).pdf PDF
TE-4 (Schedule A - Museums and Libraries).pdf PDF
TE-11 Facility Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE-10 (Schedule X - Classrooms).pdf PDF
TE-7 (Schedule D - CRC Buildings).pdf PDF
TE-1 Fort Novosel BID- CHART.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TE -12 Installation Map(s) Fort Novosel.docx DOCX document
Fort Novosel BID-SCHEDULE-FOR-CUSTODIAL- Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the following individuals:

Anita McLain, anita.l.mclain.civ@army.mil Courtney DeLosh, courtney.m.delosh.civ@army.mil

Thank you for your assistance.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104)

JAN 22

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .