N6945022R0032 Amend 0003.pdf

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

PWD GTMO

PSC 1005, PO BOX 37

FPO AE 09593

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6945022R0032, NSGB BOS Services See BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Sep-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945022R0032

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Aug-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Sep-2022

CODE

NAVFAC ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND SE

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N69450

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6945022R0032

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

This Amendment is issued to make the following changes:

1. Section C, The Section C Performance Work Statement has been updated. Changes within the attachment are annotated in red and blue font, blue underline font for additions and red strikethrough font for deletions.

The revised Section C attachment is provided under file name N6945022R0032 Section C_Amend 0003.pdf A summary of the revised spec items is as follows:

a. Annex 1503050,

i. Spec Item 3.2, Related Information, added information to clarify grounds maintenance requirements for utility right-of-ways, corridors and equipment operational areas.

b. Annex 1602000, Electrical

i. Spec Item 2.3, Related Information, added information to clarify critical electrical equipment and Cross Bay Cable (CBC) testing requirements.

ii. Spec Item 3.5.2, Related Information, added information to clarify the point of demarcation between the LNG Off-Loading System and ESPC Fueling System for the Combined Cycle Power Plant (CCPP).

2. Section J, The Section J Technical attachment has been updated. Changes within the attachment are annotated in red and blue font, blue underline font for additions and red strikethrough font for deletions.

The revised Section J attachment is provided under file name N6945022R0032_Section J_Amend 0003.pdf. A summary of the revised attachments is as follows:

a. Attachment J-1602000-06-03, added to provide additional drawings for the LNG Off-Loading System from Pier Charlie to the point of demarcation with the ESPC CCPP Fueling System.

3. Section J – The Table of Contents has been revised as follows (changes within the Table of Contents are indicated in red font):

a. Responses to Government Pre-Award Inquiries (GPIs) are provided via attachment under file name JL-2_N6945022R0032_GPI responses_0003.pdf

i. The Government has provided an updated response to Question #9.

ii. The Government has provided additional clarification for Question #127.

b. Attachment J-1602000-06-03, is provided via attachment under file name J-1602000-06- 03_N6945022R0032_LNG_SubseaPipeline_Drawings.

4. Section L.13 - Section L.13(k) has been updated. Changes within the section are annotated in red font.

a. The following verbiage has been incorporated: “Screen shots used for illustrative purposes only, are excluded from the font and color restrictions.”

5. Section M.3 – Section M.3 4.(a)(2)(i) has been updated. The deletion is annotated with a strikethrough and addition in red font.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

This is a performance-based contract which incorporates performance-based specifications.

The files for Section C are provided as the following attachment posted on the SAM.gov website at:

https://sam.gov/ N6945022R0032 Section C_Amend 0003.pdf

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the SAM. gov website at https://sam.gov/ with the solicitation.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table. The TECHNICAL documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table or “all-inclusive” under filename:

N6945022R0032 Section J_Amend 0003.pdf.

Section J – Table of Contents

JL-1 JL-1. Provided as file name JL-1_N6945022R0032_Amend 0002.

JL-2 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF). Provided as file name JL-2_N6945022R0032_GPI

Responses_0003.pdf.

JL-3 AMAG Form to Obtain Visitor’s Pass. Provided as file name JL-3_N6945022R0032_AMAG.xlsx.

JL-4 SECNAV 5512/1 Form for base access. Provided as file name JL-

4_N6945022R0032_SECNAV5512.pdf JL-5 Site Visit Itinerary for NSGB. Provided as file name JL-5_N6945022R0032 NSGB BOS Site Visit

Itinerary.doc JL-6 ENCL (1) ENTRY CLEARANCE COVER SHEET. Provided as file name JL-6_ENCL (1)

ENTRY CLEARANCE COVER SHEET.pdf JL-7 ENCL (3) AMC Flight Reservation request blank. Provided as file name JL-7_ENCL (3) AMC

Flight Reservation request blank.pdf JL-8 PWD Jax Building 27 Location Map. Provided as file name JL-8_PWD Jax Building 27 Location

Map.pdf JL-9 NSGB Industry Day Brief_January. Provided as file name JL-9 NSGB Industry Day

Brief_January.pdf JL-10 NSGB Industry Day Brief_June. Provided as file name JL-10 NSGB Industry Day Brief_June.pdf JL-11 Award Fee Plan DRAFT. Provided as file name JL-11_N6945022R0032_AwardFeePlan

DRAFT.pdf JL-12 Site Visit Sign In Sheets. Provided as file name JL-12_N6945022R0032_Site Visit Sign In

Sheets.pdf JL-13 NSGB INST. Provided as file names: JL-13_NSGB INST.

a. NSGB INST 11200.1G

b. NSGB INST 11106.1B CH-1

c. NSGB INST 11106.1B

d. NSGB INST 4500.1A

e. NSGB INST 5090.4B

f. NSGB INST 5090.1E

JM-1 Corporate Experience. Provided as file name JM-1_N6945022R0032_Corporate Experience_Amend 0002.doc

JM-2 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Provided as file name JM- 2_N6945022R0032_PPQ_Amend 0002.doc

J- TECHNICAL N6945022R0032 Section J-Technical Attachments. Provided as file name J- TECHNICAL_N6945022R0032_Section J_Technical-Attachments_Amend 0002.xls.

J-0200000-06 SERVICE PROVIDER INFORMATION. Provided as file name J-0200000- 06_ SERVICE PROVIDER INFORMATION.xls

J-0200000-07 ASSET INFORMATION. Provided as file name J-0200000-07_ASSET INFORMATION.xls J-0200000-08 ASSET PROTECTION. Provided as file name J-0200000-08_ASSET SPECIFICATION.xls J-0200000-09 CHARACTERISTIC METER READING INFORMATION. Provided as file name J-0200000-

09_CHARACTERISTIC METER READING INFORMATION.xls

J-0200000-12 Energy Policy CNRSEINST 4101.1C. Provided as file name J- 0200000-12 Energy Policy CNRSEINST 4101.1C.pdf

J-0200000-13 Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) spreadsheet. Provided as file name J-0200000- 13_N6945022R0032_ELINs_Amend 0002.xls.

J-0200000-14 Contractor Housing Site. Provided as file name J-0200000- 14_N6945022R0032_Contractor_Housing _Site.pdf

J-0200000-15 Additional Requirements for CCMUEB. Provided as file name J-0200000- 15_N6945022R0032_Additional Requirements for CCMUEB.pdf

J-0200000-16 CAT Call Request. Provided as file name J-0200000-16_N6945022R0032_CAT_Call_request.pdf J-1501000-04 Base Map. Provided as file name J-1501000-04_BaseMap.pdf J-1502000-

02(DHA)

FORMS:

• Above Ceiling Permit Form. Provided as file name J-1502000-02(DHA)-01_Above

Ceiling Penetration Permit.pdf

• Infection Control Construction Permit Forms. Provided as file name J-1502000-02(DHA)-

02_Infection_Control_Risk_Assessment.pdf

• Pre-Construction Site-External Survey Form. Provided as file name J-1502000-02(DHA)-

03_Pre-Construction_Site_Survey.pdf

• Life Assessment Tool Form. Provided as file name J-1502000-02(DHA)-04_ISLM

Assessment Form J-1502000-03 Historical Work NSGB. Provided as file name J-1502000-03-Historical Work NSGB_Amend 0002 J-1502000-15 (DHA)MedicalAirGasAndVacuumSystemsMaps. Provided as file name J-150200-

15_(DHA)MedicalAirGasAndVacuumSystemsMaps.pdf J-1502000-20 (DHA)FireWallsAndFireDoorsMap. Provided as file name J-1502000-

20_(DHA)FireWallsAndFireDoorsMap.pdf J-1502000-32 ESPC R&R. Provided as file name J-1502000-32_N6945022R0032_ESPC_R&R.pdf J-1503050-05 Site. Provided as file name J-1503050-05_Site_Map_Amend 0002.pdf J-1503050-08 Roads. Provided as file name J-1503050-08_Roads.pdf J-1601000-12 Outage Request. Provided as file name J-1601000-12_Outage request.pdf J-1602000-05 LNG SOP. Provided as file name J-160200-05_LNG_SOP.doc J-1602000-06 LNG Schematic. Provided as file name J-1602000-06_LNG_Schematic.doc.

J-1604000-05 Sample Reports. Provided as file name J-1604000-05_Sample Reports.pdf J-1606000-04 Sample Reports. Provided as file name J-1606000-04_Sample Reports.pdf J-1700000-09 DDForm1970. Provided as file name J-1700000-09_DDForm1970.pdf J-1401000-03-01 FH Water Heater Schedule. Provided as file name J-1401000-03-01_FH_Water_Heater_Sched.pdf.

J-1501000-09 ICAP Report. Provided as file name J-1501000-09_ICAP_Report.xls.

J-1503050-05-01 Storm Drainage maps. Provided as file name J-1503050-05-01_Storm_Drainage_Maps.pdf.

J-1602000-06-01 LNG System Pier C. Provided as file name J-1602000-06-01 LNG_System_Pier C.pdf.

J-1602000-06-02 LNG Drawing. Provided as file name J-1602000-06-02_LNG_Drawing.pdf.

J-1602000-06-03 LNG Subsea Pipeline. Provided as file name J-1602000-06

03_N6945022R0032_LNG_SubseaPipeline_Drawings.pdf

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

L.13 CONTENT OF PROPOSALS

(a) PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. The responsibility determination, non-price proposal, and the price/cost proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The non-price proposal shall not contain any cost/pricing information. The non-price proposal presented by the offeror to whom the award is made will be incorporated into the contract at time of award.

(b) The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Responsibility Determination Binder: 2 (1 original and 1 copy) copies of the responsibility determination information. With the responsibility determination binder, submit the following:

a. Submit completed and signed Standard Form 33 with the applicable Entity Identifier number and CAGE code of the offeror provided on the face of the SF-33. Ensure the SF-33 includes the appropriate name and address of any newly formed joint venture/partnership arrangement if applicable;

b. Submit acknowledgement of all amendments;

c. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and Entity Identifier for all team members and identify their role (prime, joint venture partner, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

d. Submit individual representations and certifications if System for Award Management (SAM) representations and certifications are not complete in accordance with FAR 52.204-7;

e. Provide confirmation of most recent VETS-4212 filing or an explanation of the offeror’s exemption from this requirement;

f. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If the offeror is a new joint venture or partnership, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

g. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

h. If joint venture or partnership arrangement is being proposed, include copies of agreements and letters of commitment signed by the appropriate individuals of each firm. Agreements must include company name, Entity Identifier number, address, point of contact, email address, phone number and fax number for the joint venture/partnership and each member of the joint venture/partnership. The agreements shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind the firm/joint venture/team/partnership. Offerors proposing significant subcontracts (subcontracts exceeding 10% of the total contract value) shall submit signed letters of commitment from the subcontractors which define the contractual relationship and identify contribution to the planned arrangement in terms of the type and proportion of work to be performed. For Joint Venture arrangements discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

i. Offerors shall submit plan in accordance with DFARS 252.237-7024 NOTICE OF CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES (OCT 2010). The Mission

Essential Services Plan will not count toward the page limitation and shall not exceed five (5) pages.

j. Submit two copies of the entire Responsibility Determination information on CD filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Responsibility Determination binder. Note: do NOT submit a USB flash/jump drive in lieu of CD.

k. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. All text (including text in all graphics, exhibits, tables, and headers/footers) will be in a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier. Colored font may be used for headers/footers, section headings and subheadings only; all other text will be black. Double-side printing is permitted; Screen shots used for illustrative purposes only, are excluded from the font and color restrictions.

l. There is no page limitation on the responsibility determination submission.

(2) Price Proposal Binder: 2 (1 original and 1 copies) copies of the cost/price proposal. With the price proposal, submit the following:

a. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and Entity Identifier for all team members and identify their role (prime, joint venture partner, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

b. Submit all Price factor requirements;

c. Submit two copies of the entire Price Proposal on CD in readable/searchable electronic format and filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Price Proposal binder. Acceptable readable/searchable formats include MS Word, Excel, and searchable PDF. Note: do NOT submit a USB flash/jump drive in lieu of CD.

d. Offerors shall submit pricing spreadsheet data (Section B, Section J Attachment J-0200000-13 Exhibit Line Item Numbers) in hard copy and in Excel (Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on a CD-ROM. Formulas shall be traceable. Failure to do so may be cause to render the offer non-responsive. Offerors shall utilize the pricing attachments in Excel (Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format in Section J for submission of pricing data. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the price proposal hard copies and the price proposal electronic copies, the price proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

e. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. All text (including text in all graphics, exhibits, tables, and headers/footers) will be in a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier, with single line spacing. Colored font may be used for headers/footers, section headings, and subheadings only; all other text will be black. Double-side printing is permitted; however, each side will be counted as one page for sections with page limitations. For larger spreadsheets, the offeror may submit 11 by 17 inch sheets that must be folded to fit within the binder, with printing on one side only;

f. Offerors shall put company name on every pricing page.

g. There is no page limitation on the pricing proposal.

(3) Non-Price Proposal Binder: 3 (1 original and 2 copies) copies of the non-price proposal. With the non-price proposal, submit the following:

a. Identify the company names, CAGE Code, and Entity Identifier for all team members and identify their role (prime, joint venture partner, significant subcontractor, subcontractor, etc.);

b. Submit all Non-Price factor requirements divided. Each Non-Price factor must have an individual tab divider;

c. Submit two copies of the entire Non-Price Proposal on CD in readable/searchable electronic format and filed inside the cover of the "Original" hard copy Non-Price Proposal binder.

Acceptable readable/searchable formats include Word, Excel, and searchable PDF. Note: do NOT submit a USB flash/jump drive in lieu of CD. For the JB-1 Attachment, ensure data is submitted in hard copy and in Excel (Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on the above mentioned CD. In the event of a discrepancy between the JB-1 Attachment hard copies and the JB-1 Attachment electronic copies, the JB-1 Attachment electronic copies will take precedence. For the remainder of the Non-Price Proposal, in the event of a discrepancy between the hard copies and the electronic copies, the Non-Price proposal hard copies will take precedence.

d. State a clear acknowledgement within the beginning of the binder that nothing in the following proposal is meant to supersede or reduce any of the individual requirements to which the offer addresses. It is the Government’s intent to incorporate the offeror’s proposal into the final contract while at the same time eliminating any contradictory or conflicting requirements between the two. In the event of a conflict between any part or parts of the offer and part or parts of the requirement, the government has the right to selectively choose that part or those parts which are the more advantageous of the two.

e. Paper should be white, 8 ½ by 11 inches and have margins of 1 inch on all four sides. NOTE:

Margins in forms and attachments provided by the Government are exempt from the margin size requirement and shall be submitted in the format provided. All text (including text in all graphics, exhibits, tables, and headers/footers) will be in a font no smaller than 11 point, Times New Roman or Courier. Colored font may be used for headers/footers, section headings, and subheadings only; all other text will be black. Double-side printing is permitted; however, each side will be counted as one page;

f. Foldouts are permitted only for the organization charts and Gantt charts for phase-in/out schedules. Foldouts are limited to 11 by 17 inch white paper that must be folded to fit within the binder, with printing on one side only. 11 by 17 foldouts are considered one page;

g. Offerors shall put company name on every Non-Price page.

h. The non-price proposal submittal shall not exceed 150 pages. Blank tab dividers, Past

Performance Questionnaires, Contractor Performance Assessment Reports and Performance recognition documents will not count towards the page limitation. Two pages of Performance recognition documents will not count towards the page limitation;pages in excess of two (2) are not excluded from the page count.

(4) All binder covers (no spine inserts please) will contain the solicitation number and title, the offeror’s name including individual point of contact, with phone number AND email address.

(5) Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Performance Work Statement Performance Objectives with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.3 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Management Factor 3 – Technical Approach

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Past Performance

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment Factor 5. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

3. The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

4. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Provide a completed Section B of the solicitation. An electronic version of Section B is provided for completion within the Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment.

(ii) Provide a completed Section J ELIN Pricing Attachment. There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion. Proposed Total Prices shall be provided in the same level of detail for all requirements, whether the work is proposed to be accomplished as the prime contractor, subcontractor, or by other means.

(iii) Submit pricing data (Section B and Section J ELINs) in hard copy and in electronic

(Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on CD-ROM. Offerors shall utilize the pricing attachments provided in Section J to submit the Section B ELIN data in the format provided. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(iv) Provide a narrative (limited to 15 pages) of all costs your firm classifies as direct and indirect and describe the basis and rationale for the proposed amounts.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

(i) The Government will evaluate price based on the total proposed price, which consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). excluding the Award Fee CLINS (0003, 0006, 0007, 0010, 0011, 0014, 0015, 0018, 0019, 0022, 0023, 0026, 0027, 0030, 0031 and 0034). For evaluation purposes, the total proposed price consists of the basic recurring and non-recurring CLINs and all option recurring and non-recurring work CLINs (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation.

In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(d) Comparison of market survey results.

(e) And/or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and consistent with FAR 15.404-1.

(ii) Identification of unbalanced pricing including allocation to the ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more prices at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) level, ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices, or contract line items is significantly overstated or understated. An offer may be rejected if the proposed price is materially unbalanced between line items or sub-line items within a pricing period, or between line items or sub-line items for the basic requirement and any option period.

(iii) Any suspected issues or concerns in the price proposal, including any inconsistent pricing submitted within Section B and the Section J ELIN attachment.

(iv) Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unbalanced/inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide all required documentation.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

The offeror’s response to factors that require the submission of Experience Narrative and Past Performance shall be based on the following relevancy definition:

RELEVANT PROJECT: Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP. Relevant projects must demonstrate ALL of the following:

(i) the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP;

(ii) a contract value of $20,000,000.00 per year or greater;

(iii) and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of initial proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last eight (8) years of date of receipt of initial proposals.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

a. 1502000 – Facility Investment (at minimum, Service orders, emergency generator, HVAC and fire protection system maintenance and repair similar to the requirements in the RFP).

b. 1602000 – Electrical similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Transmission & Distributions operations, maintenance and repairs).

c. 1606000 – Water similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Raw Water Supply, Water Treatment Plant and Distribution System operation, Laboratory and Testing processes, maintenance and repairs).

d. 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including maintenance and repair of vehicles and Civil Engineering Support Equipment (CESE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).

Complexity will be determined based on the projects’ contract type, facilities maintained (size, quantity and type), systems maintained (quantities and capacities), and program structure (combination of Preventive Maintenance (PM) Program, service orders, Integrated Maintenance Program (IMP), other recurring services).

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) examples of recent, relevant projects that the offeror (including joint ventures and partnerships) completed and served as the prime contractor. For each project the offeror shall provide a completed JM-1 Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet that includes all information requested on the form. Offerors shall not submit any project information unless submitted on Attachment JM-1. Information submitted for a corporate affiliate to include a one page narrative, organization chart and teaming agreement/letter of commitment may be provided in addition to the Attachment JM-1. The Corporate Experience Project Data attachment may be expanded and is not limited to the two (2) pages provided within the solicitation.

Relevant Projects: Relevant projects must demonstrate ALL of the following:

(iv) the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP;

(v) a contract value of $20,000,000.00 per year or greater;

(vi) and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of initial proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last eight (8) years of date of receipt of initial proposals.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

(i) 1502000 – Facility Investment (at minimum, Service orders; emergency generator, HVAC and fire protection system maintenance and repairs similar to the requirements in the RFP).

(ii) 1602000 – Electrical similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Transmission & Distributions operations, maintenance and repairs).

(iii) 1606000 – Water similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Raw Water Supply, Water Treatment Plant and Distribution System operation, Laboratory and Testing processes, maintenance and repairs).

(iv) 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including maintenance and repair of vehicles and Civil Engineering Support Equipment (CESE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).

The offeror’s submitted projects must aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing or managing the annexes/sub-annexes identified above in (i) through (iv).

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), recent/relevant experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have such experience, recent/relevant experience shall be submitted for each JV partner (except for offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration). JV offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) recent and relevant projects.

If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from the prior JV are proposing on this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work on the submitted project was performed by the JV partner offering on this solicitation. If the offeror does not specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted project was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract, the project will not be considered relevant.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience or corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits all of the following:

(i) A one-page narrative clearly demonstrating the corporate affiliates will have meaningful participation in the project by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliates that will be dedicated to the project;

(ii) An organization chart that demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates, and

(iii) Teaming Agreement/letter of commitment

(a) Basis of Evaluation. The assessment of the offeror’s recent and relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of this solicitation.

The Government will consider the depth and breadth of the relevant experience, focusing on performance of technical specifications to be performed under this contract, to evaluate the level of risk of unsuccessful performance.

The Government will review only five (5) projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) project limit will not be considered.

Offerors who fail to demonstrate relevant experience in one or more of the following annexes/sub-annexes will be considered unacceptable: 1502000 – Facility Investment similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service orders; emergency generator, HVAC and fire protection system maintenance and repairs similar to the requirements in the RFP); 1602000 – Electrical similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Transmission and Distribution Systems operation, maintenance and repairs); 1606000 – Water similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Raw Water Supply, Water Treatment Plant and Distribution Systems operation, Laboratory and Testing processes, maintenance and repairs) and 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including maintenance and repair of vehicles and Civil Engineering Support Equipment (CESE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).

Offerors who demonstrate relevant project experience in any of the remaining technical annexes/sub-annexes may be evaluated more favorably.

Additionally, offerors who demonstrate experience in any of the following areas may be evaluated more favorably regardless if the project meets the relevancy requirement: Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE) maintenance and certification similar to the requirements of Annex 1502000; or Landfill operations similar to the requirements of Annex 1503050; or Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant operations similar to the requirements of Annex 1606000; or Maintenance and repair of federal institutional facilities or federal courts.

Offerors who submit at least one recent/relevant project which demonstrate experience self-performing or managing Base Operating Services (BOS) (or equivalent) contracts at a remote and/or OCONUS location may be evaluated more favorably.

Projects completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects performed by the offeror as the prime contractor may be evaluated more favorably than those performed by affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD/ member companies.

Projects completed by a proposed subcontractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects submitted by JVs where the JV members performed together may be evaluated more favorably than projects in which the JV members did not perform together.

With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a JV, each member of the JV must demonstrate prime contractor experience on at least one relevant project. If each member of the JV does not have at least one relevant experience project, then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

Offerors who demonstrate experience without relying on corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) may be evaluated more favorably.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, the specific relevant task order, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

(2) Factor 2, Management

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall clearly demonstrate a feasible approach for controlling and managing the entire project, including the interface between the major functional areas and sub-annexes, and the offeror’s general management and administration structure. For organizational purposes, address the requested information in the following format limiting the Factor 2 submission to a maximum of 20 pages.

(i) Workforce Management. Provide and explain a plan to hire, retain, organize, manage, and supervise workforce and key personnel to accomplish the requirements of this contract. The plan shall explain how the offeror plans to improve workforce skills and productivity if retaining incumbent workforce and its impact on the BOE. The plan shall include an organization chart identifying the on-site organization, on-site staff, and corporate staff that will be used to perform this contract as well as the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, sub-annex area organizations, and subcontractors. The plan shall identify the function(s) of the various groups of the organization, direct and indirect staffing and associated trade classifications with skill level (journeyman, etc.) consistent with the labor hours provided in Section J Attachment JL-1 Staffing Levels.

(ii) Quality Management System (QMS). Provide a summary QMS Program, as described in Section C 0200000, 2.6.7 Management and Administration Quality Management System (QMS), that demonstrates the processes (practices, resources, and activities) and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all management and administration requirements, performance objectives and standards throughout the performance work statement. Additionally, provide details which clearly identify how the contractor intends to approach the following:

1) Explain how the technical qualifications of the individual(s) providing QC oversight will meet the requirements of Annex 0200000 Spec Items 2.7.1.2 and 2.7.1.2.1;

2) Explain the role of QC organization as it pertains to workforce staffing;

3) Explain how the QC personnel will become and remain cognizant of what encompasses contractual obligations of IMP systems, how they will ensure implementation of the offeror’s technical approach and compliance with all applicable requirements; and

4) Explain how the QC organization will measure performance to the recurring work schedule, correct defects and ensure rework is accomplished as required in Section H.

(iii) Scheduling. Provide the methodology to develop recurring work schedules and the tactics used to determine if and when there is a need to adjust the schedule. Describe scheduling procedures to minimize interference with Government operations and the flexibility to adjust schedules to allow for access outside regular Government working hours; as well as the flexibility to manage workload fluctuations due to surges of non-recurring work task orders, natural disasters that could occur or any other foreseeable contingencies.

(iv) Phase-In Plans. Provide a phase-in plan that ensures personnel, materials and equipment are on site to meet the performance standards at the start of the contract. The phase-in plan is limited to no more than 90 calendar days. The plans shall include: 1) a schedule for all key events; 2) personnel actions and responsibilities regarding employees at all levels; and 3) acquisition, delivery, storage, inventory and disposal of equipment, working stock, and materials (to include inbound items as applicable).

(b) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 2 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no sub-factors.

The Government will evaluate how well the management approach demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the management approach to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the RFP without reliance on government direction.

(i) The Government will evaluate the degree to which the offeror’s management approach demonstrates effective and resource efficient management of their workforce; labor; skill competencies;

productivity; quality management; scheduling; and phase-in plans. Workforce Management plans with hours, and staffing levels on organizational charts that are not consistent with the Basis of estimate and the JL-1 Staffing Levels will be deemed unacceptable.

(ii) Offerors who demonstrate an innovative approach to hiring, retaining, training and tracking to ensure technicians and key personnel are onboard and qualified to perform work within the PWS may be evaluated more favorably.

(iii) Offerors who demonstrate an innovative quality management approach that minimizes down time on IMP systems within critical facilities may be evaluated more favorably.

(iv) Management plans containing statements such as “will comply” or “noted and understood” without supporting narrative to demonstrate understanding are not acceptable. Cursory responses or responses, which merely reiterate or reformulate solicitation language, may not be considered as satisfying the requirement of the RFP or as demonstrating the ability to manage the workforce.

(3) Factor 3, Technical Approach

(b) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Describe staffing levels for each annex and sub-annex. Provide a completed Attachment JL-1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period.

Attachment JL-1 is provided under file name N69450-22-R-0032_JL1.xlsx. The JL-1 shall be submitted electronically in the format provided. In summary, provide the rationale for Basis of Estimate (BOE) for each specification item listed in Section J Attachment JL-1. BOE shall include labor classification; annual direct and indirect labor hours; state the estimate data source(s) (such as, RS Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, Whitestone Building and Repair Cost Reference, etc.) and methodology used to develop estimate for performing each specification item listed in JL-1.

(ii) Describe the methodology to be implemented to accomplish the requirements in each annex and sub-annex and detail how the proposed approach will effectively achieve each performance objective and standard across all annexes and sub-annexes to include the offeror’s methodology and approach to perform service orders, preventative maintenance (PM) program, integrated maintenance program (IMP), other recurring and non-recurring services. The solicitation uses a systems approach that does not list every ancillary part/component of a system; however, the requirement is to maintain the system to include all mechanically and electrically interlocked ancillary parts, equipment and components forming a functioning system (i.e. fire protection system, HVAC system, Utility Systems, etc.).

(iii) The offeror’s methodology shall clearly demonstrate an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The offeror’s methodology shall demonstrate: an understanding of all Limits of Liability (LOL); an understanding of supply chain management necessary to ensure materials, supplies, and equipment availability meet contractual delivery timelines and all other logistical challenges performing services at a remote OCONUS location; an efficient labor approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements; and an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement for each of the annexes and sub-annexes.

(iv) In addition to submittal requirements identified above, respond to each request identified below and provide a methodology that clearly demonstrates full understanding of requirements regarding the following:

1) Off base disposal. Note that the solicitation requires off base removal of various materials such as tires, recoverable material, and recyclable material. See Annex 1503030. Provide a narrative that clearly demonstrates an adequate approach that ensures full performance of the requirement.

2) Systems maintenance (PM, IMP, and other). Note that the solicitation uses a systems approach that does not list every ancillary part/component of a system, however, the requirement is to maintain the system to include all mechanically and/or electronically interlocked parts, equipment, and components forming a functioning system (i.e. fire protection system, HVAC system, etc.). Provide a narrative that clearly demonstrates an approach to perform services on the complete systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements and hospital standards.

3) Service orders. Note that service orders are required in multiple annexes/sub-annexes within the solicitation. Provide a narrative that demonstrates an efficient and effective approach to performing service orders for each applicable annex/sub-annex.

4) Utility services. Note that NS Guantanamo Bay produces and distributes its own electricity and water, and utilities must be remain adequate and sufficient at all times. See sub-annexes 1602000 and 1606000. Provide a narrative that clearly demonstrates understanding of policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in each of the performance objectives and standards of sub-annexes 1602000 and 1606000. Provide a methodology that ensures all availability of electrical power and quality water will remain consistently sufficient.

5) Logistics. Note that NS Guantanamo Bay is an isolated location, but adequate staffing, supplies, spare parts, material, equipment and any other items that requires shipment must be available at all times to prevent unwarranted mission impacts and delays. Provide a narrative that demonstrates that proper personnel, spare parts, materials, and equipment will be readily available, and that downtime for all systems will be minimized.

6) NAVFAC Maximo Data. The data in Maximo is critical to government planning, programming and budgeting processes and therefore maintenance of Service Provider, Asset, Specification, and Characteristic Meter Reading data fields is required throughout the PWS. Note the solicitation requires data entry by Direct Entry. Offerors who propose data entry by any other means will be determined unacceptable.

7) Transportation equipment. Note that vehicles and transportation equipment must be maintained and repaired within specified time frames with minimal allowable downtime. See Annex 1700000 Sections C and J. Provide a narrative that demonstrates that all vehicles will be maintained and repaired within the specified timeframes identified in Annex 1700000.

8) Unit Price Labor (UPL). Note the requirement to provide a UPL rate to perform one hour of work-in-place for any work over the Limits of Liability and any other over and above work identified by the Government. Provide a detailed understanding of all costs included within the contractor’s unit price to perform one hour of work-in-place.

9) Risk mitigation. Note that practical contingency plans are required to mitigate risks involving shortages of: material, equipment, and workers (licensed, certified, and security cleared as appropriate) to successfully perform the contract. Provide a narrative on how the technical approach and contingency plans will mitigate risks involving shortages of material, equipment and workers.

(c) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 3 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no sub-factors. The

Government will evaluate the degree to which the offeror’s technical approach:

(i) Demonstrates adequate staffing levels for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item supported by a reasonable Basis of Estimate (BOE), a reasonable understanding of the requirements and labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform. Offerors who fail to provide a MS Excel version of the Attachment JL-1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period will be considered unacceptable. Offerors who propose inadequate staffing levels without a unique and innovative approach or methodology to support it may be evaluated less favorably or considered unacceptable.

(ii) Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve performance objectives and standards for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item that reflects the current industry and/or commercial practices, standards and procedures for each major task. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an adequate approach to performing service orders.

The offeror demonstrates an understanding of and commitment to adhere to all limits of liability identified in each respective spec item. The approach clearly demonstrates an understanding of the systems approach described in Section J. The methodology demonstrates a state-of-the-art, reliability-centered inspection, testing, maintenance and repair program that ensures systems are maintained fully functional in accordance with design parameters and OEM specifications.