MSOC_Question_and_Answer_(09-16-16).pdf
PDF 183 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mission Systems Operations Contract (MSOC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- NNJ16100117R
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers – 09/16/2016
NNJ16100117R
MSOC Solicitation Synopsis
Amendment 8
QUESTIONS ANSWERS
Q405: In reference to answer to A374: “No, It is not acceptable for the mentioned data to be combined for all US locations. As to the OSHA logs, as instructed by the RFP, "A copy of each year’s OSHA logs (Forms 300 and 300A) may be submitted or equivalent occupational injury and illness data."
Also answer to question A376: “The scope of the requested information includes all contracts for the proposing company or division during the defined period of past performance. No update to the RFP was believed to be necessary to clarify this question. Therefore, the sentences in the original A255 response, "RFP Section L.16.4 (f) is revised. Refer to the Final RFP for final disposition." should not have been included.
Therefore A255 is updated as follows: "A255: The scope of the requested information includes all contracts for the proposing company or division during the defined period of past performance. To address the Government’s requirements would result in hundreds of pages of safety and health information, which would be onerous on the contractor to submit. Is this the Government’s intent? Please advise.
A405: It is the Government’s intent that the requested information be only for those contracts that have been referenced in the Past Performance volume for the proposing company or division for the defined period of past performance (4 years). It is not the Government's intent for Offerors to provide all safety and health data for the entire company or division.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .