NM NP MULTI PMS(1)_7400-002P Chaco Wash Bridge - Fajada.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- NM NP MULTI PMS(1), Pavement Preservation New Mexico Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 69056724R000026
About this file
This is a bridge inspection report dated May 18, 2022 for the Chaco Wash Bridge (Structure No. 7400-002P) located on State Highway 57 near Fajada Butte in Chaco Culture National Historical Park, New Mexico. The bridge is a prestressed concrete channel beam structure built in 1975 and reconstructed in 1991, consisting of 5 main spans with a total length of 220 feet.
The inspection found the bridge to be in fair condition overall, with several issues requiring maintenance. Key problems include cracking of abutment breastwalls and pier caps, debris accumulation in deck expansion joints, and damaged/missing hardware for the railing system. The bearing pads show distortion and tearing but replacement is not currently recommended. The bridge has a load rating capacity below its H15 design load, with an operating rating of 29 tons for HS trucks. The report recommends approximately $18,000 in maintenance work including cleaning debris from deck joints, replacing missing rail bolts, installing missing reflectors, and reattaching guardrails. A 1999 scour study recommended closing the road during major floods and inspecting for damage after significant flood events.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
CHACO WASH BRIDGE - FAJADA
STATE HIGHWAY 57 OVER CHACO WASH
CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LOOKING EAST
STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/18/2022
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
CHACO WASH BRIDGE - FAJADA INSPECTION DATE: 05/18/2022
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
22 - CHANNEL BEAM NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 220.0 FT (67.1 M)
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 44.4 FT (13.5 M)
0 - NONE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 25.5 FT (7.8 M)
4 - PILE BENT YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: . 1991
0603-501 SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °
2 - CONNECTOR ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1991-DECK REPAIRED, EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED, WEB WALLS ADDED TO
PIERS. 2013-(PROJECT: NM PRA CHCU 10 (2)) LATERAL TIES ADDED TO BEAMS,
WEARING SURFACE AND JOINTS REPLACED
LOCATION
CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
STATE: .............................. 356 - NEW MEXICO
FACILITY CARRIED: ......... STATE HIGHWAY 57
FEATURE INTERSECTED: CHACO WASH
MILE POINT: .. .99 (KM PT 0.3)
LOCATION: .... NEAR FAJADA BUTTE.
INSPECTION TEAM: Z. Bailey, B. Dietrick
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Bill Dietrick
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 11/17/2022
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete channel beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problems include cracking of the abutment breastwalls and pier caps; debris in the deck expansion joints; and damaged or missing hardware for the railing system. Corrective measures for these issues should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. Please be advised that the previous recommendation for extending deck drains has been removed, as the deck drains extend below bottoms of channel beam top flanges and do not appear to drain directly onto the channel beams themselves.
It should also be noted that several of the exterior elastomeric bearing pads at pier ends are torn, and all bearing pads are distorted. No distress to the structural elements of the bridge is evident as a consequence, and replacement of the bearing pads is not deemed necessary or advisable at this time. However, the condition of the bearing pads will also continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
CHACO WASH BRIDGE - FAJADA INSPECTION DATE: 05/18/2022
NOTE: Please also be advised that a 1999 scour study recommended the road be closed to traffic during all major floods, and the site be inspected for damage following significant flood events.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
CHACO WASH BRIDGE - FAJADA INSPECTION DATE : 05/18/2022
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.2,58.7
CLEAN DEBRIS FROM DECK JOINTS AND ALONG
SOUTHWEST CURB FACE/DECK SHOULDER. 150 LF 20 3000
58.6,222.
3,222.7
REPLACE MISSING RAIL BOLTS. INSTALL MISSING
REFLECTORS AS NEEDED.
INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE ENDS.
6 LS 2000 12000
58.6,222.
RE-ATTACH GUARDRAIL AND APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT
NOTED LOCATIONS. INSTALL MISSING REFLECTORS AS
NEEDED.
6 LS 500 3000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 18000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
CHACO WASH BRIDGE - FAJADA INSPECTION DATE: 05/17/2022
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
F
G
F
F
F
G
F
P
F
N
N
N
G
N
N
G
G
N
G
F
G
G
F
1- SUFF
3 - LOW
G
F
G
F
G
N
G
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS F
3. WEARING SURFACE G
N
CONCRETE APRON
10 FT
F
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
SILT, SANDlane markers
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F
5. FOUNDATIONS 02 - CAISSONS N
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS F
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION G
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14.PILE BENTS
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16.FOUNDATIONS 01 - BURIED
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER GRADE BEAMS
F
F
F
N
G
G
G
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 MINOR HAIRLINE LONGITUDINAL CRACK IN DECK ALONG CENTER OF BRIDGE (VISIBLE IN YELLOW STRIPING).
SMALL PALM SIZE SHALLOW SPALL WITH ONE EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH EXTERIOR DECK FACE BELOW RAIL POST NEAR
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGE.
58.2 CORROSION IN JOINT ARMOR OVER PIER #1 IN EASTBOUND LANE, NOT VISIBLE DURING THIS INSPECTION. DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN DECK EXPANSION JOINT SEALS AT ABUTMENTS. BRIDGE DECK JOINTS AT PIERS ARE MOSTLY PAVED OVER.
58.4 VERY MINOR BUMP AT EASTBOUND LANE OF EAST APPROACH DUE TO SETTLEMENT. SEE ALSO 60.9 AND 222.6.
58.5 EXTENSIVE MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS. MODERATE STAINING OF CURBS FROM WEATHERING STEEL RAILINGS.
MINOR SURFACE SPALL IN FACE OF SOUTH CURB IN SPAN #1. SPALLING OF SOUTH CURB IN SPAN #5 WITH EXPOSED REBAR.
58.6 1" DIAMETER TORCH CUT HOLE IN TOP OF SOUTH BOTTOM RAIL IN SPAN #5 AT WEST ABUTMENT AND NORTH RAILING IN SPAN
#1 AT EAST ABUTMENT.
SOUTH RAIL:
SHEARED BOLT AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE.
MISSING BOLT AT POST #4 FROM WEST END.
MISSING BOLT IN POST ABOVE PIER #1.
MISSING BOLT AT POST #1 FROM PIER #2.
NORTH RAIL:
MISSING CONNECTION BOLT AT POST #10 FROM WEST END.
58.7 SURFACE CORROSION OF DECK DRAINS. MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND GRAVEL IN CURBLINES.
58.10 ALL RAISED CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKERS ARE BROKEN OFF.
59.1 MINOR CRACKING AND MODERATE TO SEVERE DISTORTION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS.
59.2 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF EXTERIOR CHANNEL BEAM TOP FLANGES AT END SPANS. INADEQUATE BOLT PROJECTION AT TIE BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2 IN SPAN #1, NOTED PREVIOUSLY, COULD NOT CONFIRM DURING THIS INSPECTION. WIDESPREAD MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF BEAM WEBS AT EAST ABUTMENT, MOST LIKELY OCCURRING DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
MINOR SPALL IN BEAM #2 WEB NEAR PIER #1.
EPOXY MORTAR HAS BEEN SURFACE APPLIED OVER CRACKS ON BOTTOM OF CHANNEL BEAMS IN SPAN #5.
MINOR SCALING OF EXTERIOR CHANNEL BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES DUE TO PAST DRAINAGE FROM DECK SCUPPERS. MINOR SCALING ON UNDERSIDE OF CHANNEL BEAMS IN SPANS #1 AND #5 HAVE BEEN REPAIRED WITH GUNITE.
MINOR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF EAST END OF NORTH EXTERIOR GIRDER AT WEST ABUTMENT CAUSED FROM
EMBEDDED FORM TIES THAT REMAIN, NO REBAR EXPOSED.
MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REINFORCEMENT ON NORTH SIDE OF BEAM #6 AT EAST ABUTMENT.
DELAMINATION IN WEB OF BEAM #6 AT PIER #1 BEARING.
59.6 END DIAPHRAGMS:
MINOR SPALLING AND DELAMINATING OF DIAPHRAGM CONCRETE AT WEST ABUTMENT; MODERATE SPALL (4" DEEP) ON WEST ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGM AT CHANNEL BEAM #2, EXPOSING 1" DIAMETER DRIFT ANCHOR DOWEL. EXTENSIVE RANDOM
CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGMS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
BEAM DIAPHRAGMS: (KEYWAY, WEDGE FILLERS)
SHORT BOLT AT BEAM #5, MIDWAY THRU SPAN #2.
HONEYCOMBING OF DIAPHRAGMS BETWEEN BEAMS.
60.1
60.4
60.3
EXTENSIVE MAP CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, WITH EFFLORESCENCE LEACHING FROM CRACKS.
TOP OF BACKWALLS PARTIALLY COVERED WITH ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MAP CRACKING AND BACK EDGE SPALLING OF
CONCRETE ALONG TOP OF BACKWALLS.
60.6
60.4
MINOR MAP CRACKING OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL. MINOR TO MODERATE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
60.9 RIPRAP PROTECTING SOUTHWEST DITCH AND WINGWALL FROM EROSION.
60.11 ROCK DITCHES AT CORNERS OF STRUCTURE DIRECT RUNOFF AWAY FROM STRUCTURE. RIPRAP AT FRONT AND SIDES OF
ABUTMENTS. TOP OF GABION BASKETS ARE EXPOSED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS OF EMBANKMENT.
60.13
60.14
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF WEB WALLS AT COLUMN INTERFACES. EXPOSED TIE STEEL IN FACE OF COLUMN #1 AT PIER #1.
6"L X 1"W PATCH OF DELAMINATED CONCRETE ON EAST FACE OF COLUMN #1 AT PIER #1. 6"L X 2"W PATCH OF DELAMINATED
CONCRETE IN COLUMN #3 AT EAST FACE OF PIER #3.
8"L X 4"T SPALL IN BOTTOM OF WEB WALL AT PIER #2 BETWEEN COLUMNS #2 AND #3 ON EAST SIDE. 4"L X 2"W SHALLOW SPALL
IN EAST FACE OF COLUMN #2 AT PIER #2.
SHALLOW SPALL 6"L X 2"W IN COLUMN #3 AT PIER 1 BELOW WEB WALL.
60.15 VERTICAL FLEXURE CRACKS IN PIER CAPS BETWEEN COLUMNS. RANDOM CRACKING OF PIER CAPS OVER COLUMNS. PIER CAPS ARE WATER STAINED. MINOR CRACKING, SPALLING, AND DELAMINATING OF CONCRETE ON TOP OF PIER #2 CAP AT
SOUTH SIDE.
60.16
60.19
MINOR SPALL IN NORTHWEST CORNER OF PIER #2 GRADE BEAM, CURRENTLY COVERED WITH FILL. CFL SCOUR ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED FOR REHAB PROJECT INDICATES 500-YEAR SCOUR DEPTH WOULD BE WITHIN LIMITS OF CAISSON
FOUNDATIONS.
61.5
60.19
USGS FLOOD MONITORING EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO NORTH COLUMN OF PIER #3.
61.2 VERTICAL CUTTING OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS. STREAM CHANNEL PROFILE LARGELY UNCHANGED
SINCE 1986 INSPECTION. MINOR EROSION OF DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS.
SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4
61.5
MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SIDES OF STRUCTURE. SEVERAL TREES GROWING IN UPSTREAM
CHANNEL. LARGE TREE GROWING IN CHANNEL IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF PIER #2.
OLD LOW WATER CROSSING IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; MINOR SCOUR ALONG DOWNSTREAM EDGE OF CROSSING.
222.3 DAMAGED REFLECTORS ALONG APPROACH GUARDRAILS. MINOR CRACKING AND DELAMINATING OF EXPOSED APPROACH
GUARDRAIL POST FOUNDATIONS AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
222.4
222.7
MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES.
TRANSVERSE CRACK ACROSS APPROACHES, 5' FROM DECK ENDS.
NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT BRIDGE ENDS. DISCONNECTED APPROACH RAIL REFLECTORS AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 14 13 23 21
HS 17 15 29 26
TYPE 3 16 15 27 24
TYPE 3S2 25 23 41 37
TYPE 3-3 29 26 49 44
DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 07/26/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: BEAM MOMENT CAPACITY
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: CHACO CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE:............................................ 356 - NEW MEXICO
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............CHACO WASH BRIDGE - FAJADA (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 35045 SAN JUAN
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........7400-002 P (4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
1 - INTERMOUNTAIN (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................(205) NPS REGION:........................ 1 6 1 00010 0
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:.......10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... CHACO WASH
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. (7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... STATE HIGHWAY 57
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. 7400002P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes (9) LOCATION:..................................... NEAR FAJADA BUTTE.
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 0603-501 (11) MILE POINT:................................. .99 (KM PT: 0.3 )
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........41020 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 22 - CHANNEL BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............005 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............44.4 FT ( 13.5 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 220. FT ( 67.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............17 TONS ( 15.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............29 TONS ( 26.3 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 05/18/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 07/01/1999 (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://LENGTH:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 7400-002P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 36° 01'42 39" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 25.5 FT ( 7.8 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................107°55 '07.66" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 10 MI ( 16 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............200 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................300 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 25.5 FT ( 7.8 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL
REQUIRED
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:..............................0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 1 - MAINTENANCE
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 15000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 0
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1991-DECK REPAIRED, EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED, WEB WALLS ADDED TO PIERS. 2013-(PROJECT: NM PRA CHCU 10 (2)) LATERAL TIES ADDED TO
BEAMS, WEARING SURFACE AND JOINTS REPLACED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Bill Dietrick Structure Number: 7400002P0000000
Inspection Date: 05/18/2022 Facility Carried: STATE HIGHWAY 57
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING WEST
PHOTO 4
Description SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOP SIDE LOOKING WEST
PHOTO 6
Description TYPICAL APPROACH RAIL END TREATMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH RAIL END TREATMENT
PHOTO 8
Description TYPICAL REFLECTOR MISSING AT APPROACH RAILS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE ASPHALT CRACK AT BACK OF APPROACH SLAB - EAST SIDE
SHOWN - NOTE MINOR EDGE SPALLING AND CRACKING AT TOP OF EAST ABUTMENT
BACKWALL
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL THERMAL EXPANSION GAP BETWEEN BRIDGE RAIL AND WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description SHEARED BOLT AT SOUTHEAST APPROACH RAIL ATTACHMENT
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL CRACK IN CURB FACE - NORTH SIDE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description MISSING 1 OF 3 BRIDGE RAIL BOLTS ON POST ON SOUTH SIDE
PHOTO 14
Description SMALL DELAMINATION/SPALL BELOW 5TH RAIL POST ON SOUTH CURB FACE NEAR EAST
END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINE - NORTH CURB NEAR EAST END
SHOWN
PHOTO 16
Description JOINT OVER PIER #1
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description JOINT OVER PIER #2
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF JOINT MATERIAL IN NORTH CURB AT PIER #2
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description JOINT OVER PIER #3
PHOTO 20
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF CURB - NORTH CURB IN SPAN #3 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description JOINT OVER PIER #4
PHOTO 22
Description MINOR MISALIGNMENT OF BOTTOM SOUTH RAIL NEAR PIER #4
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description TYPICAL STAINING OF CURB - SOUTH CURB IN SPAN #4 SHOWN
PHOTO 24
Description DIRT ACCUMULATION UP TO 2" HIGH ON SOUTHWEST BRIDGE SHOULDER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description SMALL PALM SIZE SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN SOUTH CURB FACE NEAR WEST END
BELOW RAIL 2ND RAIL POST - NOTE DIRT ACCUMULATION
PHOTO 26
Description 5.5" DIAMETER SHALLOW SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN SOUTH EXTERIOR DECK
FACE BELOW 2ND RAIL POST FROM WEST END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF GROUT AROUND RAIL CONNECTIONS - SOUTHWEST
CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO 28
Description GENERAL TOP SIDE LOOKING EAST
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE ASPHALT CRACK AT BACK OF APPROACH SLAB - WEST SIDE
SHOWN - NOTE MINOR EDGE SPALLING AND CRACKING AT TOP OF WEST ABUTMENT
BACKWALL
PHOTO 30
Description CLOSE UP OF TYPICAL MINOR EDGE SPALLING AND CRACKING AT TOP OF WEST
ABUTMENT BACKWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description TYPICAL BROKEN REFLECTOR - NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL SHOWN
PHOTO 32
Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT - NOTE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE
THROUGHOUT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 33
Description SHALLOW SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EXTERIOR OF BEAM #6 NEAR EAST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO 34
Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #1 - WEST FACE SHOWN - NOTE EROSION CONTROL BAIL
ABOUT 20' WEST OF PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 35
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF DISTORTED ELASTOMERIC PADS - PIER #1 UNDER BEAMS #5
AND #6 EAST FACE
PHOTO 36
Description SHALLOW SPALLING AND DELAMINATION ON TOP OF PIER #1 CAP ON SOUTH SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 37
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK BETWEEN WEB WALL AND COLUMN - NORTH COLUMN AT
PIER #1, EAST FACE SHOWN
PHOTO 38
Description 10"L X 4"H SPALL/DELAMINATION ON COLUMN #3 OF PIER #1 ON SOUTH FACE BELOW
WEB WALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 39
Description DELAMINATED CONCRETE OF COLUMN #1 OF PIER #1 NEAR WEB WALL 2'H X 3"W X 1/2"D
PHOTO 40
Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #2 - WEST FACE SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 41
Description SPALL AT BOTTOM OF WEB WALL AT PIER #2 ON EAST FACE BETWEEN COLUMNS #1 AND #2
PHOTO 42
Description USGS FLOOD MONITORING EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO COLUMN #1 AT PIER #2
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 43
Description SHALLOW SPALL 2"H X 3"W ON SOUTH FACE OF EAST EXTERIOR GIRDER NEAR EAST
DIAPHRAGM OF SPAN 2
PHOTO 44
Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #3 - NOTE BIRD DROPPINGS ON WEST FACE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 45
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST - SPAN #3 SHOWN
PHOTO 46
Description TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING IN PIER #4 CAP ON EAST FACE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 47
Description MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDE OF BEAM #3 SOFFIT IN SPAN #4
PHOTO 48
Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER 4, WEST FACE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 49
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDIAL SOFFIT CRACKS BETWEEN CHANNEL BEAMS, EPOXY COATED, IN
SPAN 5, BAY 5
PHOTO 50
Description 3" DIAMETER SPALL 1/2"D IN SOFFIT OF SPAN 4 NEAR GIRDER 5, NEAR WEST
DIAPHRAGM AT CORE HOLE - NOTE SIGNS OF LEAKAGE AND CRACKING
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 51
Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO 52
Description MAP CRACKING AT WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL WITH EFFLORESCENCE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 53
Description TYPICAL DISTORATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARING PAD - WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO 54
Description LARGE SPALL IN WEST ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGM BENEATH BEAM 2 WITH EXPOSED REBAR
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 55
Description SPALLING AT WEST ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGM BENETH BEAM 3
PHOTO 56
Description SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 57
Description NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .