NM NP MULTI PMS(1)_7400-001P Pueblo Bonito Bridge.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NM NP MULTI PMS(1), Pavement Preservation New Mexico Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 69056724R000026
About this file
This is a bridge inspection report from May 2022 for the Pueblo Bonito Bridge (Structure No. 7400-001P) located in Chaco Culture National Historical Park in New Mexico. The report was prepared by the Federal Highway Administration's Federal Lands Bridge Office.
The report details a routine inspection of the 190-foot long prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge built in 1991, which carries Loop Road over Chaco Wash. The bridge is rated in good to fair condition overall, with several issues noted including extensive random cracking in the concrete deck surface, transverse cracks with efflorescence on the deck underside, and moderate settlement of asphalt approach pavement up to 3 inches. The report recommends repairs totaling $47,500, including $10,000 for maintenance (repairing erosion at wingwalls) and $37,500 for rehabilitation work (installing waterproofing membrane and asphalt to protect the concrete deck, repairing approach settlements, and associated mobilization/traffic control costs). The bridge has a load rating that meets or exceeds its HS-20 design loading, with an operating rating of 62 tons.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE
LOOP ROAD OVER CHACO WASH
CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LOOKING SOUTH
STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/2022
EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 190.0 FT (57.9 M)
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 63.5 FT (19.4 M)
1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 22.5 FT (6.9 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)
4 - PILE BENT YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .
CHCU 10(1) SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °
2 - CONNECTOR ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
2005 & 2013 APPROACHES OVERLAID, 2011-RIPRAP PLACED AT SW CORNER.
LOCATION
CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: .. 5.21 (KM PT 1.59)
STATE: .............................. 356 - NEW MEXICO LOCATION: .... JUST SOUTH OF PUEBLO BONITO, ON ONE-WAY LOOP ROAD.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... LOOP ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: CHACO WASH
INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, B. Dietrick
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Bill Dietrick
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 11/17/2022
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in good to fair condition overall. Extensive random cracking was noted in the top surface of the concrete deck, and transverse cracks with efflorescence were observed in the underside of the deck. In addition, there is moderate settlement of the asphalt approach pavement. Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to help protect this structure from further deterioration.
It should also be noted that the bridge exhibits extensive minor random cracking of the curbs, abutment breastwalls and backwalls, and wingwalls, with efflorescence leaching from the cracks; this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 05/17/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.6,222.
REPAIR EROSION AT WINGWALLS.
1 LS 10000 10000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 10000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
58.1 INSTALL WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE AND
ASPHALT TO HELP PROTECT CONCRETE DECK
FROM FURTHER DETERIORATION.
1 LS 15000 15000
222.4 REPAIR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACHES.
1 LS 10000 10000
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 12500 12500
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 37500
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 05/16/2022
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
G
F
G
F
G
N
G
G
N
N
N
F
N
N
G
G
N
G
F
F
G
N
1- SUFF
2 - MED
N
N
F
F
F
F
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS N
3. WEARING SURFACE N
N 15 FT
F
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
SAND
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F
5. FOUNDATIONS 01 - BURIED N
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION G
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G
G
G
N
G
G
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE THROUGHOUT; MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING AT PVC SLEEVED DECK DRAINS AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE. MAP CRACKING OF WEST DECK EDGE TOWARD SOUTH ABUTMENT.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING (3' - 5' SPACING) OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH MOISTURE STAINS AND MINOR EFFLORESCENCE
FROM CRACKS.
58.4 SLIGHT BUMP AT ENDS OF BRIDGE DUE TO APPROACH PAVEMENT SETTLEMENT UP TO 3" (SEE 222.6).
58.5 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF CONCRETE CURBS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF TOP OF CURBS.
MODERATE TO HEAVY STAINING OF CURBS FROM WEATHERING STEEL RAILINGS.
58.6 MINOR FAILURE OF CALKING AT BASE OF SEVERAL RAIL POSTS.
58.7 THREE PVC SLEEVED HOLES THROUGH DECK AT ENDS OF BRIDGE. SEVERAL DRAINS HAVE AN UNSLEEVED DEPTH UP TO 2".
59.2 DESIGNED CAMBER IN CENTER SPAN GIRDERS.
SUPERSTRUCTURE AND SUBSTRUCTURE ARE PIGMENTED CONCRETE.
HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACK ON EAST BEAM CLOSURE POUR ABOVE NORTH PIER.
59.6 SPALL (6"L X 8"W X 3"D) IN SOUTH FACE OF BAY #3 DIAPHRAGM OVER NORTH PIER WITH EXPOSED REBAR.
VERTICAL CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGM CLOSURE POURS ON BOTH SIDES OF SOUTH PIER AND WEST SIDE OF NORTH PIER.
MINOR SPALL IN DIAPHRAGM OVER NORTH PIER.
PENDING SPALL/DELAMINATION 12"L X 20"H IN SOUTH FACE OF CENTER BAY DIAPHRAGM AT NORTH PIER.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. CRACK ACROSS TOP OF NORTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT
IN WEST BAY, MATCHING UP WITH VERTICAL CRACK IN BREASTWALL.
EXTENSIVE RANDOM SURFACE CRACKING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS.
60.4 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
7 INCH LONG X 5 INCH WIDE SHALLOW SPALL IN WEST BAY OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL.
60.6 EXTENSIVE MINOR MAP CRACKING OF WINGWALLS.
60.9
60.11
MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION AT END AND BESIDE WINGWALLS.
60.13
60.15
WIDESPREAD MINOR SURFACE CRACKING OF PIER COLUMNS.
MINOR EDGE CHIP OF NORTH SIDE OF NORTH PIER CAP BETWEEN CENTER AND WEST COLUMN, MOST LIKELY FROM
CONSTRUCTION.
61.2 RIPRAP AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EMBANKMENT.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
222.3 APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT NORTH END OF BRIDGE ONLY.
MODERATE MAP CRACKING OF APPROACH RAIL POST FOUNDATIONS AT NORTH END.
222.4 TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF NORTH APPROACH ASPHALT PAVEMENT. TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF SOUTH
APPROACH ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
222.5 MINOR EROSION AT ENDS OF WINGWALLS AT ENDS OF BRIDGE.
222.6
222.7
APPROACH PAVEMENT IS NOW 3 INCHES LOW DUE TO SETTLEMENT AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE.
"ONE WAY ROAD NEXT 4 MILES" SIGN AT NORTH APPROACH. MISSING RAIL REFLECTORS AT NORTH APPROACH RAIL CORNERS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 31 28 52 47
HS 37 34 62 56
TYPE 3 42 38 70 64
TYPE 3S2 59 54 100 91
TYPE 3-3 71 64 119 108
DESIGN LOADING: 5 - HS 20
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 04/07/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: END SPAN SHEAR
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............PUEBLO BONITO BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........7400-001 P
1 - INTERMOUNTAIN(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... CHCU 10(1)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........RG2532
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:............................................ 356 - NEW MEXICO
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 35045 SAN JUAN
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................ 1 6 1 00010 0
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... CHACO WASH
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... LOOP ROAD
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. 7400001P0000000
(9) LOCATION:..................................... JUST SOUTH OF PUEBLO BONITO,
ON ONE-WAY LOOP ROAD.
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(11) MILE POINT:................................. 5 21 (KM PT: 1.59 )
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............63.5 FT ( 19.4 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 190. FT ( 57.9 M)
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE
(CONCURRENTLY PLACED WITH
STRUCTURAL DECK)
B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................5 - HS 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............37 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 33.6
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............62 TONS ( 56.2 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 09/01/1998 (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://LENGTH:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7400-001P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 36° 03'28.76" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................107°57 '39.49" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 22.5 FT ( 6.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 4 MI ( 6 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 20.0 FT ( 6.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............200 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................300 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 20 FT ( 6.1 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 10000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 37500
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2005 & 2013 APPROACHES OVERLAID, 2011-RIPRAP PLACED AT SW CORNER.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
TYPE 502 (P/S GIRDERS) 4 EACH
https://03'28.76
Inspector: Bill Dietrick Structure Number: 7400001P0000000
Inspection Date: 05/17/2022 Facility Carried: LOOP ROAD
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN NORTH APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF APPROACH RAIL FOUNDATION - NORTHWEST FOUNDATION
#2 SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL BROKEN REFLECTORS - NORTHWEST APPROACH SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description SETTLEMENT AT NORTH APPROACH 8.5'L X 8"W X 3"D
PHOTO 10
Description FADED AREA OF WEST SHOULDER STRIPING NEAR NORTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE - MINOR ACCUMULATION
ALONG EAST CURBLINE
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING ON WEST CURBLINE OF DECK
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description MINOR SPALLING AND DELAMINATION OF SURFACE COAT OF WEST CURB NEAR SOUTH
END
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING IN CURB FACE - SOUTHEAST SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF CAULKING AROUND RAIL POST - POST #2 FROM SOUTH
PIER ON WEST CURB SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING ON EXTERIOR CURB FACE - SOUTHWEST SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description TYPICAL CRACKING ON DECK SURFACE NEAR DRAIN HOLE - SOUTHWEST DRAIN
SHOWN
PHOTO 18
Description 2.5" SETTLEMENT AT SOUTH APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACK IN SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT
PHOTO 20
Description TYPICAL EROSION AT WINGWALL END - 16" L X 8"W X 4"D NORTHWEST END SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description SETTLEMENT AND EROSION ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL 7'L X 8" H
PHOTO 22
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description SHALLOW SPALL 7"L X 5"H X 3/4"D WITH CRACKING ADJACENT AT NORTH ABUTMENT
BACKWALL IN WEST BAY
PHOTO 24
Description MINOR CRACKING AT NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL WITH SMALL PATCHES IN CENTER
BAY
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT DECK DRAIN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT IN EAST BAY
PHOTO 26
Description DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT DECK DRAIN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT IN
WEST BAY
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO 28
Description SPALL IN NORTH PIER DIAPHRAGM AT SOUTH FACE IN CENTER BAY
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO 30
Description TYPICAL MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN SOFFIT OF SOUTH
SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER - NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH BELOW CENTER BAY
PHOTO 32
Description VERTICAL CRACK IN EAST FACE OF CLOSURE POUR ABOVE SOUTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 33
Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 34
Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW EAST BAY
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 35
Description SIGNAGE AT NORTH APPROACH - NOTE MINOR FADING AND HEAVILY CHECKED
PHOTO 36
Description TYPICAL STEEP ERODABLE BANKS - UPSTREAM SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 37
Description LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 38
Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .