2.03 RFP Amend 0002 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 08 Sep 2026 18 Sep 2026

N6883626R00020002

Section B - Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs

The following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1 44 +43 Unit of Measure Months Days

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1 44 +43 Unit of Measure Months Days

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1 44 +43 Unit of Measure Months Days

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1 44 +43 Unit of Measure Months Days

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 1 44 +43 Unit of Measure Months Days

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 11 10 -1

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 11 10 -1

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 11 10 -1

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 11 10 -1

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 11 10 -1

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 12 10 -2

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

Quantity 12 10 -2

Section F - Deliveries or Performance

The delivery information for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 28 Feb 2027.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 16 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Mar 2027.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 28 Feb 2027.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 16 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Mar 2027.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 28 Feb 2027.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 16 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Mar 2027.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 28 Feb 2027.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 16 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Mar 2027.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 28 Feb 2027.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 16 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Mar 2027.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Mar 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Mar 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Mar 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Mar 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Mar 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 16 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Ship To - N09697 - NAVY REGION SOUTHEAST CODE N323

INFORMATION FROM TO

Delivery Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Feb 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Delivery Period PeriodStart = 01 Apr 2027. PeriodEnd = 31 Jan 2028.

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

DD 254 Draft

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Performance Work Statement has the following 11 exhibits referenced.

Technical Exhibit 01 RPOC Organization Chart

Technical Exhibit 02 Vessel Inventory

Technical Exhibit 03 Contractor Facility Equipment Maintenance List Rev 1

Technical Exhibit 04 Materials Inventory - excel file

Technical Exhibit 05 Commercial Maintenance Program Business rules

Technical Exhibit 06 Ships Arrival Notification and Check Off List

Technical Exhibit 07 Consumables List

Technical Exhibit 08 Aviation Rescue Swimmer Course Instructor SOP

Technical Exhibit 09 Emergency Action Plan (ARSS)

Technical Exhibit 10 Installation Access Badge Form SECNAV Form 5512-1 (Kings Bay)

Technical Exhibit 11 NSB Kings Bay Visitor Request

Past Performance Questionnaire provided as referenced in 52.212-1 Addendum, Volume III Past Performance

Contract Data Requirements List

Wage Determination 2015 - 4515 GA

Wage Determination 2015 - 4539 North FL

Wage Determination 2015 - 4559 Panhandle FL

Wage Determination 2015 - 4561 West FL

Wage Determination 2015 - 4583 South FL

DD 254 DRAFT

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

The following provisions are incorporated into 52.212-1 as an addendum to this solicitation:

The Government intends to post solicitation N6883626R0002 and all amendments to the Government Point of Entry via SAM.gov.

QUESTIONS

All questions and clarifications regarding this solicitation must be submitted via email to Mrs. Peiney Allerton at Peiney.t.allerton.civ@us.navy.mil and Harold Melton at Harold.m.melton.civ@us.navy.mil; subject line to read:

Questions/Clarifications for N6883626R0002. Each question or comment should reference the applicable document, page number, and paragraph number. Offerors shall not include any proprietary information in a question, because the Government will provide the question and answer to all potential offerors. All questions must be submitted no later than 11:00am Eastern Standard Time, Friday, August 21, 2026.

The Government reserves the right not to respond to any questions received concerning this solicitation after the questions receipt date above. Accordingly, offerors are encouraged to carefully review all solicitation requirements and submit questions to the Government early in the proposal timeframe.

HISTORICAL DATA

Incumbent: Metson Marine Services, Contract number N68836-24-C-0003

Historical Resources: The below information illustrates the Historical Labor Mix utilized on past contracts and is provided as a tool to assist in establishing resources. It is the Contractor's sole responsibility to determine appropriate resources needed to accomplish work. See PWS section 17 for staffing required for this requirement.

Position Location Hours (per year)

Heavy Equip Mechanic Jacksonville, FL 2080 per person

Heavy Equip Mechanic Panama City, FL 2080 per person

Heavy Equip Mechanic Pensacola, FL 2080 per person

Heavy Equip Mechanic Key West, FL 2080 per person

Heavy Equip Mechanic Kings Bay, GA 2080 per person

(a) Submission of offers. Offerors shall submit offers in PDF format by volume as described below. Each volume shall contain a cover sheet with #1 and #3 below.

The offer shall contain the following information:

1. The solicitation number;

2. The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

3. The Offeror's Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and, if applicable, Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator;

4. Information necessary to evaluate the factors contained in the provision at 52.212-2 or as described in the solicitation;

5. Responses to provisions that require Offeror completion of information, representations, and certifications (other than those collected via the System for Award Management (SAM)); and

6. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and any solicitation amendments.

Volume I - Price There is no page limit for Volume I submission

Offerors shall submit the following:

1. Standard Form (SF) 1449. Blocks 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c of page one of SF 1449 shall be completed and signed to show the Offeror has read and agrees to comply with all terms, conditions, and instructions provided in the solicitation document.

2. Price Offer. The Offeror shall fill in the price schedule and include unit prices. The unit price should be evenly incremented so that it adds up to the total price without rounding past the second digit right of the decimal point for total prices for all contract line items (CLINs). Pricing shall be structured in accordance with the contract line items identified in the SF 1449 bid schedule. Do not submit pricing for "Not Separately Priced" or "Not to Exceed" line items.

Volume II - Technical Capability Volume II is limited to 20 pages

Offerors shall demonstrate an understanding of the solicitation requirements by providing the following:

Subfactor A. Staffing Maintenance Plan IAW PWS Chapters 8, 17.5, 17.6, and Tech Exhibits 1, 2 and

Subfactor B. Staffing Operations Plan IAW PWS Chapter 10 and 17

Subfactor C. Personnel Qualifications IAW PWS Chapter 17 - Submit resumes for key personnel (PWS Chapter 17.5); resumes are limited to 2 pages per resume and do not count toward 20 page limit.

Each technical capability element must provide sufficient evidence that the Offeror has a clear understanding of the solicitation and are able to meet the minimum requirements and qualifications set forth in the PWS.

Volume III - Past Performance Volume III is limited to 10 pages

The Offeror shall provide a maximum of three relevant past performance evaluations of similar size, scope and complexity to services set forth in the PWS, that is currently ongoing with at least one year complete or completed within the past three years prior to the solicitation release date (see block 8 of the SF1449). If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available which meets the requirements identified above, it shall be submitted with the offer. If a CPARS evaluation is not available, then the Offeror shall submit a completed Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (PPQ, Attachment 13) for each reference submitted. At the PPQ customer/ client's request, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government's POC, Contract Specialist, Mrs. Peiney Allerton at peiney.t.allerton.civ@us.navy.mil and Contracting Officer, Harold Melton at harold.m.melton.civ@us.navy.mil on the date and time offers are due. Offers shall not incorporate by reference PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Offeror is responsible for providing the PPQ to its references for completion.

Offerors may submit a combination of delivery orders (DOs), task orders (TOs), technical direction letters (TDLs), and/or technical area tasks (TATs) placed under an Indefinite Delivery type contract or BPA as one of the examples of past performance, however, no more than five total combined as one submission will be reviewed. Each individual example in the combination must meet the requirements listed above.

If offerors submit past performance examples where they served as a subcontractor, they must clearly identify their role as a subcontractor. Additionally, the offeror shall demonstrate that the scope, complexity, and magnitude of the subcontractor's work on the referenced past performance are substantially similar to the requirements outlined in the solicitation.

For Joint Ventures (JV), only a single set of up to three (3) references shall be submitted. For all JVs, the proposal shall clearly identify the parts of the PWS which each JV member will perform. If the offeror does not provide this information, the JV member reference will not be considered.

If no recent (currently ongoing with at least one year complete or completed within the past three years prior to solicitation release date), relevant past performance is available the Offeror shall affirmatively state that it possesses no recent or relevant past performance.

Note: An incomplete PPQ may not be evaluated.

Volume IV Contractor Responsibility There is no page limit for Volume IV submission

1. Representation and Certifications. Offerors shall either complete the following provisions contained in the solicitation OR provide a statement that certification in System for Award Management (SAM) is current, complete, and accurate as of the date of the Offeror's signature, or list any changes as they relate to the following provisions:

FAR 52.209-5

FAR 52.209-7

FAR 52.229-11

DFAR 252.204-7998

2. No Exception. By submitting a quote, the quoter agrees to all terms, conditions, and provisions of this solicitation. To reject these terms, the quoter shall provide a formal statement of rejection.

3. Financial Letter. A letter from the Offeror's financial institution that indicates that the Offeror has adequate financial resources to perform the contract.

Note: After the solicitation closing date, the Contracting Officer may require an Offeror to promptly submit additional information to demonstrate the Offeror is responsible.

AWARD NOTICE TO SUCCESSFUL OFFEROR

A written notice of award or acceptance of an Offer will be emailed to the successful Offeror. Before the Offeror's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Failure to submit all required documentation may render an offer non-responsive and the offer may not be considered for award.

(b) Period for acceptance of offers. Offeror agrees to hold their prices firm for a period of 120 calendar days from date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an amendment to the solicitation.

(c) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers. Not modified.

(d) Contract award. Not modified.

(e) Debriefing. Not modified.

ATTACHMENTS: The following documents are provided as attachments and are considered part of this solicitation:

Attachment 13 in RFP: Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (4 pages)

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

52.212-2 Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services (DEVIATION 2026-O0038) (Feb 2026)

Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government will make a single award using best value trade-off IAW RFO 15.103-1, with Technical Capability assessed as either acceptable or unacceptable basis and no additional credit will be assessed for technical capability beyond the acceptable or unacceptable rating. Technical and Past Performance are approximately equal. When combined, Technical and Past Performance are significantly more important than Price IAW RFO 15.104(d)(1). Tradeoff is between Past Performance and Price among all technically acceptable proposals.

(a) The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1: Technical factor level.The technical capability will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis at both the subfactor and

Technical Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptab le

Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation and reflects a complete understanding of the PWS.

Unaccept able

Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation nor reflect a complete understanding of the PWS.

n importance and will be evaluated as either The proposals shall be evaluated against the three subfactors below. The subfactors are considered equal i Acceptable or Unacceptable. An unacceptable rating at the subfactor level will result in a proposal being deemed unacceptable at the overall factor level. Technically unacceptable proposals will be removed from further award consideration.

Staffing Maintenance Plan - To be rated "Acceptable", the offeror's staffing maintenance plan must demonstrate sufficient Subfactor A.

management, supervision and staffing to support the performance requirements identified in the PWS. An acceptable staffing Maintenance plan shall be submitted that:

- Demonstrates, with narrative, adequate staffing with the necessary skill sets and sufficient management to ensure the requirements of PWS Chapters 8.0, 17.5, 17.6; and Tech Exhibits 1, 2, and 3.

- The offeror shall submit an organization chart by installation which identifies all on-site management and supervisory positions, the number of personnel assigned to each location and skill set being provided, see PWS Chapters 17.5 and 17.6.

. Staffing Operations Plan - To be rated "Acceptable", the offeror's staffing operations plan must demonstrate sufficient Subfactor B management, supervision ad staffing to support the performance requirements identified in the PWS. An acceptable staffing Operations plan shall be submitted that:

- Demonstrates, with narrative, adequate staffing with the necessary skill sets and sufficient management to ensure the requirements of PWS Chapter 10.0 are met.

- The offeror shall submit an organization chart which identifies all on-site management and supervisory positions, the number of personnel assigned to each location and skill set being provided, see PWS Chapters 17.5 and 17.6.

Subfactor C. Personnel Qualifications - personnel, To be rated "Acceptable", the offeror's submitted resumes for key that will be evaluated, must demonstrate that the personnel meet requirements identified in the PWS Chapter 17.

Factor 2: Past Performance offerors' points of contact (POCs) for the same or Using the information submitted in Volume III, Past Performance Questionnaires submitted by the similar works that is currently ongoing with at least one year complete or have been performed in the last three years from the solicitation release date and other information independently obtained from Government or commercial sources. The Government will assign an overall confidence assessment for each offeror whose past performance is evaluated IAW the rating tables below. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror's ability to perform the effort described in this RFP, based on the offeror's demonstrated present and past performance. Each Past Performance effort will be evaluated based on recency, relevancy, and quality.

The Government will begin its evaluation by first determining the recency and then the relevancy of each past performance effort. To be considered a recent effort, the effort must be currently ongoing with at least one year complete or have been performed within the last three years from the solicitation release date. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained. To be considered relevant, the Offeror's past performance information will be assessed on the similarity of the scope, magnitude, and complexity of the Offeror's prior or ongoing contracts to this solicitation's performance requirements. The relevancy of each contract reference will be considered in the overall confidence assessment rating for the offeror. The following ratings will be utilized in evaluating the relevancy of each past performance effort:

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjecti val Rating

Description

Very Relev ant

(VR)

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and this solicitation requires.complexities

Relev ant (R)

Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Some what Relev ant

(SR)

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and this solicitation requires.complexities

Not R eleva nt

(NR)

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and this solicitation requires. complexities

Scope Defined as providing port operations services to include limited operation of various watercraft and boats, related maintenance services, port operations, and waterfront administration at multiple locations.

Magn itude

Experience managing maintenance, port operations and waterfront administration at multiple locations with a dollar value greater than or equal to $1.5M per year.

Comp lexity

Experience providing services in the functional areas of performance: Operations, preventive, predictive, corrective, depot level maintenance of various watercrafts, boats and equipment, industrial marine repair services occur in support of assigned boats, waterfront equipment and operations.

performance. The Past Performance Evaluation The third aspect of past performance evaluation is to establish the overall quality of the offeror's past Team will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror's performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. A separate quality assessment rating is not required; rather the past performance rating, using the confidence assessment rating method below is based on the offeror's overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance (Ref: DoD Source Selection Procedures). One of the following overall Past Performance Confidence Assessment ratings will be assigned to each offeror using the following definitions:

Past Performance Confidence Rating Method

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a Reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Past performance as the prime contractor will be considered more relevant in assigning the overall past performance confidence assessment than that as a subcontractor. Offerors with no recent/relevant performance record shall receive the rating "Unknown Confidence" meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Past performance ratings of "Substantial Confidence" or "Satisfactory Confidence" will be considered more favorably than a "Neutral Confidence" rating in conducting the trade-off.

For Joint Ventures (JV), the JV past performance will be given weight proportional to the scope and magnitude of the aspects of the work under the solicitation for which each JV member is proposed to perform. It is the offeror's responsibility to adequately explain the relevance of a reference provided for a JV member's past performance to the effort that the JV member is proposed to perform under the solicitation.

Factor 3: Price

Price Evaluation. Price analysis will be conducted in accordance with RFO 15.404-1. An offeror's proposed prices will be determined by multiplying identified in the Schedule by the proposed unit price for each contract line item number to confirm the extended amount for each. the quantities

Offerors shall ensure each CLIN is priced, except those listed as Not to Exceed and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), which are not separately priced.

The Government will evaluate pricing to determine the following:

Completeness: All price information/data required in the RFP has been submitted. For all items in the schedule, the unit price will be multiplied by the quantity for each line item for the base and all option years .

Reasonableness: Price is fully justified and supported and is considered fair under current market conditions, reasonable to the Offeror and reasonable to the Government. Reasonableness may also be determined by comparison with the Government estimated and/or other offers received. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. An offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government. In accordance with FAR 15.404-6(b) price analysis will be conducted on the individual CLIN to RFO determine whether unbalanced pricing occurred.

(b) . The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options, to include RFO FAR 52.217-8, to Options the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. The evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0097

JACKSONVILLE, FL 32212-0097

UNITED STATES

Peiney Allerton, Email: peiney.t.allerton.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 904-542-4327 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: