Final_DG_IDIG_Constn_Pre-Con_(10-22-13).pdf
PDF 234 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6274213R1303
About this file
Pre-proposal conference slides
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Notice_No._3-Final.pdf | ||
| 00010-Exhibit_A_131204.pdf | ||
| Notice_No.4_Final.pdf | ||
| Notice_No._3-Final.pdf | ||
| SF30_-0001.pdf | ||
| Notice_No._2-Final.pdf | ||
| Notice_No._1.pdf | ||
| 13-R-1303 _Front_End_(Final).pdf | ||
| 13-R-1303 _Parts_2_and_4-Tech_Specs.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_WON_1291815_UPH_7_Repair.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_WON_1301741_Softball_Field.pdf | ||
| Non-U.S._Contractor_Listing_form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PACIFIC
Pre-Proposal Conference
N62742-13-R-1303 Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity for Design-Build/Design-Bid-Build Construction Contract for Diego Garcia, British-Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT)
22 October 2013
Agenda Administrative Remarks
Solicitation Overview
Seed Projects Overview
Source Selection Process
Price Evaluation
Technical Evaluation Factors
Proposal Submission Requirements
Site Visit
Administrative Remarks
Conference Ground Rules Minutes of this meeting will not be published. A list of attendees and the slides will be posted on the FBO website
Remarks and explanations addressed during the conference shall not qualify or alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation
The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing
Picture taking, video cameras, and recording devices are not allowed in the conference
All questions must be submitted in writing.
Conference Ground Rules (cont.)
Please leave completed question form with one of the Government Reps or email to annette.tijerina@navy.mil
A consolidated list of all questions and answers will be posted to the FBO website (https://www.fbo.gov)
Solicitation Overview
Purpose
The purpose for this acquisition is for construction services required for a design-build/design-bid-build projects on Diego Garcia, BIOT.
Restriction
This procurement is restricted to joint ventures with a minimum of one firm each from the United States (U.S.) and one from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (U.K.) and no other countries. If no qualified and responsible U.S./U.K. joint ventures submit proposals, only U.S. firms may be considered for award. In any U.S./U.K.
joint venture, the percentage of participation between U.S.
and U.K. firms will be a matter of negotiations between members of the joint venture consortium, but in no event will U.S. participation be less than 60% or U.K. participation below 20%. In any U.S./U.K. joint ventures, management control will be vested in the U.S. partner or partners.
Contract Type and Term
Full and open competition
Single Award
Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract
Minimum Guarantee is $30K for the life of the contract
$95M contract maximum
Base (12 months) + Four 12-month Option Periods
Firm Fixed Price Task Orders from $150K to $10M
Transportation of Supplies by Sea
DFARS 252.247-7023, Transportation of Supplies by Sea, will apply to the contract
• Contractor shall use U.S.-flag vessels when transporting any supplies by sea under this contract
Task Orders
Task Orders will be issued by FEAD Diego Garcia Refer to Section 00803 for Task Order Issuance Procedures Task Orders will be fixed price
Seed Projects Overview
Project Description
Seed Projects:
• Repairs Softball Field, Facility 120, Diego Garcia, BIOT
- Estimated price range is between $500,000 and
$1,000,000
• Repairs to Unaccompanied Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
(UPH) 7, Diego Garcia, BIOT
- Estimated price range is between $5,000,000 to $10,000,000
Repair Softball Field, Facility 120, Diego Garcia, BIOT
This project will provide repairs to the existing deteriorated natural grass and coral sand surface of Softball Field #2 (F-120). Existing playing field surface will be replaced with synthetic turf complete with subbase and drainage system.
Project Description (cont.)
Repairs to Unaccompanied Bachelor Quarters (UPH) 7, Diego Garcia, BIOT
This project will provide repairs to worn out and deteriorated building components and utility systems of Unaccompanied Personnel Housing (UPH) 7.
Project Description (cont.)
Source Selection Process
Source Selection Process
Lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-price factors.
Evaluation Factors are “Price” and “Technical” Intent to award without discussions If discussions are necessary, establish a competitive range
Source Selection Process (cont.)
Source Selection Evaluation Board
• Evaluates technical proposals without knowledge or consideration of price Price Evaluation
• Evaluate price reasonableness Source Selection Board Evaluation Board Chairperson
• Reviews technical and price evaluation board findings Source Selection Authority
• May accept (totally or in part) or reject the recommendations of the SSEB
Price Evaluation
Price Evaluation Price DD 1155 Price Proposal
• CLIN 0001 – Seed Project 1 (UPH 7 Repairs)
• 000101 – All costs except for 000102 and 000103
• 000102 – Man Camp
• 000103 – Mob/Demob
• Total Seed Project 1
• CLIN 0002 – Seed Project 2 (Softball Field)
• 000201 - All costs except for 000202 and 000203
• 000202 – Man Camp
• 000203 – Mob/Demob
• Total Seed Project 2
• TOTAL SEED PROJECTS 1 & 2
Include Task Order Support Worksheet
Price Evaluation (cont.)
Evaluate the total price proposed for each seed project to ensure that each seed project’s price is fair and reasonable.
Following techniques may be used to analyze the total price proposed for each seed project to ensure that each project’s price is fair and reasonable:
• Comparison of proposed prices received
• Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE
Add the total prices for CLINs 0001 & 0002 (Seed Projects) to arrive at a total evaluated price.
Total evaluated prices will be listed from lowest to highest.
Exhibit Line Item Numbers
• Exhibit A – Line Item 0001 (Base Period)
• ELINs A0700 through A0707
• Exhibit B – Line Item 0002 (1st Option Period)
• ELINs B0700 through B0707
• Exhibit C – Line Item 0003 (2nd Option Period)
• ELINs C0700 through C0707
• Exhibit D – Line Item 0004 (3rd Option Period)
• ELINs D0700 through D0707
• Exhibit E – Line Item 0005 (4th Option Period)
• ELINs E0700 through E0707 Include Indirect Rate Submission, Attachment (A)
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Effort
• Evaluated for completeness and price reasonableness
• Prices for all Option Year ELINs shall be binding
• The following will be evaluated for (1) Unit Priced Labor
Hourly Rates; (ii) United Priced Labor Composite Hourly Rates; and (iii) Indirect Rate(s) for all contract periods.
- Completeness
- Price Reasonableness
Unit Priced Labor & Priced Labor Composite Hourly Rates
• Provide the fully burdened fixed labor hourly rate and fixed composite hourly rate for each contract period on the ELIN Schedules, Exhibits A through E.
Indirect Rate(s)
• For each Task Order, the fixed indirect rate(s) shall be applied to the negotiated costs for all non-labor costs (indirect rates applicable to labor costs are included in the Unit Priced Labor and Priced Labor Composite Hourly Rates.
• For each contract period, provide the fixed indirect rate(s) for each contract period on the attached worksheet (Attachment (A)).
Technical Evaluation Factors
FACTOR A: Offeror’s Recent Relevant Project Experience
• Subfactor A1 – Construction Contractor’s Experience
• Subfactor A2 – Designer’s Experience
FACTOR B: Offeror’s Recent Relevant Past Performance
• Subfactor B1 – Construction Contractor’s Past Performance
• Subfactor B2 – Designer’s Past Performance
FACTOR C: Management Plan FACTOR D: Safety Record
NOTE: The overall technical rating must be “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.
An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any subfactor will result in the factor being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” and the overall technical proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions.
Will be evaluated separately from price.
Deficiency is defined as a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.
Weakness is defined as a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
Technical Evaluation Factor A
Factor A: Offeror’s Recent Relevant Project Experience
Subfactor A1. Construction Contractor’s Experience
The Construction Contractor’s experience will be evaluated based on upon experience on recent, relevant projects completed or substantially completed in a remote, tropical location within the last ten (10) years of the date of the RFP closing.
Technical Evaluation Factor 1 (cont.)
Subfactor A2. Designer’s Experience
The Designer’s experience will be evaluated based upon experience on recent, relevant projects completed or substantially completed in a remote, tropical location within the last ten (10) years of the date of the RFP closing.
Technical Evaluation Factor 2
Factor B: Construction Contractor’s Past Performance
Subfactor B1. Construction Contractor’s Experience
The Construction Contractor’s past performance will be evaluated based upon customer satisfaction in the construction of recent, relevant projects completed or substantially completed in a remote, tropical location within the last ten (10) years of the date of the RFP closing.
Technical Evaluation Factor 1 (cont.)
Subfactor B2. Designer’s Past Performance
The Designer’s past performance will be evaluated based upon satisfaction in the construction of recent, relevant projects completed or substantially completed in a remote, tropical location within the last ten (10) years of the date of the RFP closing.
Technical Evaluation Factor 2 (cont.)
Factor C: Management Plan
The Offeror’s Design and Construction Management Plan will be evaluated for overall management of the mobilization of pesonnel, materials, and equipment to Diego Garcia, seed project design and construction strategy.
Technical Evaluation Factor 2 (cont.)
Factor D: Safety
Total Case Incident Rate (TCIR) rate of 3.0 or less and Days
Away from Work, Restricted duty, or Job Transfer (DART) of .49 or less. If the rates exceed the level of acceptability established, please provide an explanation of the extenuating circumstance that affected the rate(s) and actions taken to prevent future occurrences.
Proposal Submission Requirements
Volume I, Price Proposal
Price Proposal (Paper): An original and one (1) paper copy of the price proposal
Signed and completed SF1442
Completed Enclosure (1), DD 1155 Price Proposal
Task Order Support
Bid Guarantee (SF24) for each Seed Project
Representations and Certifications (See Section 00600)
Information required by paragraph 1.5, Pre-Award Survey/ Responsibility Determination
Volume I, Price Proposal
Information required by paragraph 1.6, Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), Limited Partnerships (LP), Etc.
Refer to Document 00100, Instruction to Proposers
Refer to Document 00202, Submission Requirements
Volume II, Technical
Technical Proposal (Factors A, B, C, and D) (Paper): An original and three (3) paper copies of the technical proposal
Submitted in a three ring binder with table of contents and tabbed
All information required by Factor A, Offeror’s Recent Relevant Project Experience
All information required by Factor B, Offeror’s Recent Relevant Past Performance
All information required by Factor C, Management Plan
All information required by Factor D, Safety
Volume II, Technical
Refer to Document 00100, Instruction to Proposers
Refer to Document 00202, Proposal Submission Requirements for each Factor and Subfactor
Section 00100
Questions must be submitted no later than 10 days prior to proposal due date
Please submit your question(s) to annette.tijerina@navy.mil using this format:
– Name & Company
– Solicitation Reference (page, paragraph, etc.)
– Question
Section 00100 (cont.)
Notices will be posted at the FBO website to respond to written questions. Notices do not revise the solicitation requirements
Amendments
• Solicitation remains unchanged unless amended in writing on a Standard Form 30
• Amendments will be posted to the FBO website
(https://www.fbo.gov)
• If amendment contains drawings, the amended drawings will be posted to FBO website https://www.fbo.gov
Project Timeline
Solicitation Issued – October 4, 2013
Pre-Proposal Conference/Site Visit – October 22, 2013
Proposals Due – November 19, 2013, 2:00 p.m., HST
Planned Contract Award – Spring 2014
Site Visit
Ground Rules
Site Visit begins 30 minutes after conference
Video cameras and any recording devices are not allowed
Stay together
Wear name tags at all times
Bring passport and ID
Electronic Website
For the most current updates on this solicitation:
Go to “Business Opportunities” and search for
N62742-13-R-1303
| Pre-Proposal Conference � � �� |
| Slide Number 2 |
| Slide Number 3 |
| Conference Ground Rules |
| Conference Ground Rules (cont.) |
| Slide Number 6 |
| Purpose |
| Restriction |
| Contract Type and Term |
| Transportation of Supplies by Sea |
| Task Orders |
| Slide Number 12 |
| Project Description |
| Slide Number 14 |
| Slide Number 15 |
| Slide Number 16 |
| Source Selection Process |
| Source Selection Process (cont.) |
| Slide Number 19 |
| Price Evaluation |
| Price Evaluation (cont.) |
| Price Evaluation (cont.) |
| Price Evaluation (cont.) |
| Price Evaluation (cont.) |
| Slide Number 25 |
| Technical Evaluation Factors |
| Technical Evaluation Factors |
| Technical Evaluation Factor A |
| Technical Evaluation Factor 1 (cont.) |
| Technical Evaluation Factor 2 |
| Technical Evaluation Factor 1 (cont.) |
| Technical Evaluation Factor 2 (cont.) |
| Technical Evaluation Factor 2 (cont.) |
| Slide Number 34 |
| Slide Number 35 |
| Slide Number 36 |
| Slide Number 37 |
| Slide Number 38 |
| Section 00100 |
| Section 00100 (cont.) |
| Slide Number 41 |
| Slide Number 42 |
| Slide Number 43 |
| Slide Number 44 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .