N6339422R0001 RFP Amendment 3 - Summary of Changes.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to questions.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 40

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6339422R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Nov-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

U0003

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Dec-2021

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

4363 MISSILE WAY,

PORT HUENEME CA 93043-4307

N63394 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6339422R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 3

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to questions and update clauses

The following questions (#1-#7) refer to attachment JS-1 Pricing Summary MTP v.2 of the solicitation.

1) Question: Attachment JS-1 lists the “Unit” for CLINs 1000AA through 1000AD as “Set” while the RFP section B lists the “Unit” for these same CLINs as “Each.” We believe “Set” to be the correct unit for these CLINs as the CLINs are for the MTP #1 – MTP #2 – STP Set which includes 8660382-9, 8660384-9, and 5497369-19. Please confirm.

Response: CLINs 1000AA through 1000AD, the “Unit” has been corrected to “Set” from “Each.”

2) Question: Both Attachment JS-1 and the RFP section B list the “Unit” for CLINs 1100, 1200, 1300, and 1400 as “Each.” We believe “Set” to be the correct unit for these CLINs as the CLINs are for the MTP #1 – MTP #2 – STP Set which includes 8660382-9, 8660384-9, and 5497369-19. Please confirm.

Response: CLINs 1100, 1200, 1300, and 1400, the “Unit” has been corrected to “Set” from “Each.”

3) Question: Attachment JS-1 lists the “Unit” for CLINs 2000AA through 2000AD as “Each” while the RFP section B lists the “Unit” for these same CLINs as “Set.” We believe “Each” to be the correct unit for these CLINs as the CLINs are for the MT-System Transformer which only includes 5497369-19. Please confirm.

Response: CLINs 2000AA through 2000AD, the “Unit” has been corrected to “Each” from “Set.”

4) Question: Both Attachment JS-1 and the RFP section B list the “Unit” for CLINs 2100 and 2400 as “Set.”

We believe “Each” to be the correct unit for these CLINs as the CLINs are for the MTP - ST which we believe only includes 5497369-19. Please confirm.

Response: For MTP CLINs 2100 and 2400 should be “Set”, for STP CLINs 2100 and 2400 should be “Each.”

5) Question: The RFP section B lists CLINs 2200AA and 2300AA as MTP – STP MAM CMPNTS. JS-1 lists these CLINs only as “ST.” Furthermore section C of the RFP does not define a MAM CMPNTS Kit as it does for the other kits in the RFP. We currently believe that CLINs 2200AA and 2300AA should call out MTP-ST (5497369-19 only) as the other 2X00 CLINs do. Please confirm.

Response: The CLINs 2200AA and 2300 now listed as “ST” both the JS-1 and SOW now reflect said changes.

6) Question: Please confirm that the unit of “Set” as listed in JS-1 and Section B of the RFP for CLIN series 3000, 4000, 5000, and 6000 is used due to these CLINs being Kits and not a single deliverable.

Response: The Unit is correct as “Set.”

7) Question: The Maximum Quantities on RFP page 7 and JS-1 Column F are defined as the maximum number of VLS MTP production units and associated kits that can be purchased under this contract. Are the quantities listed for CLINs 1100, 1200, 1300 and 1400 a combined total of both the MTP #1 and MTP #2 quantities, or are the quantities for each MTP unit (CLIN 1100 max quantity would actually be 96 MTP (+48 MTP-ST)). Please clarify and confirm.

Response: The unit is “SET” which is both MTP #1 and MTP #2 combined for a set.

The following question (#8) refer to attachment WS20130C of the Solicitation.

8) Question: WS 20130 production environmental test requirements for vertical launch system is called out in the RFP as noted but WS 20130 is not referenced on any drawing or parts in the TDP. Please confirm and provide direction on which of the assemblies does WS20130 apply.

Response: Attachment for details will be sent via DoD Safe.

The following question (#9) refer to attachment MTP-STP Kits contents_16December2021 of the solicitation.

9) Question: There seems to be no information regarding what makes up the VLS MTP-STP and MTP-ST.

Will this information be released?

Response: MTP set defines as quantity 1 of MTP #1 and quantity one of MTP #2.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

SUBCLIN 1000AA

The unit of issue has changed from Each to Set.

SUBCLIN 1000AB

SUBCLIN 1000AC

SUBCLIN 1000AD

SUBCLIN 1100AA

SUBCLIN 1200AA

SUBCLIN 1300AA

SUBCLIN 1400AA

SUBCLIN 2000AA

The unit of issue has changed from Set to Each.

SUBCLIN 2000AB

SUBCLIN 2000AC

SUBCLIN 2000AD

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

STATEMENT OF WORK

STATEMENT OF WORK

VERTICAL LAUNCHING SYSTEM

MODULE TRANSFORMER PLATFORM N63394-22-R-0001

1.0 SCOPE

The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory and timely performance of all tasks defined in the Statement of Work (SOW). This SOW, with its supporting attachments and referenced documentation, describes the total requirement for the manufacture, assembly, test and delivery of Vertical Launching System (VLS) Module Transformer Platform (MTP), Onboard Repair Part (OBRP) kit, Installation and Checkout (INCO) spares kit, Depot spares kit, and Lowest Replaceable Unit (LRU) kit.

2.0 PROGRAM AUTHORITY

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD) is the program authority for this contract.

3.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents, of the issue indicated, form a part of this SOW, including all applicable terms, conditions, clauses, attachments and exhibits. The exact revisions of the documents are not cited in the text of this SOW. The Contractor shall apply the latest version of the documents in effect at the time of award of the contract. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the SOW shall be considered the superseding requirement.

3.1 Government Documents

Document Number Document Title MIL-STD-109C Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions MIL-STD-1686C Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of

Electrical and Electronic Parts, I Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices)

WS 20130 Production Environmental Test Requirements for VLS TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS Configuration Management Program Plan for the MK 41 VLS, Volume 1, Equipment (Hardware) Configuration Management MK 41 VLS Standing Instruction 94-1F, Attachment 6

Marking for technical data

TL130-AD-PLN-030-VLS, Firmware Configuration Management NAVSEA Drawing Motor Transformer Platform (MTP)

3.2 Industry Documents

Document Number Document Title ANSI/ISO/ASQC Q9001 Quality Systems - Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing ANSI/EIA-649 2011 National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management ANSI/ASQC Q9004 Quality System Elements ISO 9001 Quality Program Requirements SAE Aerospace Standard AS9102 Rev A

Aerospace First Article Inspection

ISO 14000 Environmental Management Systems Standards SAE AS5553 & AS6174 Counterfeit Prevention Plan

4.0 REQUIREMENTS

The Government requires manufacturing of VLS Launch Sequencer, MAM, OBRP, INCO, Depot and LRU kits in accordance with the documents specified in SOW and the technical data package (TDP). All MTP and associated components kits shall meet all requirements in accordance with the TDP and associated specifications.

The OBRP kit contains the following:

Nomenclature Part Number Quantity

Transformer, Power Assy 5598314-9 1 Transformer, Power Assy T5 8666059-1 1

Transformer, Power Assy 5598215-9 1

The INCO spares kit contains the following:

Nomenclature Part Number Quantity

Transformer, Power Assy 5598314-9 1 Transformer, Power Assy T5 8666059-1 2

The Depot spares kit contains the following:

Transformer, Power Assy 5598314-9 2 Transformer, Power Assy T5 8666059-1 2

The LRU spares kit contains the following:

Plate Assy, Platform No. 1 8660381-9 18

4.1 Automatic Test Equipment

The Government will provide all necessary test equipment to test the LRUs and MTPs.

The Government has certified the MTP and associated equipment ATEs, along with test program sets for use.

The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining and calibrating the necessary test capability including ATE, associated interface cables, test tools and calibration tools.

Changes to certified ATE shall be submitted to the Government for approval and certification.

4.2 First Article Inspection

The Contractor shall perform First Article Inspection (FAI) of all assemblies, subassemblies, components and detail parts including castings and forgings in accordance with SAE Aerospace Standard AS9102 Rev A. The purpose of FAI is to provide objective evidence that all TDP and specification requirements are correctly understood, accounted for, verified, and recorded. An FAI is not required for standard catalog items, commercial-off-the-shelf items, raw materials or items procured in accordance with source control drawings.

The Contractor shall submit all FAI requirement waivers to the NSWC PHD for approval. The waiver shall identify, at a minimum, the part description, part number, manufacturer, date last built, location last built, FAI report summary (if applicable), FAI discrepancies and corrective actions (if applicable), and waiver justification.

The Government reserves the right to witness all FAI activities. The Contractor shall submit a comprehensive schedule of FAI events prior to the first event in accordance with CDRL A001. The schedule shall include date, time, expected duration and location.

The Contractor shall generate FAI reports in accordance with AS9102 Rev A. The Contractor shall retain the FAI reports for at least seven years. The Government reserves the right to examine all FAI reports. The Contractor shall submit a report copy via digital means in accordance with CDRL A002.

All deficiencies discovered during the FAIs shall be corrected at Contractor’s expense prior to unit delivery to the Government.

5.0 TECHNICAL DATA REVIEWS, QUALITY AUDITS

During the performance of the contract, the Government shall have the right to perform technical data reviews and quality audits consisting of evaluation of records, processes and products to verify the Contractor's compliance with the respective quality programs. The Government audits may include evaluation of effectiveness in implementing the Contractor's and Subcontractors' or suppliers' audit programs to promote prevention of defects, which includes schedule of audits, evaluation of operations, notification of required corrective action with follow-up and means of notification to top management concerning audit results.

6.0 FOLLOW-ON PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION AUDIT

During the performance of the contract, the Government shall have the right to perform a Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). The PCA may include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Contractor, Subcontractor and/or supplier audit programs to promote prevention of defects. This includes scheduling of audit, evaluation of operations, and notification of required corrective action with follow-up and means of notification to top management concerning audit results. The PCA will be conducted in accordance with Section 7 of TL130-AD- PLN-010-VLS, Configuration Management Program Plan for the MK 41 VLS, Volume 1, Equipment (Hardware) Configuration Management.

One (1) PCA shall be conducted over the course of the contract on the MTP. The MTPs shall be selected by the Government and the Contractor from the initial production run.

The Contractor shall provide qualified engineering, technical, manufacturing, administrative, management and other support as necessary for the PCA. The Contractor shall provide all tools, measuring devices and other equipment required for equipment disassembly, dimensional and tolerance verification and performance verification. The Contractor shall provide an area to conduct PCA that is well illuminated, temperate and low noise level. The PCA work area shall contain worktables, print copies of all pertinent drawings, telephone and easy access to a copy machine.

During the PCA, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, individual parts that make up the configuration item, completed assemblies, an as-built list delineating all Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) (either requested or approved), deviations and waivers, hardcopies of production specifications and technical drawings, complete shortage list, manufacturing instructions, acceptance test procedures and data, purchase order documents and associated certificates of conformance from suppliers or appropriate documents indicating compliance with material or drawing requirements in accordance with CDRL A003.

The PCA will be conducted at the Contractor's, Subcontractors' and suppliers' facilities by the Government team.

The Government will notify the Contractor seven (7) to 14 business days prior to performance of the PCA. This notice will include identification of assemblies, subassemblies and/or piece parts to be audited. The PCA will be approximately one to two weeks in duration.

Following conduct of the PCA, the Contractor shall generate the necessary documentation to resolve all audit findings and provide these to the Government audit team within the timeframe specified by the Government in accordance with CDRL A004. The Government audit team will evaluate the documentation to assess corrective action(s) taken to close any and all audit finding(s). Necessary documentation may include, but not be limited to, revised manufacturing processes, ECPs, notice of revisions, SCN and revised TDP drawings.

Government and Contractor pre- and post-PCA activities are described in Sections 7.4 through 7.7 of the VLS Configuration Management Plan TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS.

7.0 GOVERNMENT INSPECTION

The Contractor shall provide technical, administrative, and management support for Government source inspection for purposes of inspection and acceptance of supplies and services provided by the Contractor, Subcontractor and suppliers. Government source inspection will be conducted at the convenience of the Government.

8.0 PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS

The Contractor shall perform production environmental testing as specified by the TDP or production environmental test requirements for VLS Specification WS 20130.

9.0 TECHNICAL DATA RIGHTS

The Government will maintain the Government-owned TDP. The Contractor shall submit proposed changes to the TDP to the Government. The Government shall retain unlimited rights to all versions of and changes to all drawings, specifications and other documents for the VLS components produced under this contract.

10.0 MARKING FOR TECHNICAL DATA

The Contractor shall mark all technical data in accordance with MK 41 VLS Standing Instruction 94-1F, Attachment

6. This instruction is applicable to new documents, revised documents or documents from file in response to a request for copy.

11.0 MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

The Contractor shall maintain and control manufacturing processes to fabricate, assemble, inspect, test, and deliver VLS MTP as described in the SOW. The processes shall cover all phases from the ordering of raw materials to Government acceptance of the finished product. All hardware components shall be manufactured in accordance with the drawings and specifications referenced in the TDP and this SOW.

12.0 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the MTP produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA- 649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

12.1 Configuration Identification

The Contractor shall maintain identification of the product baselines throughout fabrication, testing, and delivery.

The Contractor shall ensure that equipment is assigned identifying numbers, designators, and serial numbers in accordance with the TDP.

Serialized items shall be traceable to source of manufacture and production contract year. This information may be incorporated as a formal part of the Contractor's serialization system or otherwise be annotated on the affected item.

Serial number assignments shall be requested in writing from the COR. The request for serial number assignment shall contain the following minimum information:

(a) Officially assigned item name

(b) Officially assigned type designation

(c) Officially assigned model number

(d) Top drawing number and list of drawings or parts list

(e) Exact quantity to be delivered under the contract including pre-production samples and spares required by the contract.

(f) Contract number

(g) National Stock Number

(h) NAVSEA cognizant office code

The Contractor shall submit a configuration definition data package describing the detailed configuration of each end item as delivered to the designated destination in accordance with CDRL A004. The Contractor shall maintain a system to monitor engineering release and correlation of manufactured products.

12.2 Military Specifications and Standards:

The Government shall maintain the Government owned Technical Data Package(s) (TDP). Proposed changes to the TDP shall be submitted by the Contractor to the Government. The Government shall retain unlimited rights to all versions of and changes to all drawings, specifications and other documents for the MTP and associated parts produced under this contract.

The Contractor shall prepare the updated drawings, specifications and all related documents with revisions, including the Request for Variance.

12.3 Qualification of Substitute Sources of Supply

The TDP contains source control or vendor item drawings that specify approved or suggested sources of supply.

The Contractor may qualify other sources for these items. Qualification of new sources selected by the Contractor shall be at the Contractor’s expense.

The Contractor shall submit all proposed changes to approved or suggested sources of supply as indicated in the source control or vendor item drawings in accordance with SOW. The package of information that is submitted for Government review shall contain all applicable drawings, test plans, procedures and qualification reports. An extended Government review period of 20 business days applies to all proposed changes to approved or suggested sources of supply.

12.4 Configuration Status Accounting

The Contractor’s configuration status accounting shall be in accordance with ANSI/EIA-649, the Configuration Management Plan for the VLS, Volume 1, Equipment (Hardware) Configuration Management, TL130-AD-PLN- 010-VLS, and the Configuration Management Plan for the VLS, Volume 3, Firmware Configuration Management, TL130-AD-PLN-030-VLS.

The Contractor shall provide a system that documents the exact delivered configuration of each unit. The Contractor, or Subcontractor at the appropriate tier, shall identify the "as-built" production configuration of each NAVSEA nomenclatured item by means of permanent markings on the appropriate ORDALT/ Ship Change Installation Procedure (SCIP) label plate on the equipment to identify the specific ORDALTs/SCIPs installed in the equipment being delivered. For Class I ECPs, which are not assigned an ORDALT number, the ORDALT label plate shall be marked with the applicable Class I ECP number as assigned by the Government. For purposes of this requirement, markings may be etched, steel stamped or affixed by other suitable means which results in the permanent identification of the equipment configuration. Ink stamping is not permitted.

12.5 Failure/Defect Reporting and Corrective Action System (FACAR)

The Contractor shall have a FACAR system established and maintained for both manufacturing and test processes.

Level of assembly for failure reporting shall be consistent with the requirement for recording defect history.

FACAR system information required to be recorded or reported by this SOW paragraph shall be submitted in accordance with CDRL A005.

The Contractor shall implement an effective system for evaluation and disposition of supplies and services that exhibit nonconformance, including those furnished by suppliers (Subcontractors and vendors). The Contractor shall ensure that the personnel staffing the FACAR system have the authority to coordinate and implement the necessary failure and problem reporting, analysis, and related corrective action. The Contractor shall ensure that nonconformance data is adequately analyzed, distributed to appropriate organizations and personnel, and that appropriate management decisions are based on this data. Analysis must target root cause corrective action. The Contractor shall take appropriate actions to improve or change processes that do not meet requirements. All use-as-is and repair dispositions shall include a determination of whether or not a change is required to the product database (drawing, specifications, work instructions, tooling, etc.). Determination that such a change is not required shall be recorded and shall be available to the Government for review. Acceptance of the nonconformance corrective action and disposition is the prerogative of the Government and can be revoked whenever the Contractor’s system fails to demonstrate effective root cause corrective action or when repeated nonconformance indicate an overall quality system degradation.

12.6 Configuration Control

Minor Deviations:

(1) The Contractor shall submit the deviation to NSWC DD via NSWC PHD for review and approval.

(2) If NSWC DD concurs in classification, the deviation will be boarded at NSWC DD CCB for approval or disapproval.

(3) If NSWC DD does not concur in classification, the Contractor shall cancel the minor deviation.

The Contractor shall submit for review and approval all specification changes to NSWC PHD for review and approval.

13.0 TESTING, INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

Testing and inspection of the VLS MTP shall be performed at the Contractor's facility in accordance with the applicable drawings, standards and specifications and factory test and inspection plans. The Contractor shall prepare specific written inspection and test procedures for each inspection and test operation to be performed by the Contractor. These inspection and test procedures shall be reviewed by the quality assurance organization and maintained current in accordance with the change control system requirements. The inspection and test procedures shall clearly identify the item through part number with revision and nomenclature, and include detail instructions and/or operations to be performed.

The Contractor shall maintain records of inspection results and quantitative test data for each deliverable end item and make them available to the Government upon request.

Although preliminary inspections will occur at the contractor’s facility, the final Inspection and Acceptance will take place at Port Hueneme, CA and will be performed by the Government. The Contractor is responsible for delivering items to the destination in Port Hueneme.

14.0 Parts Re-Screening

The Contractor is not required to implement the TDP requirements to conduct re-screening of electrical components.

Remarking of parts to the re-screened part number will not be required and the existing base part number shall remain intact. Programmable parts shall require re-identification.

15.0 Counterfeit Parts and Materials

The following minimum processes shall be implemented and flowed down by the Contractor to all Subcontractors in order to minimize the risk of use of counterfeit parts in VLS components.

The Contractor shall establish processes to minimize the risk of procuring and using counterfeit parts and materials.

The Contractor shall document these processes and provide those documented processes to Government upon request. These processes shall include:

At a minimum, these processes shall ensure that all components for MTP assemblies and subassemblies are purchased from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM), Original Component Manufacturers (OCM) authorized suppliers or franchised distributors. The term OEM, OCM, authorized supplier and franchised distributor are each defined in SAE AS5553.

At a minimum, the contractor shall ensure procurement practices and processes to purchase and install components from OEM, OCM, authorized suppliers and franchised distributors are flowed down to subcontractors and suppliers at all tiers.

The Counterfeit Prevention Plan, SAE AS5553 and SAE AS6174 requirements shall be flowed down to all subcontractors and suppliers.

The Contractor shall maximize the use of authentic, originally designed and/or qualified parts.

The Contractor shall assess potential sources of supply to minimize the risk of receiving counterfeit parts or materials.

The Contractor shall have purchasing procedures, which confirm whether a selected supplier is authorized, as defined in SAE AS5553 and SAE AS6174, for each purchase.

The Contractor shall define minimum inspection and test requirements for parts being procured and shall ensure that in-house, third-party, and/or supplier inspection and test procedures and facilities comply with these requirements. These minimum inspection and test requirements shall specify appropriate test methods to detect potential counterfeit parts and materials.

The Contractor shall require a certificate of compliance and supply chain traceability for all electronic part purchases.

The Contractor shall require a Certificate of Conformance, as defined in SAE AS5553 and SAE AS6174, and supply chain traceability for all electronic part purchases.

The Contractor shall use government or industry services such as the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) and other commercially available services to identify part or supplier quality or authenticity problems.

The Contractor shall notify the Government of the occurrence of a confirmed counterfeit part or material and the actions taken to identify, contain, and impound all product from the lot, within seven (7) business days of confirmation of the counterfeit status. The Contractor shall flow down a requirement for similar notification from Subcontractors to the Contractor. The Contractor shall initiate and submit an alert to the GIDEP within 30 calendar days of knowledge of the counterfeit part or material.

Counterfeit parts and material are defined by SAE AS5553 and SAE AS6174 may be electronic or mechanical in nature. Counterfeit electronic parts may typically be used parts, which have been refurbished and represented as new. Commonly counterfeited electronic parts include parts such as microcontrollers or specially screened devices, or common parts, which have several pin-compatible versions from multiple manufacturers, such as memory devices and operational amplifiers. Counterfeit mechanical parts are typically improperly made, marked, or treated products. Examples are improper anodization or heat treatments, falsified data, mismarked parts sold as a higher-grade steel, or used/fake parts such as valves or circuit breakers.

An authorized supplier is a supplier authorized by the original component manufacturer to buy parts or materials directly from the manufacturer. Parts provided from authorized suppliers typically have never left the manufacturer’s authorized supply chain, and are accompanied by full manufacturer support and warranty.

16.0 REVIEWS

16.1 Program/Production Reviews

The Production Readiness Review (PRR) will be conducted by the Government to ensure the Contractor has accomplished adequate production planning and preparations to produce MTP and associated cables that meet performance requirements in accordance with the contract schedules and without unacceptable risks. During PRR, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of:

Producibility;

Manufacturing Planning;

Manufacturing Schedules;

Configuration Management;

Quality Assurance;

Material Procurement & Supplier Control;

Facility and Equipment;

Production Processing & Fabrication;

Calibration, Tool and Test Equipment;

Non-Conforming Material Control Completed Item Inspection and Test;

Handling, Storage and Delivery

The Contractor shall demonstrate the ability to manufacture and test the MTP and associated cables by providing various documents to include, but not be limited to, Manufacturing, Testing, Quality Assurance, Configuration Management, Calibration, and Supplier Management Plans. Policies, procedures, processes & plans demonstrating production processing & fabrication capability, facilities & equipment capacity, production scheduling, manpower resources & training, supplier management, parts & material procurement and shop loading will also be required.

On-Site examination of the plans/documents described above, as well as examination of the manufacturing equipment and facility, review of support functions/groups, and interviews with project personnel, are all integral parts of the PRR. Processes must be able to produce repeatable conforming hardware within time constraints of the contract. During the PRR, the Contractor shall be prepared to discuss manufacturing & procurement planning status, issues, problems, risks and schedules associated with the production program, and provide requested supporting objective evidence.

A successful review is predicated on the Government’s determination that there are no unacceptable risks, performance & quality requirements are fully met in the production configuration, and production capability demonstrates a satisfactory basis for proceeding into production. The Government in its sole discretion will determine whether the PRRs are successful.

The Government will provide a report summarizing the proceedings and identifying deficiencies and issues, as applicable. The Contractor shall provide a written response within 30 working days that addresses all identified deficiencies and issues and provides corrective actions.

The Contractor shall hold program reviews commencing after contract award, which shall cover progress, schedules and problems. These reviews will be used to assess the Contractor’s progress, risk in meeting contractual requirements and status. During these reviews, the Contractor shall provide, at a minimum, overall comprehensive status of:

Production, Procurement and Material Issues;

Subcontractor and Vendor Procurement;

Integrated Master Schedule including the Critical Path;

Make-or-Buy Program Changes;

Risk Analysis Activities;

Quality Program Status;

Defect Reduction Program Status;

Safety Program Status;

Configuration Management Activities;

Government Furnished Equipment/Property Status and Issues;

Component Procurement Status and Expected Delivery Schedule;

Equipment and Data Item Delivery Schedule;

Final System Test(s);

Cost Saving Initiatives;

Other Issues Identified by the Technical POC;

For planning purposes, the program review location will be at the Contractor’s facility.

The Contractor shall also conduct management meetings regarding delivery on a regular basis (to be mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor) between the program reviews. The meetings will be conducted via teleconference or at the Contractor’s facility.

Meetings may be held bi-weekly via teleconference;

Meeting materials shall be made available 24 hours prior to meeting start and distributed via email;

Bi-weekly review shall include updated to schedules for MTP and associated equipment production status with actual start and completion dates for each major step and updated projections with detailed explanation if schedule slips;

Bi-weekly review shall include any special topics as mutually agreed upon between the Government and Contractor;

The Contractor shall provide presentation material in accordance with CDRL A006. The Government shall reserve and exercise the right to hold additional informal reviews at mutually convenient times to follow progress and problems, which may exist. Attendance at program reviews may include Government personnel, Government support service Contractor personnel, and other Government representatives as appropriate (Contractor personnel are not permitted for all reviews addressing matters pertaining to competitive contracting and actual pricing).

16.2 Defect Reduction

The Contractor shall establish a statistically-based process control and defect reduction program to control and improve product quality. The Contractor shall present the progress of the process control and defect reduction program at the program reviews and/or periodic production reviews of SOW paragraph 16.1.

17.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

17.1 Program Management

The Contractor shall follow its internal Program Management Plan in the production of VLS MTP and shall submit Progress, Status and Management Reports in accordance with CDRL A005.

17.2 Manufacturing Planning

The Contractor shall update their Manufacturing Plan to include VLS MTP being produced by the Contractor under this contract. The Contractor shall develop manufacturing and test procedures. The Contractor shall identify key production processes and shall establish process capability and process control requirements for each. The Contractor shall submit Progress, Status, and Management reports to cover progress, schedule performance, technical and quality problems and other issues as may be appropriate to facilitate program management by the Government in accordance with CDRL A005.

17.3 Risk Assessment and Management

The Contractor shall perform risk assessment and management. The Contractor shall use its own established Risk Management Program; however, the Risk Management Program shall at a minimum contain the following:

Risk management shall be a continuous process, analyzing program risks and individual mitigation plans on a sufficiently frequent basis to be proactive in preventing major Program problems. Major problems include, but are not limited to, not meeting delivery dates and nonconformance to specifications and drawings. The analysis shall identify the risks associated with each area, assess the probability of occurrence, identify the impact of each risk on the overall program, and develop and implement risk mitigation plans for identified risks. The risk analysis shall use metrics from the Contractor’s Risk Management Program. Risk analysis status and metrics shall be reported in the Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report in accordance with CDRL A005 and presented during Program and Technical Reviews.

17.4 Right of Access

The Government shall have right of access to all facilities in which storage of raw materials, purchased parts, either finished or unfinished, and finished equipment may be established. Right of access shall include all areas in which VLS MTP are stored, manufactured, processed, aligned, assembled, and tested. Right of Access shall be interpreted to include, access to records and documentation concerning the VLS MTP. Access includes specifications, purchase orders and subcontract documentation, receiving, inspection and test records for such purchase parts. Right of access shall include access at all tiers to vendors, Subcontractors and suppliers in accordance with FAR 46.405 and FAR clauses 52.245-1(g) and FAR 52.246-1.

The Government may perform any necessary inspections, verifications and evaluations to ascertain conformance to requirements, and the adequacy of the implementing procedures.

18.0 SUBCONTRACTOR AND VENDOR MANAGEMENT

The Contractor shall identify and monitor Subcontractor and vendor technical, quality, schedule, and milestone achievement on a continuing basis, according to the Contractor’s established subcontract and vendor management techniques. Notwithstanding the above, at a minimum the Contractor’s subcontract and vendor management system shall comply with ANSI/ISO/ASQC Q9001 provisions for purchasing and supplier management. The Contractor shall:

Establish, document, and maintain a purchasing system and develop a self-assessment program to ensure adequate controls;

Conduct Subcontractor Production Readiness Reviews;

Audit subcontracts as needed;

Notify the Government prior to changes in Subcontractor status.

18.1 Special Tooling and Equipment Report

The Contractor shall design, fabricate or procure all special tooling, test equipment and gauges required to manufacture, assemble, test and inspect VLS MTP and associated equipment except for GFP.

18.2 Contractor Storage of Equipment

Prior to and following the DD Form 250 acceptance and/or Program Qualitied Acceptance (PQA) signature, the Contractor shall provide material, services and facilities to store, preserve and protect any equipment completed during manufacturing process until the specified contract delivery date.

19.0 QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE

19.1 Quality Control Program Plan

The Contractor shall submit a Quality Control Program Plan in accordance with CDRL A007. This document shall address all aspects of manufacturing, testing, and inspection as specified in the TDP, SOW, and contract. The Quality Control Program Plan should also address other aspects where quality control interface is appropriate, such as the quality group’s input into purchasing decisions, and incoming receiving and inspection of material and components. The Contractor’s Quality Control Program Plan must be approved by the Government before fabrication or procurement of any product for eventual delivery. Acceptance of the Contractor’s quality control program shall not in any way relieve the Contractor of their responsibility for compliance with all contract requirements. All manufacturing, assembly, inspection, and testing shall adhere to the requirements of this document for the life of the contract. If any changes are made to the Quality Control Program Plan during the use of this contract, the Contractor shall notify the Government in writing of these changes.

19.2 Manufacturing Certifications and Traceability

The Contractor shall submit a Certificate of Conformance certifying that the VLS MTP meets the requirements of this contract.

The Contractor shall retain and provide upon request inspection and test results associated with certifying the units in accordance with CDRL A005.

19.3 Quality System and Quality Control Processes

The Contractor shall maintain a quality system, associated certifications or compliances, and test/inspection results.

The Contractor shall maintain quality and process controls that shall be used to ensure that the manufactured products shall be in compliance with the applicable drawings, specifications, and this SOW. The Contractor shall maintain documentation and processes that shall be used to identify, record, and disposition non-conforming material, in-process rejects/reworks and characteristic discrepancies. This documentation shall be kept by the Contractor until further notified by the Government.

The quality management system procedures, planning, and all other documentation or data that comprise the quality management system shall be submitted to the Government for review in accordance with CDRL A007. Existing quality documents that meet the requirements of this contract may continue to be used. The Government may perform any necessary inspections, verifications, and evaluations to ascertain conformance to requirements and the adequacy of the implementing procedures. The Contractor's quality management system shall conform to supplement quality requirements imposed by this contract. The Government reserves the right to disapprove the quality management system or portions thereof when it fails to meet the contractual requirements.

19.4 Quality Assurance

The Contractor's quality assurance program shall conform to the Contractor's Quality Assurance Program Plan and shall be in conformity with either ANSI/ASQC Q9001, or ISO 9001 for production; by using ANSI/ASQC Q9001 as a guide. This applies to items manufactured or performed by the Contractor at the Contractor’s plant or all outsourced facilities. The Contractor shall flow down to the Subcontractors and vendors the quality requirements through subcontracts, purchase orders, or other contractual purchasing documentation by using ANSI/ASQC Q9001 as a guide. The quality requirements include ANSI/ASQC Q9001 or ISO 9001, and relevant SOW and TDP requirements. The Subcontractors and vendors shall provide Certificates of Conformance that the flowed down requirements be fulfilled.

The Contractor shall provide for appropriate quality assurance review of manufacturing process plans and workmanship standards to ensure compliance to the quality system and standards.

The Contractor shall provide Quality Assurance Program Status describing the Contractor’s activity as part of the Status Report (Quality Assurance Program) in accordance with CDRL A007.

19.5 Limited Shelf Life Components

The Contractor’s quality management system shall ensure procured supplies that are subject to age deterioration, including epoxies and similar adhesives, are managed and controlled. Controls shall include prominent labeling and proactive measures to ensure expired material is not used in the manufacturing process. Controls shall allow complete traceability of limited shelf life components used in launcher products.

19.6 Government Inspection of Facilities

The Government may visit/inspect the plant or plants of the Contractor, or of any Subcontractors, engaged in the performance of this contract. If any examination/test is made by the Government on the premises of the Contractor/Subcontractor, the Contractor and any subcontractors shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of the Government inspectors in the performance of their duties. All examinations and tests by the Government will be performed in such a manner as will not unduly delay work.

19.7 Electrostatic Discharge Protection

The Contractor shall develop and maintain an electrostatic discharge protection/control program that complies with

MIL-STD-1686C.

20.0 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND REGULATIONS

20.1 Environmental Law and Regulations

The Contractor shall comply, and ensure that all Subcontractors comply, with all applicable environmental federal, state, and local laws and regulations and Navy policies, instructions and ISO 14000 Environmental Management Systems Standards.

20.2 Hazardous Waste and Material Control/Handling

The Contractor shall comply with all applicable Navy instructions for handling and control of hazardous waste.

20.3 Contractor use of Class I Ozone Depleting Substances

The TDP requirements notwithstanding, the Contractor shall not use 1,1,1 Trichloroethane or CFC-113 for cleaning or surface preparation. A substitute material that is not a Class I Ozone Depleting Substance shall be used to provide an equal or better level of cleanliness or surface preparation as provided by 1,1,1 Trichloroethane or CFC-

113. The Contractor shall not use 1,1,1 Trichloroethane or CFC-113 as a solvent resistance test fluid. The Contractor shall notify the Government by written correspondence of its intent to perform material qualification tests which, by material specification, include 1,1,1 Trichloroethane or CFC-113 solvent resistance testing. The Contractor shall identify any detrimental impacts on the material qualification caused by not performing the 1,1,1 Trichloroethane or CFC-113 solvent resistance testing.

20.4 Safety

The Contractor shall comply with the latest applicable federal and state laws, regulations and management plans and requirements regarding occupational safety and health.

C-246-H003 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY--HIGH VALUE ITEMS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

The following items are subject to the clause of this contract entitled "Limitation of Liability--High Value Items" (FAR 52.246-24 Alternate I):

All items procured under CLINs: 4000, 5000, 6100, 6200, 6300 and 6400.

(End of text)

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for SUBCLIN 1000AA has been changed from:

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

Origin Government Origin Government

To:

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

Destination Government Destination Government

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for SUBCLIN 1000AB has been changed from:

Origin Government Origin Government

To:

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for SUBCLIN 1000AC has been changed from:

Origin Government Origin Government

To:

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for SUBCLIN 1000AD has been changed from:

Origin Government Origin Government

To:

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following have been added by reference:

52.211-16 Variation In Quantity APR 1984 52.247-48 F.O.B. Destination--Evidence Of Shipment FEB 1999 52.247-58 Loading, Blocking, And Bracing Of Freight Car Shipment APR 1984 52.247-62 Specific Quantities Unknown APR 1984

The following have been deleted:

52.211-8 Time of Delivery JUN 1997

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (DEC 2018)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

“Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)” is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

“Document type” means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF).

“Local processing office (LPO)” is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

“Payment request” and “receiving report” are defined in the clause at 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system provides the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.232- 7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall—

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://sam.gov;

and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via web entry, Electronic Data Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor shall use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract or task or delivery order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall submit payment requests using the following document type(s):

(i) For cost-type line items, including labor-hour or time-and-materials, submit a cost voucher.

(…