Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Air Force Test Center (AFTC) is conducting an AIRCREW FLIGHT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Contract Proposal Request for personal services. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Solicitation Number, FA282325Q0061 is for the following personal services: Aircrew Flight Equipment which requires four qualified full-time equivalents (FTEs) with the expertise to execute the defined scope of work in alignment with the Performance Work Statement (PWS), ensuring full compliance with all stipulated deliverables and contractual obligations at Eglin

AFB.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than 08 October 2025 to A1C Abigail Gonzalez at abigail.gonzalez.6@us.af.mil or Gretchen Tubolino Smith at gretchen.tubolino@us.af.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services:

MARKET SEGMENT

Ancillary Services Dental Services Nursing Services Physician Services

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

COMPLEXITY

Number of FTEs:

Number of Credentialed FTEs:

Number of Privileged FTEs:

Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime Subcontractor Teaming Partner Joint Venture

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA Provided qualified HCW’s IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Recruited, placed and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Yes No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.