NM NP MULTI PMS(1)_7400-001P Pueblo Bonito Bridge.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
NM NP MULTI PMS(1), Pavement Preservation New Mexico Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
69056724R000026
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This is a bridge inspection report from May 2022 for the Pueblo Bonito Bridge (Structure No. 7400-001P) located in Chaco Culture National Historical Park in New Mexico. The report was prepared by the Federal Highway Administration's Federal Lands Bridge Office.

The report details a routine inspection of the 190-foot long prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge built in 1991, which carries Loop Road over Chaco Wash. The bridge is rated in good to fair condition overall, with several issues noted including extensive random cracking in the concrete deck surface, transverse cracks with efflorescence on the deck underside, and moderate settlement of asphalt approach pavement up to 3 inches. The report recommends repairs totaling $47,500, including $10,000 for maintenance (repairing erosion at wingwalls) and $37,500 for rehabilitation work (installing waterproofing membrane and asphalt to protect the concrete deck, repairing approach settlements, and associated mobilization/traffic control costs). The bridge has a load rating that meets or exceeds its HS-20 design loading, with an operating rating of 62 tons.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE

LOOP ROAD OVER CHACO WASH

CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/2022

EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 190.0 FT (57.9 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 63.5 FT (19.4 M)

1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 22.5 FT (6.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

4 - PILE BENT YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

CHCU 10(1) SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

2 - CONNECTOR ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

2005 & 2013 APPROACHES OVERLAID, 2011-RIPRAP PLACED AT SW CORNER.

LOCATION

CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 5.21 (KM PT 1.59)

STATE: .............................. 356 - NEW MEXICO LOCATION: .... JUST SOUTH OF PUEBLO BONITO, ON ONE-WAY LOOP ROAD.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... LOOP ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: CHACO WASH

INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, B. Dietrick

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Bill Dietrick

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 11/17/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in good to fair condition overall. Extensive random cracking was noted in the top surface of the concrete deck, and transverse cracks with efflorescence were observed in the underside of the deck. In addition, there is moderate settlement of the asphalt approach pavement. Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to help protect this structure from further deterioration.

It should also be noted that the bridge exhibits extensive minor random cracking of the curbs, abutment breastwalls and backwalls, and wingwalls, with efflorescence leaching from the cracks; this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/17/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

60.6,222.

REPAIR EROSION AT WINGWALLS.

1 LS 10000 10000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 10000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.1 INSTALL WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE AND

ASPHALT TO HELP PROTECT CONCRETE DECK

FROM FURTHER DETERIORATION.

1 LS 15000 15000

222.4 REPAIR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES.

1 LS 10000 10000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 12500 12500

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 37500

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/16/2022

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

G

F

G

N

G

G

N

N

N

F

N

N

G

G

N

G

F

F

G

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

F

F

F

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE N

N 15 FT

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SAND

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F

5. FOUNDATIONS 01 - BURIED N

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

G

G

N

G

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE THROUGHOUT; MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING AT PVC SLEEVED DECK DRAINS AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE. MAP CRACKING OF WEST DECK EDGE TOWARD SOUTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING (3' - 5' SPACING) OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH MOISTURE STAINS AND MINOR EFFLORESCENCE

FROM CRACKS.

58.4 SLIGHT BUMP AT ENDS OF BRIDGE DUE TO APPROACH PAVEMENT SETTLEMENT UP TO 3" (SEE 222.6).

58.5 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF CONCRETE CURBS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF TOP OF CURBS.

MODERATE TO HEAVY STAINING OF CURBS FROM WEATHERING STEEL RAILINGS.

58.6 MINOR FAILURE OF CALKING AT BASE OF SEVERAL RAIL POSTS.

58.7 THREE PVC SLEEVED HOLES THROUGH DECK AT ENDS OF BRIDGE. SEVERAL DRAINS HAVE AN UNSLEEVED DEPTH UP TO 2".

59.2 DESIGNED CAMBER IN CENTER SPAN GIRDERS.

SUPERSTRUCTURE AND SUBSTRUCTURE ARE PIGMENTED CONCRETE.

HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACK ON EAST BEAM CLOSURE POUR ABOVE NORTH PIER.

59.6 SPALL (6"L X 8"W X 3"D) IN SOUTH FACE OF BAY #3 DIAPHRAGM OVER NORTH PIER WITH EXPOSED REBAR.

VERTICAL CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGM CLOSURE POURS ON BOTH SIDES OF SOUTH PIER AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH PIER.

MINOR SPALL IN DIAPHRAGM OVER NORTH PIER.

PENDING SPALL/DELAMINATION 12"L X 20"H IN SOUTH FACE OF CENTER BAY DIAPHRAGM AT NORTH PIER.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. CRACK ACROSS TOP OF NORTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT

IN WEST BAY, MATCHING UP WITH VERTICAL CRACK IN BREASTWALL.

EXTENSIVE RANDOM SURFACE CRACKING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS.

60.4 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.

7 INCH LONG X 5 INCH WIDE SHALLOW SPALL IN WEST BAY OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL.

60.6 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF WINGWALLS.

60.9

60.11

MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION AT END AND BESIDE WINGWALLS.

60.13

60.15

WIDESPREAD MINOR SURFACE CRACKING OF PIER COLUMNS.

MINOR EDGE CHIP OF NORTH SIDE OF NORTH PIER CAP BETWEEN CENTER AND WEST COLUMN, MOST LIKELY FROM

CONSTRUCTION.

61.2 RIPRAP AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EMBANKMENT.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

222.3 APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT NORTH END OF BRIDGE ONLY.

MODERATE MAP CRACKING OF APPROACH RAIL POST FOUNDATIONS AT NORTH END.

222.4 TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF NORTH APPROACH ASPHALT PAVEMENT. TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF SOUTH

APPROACH ASPHALT PAVEMENT.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AT ENDS OF WINGWALLS AT ENDS OF BRIDGE.

222.6

222.7

APPROACH PAVEMENT IS NOW 3 INCHES LOW DUE TO SETTLEMENT AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE.

"ONE WAY ROAD NEXT 4 MILES" SIGN AT NORTH APPROACH. MISSING RAIL REFLECTORS AT NORTH APPROACH RAIL CORNERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 31 28 52 47

HS 37 34 62 56

TYPE 3 42 38 70 64

TYPE 3S2 59 54 100 91

TYPE 3-3 71 64 119 108

DESIGN LOADING: 5 - HS 20

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 04/07/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: END SPAN SHEAR

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........7400-001 P

1 - INTERMOUNTAIN(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... CHCU 10(1)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........RG2532

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:............................................ 356 - NEW MEXICO

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 35045 SAN JUAN

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................ 1 6 1 00010 0

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... CHACO WASH

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... LOOP ROAD

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. 7400001P0000000

(9) LOCATION:..................................... JUST SOUTH OF PUEBLO BONITO,

ON ONE-WAY LOOP ROAD.

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(11) MILE POINT:................................. 5 21 (KM PT: 1.59 )

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............63.5 FT ( 19.4 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 190. FT ( 57.9 M)

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE

(CONCURRENTLY PLACED WITH

STRUCTURAL DECK)

B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................5 - HS 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............37 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 33.6

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............62 TONS ( 56.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 09/01/1998 (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 36° 03'28.76" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................107°57 '39.49" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 22.5 FT ( 6.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 4 MI ( 6 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............200 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................300 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 20 FT ( 6.1 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF

FOOTING OR PILES

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 10000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 37500

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2005 & 2013 APPROACHES OVERLAID, 2011-RIPRAP PLACED AT SW CORNER.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

TYPE 502 (P/S GIRDERS) 4 EACH

https://03'28.76

Inspector: Bill Dietrick Structure Number: 7400001P0000000

Inspection Date: 05/17/2022 Facility Carried: LOOP ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN NORTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF APPROACH RAIL FOUNDATION - NORTHWEST FOUNDATION

#2 SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description TYPICAL BROKEN REFLECTORS - NORTHWEST APPROACH SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description SETTLEMENT AT NORTH APPROACH 8.5'L X 8"W X 3"D

PHOTO 10

Description FADED AREA OF WEST SHOULDER STRIPING NEAR NORTH END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE - MINOR ACCUMULATION

ALONG EAST CURBLINE

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING ON WEST CURBLINE OF DECK

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description MINOR SPALLING AND DELAMINATION OF SURFACE COAT OF WEST CURB NEAR SOUTH

END

PHOTO 14

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING IN CURB FACE - SOUTHEAST SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF CAULKING AROUND RAIL POST - POST #2 FROM SOUTH

PIER ON WEST CURB SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING ON EXTERIOR CURB FACE - SOUTHWEST SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description TYPICAL CRACKING ON DECK SURFACE NEAR DRAIN HOLE - SOUTHWEST DRAIN

SHOWN

PHOTO 18

Description 2.5" SETTLEMENT AT SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACK IN SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO 20

Description TYPICAL EROSION AT WINGWALL END - 16" L X 8"W X 4"D NORTHWEST END SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description SETTLEMENT AND EROSION ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL 7'L X 8" H

PHOTO 22

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description SHALLOW SPALL 7"L X 5"H X 3/4"D WITH CRACKING ADJACENT AT NORTH ABUTMENT

BACKWALL IN WEST BAY

PHOTO 24

Description MINOR CRACKING AT NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL WITH SMALL PATCHES IN CENTER

BAY

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT DECK DRAIN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT IN EAST BAY

PHOTO 26

Description DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT DECK DRAIN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT IN

WEST BAY

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER

PHOTO 28

Description SPALL IN NORTH PIER DIAPHRAGM AT SOUTH FACE IN CENTER BAY

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 30

Description TYPICAL MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SOFFIT OF SOUTH

SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER - NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH BELOW CENTER BAY

PHOTO 32

Description VERTICAL CRACK IN EAST FACE OF CLOSURE POUR ABOVE SOUTH PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 33

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 34

Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW EAST BAY

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 35

Description SIGNAGE AT NORTH APPROACH - NOTE MINOR FADING AND HEAVILY CHECKED

PHOTO 36

Description TYPICAL STEEP ERODABLE BANKS - UPSTREAM SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 37

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO 38

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .