Attachment 2- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Cyber Mission Systems, Kitting, and Supplies
Solicitation number
N65236-16-R-0036
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N65236-16-R-0036-0003.pdf PDF
N6523616R0036.pdf PDF
Attachment 1B- Reference Information Sheet-Contract Data.docx DOCX document
Pre Acquisition Planning Industry Day Q&A (19 May 2017).pdf PDF
Market Research QA (2-22-17).pdf PDF
Industry Day 11-4-2016 Attendees.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N6523616R003600002 Conformed.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0036 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Market Research QA (11-10-16).pdf PDF
QA (11-15-17).pdf PDF
Market Research QA (12-16-16).pdf PDF
Attachment 4B- PWS TSCS.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0036-0003 (Conformed Copy).pdf PDF
Technical Briefs for Industry Day 15 May - Final.pdf PDF
N6523616R003600002.pdf PDF
N6523616R00360001 Conformed.pdf PDF
Market Research QA (1-31-17).pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 3A- PRIME PRICING MODEL-Rev 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit A - CDRLs.pdf PDF
Attachment 3B- Product List Pricing Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5- DD254.pdf PDF
QAs 6 October 2017.pdf PDF
Attachment 1A - Reference Information Sheet - Summary Data.docx DOCX document
Attachment 6- QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment 1C- Team Member Summary.docx DOCX document
Industry Day Command-Wide Contracts Presentation Master 3 Nov - Rev A.pdf PDF
Market Research QA (10-28-16) (3).docx DOCX document
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

N65236-16-R-0036

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 1 of 4
SPAWAR Systems Center – Atlantic
Giancarlo Dumenigo, CODE 22420

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT,

P.O. BOX 190022, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29419-9022

TO: AGENCY:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

PAST PERFORMANCE

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

b.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

c.) Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;

d.) Business Relationships - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;

e.) Key Personnel - How long key personnel stayed on the contract, how well they managed their portion of the contract, the quality and relevancy of the products/services generated by key personnel.

f.) Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, before the closing date of this solicitation to giancarlo.dumenigo@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Respectfully,
Giancarlo Dumenigo
Contract Negotiator
ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
N65236-16-R-0036
Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 2 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print)

Code

Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(d) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

2-1

N65236-16-R-0036

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 3 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

5. KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) The Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.

6. Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

N65236-16-R-0036

Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
For Official Use Only
Page 4 of 4

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

2-4

File details come from the government source that posted it.