NNJ16100117R_MSOC_RFP_Amendment_2.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

00002

JSC

Scott A. Stephens, Contracting Officer

The purpose of Amendment 2 to the Mission Systems Operations Contract (MSOC) RFP posted on August 10, 2016 is to post additional Questions and Answers (dated 09/16/2016 and 09/22/2016) and update the RFP accordingly.

A list of changes resulting from this Amendment are identified in the “Document Change Log.” Change pages are included for all changes referenced herein.

NASA/Johnson Space Center BR2/Scott A. Stephens 2101 NASA Parkway Houston, TX 77058

4200587134

NNJ16100117R

1 18

09/22/2016

08/10/2016

SCOTT STEPHENS Digitally signed by SCOTT STEPHENS DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=NASA, ou=People, cn=SCOTT STEPHENS, 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=sascott Date: 2016.09.16 14:20:16 -05'00'

09/22/2016

Questions and Answers – 09/16/2016

NNJ16100117R

MSOC Solicitation Synopsis

Amendment 8

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

Q405: In reference to answer to A374: “No, It is not acceptable for the mentioned data to be combined for all US locations. As to the OSHA logs, as instructed by the RFP, "A copy of each year’s OSHA logs (Forms 300 and 300A) may be submitted or equivalent occupational injury and illness data."

Also answer to question A376: “The scope of the requested information includes all contracts for the proposing company or division during the defined period of past performance. No update to the RFP was believed to be necessary to clarify this question. Therefore, the sentences in the original A255 response, "RFP Section L.16.4 (f) is revised. Refer to the Final RFP for final disposition." should not have been included.

Therefore A255 is updated as follows: "A255: The scope of the requested information includes all contracts for the proposing company or division during the defined period of past performance. To address the Government’s requirements would result in hundreds of pages of safety and health information, which would be onerous on the contractor to submit. Is this the Government’s intent? Please advise.

A405: It is the Government’s intent that the requested information be only for those contracts that have been referenced in the Past Performance volume for the proposing company or division for the defined period of past performance (4 years). It is not the Government's intent for Offerors to provide all safety and health data for the entire company or division.

MSOC Solicitation

Amendment 2 Questions and Answers – 09/22/2016

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

Q406: Given that much of the property management and purchasing data resides within the current contractor's Maximo system. Does the Government intend to require MAXIMO as a tool on MSOC? If not, will the Government incumbent contractor to provide an export and in what format?

A406: No, MAXIMO is not required and all on-site property will be NASA property. Additionally, all property and materials are listed in the J-8, Off-Site Government Furnished Property and J-9, On-Site Government Furnished Property Excel spreadsheets. No other data is being provided.

Q407: Statement of Work Para. 1.2.6 & 2.6. Given that the Security Management Plan requires "development and approval of COMSEC Procedures". And given that NASA owns the architecture, Requirements and equipment. Please confirm the contractor is not required to establish a COMSEC account assigned to its Company CAGE code.

A407: The JSC Center COMSEC Account will be used and the Offeror is not required to setup a separate account.

Q408: 52.222-17 - NON-DISPLACEMENT OF QUALIFIED

WORKERS. Please clarify: If the government is stating that the Service Contract Labor Standard FAR clause 52.222-41 does not apply, why is the non-displacement clause (FAR 52.222-

17) being applied? FAR 52.222-17 applies to service contracts for performance by service employees (non-exempt) of the same of similar work at the same location. Predecessor non-exempt employees are offered a right of first refusal only for positions for which they are qualified and a position is available.

A408: The Johnson Space Center (JSC) Contractor Industrial Relations Officer (CIRO) has considered your question and concurs that FAR 52.222-17 is not applicable to the MSOC contract. The prescription for FAR 52.222-17 states: The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers, in solicitations and contracts for (1) service contracts, as defined at 22.001, (2) that succeed contracts for performance of the same or similar work at the same location and (3) that are not exempted by 22.1203-2 or waived in accordance with 22.1203-3. Because the MSOC contract is anticipated to employ less than ten percent of non-exempt service employees, it is not considered to be a “Service Contract” as defined in FAR 22.001. According to FAR 22.001: “”Service contract” means any Government contract, or subcontract thereunder, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees….”.

The Department of Labor interprets the word “principle”.

The Department of Labor (DOL)’s Field Operations Handbook is available at:

http://www.dol.gov/whd/FOH/FOH_Ch14.pdf. Refer to Section 14c07: “In practice, a 10 to 20 percent guideline has been used to determine whether there is more than a minor use of service employees. (See Preamble at 48 Fed.

Reg. 49736, 49743-44 (Oct. 27, 1983).)” An RFP Amendment will be issued to remove FAR 52.222-17 from the MSOC RFP.

http://www.dol.gov/whd/FOH/FOH_Ch14.pdf http://www.dol.gov/whd/FOH/FOH_Ch14.pdf

Q409: J-12 - Standard Labor Categories. Please clarify: If the government is stating that the Service Contract Labor Standard FAR clause 52.222-41 does not apply, why is the non-displacement clause (FAR 52.222-17) being applied? FAR 52.222-17 applies to service contracts for performance by service employees (non-exempt) of the same of similar work at the same location. Predecessor non-exempt employees are offered a right of first refusal only for positions for which they are qualified and a position is available.

A409: See A408.

Q410: DRD-MSOC-0035. Please provide reference to the specific FAR clause describing the exception to SCA by having less than 10% non-exempt positions?

Has a review and advisement been made by the Department of Labor to determine this is not an SCA contract in accordance with SCA as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 29?

A410: See A408. With regard to the Department of Labor review, the Johnson Space Center (JSC) Contractor Industrial Relations Officer (CIRO) contacted the Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division – Clear Lake District Office to inform them that the Contracting Officer intended to waive FAR 52.222-17, Service Contract Labor Standard and to obtain validation of this approach. This office replied verbally that the Contracting Officer had the authority to waive the SCLS, provided that the percent of non-exempt service employees was less than ten percent.

Q411: L16.2, Table L-2a Proposal Volumes and Page Limitations, Volume I. For Sub-factor 1 (Technical Approach), a Narrative and the four DRDs are indicated in the table. For Sub-factor 2 (Management Approach), only the 5 DRDs are indicated in the table. Is a Narrative that accompanies the five plans permitted within Sub-factor 2 (Management Approach), similar to the structure of Sub-factor 1 (Technical Approach)?

A411: Although not required in accordance with Section L L16.3.2, any supporting rationale provided for Sub-Factor 2 (Management Approach) will be evaluated per Section M3.2.

Q412: L16.3.4, SB1, e. Please clarify if the flow down to first tier large business subcontracts for construction of a public facility should be $1M as stated in the RFP, or $1.5M as stated in FAR 52.219(d)(9). Would like to ensure that SB Plan is compliant with FAR and the RFP Section L, but they appear to be in conflict.

A412: The flow down to first tier large business subcontracts for construction of a public facility should be $1.5M as stated in FAR 52.219-9(d)(9).

The RFP is revised accordingly.

Q413: Section L .16.4(g). Does the definition of "record" mean the actual versus target of small business participation?

A413: Yes, the definition of "record" means the actual small business participation.

Q414: Section L-16.2. As per the directions in Section L.16.2, the plans (DRD-MSOC-0030, DRD-MSOC-0043, DRD-MSOC- 0044, and DRD-MSOC-0057) in the Mission Suitability Volume will contain Title Pages, table of contents, acronym lists, etc.

that will be numbered with lower case numbers. As such, please confirm that the pages numbered with roman numerals will not count against the overall page count in the Mission Suitability Factor.

A414: Title pages, table of contents, cross-reference matrices, glossaries, acronym lists, page tabs, and section dividers that do not contain information that can be construed as proposal information will not be counted as part of the page limitations. However, these pages shall be numbered with lower case Roman numerals (i, ii, iii, etc.).

The instructions in Section L-16.2 (c) also apply to the DRDs since they are part of the proposal.

Q415: L16.5 (d)(3c). Does the Prime Offeror's LPT template intended to be contain only the prime Offeror's workshare of proposed hours and direct labor rates?

Does the Prime Offeror need to complete an LPT for all major and minor subcontractors? If so, we have no insight into subcontractor direct labor rates.

A415: The LPT template is to be completed by each prime and major subcontractor. The LPT would reflect the direct labor hours associated with the effort to be performed by the prime and each major subcontractor. Minor subcontractors are not required to complete the LPT per the RFP instructions.

Major subcontractors may submit proprietary data (i.e., the completed EPM) directly to the Government or thru the Prime Offeror, as deemed appropriate by the Offeror and their team members.

Q416: L16.5 (d)(3c). If the prime Offeror's LPT template only contains the prime Offeror's workshare in terms of hours, then it cannot be reconciled to the "Proposed Hours" column on the TRST-CF template which contains the hours on the entire proposed team. Shall the Prime Offeror's TRT-CF & TRST-CF templates be copied down vertically to show the effort for each teammate (major and minor)?

A416: The LPT template for the prime Offeror will not reconcile to the TRST-CF template unless the prime Offeror is performing 100% of the MSOC effort. The data shown on the TRST-CF MUST represent the total effort of the entire team per the RFP instructions. It is not required to provide a separate TRT-CF or TRST-CF template for each subcontractor, but the prime Offeror may do so if they desire. Note: The Government will trace the hours proposed for subcontractors from/to the subcontractors proposed data points. It is important that the hours proposed by the subcontractors reconcile to the hours proposed by the prime Offeror for the subcontractors.

Q417: L16.5 (d)(4c) & the "MST" tab in the EPM. Does Colum F (Fee rate in FBR) on the "MST" tab intended the represent the Fee rate the minor subcontractor has included in their rates to the prime?

Or is this intended to represent the fee the prime Offeror is including on the sminro subcontractors FBR? If so do the minor subcontractor's rates in columns G thru N include the prime Offeror's fee on minor subcontractor's FBRs?

A417: Yes, Column F on the “MST” tab of the EPM represents the fee rate included in the minor subcontractor’s proposed FBR. The proposed FBR for the minor subcontractor does not include the prime Offerors fee rate. The Columns G thru N on the MST tab of the EPM includes the fee rate (identified on Column F of the MST tab) proposed, and included in, the minor subcontractors proposed FBR. No column on the MST tab is to include the prime Offerors proposed fee rate or fee dollars.

Q418: Statement of Work Para. 2.6. Statement of Work paragraph 2.6 requires the contractor to provide security engineering and training and administrative COMSEC equipment. However, DD Form 254 Block 10, a) Communications Security (COMSEC) information is checked

"NO"

Please clarify

A418: Block 10, a) should be checked "YES". The Section J, Attachment J-6, DD Form 254, “CONTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION”) will be updated accordingly.

Q419: L.16.2(c) 5th paragraph. Are page numbers required on both sides of tabs?

A419: Yes.

Q420: L.16.2(a). If the Past Performance Volume is submitted on the requested due date of September 13, 2016, does the volume need to be submitted again along with the other volumes on October 13, 2016?

A420: Submitting the Past Performance Volume on the requested date in the RFP completes the submission requirement and no other submission is required.

Q421: TC templates of the EPM. Are TC (a), TC (b), and TC (c) required for T&M subcontractors over $750,000?

A421: No, TC(a), TC(b), and TC(c) are not required for Time and Material (T&M) subcontractors.

Q422: LPT and OPT templates of the EPM; the example includes linking the hours to the TRST-CF template, which includes all hours (prime + subcontractors) L16.5(d) 3. C and D, which states the hours shown [in the LPT (d.3.C) and OPT (d.3.D)] MUST also reconcile to the hours proposed in the “Proposed Hours” column on the TRST-CF template.

Since the LPT and the OPT templates are required by the Prime and each major subcontractor, please confirm the hours on the LPT and OPT should reflect only those hours proposed by the prime or each major subcontractors (and not an aggregate of the two).

Please confirm the hours on the LPT and the OPT are not required to link to the TRST-CF, and that Offerors may remove this link. Alternatively, please confirm if rows and columns may be added to the TRST-CF to show the separation of hours between prime and subcontractors, while keeping the link in place to the LPT and OPT.

A422: The LPT and OPT templates are to be completed by each prime and major subcontractor. The LPT and OPT templates would reflect the direct labor hours associated with the effort to be performed by the prime and each major subcontractor. The prime's LPT and OPT templates would not include major subcontractor data, and vice versa. The LPT template for the prime Offeror will not reconcile to the TRST-CF template unless the prime Offeror is performing 100% of the MSOC effort. The data shown on the TRST-CF MUST represent the total effort of the entire team per the RFP instructions. It is not required to provide a separate row or column in the TRT-CF or TRST-CF template to show the hours for the prime and each subcontractor, but the prime Offeror may do so if they desire. Note: The Government will trace the hours proposed for subcontractors from/to the subcontractors proposed data points. It is important that the hours proposed by the subcontractors reconcile to the hours proposed by the prime Offeror for the subcontractors.

Also see A415 and A416.

Q423: DRD-MSOC-0017 Staffing and Critical Skills Plan, paragraph c. 2), which states “Staffing of the proposed organization structure including proposed teaming partners and subcontractor personnel, including the numbers and types of for all contract years.” and L 16.5, (d) 3. b. Technical Resources Summary Template – Completion Form (TRST-CF), which states “The “Proposed FTEs” column for Contract Year 2 through Contract Year 8 is the “Proposed FTEs” for Contract Year 1 straight-lined over the proposed period of performance.”

Should Offerors response to DRD-MSOC-0017 for all contract years also be straight-lined with Year 1, consistent with the

TRST-CF?

A423: For proposal pricing purposes contract year 1 TRST- CF should be consistent with the DRD-MSOC-0017 Staffing and Critical Skills Plan. For proposal pricing purposes contract years 2 through 8 should be straight-lined.

However contract years 2 through 8 for DRD-MSOC-0017 Staffing and Critical Skills Plan should reflect your proposed approach to fulfilling the SOW requirements.

Q424: RFP Section L 16.5, (d) 6.e – 6 Phase-In Template (PIT), which states, “this template must be supported by a narrative BOE.” Appendix A – Basis of Estimate (BOE), which includes a Tab for WBS 1.6 Phase-In. The BOEs must match the EPM TRT-CF and TRST-CF. The TRT-CF does not have a WBS 1.6 and Phase-In is not part of the Completion Form Effort.

Could the Government modify Appendix A BOE to remove Tab WBS 1.6 and revise the instructions to state that the BOEs will be 46 pages.

A424: No, Appendix A BOE, Tab WBS 1.6, is not part of the Completion Form Effort. The Appendix A BOE, Tab WBS 1.6, should be consistent with any information provided in the cost proposal associated with the Phase-In Template

(PIT).

Q425: Section M.4 first paragraph: The SEB will evaluate the past performance of the Offeror and major subcontractors, as defined in Section L.16.4. Section L.16.4(e) states prime company and subcontractors may submit additional reference information on experience and past performance for consideration.

If an Offeror submits additional reference information on experience and past performance of minor subcontractors, will this information be included in the evaluation and if so how is it evaluated relative to the past performance information that is submitted as part of L.16.4(c), specific contract citations?

A425: No, As defined in L.16.4.(a); "Offerors, including joint ventures, major subcontractors (proposed subcontracts with an estimated average annual value greater than $10M on MSOC) shall each provide information on up to five past contracts (subject to the page limitation constraints)."

Q426: C 2.15. All contract management special project support will be enabled through IDIQ. Please clarify the definition of "contract management special project support".

A426: Contract Management Special Projects are non-baseline projects that are enabled through IDIQ as defined SOW Section 2.0.

Q427: J-20. + OFI --- Proposals shall include a provision that all Sustaining Material purchases and Development and Modification Material purchases specifically identified and directed by the Government shall be purchased without the application of fee. Please clarify the meaning of "specifically identified and directed by the Government" and please provide an example of what this may be. What percentage of the sustaining/development/modification GRE does NASA anticipated this value to be?

A427: The Government can utilize IDIQ Delivery Orders (DO) or other technical direction via the Government provided electronic system to instruct the contractor to procure materials. The DO or other directive may tell the contractor to procure materials without fee. Most items that may not have fee applied fall under modification and sustaining. Examples include renewal of software licenses and maintenance agreements, spares, and next fiscal year material buys.

Q428: J-17. Content: These documents define the standard operating procedures, processes, plans, and guidelines for the operating positions, maintenance, sustaining, and use of Mission Systems. These documents include, but are not limited to, Handbooks, Guides, Procedure Manuals, Work Instructions, Familiarization Documents, Policies, Checklist - Forms, Maintenance Plans, Maintenance Manuals, Operations Manuals, and User Manuals… This content could amount to thousands of documents. What is NASA’s expectation for this delivery (scope, format, etc.)?

A428: The requirements for delivery and format are defined in Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for Mission System Operations, Maintenance, and Sustaining Support Documentation and Checklists - DRD-

MSOC-0052.

Q429: J-20. ** OFI --- (Identify the basis of application for each Overtime and Other Premium Rate(s) (if any) and the conditions wherein each Premium Rate(s) are applied.)

*** OFI --- (Identify the basis of application for each Indirect Cost Rate(s) to be applied to each Non-Labor Resource and Other Premium Cost(s)(if any).)

Are the OFIs to be completed for the prime only, or are they to be composite rates for the team members, being blended to develop the labor rates? How should these be reported if these premium costs are not applied as hourly rates per the company's accounting practice? May the Unit be changed?

A429: The per hour Overtime and other Premium rates are composite rates for the team as identified by the "**" in the J-20 table. The indirect cost rates applied to NLR and other premium costs are prime rates only. Rates are to be proposed in accordance with the company's accounting practices.

Q430: G.5 (b)1.i. The MSOC G5 clause specifically states in (b)1.i The Contractor shall not utilize the installation's central receiving facility for receipt of contractor-acquired property.

Does this imply that we can receive property and/or materials on site at one of the MSOC logistics stores or will materials have to be received at an off-site facility?

A430: G.5 is updated to remove the Alternate 1 associated with NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) NFS 1852.245-71, “Installation-Accountable Government Property.” G.5 (b)(1)(i) is revised accordingly to state: “The Contractor’s purchase order shall require the vendor to deliver the property to the installation central receiving area.” Contractor purchased MSOC property/materials will be received on site at Building 420, then processed by MSOC contractor personnel in Building 416. See provision H.15, Contractor On-Site Logistics for further information.

The RFP is revised to incorporate these changes.

Q431: MSOC Technical Library \Documents\FOD\ FCMS MSOC summary Example.ppt. FCMS MSOC Summary Example describes the "FOD Contract Management System (FCMS)" Slide #2 includes the following language "FOD is moving to a single contract management tool. A number of new procurements are underway and will be required to use this FOD provided tool for the functions described below" Section C Statement of Work para. 2.2 " ... shall be via the Government provided electronic system." Please clarify if the electronic system is FCMS.

A431: Yes, the single contract management tool is FCMS.

Mission Systems Operations Contract (MSOC)

Document Change Log

List of Changes from RFP Amendment 1 to RFP Amendment 2

Section Title Change

A2 Table of Contents Added H.15 MSOC On-Site Logistics

G.5 Receiving Facility Clarification G.5 is updated to remove the Alternate 1 associated with NFS

1852.245-71, “Installation-Accountable Government Property.”

H.15 MSOC On-Site Logistics Added H.15 Clarifies MSOC On-Site Logisitics.

I.1 Remove FAR 52.222-17 In Section I.1, FAR 52.222-17 has been removed.

Attachment J-6 J-6 DOD Security Classification Form

DD254

Updated J-6 2. DOD Security Classification Form DD254, Item 10. a., COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) INFORMATION from

"NO" to "YES".

L.16.3.4, SB1, e. Past Performance, Subfactor 4, Small

Business Utilization Approach

The flow down to first tier large business subcontracts for construction of a public facility is revised from $1M to $1.5M.

Section J

Section L

Section M - No Change

Section A

Section B - No Change

Section C - No Change

Section I

Section F - No Change

Section G

Section H

Section K - No Change

Section D - No Change

Section E - No Change

Section A: A.2 Table of Contents Solicitation # NNJ16100117R

A-3

SECTION G. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA G-1

G.1 Listing of Clauses Incorporated by Reference G-1 G.2 Award Fee for Service Contracts G-2 G.3 Designation of New Technology Representative and Patent

Representative G-3

G.4 Contractor Requests for Government-provided Equipment G-4 G.5 Installation-Accountable Government Property G-6 G.6 Financial Reporting of NASA Property in the Custody of Contractors G-9 G.7 Property Management Changes G-10 G.8 List of Government Property Furnished G-11 G.9 Physical Inventory of Capital Personal Property G-11 G.10 Occupancy Management Requirements G-13 G.11 Security/Badging Requirements for Foreign National Visitors And

Employees/Representatives of Foreign Contractors G-13

G.12 JSC Hazardous Materials Use G-15 G.13 Identification of Employees G-16 G.14 Emergency Preparedness and Response G-17 G.15 Technical Direction G-17

SECTION H. SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS H-1

H.1 Listing of Clauses Incorporated By Reference H-1 H.2 Limitation of Future Contracting H-2 H.3 Export Licenses H-2 H.4 Key Personnel and Facilities H-3 H.5 Level-of-Effort (Cost) H-4 H.6 Submission of Vouchers for Payment H-5 H.7 Environmental and Energy Conservation Requirements H-7 H.8 Administrative Leave H-8 H.9 Small Business Subcontracting Goals H-9 H.10 Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA) for MSOC Activities H-9 H.11 Special Provision for Contract Changes H-10 H.12 Non-Government use of NASA Facilities H-11 H.13 No Cost Reimbursement or Fee for Business Development

Associated with the Non-Governmental Use of NASA Facilities H-12

H.14 Requirement for Cost Tracking and Accounting and Associated Business Systems.

H-13

H.15 MSOC Contractor On-Site Logistics H-13

PART II -- CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION I. CONTRACT CLAUSES I-1

I.1 Listing of Clauses Incorporated by Reference I-1 I.2 Approval of Contract I-12 I.3 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility I-12

Section G: Contract Administration Data Solicitation# NNJ16100117R

G-6

G.5 INSTALLATION-ACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY (NFS

1852.245-71) (JAN 2011)

(a) The Government property described in paragraph (c) of this clause may be made available to the Contractor on a no-charge basis for use in performance of this contract. This property shall be utilized only within the physical confines of the NASA installation that provided the property unless authorized by the Contracting Officer under (b) (1) (iv). Under this clause, the Government retains accountability for, and title to, the property, and the Contractor shall comply with the following:

1. NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 4100.1, NASA Materials Inventory

Management Manual

2. NPR 4200.1, NASA Equipment Management Procedural Requirements

3. NPR 4300.1, NASA Personal Property Disposal Procedural Requirements

4. NPR 4310.1A, Artifact Identification and Disposition;

5. NPR 4200.2, Equipment Management Manual for Property Custodians

6. JPR 1281.7B, Control of Customer Property

7. JPR 1281.15, Identification, Handling, Storage, Packaging, Preservation, and Delivery

8. JWI 4200.1A, Management of Controlled Equipment

9. JWI 4210.2, JSC Instructions for Control of Program Stock (formally JSC-

26549)

10. JWI 4300.1A, JSC Instructions for Excess and Disposal of Government

Property

11. JWI 6050.1A, Procedures for Processing Shipments from JSC

Property not recorded in NASA property systems must be managed in accordance with the requirements of FAR 52.245-1, as incorporated in this contract.

The Contractor shall establish and adhere to a system of written procedures to assure continued, effective management control and compliance with these user responsibilities. In accordance with FAR 52.245-1(h)(1) the contractor

Section G: Contract Administration Data Solicitation# NNJ16100117R

G-7 shall be liable for property lost, damaged, destroyed or stolen by the contractor or their employees when determined responsible by a NASA Property Survey Board, in accordance with the NASA guidance in this clause.

(b)(1) The official accountable recordkeeping, financial control, and reporting of the property subject to this clause shall be retained by the Government and accomplished within NASA management information systems prescribed by the installation Supply and Equipment Management Officer (SEMO) and Financial Management Officer. If this contract provides for the Contractor to acquire property, title to which will vest in the Government, the following additional procedures apply:

(i) The Contractor’s purchase order shall require the vendor to deliver the property to the installation central receiving area.

(ii) The Contractor shall furnish a copy of each purchase order, prior to delivery by the vendor, to the installation central receiving area.

(iii) The Contractor shall establish a record for Government titled property as required by FAR 52.245-1, as incorporated in this contract, and shall maintain that record until accountability is accepted by the Government.

(iv) Contractor use of Government property at an off-site location and off-site subcontractor use requires advance approval of the Contracting Officer and notification of the Industrial Property Officer. The property shall be considered Government furnished and the Contractor shall assume accountability and financial reporting responsibility. The Contractor shall establish records and property control procedures and maintain the property in accordance with the requirements of FAR 52.245–1, Government Property (as incorporated in this contract), until its return to the installation. NASA Procedural Requirements related to property loans shall not apply to offsite use of property by contractors.

(2) After transfer of accountability to the Government, the Contractor shall continue to maintain such internal records as are necessary to execute the user responsibilities identified in paragraph (a) of this clause and document the acquisition, billing, and disposition of the property. These records and supporting documentation shall be made available, upon request, to the SEMO and any other authorized representatives of the Contracting Officer.

(c) The following property and services are provided if checked:

_X_ (1) Office space, work area space, and utilities. Government telephones are available for official purposes only.

Section H: Special Contract Requirements Solicitation# NNJ16100117R

H-13

REQUIREMENTS FOR COST TRACKING AND ACCOUNTING AND

ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS

(a) Costs for the ISS, SLS, CCP, and future space programs shall be tracked and reported separately in order to comply with requirements that accurate and timely reporting of ISS, SLS, CCP, and other space program costs to the Congress can be accomplished by NASA. These costs are to be reported in accordance with the requirements of NFS 1852.242-73, Contractor Financial Management Reporting. The data must be in suitable format and adequate detail to fulfill obligations placed on NASA. Any cost associated with these requirements shall be included as part of the cost to develop, maintain, revise, and track costs associated with DRD-MSOC-0016, NF533 Cost Reporting, and DRD-MSOC-0012, Status Reports and Reviews.

(b) Additionally, throughout performance of this contract, the Contractor shall employ an accounting and financial system capable of accurately collecting, segregating and recording costs by the contract in accordance with the SOW requirements, the 533, Performance Assessment Plan and Performance Reporting DRDs.

(End of Clause)

MSOC ON-SITE LOGISTICS

(a) JSC Central Receiving, located in Building 420, will serve as the receiving site for vendor procured contractor acquired property related to this contract. JSC Central Receiving will perform a limited receiving process consisting of off-loading receipts, performing a visual inspection of the outer packaging for damage, assigning a control number, entering the item into the JSC tracking system as receipt verification, and set aside for contractor pick-up.

(b) The contractor shall pick up receipts daily from JSC Central Receiving and perform inspection to ensure accuracy and accountability of items received, and establishment of a Government property record in the contractor’s property system in accordance with FAR 52.245-1. The contractor shall be responsible for resolving any freight claims or discrepancies. The contractor shall contact the JSC Installation Property Office for the tagging of items in accordance with NPR 4200.1, NASA Equipment Manual. The contractor shall monitor the situation to ensure verification and NASA tagging by the JSC Installation Property Office Equipment Management Representatives (EMRs) is completed before the contractor distributes the property to their users.

Section H: Special Contract Requirements Solicitation# NNJ16100117R

H-14

(c) After establishment of a property record in the contractor’s property management system, the contractor will transfer the accountability of this property to JSC on a DD1149 or other JSC approved transfer document.

(d) Contractor acquired property fabricated by the contractor and delivered to

JSC as an initial transfer of accountability to JSC will be processed by JSC Central Receiving in accordance with the complete JSC Receiving processes and regulations.

(e) After contract award, the contractor will develop a detailed Associate

Contractor Agreement (ACA) with the Logistics Division contractor regarding processing property through/by JSC Central Receiving.

(End of Clause)

[END OF SECTION]

Section I: Contract Clauses Solicitation# NNJ16100117R

I-6

(a) The use of overtime is authorized under this contract if the overtime premium does not exceed zero or the rates identified in Attachment J-20, Labor Rate Tables.

52.222-3 JUN 2003 CONVICT LABOR

52.222-21 APR 2015 PROHIBITION OF SEGREGATED

FACILITIES

52.222-26 APR 2015 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY

52.222-29 APR 2015 NOTIFICATION OF VISA DENIAL

52.222-35 OCT 2015 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS

52.222-36 JUL 2014 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS

WITH DISABILITIES

52.222-37 FEB 2016 EMPLOYMENT REPORTS ON VETERANS

52.222-50 MAR 2015 COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS

52.222-54 OCT 2015 EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION

52.223-2 SEP 2013 AFFIRMATIVE PROCUREMENT OF BIO-

BASED PRODUCTS UNDER SERVICE AND

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

52.223-3 JAN 1997 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION

AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA -

ALTERNATE I (JUL 1995)

[Insert “None”]

52.223-5 MAY 2011 POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RIGHT-TO-

KNOW INFORMATION – ALTERNATE I,

ALTERNATE II

52.223-6 MAY 2001 DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

J-6.2

J-6 DD Form 254

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

1. CLEARANCE AND SAFEGUARDING

CONTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION a. FACILITY CLEARANCE REQUIRED

Top Secret

(The requirements of the DoD Industrial Security Manual apply to all aspects of this effort)

b. LEVEL OF SAFEGUARDING REQUIRED

Sensitive Compartmented Information

2. THIS SPECIFICATION IS FOR: (X and complete as applicable) 3. THIS SPECIFICATION IS: (X and complete as applicable)

a. PRIME CONTRACT NUMBER a. ORIGINAL (Complete date in all cases) Date (YYMMDD)

b. SUBCONTRACT NUMBER

b. REVISED (Supersedes all previous specs) Revision No.

Date (YYMMDD)

c. SOLICITATION OR OTHER NUMBER Due Date (YYMMDD) c. FINAL (Complete Item 5 in all cases) Date (YYMMDD)

4. IS THIS A FOLLOW-ON CONTRACT? X YES NO. If Yes complete the following

Classified material received or generated under NNJ09HD46C is transferred to this follow-on contract

5. IS THIS A FINAL DD FORM 254? YES X NO. If Yes complete the following

In response to the contractor's request dated N/A , retention of the identified classified material is authorized for the period of N/A .

6. CONTRACTOR (Include Commercial and Government Entity ( CAGE) Code)

a. NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE b. CAGE CODE c. COGNIZANT SECURITY OFFICE (Name, Address, and Zip Code)

DSS-Defense Security Service

7. SUBCONTRACTOR

a. NAME, ADDRESS, AND ZIP CODE b. CAGE CODE c. COGNIZANT SECURITY OFFICES ( Name, Address, and Zip Code)

8. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

a. LOCATION b. CAGE CODE c. COGNIZANT SECURITY OFFICE (Name, Address, and Zip Code) NASA/Johnson Space Center 2101 NASA Parkway Houston, TX 77058-3696

N/A

N/A

9. GENERAL IDENTIFICATION OF THIS PROCUREMENT

10. THIS CONTRACT WILL REQUIRE ACCESS TO: YES NO 11. IN PERFORMING THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL: YES NO

a. COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)

INFORMATION

X a. HAVE ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ONLY AT ANOTHER

CONTRACTOR’S FACILITY OR A GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY

X

b. RESTRICTED DATA X b. RECEIVE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS ONLY X

c. CRITICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON DESIGN INFORMATION X c. RECEIVE AND GENERATE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL X

d. FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA: X d. FABRICATE, MODIFY, OR STORE CLASSIFIED HARDWARE X

e. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION: e. PERFORM SERVICES ONLY X

(1) Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) X f. HAVE ACCESS TO U.S. CLASSIFIED INFORMATION OUTSIDE THE U.S., PUERTO

RICO, U.S. POSSESSIONS AND TRUST TERRITORIES

X

(2) Non-SCI X g. BE AUTHORIZED TO USE THE SERVICES OF DEFENSE TECHNICAL

INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) OR OTHER SECONDARY DISTRIBUTION CENTER

X

f. SPECIAL ACCESS INFORMATION X h. REQUIRE A COMSEC ACCOUNT X

g. NATO INFORMATION X i. HAVE A TEMPEST REQUIREMENT X

h. FOREIGN GOVERNMENT INFORMATION X j. HAVE OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) REQUIREMENTS X

i. LIMITED DISSEMINATION INFORMATION X k. BE AUTHORIZED TO USE THE DEFENSE COURIER SERVICE X

j. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY INFORMATION X l. OTHER (Specify). SEE BLOCK 13 REMARKS

k. OTHER Specify)

X

DD Form 254, DEC 1999 Previous editions are obsolete

Section L: Instructions, Conditions, and Notices Solicitation# NNJ16100117R

L-31

The stated goals represent the minimum for the MSOC contract. If the

Offeror proposes goals higher than the Contracting Officer’s recommendation, the Offeror shall document the methodology behind determining those goals, and their approach to successfully managing the subcontractor and consistently meeting the higher proposed goals in the face of the uncertain environment facing JSC. Offerors shall also address their approach for managing the subcontractor for both positive and negative performance. The Offeror shall also describe in detail their approach for managing and maintaining high goals with an uncertain and unpredictable workload and constant workload fluctuation.

The Plan submitted with the proposal shall be incorporated in Section J as the Small Business Subcontracting Plan and Reports (DRD-MSOC-0009), of the resulting contract. The requirements in the Plan must flow down to first tier large business subcontracts expected to exceed $700,000 or

$1,500,000 for construction of a public facility. Although these first tier large business subcontractors are encouraged to meet or exceed the stated goals, it is recognized that the subcontracting opportunities available to these subcontractors may differ from those suggested in the solicitation based upon the nature of their respective performance requirements.

Offerors are advised that a proposal will not be rejected solely because the submitted Plan does not meet the NASA recommended goals that are expressed in paragraph (b) above in terms of percent of TOTAL

CONTRACT VALUE (basic and all options combined). NASA will consider the amount of work being retained for performance by the prime contractor in-house and the associated rationale when determining whether a subcontracting plan is acceptable. Offerors shall discuss the rationale for any goal proposed that is less than the Contracting Officer’s recommended goal in any category. In addition, the Offeror shall describe the efforts made to establish a goal for that category and what ongoing efforts, if any, the Offeror plans during performance to increase participation in that category.

In addition to submitting a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, Offerors shall complete Attachment L-10, Small Business Subcontracting Tables, which provides a breakdown of the Offeror’s proposed goals, by small business category, expressed in terms of both a percent of TOTAL

CONTRACT VALUE and a percent of TOTAL PLANNED

SUBCONTRACTS. Offerors shall modify the exhibit to show the proposed