__2014-06-08_amend_0003.pdf

EXCEPT ION T O SF 30

30-105-04

ST ANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84 Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

P AGE OF P AGES

1 15

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Jun-2014

4. REQUISITION/P URCHASE REQ. NO.

ACQR3768792

5. P ROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

IPT GULFCOAST

BLDG 903, PO BOX 30

NAS JACKSONVILLE

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIT AT ION NO.

N69450-14-R-0761

X 9B. DAT ED (SEE IT EM 11)

06-May-2014

10A. MOD. OF CONT RACT /ORDER NO.

10B. DAT ED (SEE IT EM 13)

CODE FACILIT Y CODE

11. T HIS IT EM ONLY APPLIES T O AMENDMENT S OF SOLICIT AT IONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE P LACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIP T OF OFFERS P RIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SP ECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIAT ION DAT A (If required)

13. T HIS IT EM APPLIES ONLY T O MODIFICAT IONS OF CONT RACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONT RACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN IT EM 14.

A. T HIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT T O: (Specify authority) T HE CHANGES SET FORT H IN IT EM 14 ARE MADE IN T HE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN IT EM 10A.

B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED T O REFLECT T HE ADMINIST RAT IVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORT H IN IT EM 14, PURSUANT T O T HE AUT HORIT Y OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPPLEMENT AL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INT O PURSUANT T O AUT HORIT Y OF:

D. OT HER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT : Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPT ION OF AMENDMENT /MODIFICAT ION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N69450-14-R-0761 INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) PENSACOLA, FL; NAS WHITING FIELD, MILTON, FL; NSA PANANMA CITY, FL AND NOLFs LOCATED IN FL AND AL. NOSC TALLAHASSEE.

See Page Tw o for Continuation

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND T IT LE OF SIGNER (T ype or print) 16A. NAME AND T IT LE OF CONT RACT ING OFFICER (T ype or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DAT E SIGNED 16B. UNIT ED ST AT ES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DAT E SIGNED

09-Jun-2014

N69450-14-R-0761

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required performance has changed from N69450-14-R-0761 INDEFINITE DELIVERY

INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ASPHALT AND

CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) PENSACOLA, FL; NAS WHITING FIELD,

MILTON, FL; NAS PANANMA CITY, FL AND NOLFs LOCATED IN FL AND AL. NOSC TALLAHASSEE.THIS SOLICITATION IS ISSUED AS A 100% SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE AND OPEN

TO SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS WITH SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED

FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS SOLICITION WILL RESULT IN A FIRMED FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. NAICS CODE: 237310. SIZE STANDARD $33.5MA BID BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF 20% OF YOUR PROPOSAL PRICE OR $3,000,000.00 WHICHEVER IS LESS, IS REQUIRED WITH YOUR PRICE

PROPOSAL. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS WILL BE REQUIRED 10 CALENDAR DAYS

AFTER DATE OF CONTRACT AWARD. BOTH BONDS SHALL BE IN THE AMOUNT OF 100% OF

AWARD AMOUNT.ESTIMATED TASK ORDER RANGE: $2,000 - $2,000,000 MAXIMUM VALUE FOR

BASIC CONTACTS & ALL TASK ORDERS IS NTE: $20M.

Changed to N69450-14-R-0761 INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR

INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR NAVAL AIR STATION

(NAS) PENSACOLA, FL; NAS WHITING FIELD, MILTON, FL; NSA PANANMA CITY, FL AND NOLFs LOCATED IN FL AND AL. NOSC TALLAHASSEE.THIS SOLICITATION IS ISSUED AS A 100% SMALL

BUSINESS SET-ASIDE AND OPEN TO SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS WITH SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

AND QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS SOLICITION WILL RESULT IN A

FIRMED FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. NAICS CODE: 237310. SIZE STANDARD $33.5MA BID BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF 20% OF YOUR PROPOSAL PRICE OR $3,000,000.00 WHICHEVER IS

LESS, IS REQUIRED WITH YOUR PRICE PROPOSAL. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS WILL

BE REQUIRED 15 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER DATE OF CONTRACT AWARD. BOTH BONDS SHALL BE

IN THE AMOUNT OF 100% OF AWARD AMOUNT.ESTIMATED TASK ORDER RANGE: $2,000 -

$2,000,000 MAXIMUM VALUE FOR BASIC CONTACTS & ALL TASK ORDERS IS NTE: $20M..

CLIN 0005

The CLIN extended description has changed from ELINS for Option Year 4NAS Pensacola, NAS Whiting

Field, NSA Panama City; NOLFs in FL and NOSC Tallahassee : I001-I099ELINS for Option Year 4 NOLFs AL:

J001-J099 to ELINS for Option Year 4NAS Pensacola, NAS Whiting Field, NSA Panama City; NOLFs in FL and NOSC Tallahassee : J001-J099ELINS for Option Year 4 NOLFs AL: K001-K099.

The following have been modified:

NOTE

Note:

The Not-To-Exceed amount is for the total of all Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contracts awarded under the solicitation.

A task order for the minimum guarantee will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract.

NOTE

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM

QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT

$2,000.00 $20,000,000.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Deliver/Task order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

$2,000.00

AMOUNT QUANTITY

$2,000,000.00

AMOUNT

There is no yearly limit except for the total five year maximum of $20,000,000. Task orders will be firmed fixed-price, normally in the range of $2,000 to $2,000,000 per order. However, task orders over this amount may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest and approved by the NAVFAC SE Chief of Contracts.

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER

VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM GUARANTEE:

The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or actual amount of work to be ordered. The minimum guarantee of $10,000 is for the life of the contact, including any options that may be exercised. Maximum value of the life the contract is $20,000,000. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee specified herein.

The minimum guarantee for this contract including any option periods if exercised is $10,000.

The Government anticipates issuing a task order at award or just after award that will exceed the minimum guarantee. The Government has provided an estimate of each ELIN that may be ordered but does not guarantee to order a minimum of each ELIN item.

CONTRACT ADMIN POC

All post award submittals, correspondence, contact, etc. shall be directed to the office identified in Block 26 of the SF 1442. Specific point of contact is:

(to be completed at time of award)

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

18.3% 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) ) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) ) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) ) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) ) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) PENSACOLA, FL; NAS WHITING FIELD, FL; NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY (NSA) PANAMA CITY, FL AND NAVAL OUTYING FIELDS (NOLF) AL AND FL. (End of provision)

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by full text:

AMEND 0003

Amendment 0003:

1. The purpose of this amendment is to revise/add clauses, the modify Evlaution Section, provide corrections to the minimum guarantee, provide updated PPI Log, updated Exhibit 6 – ELINS IDIQ and provide intital task order information.

2. See attached updated PPI Log: 2014-06-08 PPI Log

3. See attached updated Exhibit 6: 2014-06-08 Exhibit 6 – ELINS IDIQ paving CLINS

4. See attached 2014-05-23 NASP M&Opavement Ballfields f013 and 2014-05-23 WF Basewide, Ditches, 20130308, RPR DITCHES SPECS.

5. . All other terms and conditions of this RFP remain unchanged.

barbara.czinder Highlight

6. Offeror’s must acknowledge this amendment in writing with their proposal submission.

EVALUATION

BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors.

Non-Cost/Price Factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Safety

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical Factors 1, 2, and 4 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment Factor 3. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

Provide one (1) original, one (1) copy, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements.

Price shall be considered available for award for 90 calendar days from the price proposal due date.

The Offeror shall submit the following as part of their Volume I, Price Proposal in a separate binder(s) from their Non-Cost/Price Factor (technical) proposal.

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

i. Cover letter with the following information:

Authorized negotiator’s (POC) name POC telephone number POC email address CAGE code DUNS number TIN (taxpayer ID number)

ii. SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with blocks 14 through 20c completed.

iii. The Offeror shall submit their prices using the MS Excel ELIN Price Schedule included in the solicitation, in a separate sealed envelope, as part of Volume I, Price Proposal. Offerors shall also include an electronic copy of their MS Excel ELIN Price Schedule on the required CD and shall round all unit prices to the second place behind the decimal (i.e. $1.00 vice $1.004):

Complete all Price ELINs (A001 through K099).

iv. Bid Bond (see clause 5252.228-9302 Bid Guarantee in RFP for Bid Bond amount) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price or $3M, whichever amount is less.

v. Exhibit 4 Financial Questionnaire (in sealed envelope from financial institution).

Offerors shall submit the Financial Questionnaire to their financial institution and request that the financial institution complete the questionnaire with regard to the Offeror’s firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire, the financial institution should place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Offeror so that the Offeror can include the questionnaire (in the sealed envelope) with the Offeror’s proposal.

For the Joint Venture Agreement and/or Partnership Agreement, the Financial Questionnaire and Representations and Certifications will not be rated.

They will, however, be considered in assessing the Offeror’s responsibility.

vi. Proof of the Offeror’s filled out Representations and Certifications and Active and

Inactive Exclusions from the System for Award Management (SAM).

vii. Also, Exhibit 5 DFARS clause 252.209-7993 “Representations by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law- Fiscal Year 2014 Appropriations (Deviation 2014-OO0009) (FEB 2014).

viii. Prove of VET’s 100 certification if available.

Note: The bid bond, SAM registrations must be in the name/CAGE/DUNS of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option ELINS. For the base period performance plus four (4) 12-month option periods for a total maximum duration of 60 months which equates to the sum of ELINS A001 through K099. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 0100 of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the independent Government Estimate.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.”

The Government will evaluate remaining pricing submittals to ensure the following:

(a) Pricing submittals within Section 00010 and ELIN Pricing Attachment is consistent

(b) Fair and reasonable ELIN/unit pricing and identification of unbalanced pricing as appropriate.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

Provide one (1) original, four (4) copies, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements.

The Offeror shall submit the following as part of their Volume II, Non-Cost/Price (Technical) Proposal in a separate binder(s) from their Price Proposal.

Note: Non-cost/price factor below do not contain sub-factors.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements. Provide the following for evaluation under Tab 1 of the technical proposal Volume II:

The task orders for this contract may range in value from $2,000 to $2,000,000, and shall include a combination of asphalt and/or concrete roadwork such as: streets;

parking lots; sidewalks; bridges; drainage and/or erosion control device repair, runways, taxiways, flight lines, and airfield repairs. The capacity, capability and management plan for the handling of multiple, simultaneous and potentially remotely located task orders for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed plan for handling six (6) simultaneous task orders in various locations under this contract. The six projects shall include:

Actual Task Orders in Conjunction with this IDIQ:

a. the Mill and Overlay initial task order project located at N.A.S.

Pensacola;

b. the culvert repair initial task order project located at N.A.S. Whiting Field;

Hypothetical Projects for Evaluation Purposes Only:

c. one airfield repair project involving 4000 LF of crack seal, 400 CF spall repair and 3000L LF of airfield restriping (removal or markings and remarking with retro-reflective bead paint) at Barin NOLF in Baldwin County, AL;

d. one 200,000 SF parking lot rejuvenation (asphalt slurry seal coat) and restripe with 200 LF of curb repair located at NOSC - MRCRC Tallahassee;

e. one 400,000 SF asphalt removal, grading and sodding project located at N.S.A. Panama City, FL.

f. One RW apron repair requiring demolition, removal and replacement of 400 SF of airfield concrete located at NALF Evergreen (Middleton Airfield) in Evergreen, AL..

The plan should address the Offeror's capacity, capability and management plan (material and equipment sources, manpower, subcontracting plan, batch plant availability, etc.) for the handling of a variety of simultaneous projects of various levels of complexity, distributed throughout the area covered by this contract. Provide the roles, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6) if applicable. The narrative shall include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of a significant subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 2, the firm must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to two (2) double-sided page (or four

(4) single-sided pages). Submit an additional single sided page organizational chart.

The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(1) In the Offeror is a joint venture or partnership, submit a signed copy of the joint venture agreement or partnership agreement.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the Offeror’s organizational structure, teaming relationships, capacity, capability and management approach for the handling of a variety of simultaneous projects distributed throughout the area covered by this contract. Offerors must demonstrate the capability to manage multiple, simultaneous projects in varied locations using either in-house forces or subcontracting relationships. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Factor 2 – Experience:

evaluation under Tab 2 of the technical proposal Volume II:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects where the Offeror was the prime contractor and that best demonstrate your experience on relevant projects. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as approximately $250,000 or greater in value for highway and bridge repair; airfield paving and repairs (including runway, taxiway, and flight line); street and parking lot installation; and, installation of erosion control devices. Offerors must submit at least one relevant project demonstrating the ability to install or perform major repair of airfield pavement. At least one relevant project shall include concrete installation or repair.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET (Exhibit 1) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two

(2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.:

unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) or partnership, relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity or partnership. If the Joint Venture or partnership does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the individual Joint Venture or partnership members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture or partnership members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. Offerors who demonstrate more experience on complex projects (e.g. a single project involving multiple functions such as earthwork, runway paving and marking, culvert repair, etc.)

may be rated higher.

The basis of evaluation will assess the Offeror’s experience and performing relevant construction of highway and bridge repair; airfield paving and repairs (including runway, taxiway, and flight line); street and parking lot installation; and, installation of erosion control devices. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the subcontractor firm(s) proposed in Factor 1 that have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

evaluation under Tab 3 of the technical proposal Volume II:

The Agency will evaluate the past performance assessment for each project submitted under Factor 2. If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If there is not a completed CCASS evaluation then submit NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) (Exhibit 2) for each project included in Factor 2 for Construction Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information.

However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Veronica Brooks, phone (904) 542-6810, email: Veronica.Brooks@navy.mil and Barbra Czinder, phone (904) 542-6834; email:

Barbara.czinder@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

mailto:Veronica.Brooks@navy.mil mailto:Barbara.czinder@navy.mil

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

Factor 4 – Safety

(i) Submittal Requirements. Provide the following for evaluation under Tab 4 of the technical proposal Volume II:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.). Submit Safety Questionnaire (Exhibit 3).

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

For the three (3) previous (2013, 2012 and 2011) complete calendar years, submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three (3) year period). If you have no EMR, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

For the three (3) previous (2013, 2012 and 2011) complete calendar years, submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, any and innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

-Experience Modification Rate (EMR) -OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate -Offeror’s Technical Approach to Safety -Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This acquisition will result in a competitively negotiated firm fixed-price IDIQ contract for Installation and Repair of Asphalt and Concrete Pavement for NAS Pensacola, FL; NAS Whiting Field, Milton, FL;

Naval Support Activity (NSA) Panama City, FL NOSC Tallahassee, FL. and Naval Outlying Fields (NOLF) AL and FL .

(End of Summary of Changes)