NM NP MULTI PMS(1)_7500-001S Forked Lightning Ranch Bridge.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NM NP MULTI PMS(1), Pavement Preservation New Mexico Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 69056724R000026
About this file
This is a bridge inspection report dated May 17, 2022, for the Forked Lightning Ranch Bridge (Structure No. 7500-001S) located in Pecos National Historical Park, New Mexico. The report was prepared by the Federal Highway Administration's Federal Lands Bridge Office.
The inspection reveals the glue-laminated timber multi-beam bridge, built in 1950 and reconstructed in 1999, is in fair condition overall. The bridge spans 76.3 feet across Glorieta Wash with three main spans and has a deck width of 13 feet. Key issues identified include deteriorated and loose running boards, weathered timber decking, random checking throughout, minor cracking in several center span beams, extensive paint failure on exterior beams, cracking in both concrete abutments, and cracked/delaminated concrete at the west pier. The report recommends approximately $18,500 in maintenance work, including tightening timber runners, replacing boards, repainting exterior beams, repairing PVC conduit, and placing engineered riprap for embankment stabilization. The bridge has load ratings ranging from 15-41 tons for different vehicle configurations and is currently posted for a 5-ton load limit with restricted public access.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
FORKED LIGHTNING RANCH BRIDGE
FORKED LIGHTNING ROAD OVER GLORIETA WASH
PECOS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LOOKING WEST
STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/2022
NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
FORKED LIGHTNING RANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
7 - WOOD OR TIMBER NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
14 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 76.3 FT (23.3 M)
8 - WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 25.6 FT (7.8 M)
7 - WOOD OR TIMBER DECK WIDTH: ..................... 13.0 FT (4 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 10.9 FT (3.3 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 1999
PECO DS83 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °
4 - PRIMITIVE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1999-SUPERSTRUCTURE & BEARING SEATS REPLACED, PIERS & ABUTMENTS
REPAIRED. 2007-TIMBER RUNNER REPLACED, PVC CONDUIT INSTALLED ALONG
NORTH RAILING.
LOCATION
PECOS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 1.10 (KM PT 0.34)
STATE: .............................. 356 - NEW MEXICO LOCATION: .... I-25 Exit 307. 3.7 miles N on NM Route 63 to Forked Lightning Ranch. 1.1 milesFACILITY CARRIED: ......... FORKED LIGHTNING ROAD E beyond locked gate on service road to
FEATURE INTERSECTED: GLORIETA WASH
bridge site. Call FM at 505-757-7230 for access.
INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, B. Dietrick
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Bill Dietrick
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 09/27/2022
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This glue-laminated (glulam) timber multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems include deteriorated and loose running boards over the timber deck; weathered and checked timber decking; random checking throughout;minor cracking of the bottom laminate of several beams in center span; extensive paint failure on the exterior rough sawn beams; cracking of both concrete abutments at the bearing area corners;
and cracked and delaminated concrete at the south side of the west pier. It should also be noted that the PVC conduit along the north side is disconnected, and a conduit hanger is missing in the center span. Minor scour holes exist at both piers, and there is minor debris on the upstream nose of the east pier.
The condition of the beams and substructure units will continue to be monitored during future inspections, as will the scour conditions.
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
FORKED LIGHTNING RANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. Consideration should also be given to replacing the existing timber rail with a system meeting current safety standards.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
FORKED LIGHTNING RANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/17/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.1
TIGHTEN TIMBER RUNNERS AND REPLACE BOARDS AS
NEEDED. 1 LS 3000 3000
59.2,59.7
CLEAN AND REPAINT EXTERIOR BEAMS.
1 LS 4000 4000
58.8,60.3
REPLACE MISSING STRAPS FOR PVC CONDUIT ALONG
NORTH RAILING. RECONNECT CONDUIT JUNCTION OVER
CENTER SPAN.
1 LS 1500 1500
60.11, 223.1, 223.5
PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP ALONG NORTHWEST
RETAINING WALL TO STABILIZE EMBANKMENT. RE-
SECURE NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL TIMBERS.
1 LS 10000 10000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 18500
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0
18500TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available.
Consideration should be given to replacing the existing timber rail with a system meeting current safety standards.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
FORKED LIGHTNING RANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/16/2022
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
F
F
F
G
G
N
N
F
N
N
N
N
P
N
G
G
N
G
F
N
F
N
1- SUFF
3 - LOW
N
N
G
G
G
G
F
N
P
N
N
G
F
G
P
2. EXPANSION JOINTS N
3. WEARING SURFACE P
F 14 FT
PARTIAL COLLAPSE
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
SAND
TELEPHONE LINE
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS 09 - SPREAD FTG G
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION G
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS F
N
G
N
F
G
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS 01 - BURIED
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 2" X 4" NAIL-LAMINATED TIMBER DECK. MINOR CHECKING OF TIMBER DECK. TIMBER DECK IS WEATHERED THROUGHOUT. MINOR
SEPARATION OF NAIL-LAMINATED PLANKS AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGE.
58.3 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATING OF TIMBER RUNNING BOARDS. LOOSE CONNECTIONS HOLDING RUNNING BOARDS TO
DECK DUE TO RUNNING BOARD DETERIORATION.
58.5
58.6
MINOR CHECKING AND SPLITTING OF TIMBER RAILS AND CURBS. GOUGES IN RAILING ON SOUTH SIDE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS.
58.7 SMALL HOLES CUT IN DECK IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE. MIGRATION OF GRAVEL ONTO TIMBER DECK AT
EAST END.
58.8 2" PVC CONDUIT ATTACHED TO BOTTOM OF NORTH RAILING; DISCONNECTED JOINT AT MIDSPAN BETWEEN PIERS. 2"
TELEPHONE LINE GALVANIZED CONDUIT ALONG SOUTH RAILING.
59.2 RANDOM MINOR CHECKING OF BEAMS THROUGHOUT. MINOR CRACKING OF BOTTOM LAMINATE IN SEVERAL BEAMS OF CENTER
SPAN #2, #4, #6, AND #10.
FASCIA BEAMS ARE ROUGH SAWN.
59.7 EXTERIOR FACE AND UNDERSIDE OF EXTERIOR BEAMS ARE PAINTED; SEVERE PEELING AND FLAKING OF PAINT THROUGHOUT.
60.1 MINOR TO MODERATE VERTICAL/DIAGONAL CRACKS (UP TO 1/16" WIDE) NEAR CORNERS OF BOTH ABUTMENTS. MODERATE FULL HEIGHT CRACK NEAR MIDDLE OF WEST ABUTMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY SEALED WITH EPOXY. INSIGNIFICANT VERTICAL
CRACKS IN FACE OF WEST ABUTMENT.
UPPER PORTIONS OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WERE REPAIRED WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT IN 1999.
60.5 EXPOSED FOOTING SITTING ON BEDROCK AT EAST ABUTMENT.
60.6 SEVERAL REBARS PROTRUDING FROM END OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AGAINST SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF CONCRETE AT TOP EDGE OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
LARGE TREE GROWING FROM EMBANKMENT BEHIND TOP OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL; SEVERAL SMALLER TREES GROWING AT
BASE.
60.9 CONCRETE PAD IN FRONT OF WEST ABUTMENT IS EXPOSED; NO UNDERMINING NOTED.
60.11 LOOSE, NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP FILL BEHIND WINGWALLS. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF FILL BEHIND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
60.13 CUT FORM TIES EXPOSED ON BOTH PIERS.
WIDESPREAD MINOR SURFACE CRACKING IN NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST PIER WALL. MODERATE VERTICAL CRACK IN UPPER PORTION OF WEST PIER, SOUTH SIDE, WEST FACE. 1'L X 2" DEEP PATCH OF DELAMINATED CONCRETE AT TOP OF WEST FACE OF WEST PIER WALL. MINOR ABRASION IN BOTTOM OF WEST PIER IN EAST FACE. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR
NEAR TOP OF WEST PIER, NORTH SIDE, EAST FACE, DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER.
ISOLATED MINOR HONEYCOMBING OF CONCRETE AT BOTTOMS OF EAST AND CENTER PIERS.
SMALL TREE GROWING ALONG WEST FACE OF WEST PIER.
60.15 MINOR CRACKING OF MORTAR LEVELING PAD FOR STEEL SILL AT WEST PIER AT NORTH END.
60.17 1' DEEP SCOUR HOLE AT UPSTREAM NOSE OF WEST PIER WALL. 2' DEEP SCOUR HOLE AT UPSTREAM NOSE OF EAST PIER WALL.
MINOR CONTRACTION SCOUR HOLE BENEATH EAST SPAN.
61.4 MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH IN AND ALONG UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL. MINOR ACCUMULATION
OF DEBRIS ALONG UPSTREAM NOSE OF EAST PIER.
222.3 MINOR CHECKING AND SPLITTING ON TIMBER APPROACH GUARDRAILS.
222.4 DIRT ROAD APPROACHES LOOK GOOD.
222.5 MIGRATION OF GRAVEL ONTO TIMBER DECK AT EAST END.
222.7 REFLECTORS PRESENT ON EVERY OTHER RAIL POST IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, BOTH DIRECTIONS EXCEPT NEAR NORTHWEST
POST.
"SPEED LIMIT 5" AND "CAUTION, ONE LANE BRIDGE" SIGNS AT WEST APPROACH. 3 CONVEX MIRRORS ON SOUTH SIDE OF EAST
APPROACH.
222.8 SHARP CURVE AND STEEP HILL REDUCE SIGHT DISTANCE SIGNIFICANTLY AT EAST APPROACH. MIRROR INSTALLED AT EAST
APPROACH.
223.1 LOOSE FILL AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL CONTAINED BY SMALL TIMBER POST RETAINING WALL; PORTIONS OF WALL ARE
OVERTURNED OR OVERTURNING; SEVERAL TREES GROWING FROM EMBANKMENT BEHIND RIPRAP.
TIMBER RAILS AT BRIDGE ARE NOT STEEL-BACKED AND ARE OF INSUFFICIENT STRENGTH TO SAFELY REDIRECT AN ERRANT VEHICLE. TRANSITIONS BETWEEN BRIDGE AND APPROACH GUARDRAILS DO NOT MEET CURRENT SAFETY STANDARDS. SPEED
LIMIT IS POSTED AT 5 MPH.
LOG AND CABLE APPROACH GUARDRAILS ARE OF INSUFFICIENT STRENGTH TO SAFELY REDIRECT AN ERRANT VEHICLE.
GUARDRAILS ARE NOT SAFELY TERMINATED AT WEST APPROACH.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 20 18
HS 27 24 36 33
TYPE 3 21 19 28 25
TYPE 3S2 32 29 43 39
TYPE 3-3 41 37 54 49
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 06/02/2002
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: BRIDGE PRIMARILY USED BY LIGHT PARK SERVICE VEHICLES, AND IS CLOSED TO PUBLIC TRAFFIC EXCEPT WITH ESCORT OR BY
PERMISSION.
BRIDGE IS CURRENTLY POSTED FOR 5 TON LOAD LIMIT; LOAD RATING HAS BEEN REVISED AS A RESULT OF 1999 REHABILITATION, AND
POSTING IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: PECOS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............FORKED LIGHTNING RANCH BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........7500-001 S
1 - INTERMOUNTAIN(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 4 - PRIMITIVE
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... PECO DS83
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
356 - NEW MEXICO
35047 SAN MIGUEL
00000
1 6 8 00000 0
GLORIETA WASH
FORKED LIGHTNING ROAD
7500001S0000000
I-25 Exit 307. 3.7 miles N on NM Route 63 to Forked Lightning Ranch. 1.1 miles E beyond locked gate on service road to bridge site. Call FM at 505-757-7230 for access.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
1.10 (KM PT: 0.34 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
3 - MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR NATIONAL
REGISTER
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........7 - WOOD OR TIMBER (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............003 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............25.6 FT ( 7.8 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 76.3 FT ( 23.3 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 7 - WOOD OR TIMBER
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 8 - WOOD OR TIMBER
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............27.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 24.5
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............36.0 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://RATING:
https://RATING:
https://LENGTH:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7500-001S
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35° 32'03.66" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 10.9 FT ( 3.3 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................105°40 '09 02" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 13.0 FT ( 4 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 199 MI ( 199 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............2 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................3 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 10.9 FT ( 3.3 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 7 - T MBER
REQUIRED
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 21 FT ( 0 98 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 5 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................3 (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 1 - MAINTENANCE
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 18500
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 0
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1999-SUPERSTRUCTURE & BEARING SEATS REPLACED, PIERS & ABUTMENTS REPAIRED. 2007-T MBER RUNNER REPLACED, PVC CONDUIT INSTALLED
ALONG NORTH RAILING.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
13 BEAMS IN CENTER SPAN; 14 BEAMS IN END SPANS.
https://32'03.66
Inspector: Bill Dietrick Structure Number: 7500001S0000000
Inspection Date: 05/17/2022 Facility Carried: FORKED LIGHTNING R
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING EAST
PHOTO 4
Description SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO 6
Description MIGRATION OF GRAVEL ONTO DECK AT EAST END - NOTE HEIGHT DIFFERENTAL AND
DETERIORATION OF MIDDLE BOARD OF NORTH RUNNERS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 8
Description DETERIORATED MIDDLE RUNNING BOARD OF SOUTH RUNNERS NEAR WEST END
PHOTO 9
Description MINOR LOOSE CONNECTION OF NORTH RUNNING BOARDS NEAR EAST END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 10
Description DISCONNECTION OF NORTH CONDUIT NEAR EAST END
PHOTO 11
Description SPLIT AND CHECKING IN SOUTH RUNNING BOARD OF NORTH RUNNERS AT WEST END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 12
Description DECK SEPARATION AT END OF SOUTHWEST CORNER
PHOTO 13
Description VEGETATION ENCROACHING SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAIL END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 14
Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT - NOTE CRACKS NEAR ENDS
PHOTO 15
Description VERTICAL CRACK IN NORTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT - SIMILAR AT SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST FACE OF EAST PIER
PHOTO 17
Description MINOR HONEYCOMBING AT BOTTOM OF EAST FACE OF EAST PIER AT NORTH HALF
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 18
Description MINOR HONEYCOMBING AT BOTTOM OF EAST PIER OF WEST FACE NEAR NORTH NOSE
PHOTO 19
Description MINOR DEBRIS AND SCOUR ON NORTH NOSE OF EAST PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 20
Description VERTICAL CRACKING OF BOTTOM LAMINATE IN BEAM #9 OF CENTER SPAN - TYPICAL IN
BEAMS # 2, 4, 6, 10 IN CENTER SPAN
PHOTO 21
Description SHAKE IN BOTTOM OF BEAM #8 OF EAST SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 22
Description EAST FACE OF WEST PIER NEAR NORTH NOSE WITH 3 AREAS OF SPALLING WITH ONE
AREA OF EXPOSED REBAR
PHOTO 23
Description FLOOD DEBRIS UNDER WEST SPAN - NOTE TREE GROWING AGAINST WEST FACE OF
WEST PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 24
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING EAST
PHOTO 25
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF ROUGH SAWN EXTERIOR BEAM WITH SEVERE PAINT LOSS -
EXTERIOR FACE OF SOUTH BEAM NEAR WEST END SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 26
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF ROUGH SAWN EXTERIOR BEAM WITH SEVERE PAINT PEELING -
NORTH BEAM BOTTOM SURFACE SHOWN
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT - NOTE FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN CENTER
AND PARTIAL NEAR SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 28
Description FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN CENTER OF WEST ABUTMENT WITH SPALLING OF
PREVIOUS REPAIRED EPOXY
PHOTO 29
Description NORTHWEST TIMBER RETAINING WALL ROTTED AND PARTIALLY COLLAPSED
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 30
Description SPEED LIMIT SIGN AT WEST APPROACH
PHOTO 31
Description ONE LANE BRIDGE SIGN AT WEST APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 32
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 33
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .