Amendment 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide PPI respoonses. See continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 37

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Aug-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6426723R0026

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Jul-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Aug-2023

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CORONA DIV.

1999 FOURTH STREET BLDG 510

NORCO CA 92860

N64267 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6426723R0026

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide the following:

1. Provide PPI Responses.

2. Revise to Attachment D to increase page limit

3. Revise to Attachment H

4. Revised to Exhibit B to update Attachment 1 and Attachment 8

Date

Submitte d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

Page Section Paragra ph

07/26/23 49 Attachment D

Form Instructions

Will the Government consider extending the page limit for Attachment D to four pages?

This will increase the page limit in Factor 3.

See revised Attachment D

07/26/23 50 0002 Page 17 of and

Page 18 of

Design Experience

(6) and (ii)

Please clarify the requirement for DORs to provide "design-bid-build (at least one project)" as part of Design Experience.

This type of project is not relevant to a DOR's anticipated scope of work (the project will already be designed by the Government or a different DOR) on this contract. In addition, the Basis of Evaluation states that "Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than relevant projects that do not have design-build experience." We request that the Government amend the requirement that the DOR will provide five design-build projects?

See Amendment 0004 d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

07/26/23 51 0002 Page 23 of

(4) Factor 4, Past

Performance

(i) We understand that the solicitation requires CPARS or PPQs for each project provided in Factor 1, Corporate Experience; however, this requirement is challenging for DOR projects. Considering CPARS are not issued to DORs on design-build projects and it is difficult to get technical or contracting personnel to complete a PPQ for a subcontractor. Can the requirement for CPARS or PPQs for the DOR's Design Experience projects be eliminated?

Reference RFP for guidance/instructions. CPARS submission is not required for DORs.

07/27/23 52 16-17 Factor 3 3 (i) The requirements for Factor 3 state that the narrative plan shall not exceed 10 single-sided pages, excluding resumes.

However, Offeror Team Composition and Management (Attachment D) is also required for this section. Attachment D has a two page limitation (according to the attachment itself). In addition, an organizational chart is also required, but is not part of the page limitation. Please confirm that Offeror Team Composition and Management (Attachment D) is not included in the 10 page limitation for the narrative plan required in this section.

Attachment D, excluding resumes, is included in the page limitation. See Amendment 0004 and revised Attachment D.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

07/27/23 53 3 Attachment H

4.0 (Design)

Page 17 of the solicitation states that the seed project is not design-build. However, section

4.0 of Attachment H (SOW for the seed project) states:

"Contractor is responsible for a feasible, economical and fully functional design for construction of B204 Room 105 renovation" and goes on to state:

"The design should consist of a 65%, 100%, and final design package stamped “For Construction”, including specifications and a color board of all finishes." Can you please clarify if the seed project is not design-build and can the statement of work be updated accordingly?

See revised Attachment H.

07/27/23 54 22 Factor 3 3 (i) Under Factor 3, Management Approach, the RFP states: "All personnel, including Prime Contractor Key Personnel are subject to security screening and must meet security requirements as stated in Specification Section 01-37-00." We don't see Section 01-37-00 in the specifications that were provided in the solicitation package. Can you please point us to these requirements?

See Amendment 0004

07/27/23 55 20 Factor 2 2 (i) Under Factor 2, Safety, the RFP states: "Submit NCCI calculated EMR and Safety Narrative (Attachment C) under Tab “1D”." However, Attachment C does not include any blocks for Safety Data. Is there a separate form that we should use to submit the safety data information?

See Revised Attachment C.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

07/27/23 56 20 Factor 2 2 (i) Under Factor 2, Safety (page 20), the RFP limits the technical approach to safety narrative to 2 double-sided pages. However, on page 21, bullet D states: "The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two

(2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered." Please clarify the page limitation for this section and whether it applies only to the Technical Approach to Safety Narraive or if it also includes the safety data requirement.

See Amendment 0004

07/27/23 57 Please indicate where the existing fire alarm control panel is located.

Fire alarm is located in a hallway located approximately 200 feet away from the conference room.

Picture available in sam.gov

07/27/23 58 Please provide the manufacturer of the existing fire alarm control panel.

Notifier by Honeywell.

07/27/23 59 Please send the pictures that were taken during the site walk.

See provided attachments on SAM.gov (4 attachments in total)

07/27/23 60 Please indicate exact loaction of new drinking fountain.

Reference Exhibit B - Attachment 1.

07/27/23 61 With the SEED project being such a small scope and no high hazard activities, can it be managed by a single site supervisor. (SSHO,QC,Super)

See Revised Attachment H

07/27/23 62 Please indicate the exact loaction of existing COMM room.

Reference Exhibit B- Attachment 1 - sheet A1 - COMM is located in RM 102

07/27/23 63 It was observed that the existing doorway in the CMU did not have a structural lintel and the CMU is cracked. Are we to include mitigating this in our proposal?

See revised Attachment H

07/27/23 64 Who is responsible to remove the existing furniture? If the Contractor is responsible, is it to be thrown away or stored?

Government will have furniture removed prior to construction start.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

07/28/23 65 Statement of Work

Are there any fire ratings to the building? Will we need to add fire/smoke dampers?

See Revised Attachment H

07/28/23 66 Statement of Work

Where is the LAN room located, can a floorplan be provided for location and distance?

Reference Exhibit B - Attachment 1 - sheet A1 - LAN is located in RM 102

07/28/23 67 Statement of Work

Please confirm there are NO access controls, security systems, or cameras needed for this SEED project.

See revised Attachment H

07/28/23 68 Who is the current Fire Alarm provider for the Base?

NSWC Corona

07/28/23 69 Statement of Work

Can HVAC condensate be drained to existing floor drain in Room 105?

Contractor will need to field verify that this is a feasible location for proper drainage

07/28/23 70 10 Amendment

Section 4 Please confirm that the seed project is not Design Build.

Amendment 1, Section 4, page 10 of 20, Design Experience says: While the seed project is not design-build, design-build projects may be contemplated under this MACC. This conflicts with the SOW, Section

4.0 Design Parts 4.1.1 - 4.1.4

“Contractor is responsible for a feasible and fully functional DESIGN for construction of B204 Room 105 renovation.

See revised Attachment H

07/28/23 71 Statement of Work

Bid Option #2 Water bottle fill station, please confirm location and type of filler station required.

Reference Exhibit B - Attachment 1 and 7.

07/28/23 72 Statement of Work

Bid Option #3 Wall graphic mural– Please provide details on the size and nature of the wall graphic.

See Exhibit B - Attachment 8.

This is conceptual. And final product will be worked with Interior Designer and NSWC Corona Project Manager.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

07/31/23 73 11 of 83 Solicitation Note 1 Note 1 states: In accordance with 13 CFR 125.2(g), small business Offerors may utilize the prime contractor experience of a small business first-tier subcontractor to demonstrate experience under this evaluation factor. Factor 1, Corporate Experience (i) Solicitation Requirements states:

Do not utilize experience of a proposed subcontractor to demonstrate experience for your firm. Please confirm that the Offeror may utilize experience from Key First-Tier Subcontractor(s) identified in Attachment D in accordance with 13 CFR 125.2(g) as noted in the Solicitation.

See Amendment 0004

07/31/23 74 9 of 83 Solicitation ADDITI

ONAL

INFORM

ATION

TO BE

SUBMIT

TED

WITH

PRICE

PROPOS

AL

PACKA

GE

For Joint Venture arrangements, the requirements call for each JV to submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture. Please confirm that each JV member can submit the financial statements directly to the Contracting Officer rather than being submitted with the proposal submission documents.

This information is highly sensitive and is not commonly shared with JV partners.

JV members may submit financial statements directly to the Contracting Officer as necessary.

07/31/23 75 Attachment F - Price Proposal

Rev-1

1.1 Contract

Line Items

Attachment F Price Proposal Rev-1 includes three (3) Option Items. Please specify what is included in CLIN 1001 Option 1

- Specialties. Please note, Attachment H SOW Rev-2 continues to identify four (4) Option Items.

See revised Attachment H and Attachment F for clarification.

07/31/23 76 DRAWI

NG A6

As per sheet A6 they calling for Carpet Tile with 12"x36" do you have specific manufacturer & description for the product?

Please confirm

Mohawk Group in the relaxing floor collection. Note Attachment H calls for an interior designer.

See Exhibit B - Attachment 8.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 77 23 (4) Factor 4, Past

Performance:

(i) Solicitati on Submittal Requirem ents:

Recent, relevant projects are determined within the requirements for Factor 1, Corporate Experience.

Confirming the CPARS or PPQ's are only for Corporate experience. Will the Design experience need to provide CPARS or PPQ's as well?

CPARS/PPQs are for Corporate Experience.

08/01/23 78 12 of 23 (Am03)

Factor 1 (1)(i) The solicitation submittal requirements states, in part: "Do not utilize experience of a proposed subcontractor to demonstrate experience for your firm." However, this directly contradicts Note 1 and 13 CFR 125.2(g) which states that small business Offerors may utilize the experience of a named first-tier small business subcontractor.

Please confirm that in accordance with Note 1 and 13 CFR 125.2(g) that a small business Offeror may utilize the experience of a named first-tier small business subcontractor who served as Prime Contractor on relevant project(s) to satisfy the requirements of Factor 1 if the small business Offeror cannot independently satisfy the experience requirement.

See Amendment 0004

08/01/23 79 14 of 37 Amendment

Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Note #2 Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, Note #2 says:

projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will not be considered relevant. Question: Will the Government please clarify the definition of horizontal and civil site work and what scopes of work would be considered under this requirement?

Horizontal or Civil Site Work refers to projects that consist of grading, landscaping, or other site details.

"Only Horizontal or civil site work" means only one discipline (i.e. repaving streets/parking lots, installing parking lot lights, etc.)

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 80 14 of 37 Amendment

Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Note #2 Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, Note #2 says:

projects submitted that only include horizontal or civil site work will not be considered relevant. Question: Would the Government consider a project that only included installation of site lighting (street lights to include light pole bases, light poles and fixtures), electrical ductbank, and connection of new site lighting to the base electrical system (transformer, building panels) a horizontal and/or civil work project?

Horizontal or Civil Site Work refers to projects that consist of grading, landscaping, or other site details.

"Only Horizontal or civil site work" means only one discipline (i.e. repaving streets/parking lots, installing parking lot lights, etc.)

08/01/23 81 14 of 37 Amendment

Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Item #2 Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, Scope/Complexity, Item (2) says interior and exterior repair, please clarify what is meant by interior and exterior repair.

See Attachment K.

08/01/23 82 14 of 37 Amendment

Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Item #3 Under Factor 1, Corporate Experience, Scope/Complexity, Item (3) says Renovation that includes multiple building systems. Please clarify what is meant by multiple building systems.

See Attachment K.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 83 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A6

FLOORING

NOTES &

NEW

CARPET

AND COVE

BASE

Note 1 Per PRB-90 Attachment 1, Sheet A6 “FLOORING NOTES, under

NEW CARPET AND COVE

BASE, Note 1 states; “Carpet and cove base shall be installed per carpet manufacturer's recommended instructions.

Repair holes, cracks, depressions, or rough areas using material recommended by the carpet or adhesive manufacturer. Abrupt changes in floor shall be feathered to 1/4" per foot slope with appropriate type of leveling compound”.

Please note that 1/4" per foot slope for this application is not industry standard to achieve the proper quality standard of construction, and flooring manufacture & installer warranties. 1) Can the Government please clarify Floor Flatness (FF) and Floor Levelness (FL) requirements to meet flooring manufacturer's recommended instructions? 2) Can the Government please provide existing Concrete Floor Test Report for the existing Machine Shop Floor to include Floor Flatness and Floor Levelness Testing Report findings?

All information for B204 is provided in in Exhibit B - Attachment 2 d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 84 Attachment H, Page 8

Section 6

EXECUTIO

N.

Paragrap h 6.7.3

Per RFP Attachment H, Page 8, Section 6 Execution, Paragraph 6.7.3, it reads like a project schedule is required. However, it appears like this is to be provided following the award of a Task Order, and not at this stage of the proposal process.

There is no mention elsewhere that a schedule is required. For instance in the RFP Page 20, under Section 5.2 Proposal Submission Instructions, there is no obvious request for providing a schedule as part of Contractors Proposal for the Seed Project..

Is a Project Schedule Required as part of the Contractors Proposal for the Seed Project?

See Amendment 0004.

08/01/23 85 Amendment 3 Page 14

Design Experience

Paragrap h 1

Although Amentment 003 addressed Design Build requirements for the Seed Project per PPI #34 Response and Attachment H, it remains unclear if the Seed Project is Design Build. Please reference RFP and Amendment 003 under “Design Experience”, Paragraph 1 as cited states; “While the seed project is not design-build, design-build projects may be contemplated under this MACC.

Therefore, the Offeror is required to address the design firm to be proposed on future projects.” Per Attachment H Page 3 Section 4.0 paragraph

4.1.1 it requires that the Contractor is in part responsible for a feasible, economical and fully fuctuional design for construction of B204 Room 105 Renovation.

Please clarify if its the Governments intent to award the Seed Project as a design Build or a Design Bid Build.Project.

See revised Attachment H d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 86 Specification Section 01 11 00 Page 6

1.3 DESIGN 1.3.3

Managem ent and Deliverab les, a.

In part Specification Section 01 11 00, Page 6, 1.3 DESIGN under paragraph 1.3.3 subparagraph a. requires 65% 95% 100% and final design package, however per Attachment H, Statement of Work, Section 4.0 Design under paragraph 4.1.4 requires 65% 100% and final design submittals. Please clarify which of these requirements govern.

See revised Attachment H

08/01/23 87 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A2, A3, A4 & A5

N/A N/A Can the Government provide the approx. elevation of the existing structure above B204 Room 105 or vertical distance between the proposed acoustical ceiling at 10' and the underside of the existing deck?

Reference public release photos.

(4 attachments) Contractor to field verify elevation

08/01/23 88 RFP N/A N/A Approximately how many Task Orders per year do you expect to release under this MACC? Can you provide a range of the likely number of yearly task orders?

Task Orders will vary between 3 to 9 per year.

08/01/23 89 RFP N/A N/A Regarding the SEED Project, it is our understanding the information in the Scope of Services takes precedence over information in the Specificatios.

Please confirm this is an accurate assumption.

In accordance with Solicitation No. N6426723R0026, paragraph 5.5, “In the event of an inconsistency between the provisions of this contract and the technical proposal, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (i) the contract (excluding the technical proposal), and then (ii) the technical proposal.”

08/01/23 90 RFP, Page 8 Section 4 Paragrap h 1 (vi)

RFP page 8, Paragraph 1 (vi):

We are submitting as a JV.

Please confirm if each company is to provide a VETS-4212.

Yes, each company within the JV must submit a VETS-4212.

08/01/23 91 RFP, Page 9 Section 4 Item 1 We will be submitting as a JV, with two members in it: an 8(a) company and a Small Business.

RFP, Page 9, Item 1: Does each company fill out a bank reference form separately for submission?

Each company will need to submit bank refernce forms separately.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 92 RFP, Page 9 Section 4 Item 1 We will be submitting as a JV, with two members in it: an 8(a) company and a Small Business.

RFP, Page 9, Item 1: Can the Bank Reference Statements be sent directly to the CO, or do these two documents, which are somewhat private, need to be provided in the proposal submission itself?

JV members may submit Bank Reference statements directly to the Contracting Officer as necessary.

08/01/23 93 RFP, Page 9 Section 4 Item 2 We will be submitting as a JV, with two members in it: an 8(a) company and a Small Business.

RFP, Page 9, Item 2: Each JV member will be providing 3 years of financial statements.

Can the financial statements, which are somewhat private, be sent directly to the CO, or do they need to be provided in the proposal submission itself?

JV members may submit financial statements directly to the Contracting Officer as necessary.

08/01/23 94 RFP, Page

Section 4 Paragrap h 4

We will be submitting as a JV, with two members in it: an 8(a) company and a Small Business.

1) Can you confirm the self-perform work percentage the Joint Venture is required to perform? 2) Can you confirm the percentage of work the 8(a) member is required to perform?

Can you confirm if those pecentages are calculated in each Awarded Task Order or is it calculated on all Awarded Task Orders combined over the course of the year?

IAW 52.219-14(g)(1), “ In a joint venture comprised of a small business protégé and its mentor approved by the Small Business Administration, the small business protégé shall perform at least 40 percent of the work performed by the joint venture. Work performed by the small business protégé in the joint venture must be more than administrative functions.”

IAW 52.219-14(e)(3),” General construction, it will not pay more than 85 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 85 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded; or d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

(4) Construction by special trade contractors, it will not pay more than 75 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 75 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded.”

08/01/23 95 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A2

NEW

ENLARGED

FLOOR

PLAN

Detail 1 On A2, the scale is shown to be ¼” = 1’-0” this does not bring up measurements that are equal to the measurements given on the actual rooms (e.g. 38’ – 6 ¼” for length of rom 105, or 14’- 1 ½” width of room 105. The scale calibrated with the measurements on the plan sheet and not the scale seem to be correct based on example measurements of the doorways and led 2’x4’ light fixtures. The scale we are using is approximately .5883” = 4’.

Please confirm this is correct.

Drawings are not to scale. Use measurements listed on the drawings as accurate.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 96 PRB-90

1, Plan Sheet A5

REFLECTE

D CEILING

PLAN

Detail 1 The scale for A5 also appears to be incorrect based on the A2 dimensions explained in the above RFI, and taking example measurements of the LED 2’x4’ lights. Please confirm the scale shown on the detail should be revised to approximately .5883” = 4’ to provide correct dimensions. The ceiling schedule table on A5 also appears to show incorrect dimensions. Using our scale and not the plan scale, we come up with a total of 706 SF of wall space. The ceiling schedule table adds up to 653 SF which even if we remove the 88 SF of SF for the lighting would be 618 SF. Please advise if the ceiling schedule area values should be ignored or if they need to be revised.

Drawings are not to scale. Use measurements listed on the drawings as accurate.

08/01/23 97 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A2

NEW

ENLARGED

FLOOR

PLAN

Detail 1 On A2, it indicates two (2) demising walls with a diamond and an “A” within the diamond.

Generally, this means a wall assembly is called out. Is there a detail that corresponds to the “A” diamond? We assume it is a full height 3 5/8” stud wall with gypsum board on both sides and R-11 batt insulation. Please advise if this is correct.

Reference notes in Exhibit B - Attachment 1.

08/01/23 98 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A2

NEW

ENLARGED

FLOOR

PLAN

Detail 1 On A2, it indicates one (1) furred wall on the plan north side of room 105 and 106A. This is indicated with a diamond and a “B” within the diamond.

Generally, this means a wall assembly is called out. Is there a detail that corresponds to the “B” diamond? We could assume the wall will need to be furred out enough to provide clearances for junction boxes and other infrastructure. Please provide a detail or possibly a narrative of what is required at this wall.

Reference notes in Exhibit B - Attachment 1.

d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 99 PRB-90

1, Plan Sheet A2

NEW

ENLARGED

FLOOR

PLAN

Detail 1 Please confirm if the existing walls to remain in room 105 A, plan south wall of room 105, and plan south/west walls of room 106A are to remain as is and receive a fresh coat of paint, or are they to receive new furred stud wall and gypsum board similar to what is indicated with the “B” diamond on the plan north wall of room 105 and 106A. This would make sense with some of the proposed outlets as shown, but wanted to confirm.

Reference notes in Exhibit B - Attachment 1.

08/01/23 100 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A2 & A3

Sheet A2

SECTIONS

INTERIOR

ELEVATIO

NS

Detail 1 Detail 1 on A3 and detail 2 on A4 indicate what looks like three total whiteboards. We assume they are whiteboards as the monitors appear to be on plan north wall and plan west wall of

105. 1) Who is responsible for the procurement and installation of the whiteboards? 2) Is the GC responsible for blocking of these wall mounted items?

See revised Attachment H

08/01/23 101 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A5

REFLECTE

D CEILING

PLAN

Lighting Notes

On A5, the plan set discusses installation of an LED rope or LED strip lighting to shelf the ceiling gypsum board for up lighting. This is not shown on the electrical lighting plan. Can you please describe the installation of this lighting system in more detail?

Attachment 1 and revised Attachment H

08/01/23 102 PRB-90

Attachment 3 Specification s Page 4

SECTION

01 11 00

Paragrap h 1.2.2.3

NEW

WORK,

Subparag raph c.

The third option for this project is a full wall mural. Please identify which wall this mural will be placed so we can quantify the actual dimensions for the vinyl graphic and installation thereof.

Attachment 1 and Attachment 8 d

PPI # Reference Question Responses

08/01/23 103 Amendment

N/A N/A Amendment 003 provided a revised Exhibit B. Exhibit B is a PDF Portfolio with 5 embedded PDFs in it. Can you clearly identify what the changes were introduced to these documents in Amendment 003?

Reference highlights in Amendment 3.

08/01/23 104 Amendment

Attachment H

N/A Attachment H was revised in Amendment 003, but there was no clear indication of what the revisions were. Can you provide specifics on the changes to this document?

See revised Attachment H

08/01/23 105 PRB-90

Attachment 1, Plan Sheet A7

ARCHITEC

TURAL

NOTES

PROJEC

T

OPTION

S

WATER

BOTTLE

FILL

STATIO

N /

FOUNT

AIN

OPTION

We have identified a bottle filler that we think meets the specs.

Please confirm this is adequate:

https://www.elkay.com/produc ts/category/drinking-water/fillers/floor-standing Also, confirm what connections need to be made to it, and does there need to be a sewer connection?

Attachment 8.

The following have been deleted:

AMENDMENT 0003

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS 1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF

CONTRACT

2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

5.1 SITE VISIT

5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIS)

5.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5.5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

6. ATTACHMENTS:

6.1 ATTACHMENT A - PPI LOG TEMPLATE

6.2 ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

6.3 ATTACHMENT C – SAFETY NARRATIVE

6.4 ATTACHMENT D - OFFEROR TEAM COMPOSITION

6.5 ATTACHMENT E – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

6.6 ATTACHMENT F- PRICE PROPOSAL FORM (SEED PROJECT)

6.7 ATTACHMENT G- SECNAV 5512

6.8 ATTACHMENT H- B204 Room 105 Conference Room Renovation SOW (SEED PROJECT)

6.9 ATTACHMENT I- EXHIBIT A - SUBMITTAL REGISTER (SEED PROJECT)

6.10 ATTACHMENT J - EXHIBIT B – ATTACHMENTS (SEED PROJECT)

6.11 ATTACHMENT K – TYPICAL WORK REQUIREMENTS

EXHIBIT DOCUMENT

NUMBER

DOCUMENT TITLE TOTAL

PAGES

A Submittal Register 3

B

Attachment 1 Project Location and Reference Plans 21

Attachment 2 Existing Record Plans 14

Attachment 3 Specifications 223

Attachment 5 Environmental Management System Procedures Manual

Attachment 6 Navy Safety & Occupational Health Manual

Attachment 7 DBA CA 20230025 23

Attachment 8 Finishes 14

1.GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.1.1 THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ISSUED AS AN 8(a) SET-ASIDE. THE NAICS CODE FOR

THIS PROCUREMENT IS 236220 AND THE SIZE STANDARD IS $45M.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2.1 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in accordance with the requirements designated by sections of the FAR 15.203. This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of Offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source(s) whose performance provides the best value to the Government. This acquisition will be solicited as a competitively negotiated procurement as an 8(a) set-aside.

1.2.2 The Government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals at any time prior to award; to negotiate with any or all Offerors; to award the contracts to other than the Offeror submitting the lowest total price; to award to other than the Offeror submitting the highest technically rated proposal; and to award to the Offeror submitting the proposal determined by the Government to be the most advantageous (best value) to the Government. OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT AWARD MAY BE MADE WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS OR ANY CONTACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms. Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the Offeror to revise its proposal.

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

1.3. l This acquisition will result in the award of a Firm Fixed-Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for facilities primarily at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Corona Division (NSWC, Corona) for use at NSWC, Corona’s locations (Norco, CA, Seal Beach, CA and Fallbrook, CA). The Government intends to award approximately five (5) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offerors whose proposals represent the best values after evaluation in accordance with the factors and their relative importance, unless more or less than five (5) is determined to be the best value to the government by the Source Selection Authority.

1.3.2 Projects to be performed under this MACC will require the ability to manage multiple task orders concurrently. This MACC will encompass minor Construction, renovation, and repairs at NSWC, Corona.

The selected contractor(s) will be responsible for all labor, supervision, engineering, design, materials, equipment, tools, parts, supplies, and transportation to perform all of the services described in the drawings and specifications provided for each individual project. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, management, materials, supplies, equipment, tools, and transportation to perform all work associated with various construction, renovation, or repair projects at assorted buildings and structures at NSWC, Corona.

1.3.3 The completion date for the IDIQ contracts is five (5) years from the date of contract award. The total five-year ordering period estimated construction cost for all contracts is not to exceed $$42,620,000 for the life of the contract. Projects for the MACC have an estimated construction cost between $100,000.00 and $6,500,000.00; however, smaller and larger dollar value projects may be considered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. The Government guarantees an award amount of $2000.00 to each successful Offeror.

1.3.4 After award of the initial contracts and "seed" project, the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders based on best value, using the tradeoff process or lowest price technically acceptable (to include lowest price). Only the successful IDIQ MACC contractors will compete for task orders.

1.3.5 The intent of this contract is that all MACC Contractors participate in pre-proposal conferences and site-visits and submit proposals on each task order. Contract awardees will be expected to submit a proposal for all Task Order Requests for Proposal (RFP) received from the Government. However, in the event a MACC awardee is unable to submit a proposal on a particular RFP, the contractor is required to notify, in writing, the Contracting Officer who issued the RFP and the ACO for the basic contract within five (5) working days from receipt of the RFP. A MACC awardee can only elect to withdraw from submitting a proposal on three (3) task order RFPs each year of the contract.

1.3.6 Each task order will contain project specific evaluation factors that will vary depending on the unique requirements for each task order. Additionally, each task order will cite a specific completion date and associated liquidated damages.

1.3.7 Contractor Performance Information: Contractor's performance will be evaluated using the respective contractor performance evaluation report entry system located on the website http://www.cpars.gov/. Prior to commencement of work the contractor is required to provide the government with the name, phone number and email address of the "Contractor's Representative" that will be responsible for receipt and review of draft performance evaluations prepared by the government in the appropriate system. It is the contractor's responsibility to keep this contact information current.

2. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE SEED PROJECT

2.1 The initial project ("seed project") that will be awarded as the first task order concurrently with the basic contract is building (“BLDG” or “B”) 204 Conference Room 105 Minor Renovation. B204 is listed on the National Historic Registry and is currently being used for multiple purposes such as office space, storage, laboratory workspace, and shipping and receiving. It is located in the Lake Norconian district outside of the controlled inner compound. The primary group using the facility is Range Systems (RS).

Room 105 is currently being used as a temporary conference room, but lacks the lighting, HVAC and finishes to serve this purpose efficiently. The rooms, which will be renovated in the building, will be vacant during this project’s construction phase.

* Solicitation Section 01 00 00 will include the General Requirements for the seed project.

Pursuant to FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds, the Government's obligation under this solicitation, or any task order or contract that might result from the solicitation is entirely subject to, and contingent upon, the availability of appropriated funds. Should the Government be unable to award the seed project, the Government guarantees an award in the amount of $2,000.00 to each successful Offeror upon award of the MACCs. This minimum guarantee is over the full term of the contract. No legal liability on the part of the Government shall arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer and a task order or contract is awarded by the Contracting Officer. Any Offeror proposing on this solicitation does so at its own cost and with the full knowledge that a task order for the seed project, might not result from this solicitation.

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with Offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the Offerors submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value-the proposals most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR l5.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price. The importance of price will increase if the Offerors' non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal's superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions.

Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board's assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

4. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 - Corporate experience Factor 2- Safety Factor 3 - Management Approach Factor 4 - Past Performance

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical (factors 1, 2 and

3) are of equal importance to each other, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment (factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors' non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal's superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a)Price

(l) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Proposals shall be submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer via email and must be received by the date and time specified in Block 13 of the SF1442.

Contract Specialist: Sabrina Mazumder Email: sabrina.m.mazumder.civ@us.navy.mil

Contracting Officer: Erin Graves Email: erin.d.graves.civ@us.navy.mil

Offerors are encouraged to submit proposals prior to the latest closing date. File size is limited to 5MB per email.

Offerors are responsible for ensuring their email size does not exceed the 5 MB limitation. File sizes larger than 5MB and .zip file extensions will be stripped by the Navy email system. Modifications, amendments, or withdrawal of proposals should also be made to the above email addresses. One email is acceptable as long as it does not exceed 5 MB. If it exceeds 5 MB, Offerors may separate their submission among multiple emails and should number them email 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3, etc.

All information contained in the Offeror’s proposal shall adhere to the following:

Developed with Microsoft Office or Adobe Acrobat products only.

1 inch margins, excluding headers and footers.

10-point (minimum), Times New Roman font.

NOTE: HARD COPIES OF MAILED OR HAND DELIVERED PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

Also, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered. All submissions shall include the following:

(i) Executed SF 1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block # 14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide its Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal.

(ii) Completed Proposed Price for the Seed Project.

(iii) Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the seed project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the Offeror identified on the SF1442. In addition, the Offeror shall provide a letter from its bonding company confirming that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $10,000,000 and the ability to bond multiple projects.

(iv) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal. Please note: A small business joint venture Offeror must submit, with its offer, the representation required in paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, in accordance with 52.204-8(d) and 52.212-3(b) for the following categories:

(A) Small business;

(B) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business;

(C) Women-owned small business (WOSB) under the WOSB Program;

(D) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business under the WOSB Program; or

(E) Historically underutilized business zone small business

(v) FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity

Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(vi) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets42 I 2.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report.

Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

(vii) Completed Construction/Project Schedule for See Project.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the Offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate Tab, the Offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (I) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If Offeror's firm has a line of credit - provide information on how many figures Offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures - exact line of credit is not required).

2. The Offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the Offeror.

3. Description of Offeror's facilities and equipment.

4. Other Offeror's work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with Offeror's price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm's responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful Offerors will not be returned to the Offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for the seed project.

Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items, if applicable. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

Proposals shall be submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer via email and must be received by the date and time specified in Block 13 of the SF1442.

Contract Specialist: Sabrina Mazumder Email: sabrina.m.mazumder.civ@us.navy.mil

Contracting Officer: Erin Graves Email: erin.d.graves.civ@us.navy.mil

Offerors are encouraged to submit proposals prior to the latest closing date. File size is limited to 5MB per email.

Offerors are responsible for ensuring their email size does not exceed the 5 MB limitation. File sizes larger than 5MB and .zip file extensions will be stripped by the Navy email system. Modifications, amendments, or withdrawal of proposals should also be made to the above email addresses. One email is acceptable as long as it does not exceed 5 MB. If it exceeds 5 MB, Offerors may separate their submission among multiple emails and should number them email 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3, etc.

All information contained in the Offeror’s proposal shall adhere to the following:

Developed with Microsoft Office or Adobe Acrobat products only.

1 inch margins, excluding headers and footers.

10-point (minimum), Times New Roman font.

NOTE: HARD COPIES OF MAILED OR HAND DELIVERED PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

Also, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

All submissions shall including the following characteristics:

Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format Drawings 11 x 17 inches and folded down to 8-1/2 x 11 inches 10 point font, Times New Roman One…